Written by Mathew
Naismith
Buddha nature
actually refers to the truer self, primarily of the self void of the
distractions and influences of the ego. The following question was presented to
me on this matter.
_____________________________
Has a dog Buddha nature?
Actually
P. RuèGer,
a very good and wise question.
We
could say that only domesticated pets can become this unconditionally loving,
in this case the influence of Buddha nature is influenced by humans.
However,
it is well documented that wild animals that have had their lives saved by
human's show just as much unconditional love.
This
then brings us to the point can animals, domesticated or not, be of Buddha
nature.
Buddha Nature: "The terms refer to the
notion that the luminous
mind of the Buddha
is inherently present in every sentient being, and will shine forth when it is
cleansed of the defilements, c.q. when the nature of mind is recognised for what it is."
Are animal's
sentient beings?
This is questionable: "In Buddhism, sentient beings are
beings with consciousness, sentience, or in some contexts lifeitself.[1] Sentient
beings are composed of the five aggregates, or skandhas: matter, sensation, perception, mental
formations and consciousness."
Can animals
also attain enlightenment?
To refer to attainment is to also refer
to an effort exerted to obtain Buddhahood. It is questionable if animals,
unlike human's who have to deal with egotism, have to attain enlightenment to
become truly unconditionally loving, actually, it's doubtful.
I myself agree with the following as
everything is of consciousness.
"In Mahayana Buddhism, it is to
sentient beings that the Bodhisattva
vow of compassion
is pledged. Furthermore, and particularly in Tibetan
Buddhism and Japanese
Buddhism, all beings (including plant life
and even inanimate objects or entities considered "spiritual" or
"metaphysical" by conventional Western thought) are or may be
considered sentient beings."
Human's need to be enlightened to the
facts beyond egotism, animals don't unless influenced to the extent of human
egotism.
______________________________________
I also received the following query from another
person, "But I
can't help but believe that our essential nature will make itself known
somehow, to remind us of who we really are." The following was my reply.
______________________________________
Carolyn Field I
think it does this Carolyn but we are too much within the influences of the ego
to notice them at times.
Are you not aware of your essential nature? This is all it is unless the ego inflates it into something more comprehensible so that the ego can understand what it comprehends in the first place. Basically, to be more than awareness is ego.
In saying this, our egos underestimate a state of pure awareness, a state void of the influences of ego. Such an underestimation decreases the influence a pure state of awareness can have upon us. Our capabilities beyond ego is infinite in nature, there are simply no limitations.
Just to be aware is enough in a universe, a reality, of egotism.
Are you not aware of your essential nature? This is all it is unless the ego inflates it into something more comprehensible so that the ego can understand what it comprehends in the first place. Basically, to be more than awareness is ego.
In saying this, our egos underestimate a state of pure awareness, a state void of the influences of ego. Such an underestimation decreases the influence a pure state of awareness can have upon us. Our capabilities beyond ego is infinite in nature, there are simply no limitations.
Just to be aware is enough in a universe, a reality, of egotism.
______________________________________
I should also
state that wild animal saving the life of other wild animals show a sense of
unconditional love, even towards another species of animal.
Having sacred
animals like cows or monkeys might seem ludicrous to the western mind but
consider this, a show of unconditional love and respect is shown to another
species. Does the western mind respect and show unconditional love even to
other human beings? The western mind often shows total disrespect to other
people's cultures, it's simply not conditioned to respect and express unconditional
love towards anything not of its own. This is unless it can materially gain
from this of course.
This now brings us
to materialism, a state that has no desire or need of ethical or spiritual
matters, animals simply don't have this dilemma. Animals don't have the dilemma
of material, ethical or spiritual matters, they are totally free of these
matters. They are then of course going to be able to express unconditional love
a lot easier than most human beings!!
The essential
nature basically refers to the fundamental element within all things for
example, energy and spirit. Energy is of everything as the spirit is within
everything, the truer self or the truer elements of self void of contamination
through separation, for only the ego separates everything to quench its
desires!! Animals simply don't have these dilemmas to battle with; it's totally
unconditional, not just to do with love but everything as a whole without
separation. How many spiritually aware people separate unconditional love form
unconditional acceptance, especially in regards to our present environment,
animals simply don't have these ego created dilemmas!!
So are animals of
Buddha nature, even possibly more of Buddha nature, our essential nature, than
most human beings?