Written by Mathew Naismith
I've experienced some interesting interactions
with other people recently. Are people like me critically judgemental or simply
expressing what we observe in the absence of a black and white mentality? It's
wise to be aware when people lash out at other people, it's good sign their
being controlled by the ego. This reaction of course needs a depiction of one
thing in reference to something else, for example, the comparing of a negative
in reference to a positive. It's what I call a black and white mentality; it
has to be one or the other.
When an ego in control lashes out in
critical judgment, this has to be done through a black and white mentality,
being that the ego in control is always positive and the critically judged is
always negative. How often do people like me critically judge like this, it's
simply wrong or right, negative or positive, black or white? Now, how many
other people judge through a wrong or right, negative or positive, black or
white mentality? It is however natural for the ego in control to turn the
tables or the emphasis from itself to anything else threatening it's control
and existence, people like me are a prime example of this.
I will now share a recent post I posted on
a forum that is in relation to this topic, I also inserted one of my replies I
wrote.
_______________________
I
don't get this, maybe someone on here can assist me with this.
People
like me are often critically judged as being narcissistic, negative, egotistical,
toxic and so on it goes, for simply expressing our own experiences and
observations. People like me usually observe through the absence of a black and
white mentality, an ego in control obviously finds this most threatening.
People's
egos who judge through a black and white mentality, will often define anyone
not of their egos liking narcissistic, negative, egotistical, toxic and so on,
how else would anyone critically judge other people in this way?
Through
the judgment of a black and white mentality, people like me are supposed to be (judged)
narcissistic. Just recently I wrote a post stating first up that I know little
of this particular subject, I also often state that a lot of what I write is
channelled through me and not from me. I have even stated that what is being
channelled through me I know very little about.
I'm
also suppose to be (judged) egotistical, a strange egotism when I often express
myself in a way that a controlling ego finds threatening, in the process making
myself exceptionally unpopular. Just because someone expresses their
experiences that questions the control the ego has over us, doesn't make the
person egotistical but of course it will to an ego in control.
It's
like a drug addict addicted to an addiction, the controlling ego will lash out
at anything questioning it's existence and it's control. The controlling ego
sees people like me as being a huge threat to it's control, of course the ego
in control is going to lash out like this, just like a drug addict.
People
like me are also supposed to be (judged) as being judgmentally critical. If I
was to judge in accordance with a black and white mentality, of course I would
be judgmentally critical. Honestly, I would be exactly like the people who
judge people like me so critically through their black and white mentality.
Of
course an ego in control is going to lash out like this, it's perfectly natural
for an ego in control to lash our in fear of it's own control and existence. In
actuality, if people's egos didn't lash out at people like me, I simply
wouldn't be following my chosen path in life.
__________________________
My Reply
Making
reference to old energy patterns refer to the past, you can't have a perception
of time without making reference to the ego as time is motion and all motion is
ego.
So,
if I was to refer to certain patterns as being old, I am in actuality making
reference directly and mainly to the ego.
Old
is in reference to new, a black and white mentality, which can only exist in an
ego based reality/existence. This is
exactly how the ego tricks us in thinking the new isn't of the ego when it's
just as much if not more of the ego.
There is simply no new or old in relation the divine consciousness, why?
The divine consciousness is infinite in nature, not finite, this simply means
it's not based on time but timelessness. Because there is no time, the
perception of old or new can't exist because the perception of old and new
needs a starting point of origin to exist
to start with, there is simply no starting point of origin within the
divine consciousness. In actuality, the
divine consciousness isn't above human consciousness, only the ego in control
perceives this to be the case. One being over and above another is pure ego,
nothing else.
Also,
having any kind of disdain for the old consciousness is egotistical; this
includes having disdain for anyone who defends this so-called old
consciousness. In my mind, too many
people into spirituality today exist in disdain, this is pure ego for only can
the ego express disdain.
Do
people like me truly defend this old consciousness? When you truly live by the divine, what is
old and new, black and white? This kind of consciousness in my mind can't
possibility exist within the divine consciousness but many people obviously
think it does. The ego can be exceptionally deceptive, it's
wise to be aware of this, but as always, the ego will at all cost refute what I
have stated here, or, it is simply unable to acknowledge what I have stated
here.
Are people like me narcissistic or egotistical
for pointing out the obvious? The ego in control will always say yes, however,
the ego that isn't in control will say no for obvious reasons. Please don't be duped by the ego, it's a
tricky little devil but only when in control.
I
should point out, when people like me make reference to egotistical in relation
to myself or others, this observation isn't of disdain like the ego in
control perceives, it's simply pointing
out an obvious that motion is naturally limiting, nothing more. People like me
simply don't have disdain for egotism for it's not of the divine consciousness
to do so. If to the controlling ego defending old consciousness is ego, people
like me are happy to be of the ego in the egos mind, for this shows we are not
of the ego but of the divine. Simply,
the ego is a trickster, it will always accuse itself of being of itself, within
this, the ego will always be in control.
OK, I
see now, acknowledging that the divine consciousness isn't of some higher
stature than human consciousness is going to be impossible to imagine.
There
is no true separation between the divine consciousness and human consciousness,
within this understanding, how can divine consciousness be of a higher stature?
Only through ego is everything separated and of levels/separations.
As I
understand it, divine consciousness only observes a difference in motion
between itself and human consciousness. Human consciousness is merely seen as
limited in nature, it's not judged as being of a lower stature to itself. Yes,
the ego will see that a more limited consciousness as being of a lower stature,
only can the ego judge in levels like this, this is not the case for the divine
consciousness.
So if
a consciousness is limited, it's of a lower stature!! Only to the ego in
control is this the case, so why an ego in control? The perception of levels is
all about control, the control and dominance of a lower level, in other words,
control and dominance over a consciousness that is limited.
Divine
consciousness simply means a limitless consciousness, an infinite consciousness
in nature.
