Total Pageviews

Sunday 19 July 2020

The Resurrection of Humanity


Written by Mathew Naismith


The darker it gets, the lighter the light shines. In other words, in a reality of ignorance (dark), consciousnesses becomes more aware of awareness (light) as light shines the best where ignorance resides.

What makes humans human, is it it's physical stature or it's consciousness? Physically, if an alien from a far off galaxy came to Earth and had the physical stature of a human being, they are therefore classified as being human!!

Human form obviously does not classify one being human, however, the consciousness of the being does if it is of humanity and of human form.

Humanity = The quality of being humane. The quality of being human.

Inhumanity = The quality of lacking compassion or consideration for others. An act of atrocious cruelty.

The quality of humanity is of being a humane human, where consciousness is of humane human virtues. Inhumanity of course relates to a different consciousness, even though this consciousness resides in human form. Often this kind of consciousness residing in human form will depict that all men are inherently evil,where we are born evil. This is likened to one of the atheists doctrines that we are all born atheistic, while totally ignoring cognition, the psychological result of perception, learning and reasoning. In other words ignoring learned behaviour where we learn to be believe and disbelieve.

There is a distinct similarity between conscious perceptions that man is inherently evil and we are all born atheistic, both perceptions ignore a real reality for a desired reality to start with. Is this why today's science seems to be based on profiteering science instead of real science, where with real science profits comes after science and is not governed by profits like profiteering science? Is this why there is so much fraud in today's science!!

The resurrection of humanity is actually to do with being aware of the difference of consciousnesses between a consciousness of humanity and inhumanity. This is likened to a wolf wearing a sheep's clothing (fleece), where the form depicts a sheep but the consciousness under the fleece depicts a wolf on the prowl. Just because a form looks and acts like a human, doesn't make it of human consciousness!! The best way to pray on human consciousness is to depict an image of a human while having the consciousness of something of sinister intent, like the wolf. If you look back on human history, human consciousness has been prayed upon so often, this does not make human consciousness sinister, just a victim of a consciousness that is sinister in nature.

This kind of awareness is often depicted as an ascension, where human consciousness becomes of a new heightened awareness where ignorance (darkness) cannot reside. In reality, human consciousness just becomes aware that it is not inherently evil and of humanity while not being of inhumanity. It is impossible for human consciousness to be of a consciousness of inhumanity, a consciousness of inhumanity is an entirely different consciousness of sinister intent. Yes, there are many wolfs in sheep clothing in past and present human existence, this consciousness is not human, of humanity by nature.

Resurrection = A revival from inactivity and disuse.

What this means in relation the human consciousness, is that a resurrection of human consciousness (humanity) simply means being more active humanly in the absence of inhumanity. This is not an ascension but simply a realisation of what it really means being human. We need to reclassify what makes us human and inhuman. Just because a person looks like a human, does not necessarily make looking like a human a human of humanity.

This section of the post is not for everyone if you are not into facing this sinister inhuman consciousness down. To come face to face with this consciousness takes a lot of conditioning away from control. It is not that you just don't allow yourself the be controlled, you don't try to take control either. You just are within what is truly of what human consciousness is. Also, I am going to make reference to the antediluvian period, primarily it's consciousness.

A visionary depiction of a human like exceptionally sinister entity feasting upon human flesh in an attic.

The feasting upon human flesh just doesn't represent satanist paedophilia rituals, but a feasting upon human consciousness. As the attic represents, an infiltration of human consciousness, which is being devoured in the representation of the depiction of the human flesh. The obvious sinister entity represents a consciousness infiltrating and devouring human consciousness and actual human flesh. Most people are quite unaware of this but are also unaware of supporting this kind of consciousness. So many people have been coerced and blackmailed in becoming a part of this consciousness.

What if I said to you that human consciousness itself is of a pure sense of consciousness. Most people would laugh at me while looking back in human history.

Lemuria and Atlanta where once of a human consciousness that represented human consciousness in it's purest form. This is a representation of a benign consciousness not infiltrated and feasted upon by an opposing malign consciousness of inhumanity, a consciousness that often infiltrates to then feast upon vulnerable consciousness.

So why was this human benign consciousness fallible and vulnerable to malign consciousness?

Are children often fallible and vulnerable to external sources? Human consciousness was simply of infancy, a state of a newly formed fresh growth. How easy is it to damage new plant growth? This was human consciousness. Like with children, some children have to learn the hard way no matter how much guidance you give them, this is today's present human consciousnesses. Look at the guiding wisdom in human history, it has been bountiful, so we can't ever say that human consciousness was not guided away from learning the hard way.

It is noted that Atlantis ended up being infiltrated consciously to then become physically what this infiltrating sinister consciousness represented, very much like what is occurring right now. Because the Lemurian consciousness was of infancy, it was most vulnerable. Yes, Lemurian consciousness was protected but it was obvious that even the Lumerian consciousness, human consciousness, had to also learn the hard way.

Imagine for one moment a consciousness in the absence of inhumanity. I kid you not, this is human consciousness in it's purest form. So what is the difference to then and now? Maturity, but like with people, not everyone grows up or more precisely, becomes wise within their awareness. You could say that a lot of people are still at an adolescent stage, where guidance is often refuted, however, maturity in consciousness is evident. It is this maturity that will hopefully see human consciousness come through it's own created reality of being endlessly feasted upon by inhumanity.


Monday 6 July 2020

Freedom from Letting Go



Mathew Naismith

So how do you simply let go of things that are no longer of your reality?

In reality, it is your ego that is letting go. Your ego simply learns or becomes conditioned to letting go of what is harmful to itself and even the soul. In reality, at present our egos are conditioned to hanging on, even to the bitter end. This occurs a lot in personal relationships and in business, where you try to hang onto the material. In a lot of people's personal relationship, the primarily attachments are based on the material, be it monitory or lustfully, of course there are a number of relationships that go a lot deeper than this, in the process negating material attachments.

In recent months, Tom Hanks the actor has been linked to paedophilia, even to the point of satanist paedophilia. Another actor my ego adored is Kevin Spacey, who has had three known complaints in relation to indecent sexual orientated behaviour. These three complainants are now mysteriously deceased!! My ego was in shock but mysteriously my ego had very little problems in letting go of these materiel attachments, as I found out, very different to other people's reactions.


This is inline with presenting a clarity of truth in relation to vaccines, covid-19 and proceeding lock-downs, 5G, etc, where clarity of truth for me allowed my ego to become aware, unlike what is experienced through obscurity of truth. For a prime example, how many western atheists would accept that the universe could have well been created by a far more aware and wiser consciousness than human consciousness? To stay an atheist, a high degree of bias has to be implemented in this case, in the process creating or becoming conditioned to the obscurity of truth. Let's be honest, if an atheist knew this they would either have to stop being an atheist or obscure the truth. I should say that a more aware and wiser consciousness may or may not be labelled a God, this is within each persons perceptions.

If you have not guessed it, clarity of truth is all about awareness where obscurity of truth is all about a deliberate induced unawareness (ignorant) state of consciousnesses therefore reality.

Yes, it is understandably quite difficult for the ego to let go of attachments when of obscurity of truth, but when the ego is conditioned to clarity of truth, the ego letting go of attachments becomes a lot easier. The reason for this is that the ego becomes less bias. The less bias an ego becomes, the more of clarity of truth the ego becomes. Yes, this means the more bias the ego becomes, the more of obscurity of truth the ego becomes. In a sense, there are no lies, only clarity and obscurity of truth. In the absence of clarity of truth, there is only obscurity of truth. Think on this, what part of you is learning or become of clarity or obscurity of truth? Your ego. Once the ego becomes conditioned to less bias, the more of clarity of truth the ego becomes. Are biases of direct lies? No, biases are simply of obscurity of truth where clarity of truth in absent.

What a test, in testing my egos attachments and associated biases in relation to Tom Hanks and Kevin Spacey. The clarity of truth of my ego stood up to the obscurity of truth, where my ego could have simply obscured the truth quite easily as it seemed to have for a number of people's egos in denial. For me, spirituality is all about awareness, not an unawareness to serve my ego of obscurity inline with my egos biases.

Thursday 2 July 2020

The Clarity of Truth



Written by Mathew Naismith

So what am I talking about when I state clarity of truth?

Clarity of truth is simply truth expressed in the absence of as much bias as possible. An example of this is vaccines. I am neither for vaccination nor against vaccination, but I am not for vaccines that are only 10% to 40% effective with a 0.6% fatality rate like flu vaccines that are of a higher fatality rate than that of covid-19 fatality rate of 0.26 or lower.

How many people knowing these figures are still for vaccinations no matter what? This is a prime example of obscurity of truth, where a high degree of bias is evident. There are people who don't even want to know these figures which simply represents an obscurity of truth to an extreme.

There is a problem with expressing a clarity of truth, it is too close to the truth for a lot of people. Yes, people like me could be more subtle in expressing clarity of truth to influence more people, but we are not here to influence people, we are here to inform people of clarity of truth, nothing more. Clarity of truth simply speaks for itself on its own terms, playing up to people's egos to be accepted is not needed.

Clarity of truth is not something you accept or don't accept, it is simply a truth in the absence of bias to one degree or another. Just being aware that you are bias within your own truth is of clarity of truth, of course avoiding being aware of your own bias truths is of obscurity of truth.

I was brought up in an abusive family situation, yes, this has made me bias against abuse because I have learnt from my past. I have family members who are still suffering from this past by either continuing the abuse or defending the abuse. Even though I am of a bias in relation to abuse, I am still of clarity of truth because I am aware of my biases, especially when being so open with these biases.

Obscurity of truth will continue the abuse and/or defend the abuse, most often to the point of falsely accusing others of abuse. This is called deflective tactics. As I have noticed in regards to politics and main media as of recent times, deflective tactics are often used and abused to excess to obscure the real truth. An example of this is to focus away from the fatality rate of covid-19 by primarily focusing on the infection rate of covid-19.

Sadly, a lot of people are drawn into focusing on the bigger numbers, the infection rates, while deliberately ignoring the fatality rates of lower numbers. It is called mind control, where the winner is of a higher figure so that is the figure we are cohered to mainly focus on. Yes, a huge degree of obscurity of truth is being implemented especially at present. I have lost count of how many relative information that goes against obscurity of truth is being removed from the internet. If clarity of truth exposes obscurity of truth, is often labelled an undesirable, like a conspiracy theory (Jew), which is very similar to the tactics used by Nazis in the mid 1900's.

The point is not to try to be unbiased, simply be of clarity of truth and our own biases will simply fade away. I don't label child abusers as negative, toxic, wrong, etc, because the truth is they are simply lost within their own or someone else's creation. This is a prime example of clarity of truth for to do otherwise is of obscurity of truth impelled by biases.

Clarity of truth is not about absolute truth or even individual truth, it is simply a truth told in the absence of bias as much as possible. Yes, this means obscurity of truth is not absolutely about lies either but can be of lies. I simply try to keep true to the clarity of truth, this is all.