Written by Mathew Naismith
As I have shown is previous posts, I'm all
for love and light, what I am not for is love and light being used and abused
in the same way as we have religion/spirituality as a whole. Perceiving and
using anything as a be and end all to start with, is usually a prelude to abuse
to a significant magnitude. For starters, we have an extreme within these
expression of a be and end all. As many eastern teachings teach us to become
less of motion (quietened), we instead us more motion within this excessive
action of yet another be and end all.
I find it awfully strange that views and
expressions like mine, that are balanced unbiased, are often judged as being
negative and even toxic by people of love and light. When did balanced views
and expressions become toxic or negative? Probably at the same time that extremist
expressions became normal and an acceptable way of expressing ourselves. Seen
as wisdom is anything but of extremist views and expressions, it is obvious
that wisdom has been replaced by these kinds of excessive actions. You take
away wisdom; you take away even the slightest comprehension of balance. Of
course within this state void of wisdom, balanced views and expressions are
going to be judged as negative and toxic, primarily from people who are abusing
this perception of love and light.
The question is now, why isn't this love
and light winning out over it's opposite, for example, ominous expressions and
motions? To express an unbiased view, the world isn't becoming less ominous in
nature but more. As of usual, this kind of reflection judged as negative and
toxic, what I don't get is that spiritually aware people are supposed to be
judging less, not more. When I look upon spirituality as a whole over mans
entire existence, I find our present state of spiritual expressions just as
radical as any other time in human history, this includes the religious Dark
Ages. When balanced unbiased views and expressions become toxic, just like in
the religious Dark Ages, it is obvious where spirituality is at, at present.
What I also find strange is this love and
light is suppose to be of unconditional love, this couldn't be further from the
truth, not when balanced unbiased views and expressions become toxic. As of
unconditional love, it is too obvious that many people trying to express love
and light have no idea what a true sense of love and light denotes.
Let's unbiasedly look at love and light
overcoming ominous or destructive motions. How many people in human history
have been killed or burnt alive, even within their own temples and churches
like Buddhist monks for example, were of this love and light? If this love and light was that powerful, why
did this occur in the first place? Why hasn't love and light overcome it's
opposing opposite in human history? Of course this unbiased view is but another
toxic expression, a strange expression of love and light I must say!!
Let's look at the antediluvian period where
we have opposing realms like Lemuria and Atlantis. Why was Lemuria, which was
of love and light, overcome by Atlantis's materialism and power? Considering
that Lemuria was of a much greater size realm than Atlantis, how did this love
and light succumb to materialism and power?
Ironical, I just received the following
from a friend of mine.
A true sense of love and light is indeed
expressional of unconditional love; this includes expressing this to ominous destructive
forces. It is obvious that these forces will always overcome a true sense of
love and light, but only in realities of motion. Actually, a true sense of love
and light doesn't belong in realities and dimensions of motion, however, a
balanced perspective of love and light within these kinds of realities do. When
you get abused for expressing balance, especially from so called light workers,
this within itself is ominous. In actuality, anything not of balance is going
to be ominous/destructive by nature, please expect this to be true.
We are simply not using and utilising light
and love in the correct manner in accordance with realities of motion. To me,
we are simply being too excessive within our expressions of love and light in
realities of motion. If we expressed this kind of love and light in a
motionless reality, all would be fine but we are clearly not in a motionless
reality.
Consider this. No true expression of love
and light would desire to change realities based of motion, the unconditional
love of love and light stops this from occurring. Unconditional love also means
to unconditionally love realities based on excessive motions, no matter how
destructive they are. Love and light expressed to excess does not belong within
these kinds of realities, these kinds of realities are not of love and lights
reality to change, it's this simple.
The way we continually use love and light
is feeble within realities of motion and always will be. In all, our freedom
will only come from balanced perspectives and expressions within realities of
motion.
