Written by Mathew Naismith
After watching a documentary called One
Strange Rock, narrated by Will Smith, the realisation we are one with the Earth
is slowly coming to fruition. Of course to go on from this is to realise we are
one with the universe, not just the Earth, solar system or galaxy. What we are
simply talking about here is in relation to our material self, the immaterial
self is thought or known to go way beyond any universe or material being.
We now realise the material part of humans
is simply a by-product of Earth. Of course this also means that humans and the
Earth itself is a by-product of the universe. Humans are simply a by-product of
the present environment, like any living entity is in accordance with their
present environment. What we create materially, we become materially.
I found that the documentary wasn't
altogether honest. Avoiding the degradation of man's influence upon the Earths natural
environment was too evident. Also, stating how big our brains are, therefore
depicting our intelligence in comparison to all other living entities, even in
the universe as a whole, is also dishonest. No other living entity purposely
destroys the very same environment that created it. How humans presently
measure intelligence is quite amusing.
However, in our present environment, which
we have created, any consciousness that is honest to a great degree will be
scorned and/or ignored. This documentary wasn't altogether honest but it wasn't
altogether dishonest either. Honesty was evident without being too honest
within the present created environment of dishonesty. There are other
astronauts, such as Edgar Mitchell, who realised and tried to comprehend and
understand the existence of our material and immaterial world/environment
without separating one from the other. A created dishonest consciousness will
only accept honesty to a degree. Considering that a dishonest consciousness
environment is of dishonesty, any honest consciousness will seem foreign to it
and even seen as a threat to this created environment of dishonesty. How many
spiritually aware people see other people's environment threatening to their
own environment? It's the dame thing.
It is the same thing because all the
environments humans can create come from the same source. Once you realise that
any environment we create comes from the same source, the threat of other
environments becomes neutralised and nullified. It just is what it is.
So does this mean we should just accept it
is what it is?
If you are unable to influence an
environment, accept by force or by deceit, yes, accept it is what it is, to do
otherwise is to be of the environment you are trying to influence. However,
this doesn't mean you can't live within your own created environment.
Is it deceitful, like the documentary
mentioned here, to only be partially honest?
As I have proven to myself, to be anything
but partially honest within a created environment of dishonesty, is only going
to create one kind of reaction, a reaction totally forcefully against any other
environment remotely threatening the existence of the present environment.
So why be more than partially honest within
such an environment, seen as being partially honest is more influential upon
such a dishonest created environment?
To me, being partially honest isn't
changing a thing. In all honesty, humans have always been partially honest such
as, there is a God or a source of creation of all things but it is depicted to
be of man's image, a material representation instead of an immaterial
representation. Of course many of us have now gotten to the stage of refuting
the existence of our immaterial self's altogether, no matter what evidence
their is to depict otherwise.
A true sense of honesty isn't a threat to a
created dishonest environment, but it can seem that way to a crated dishonesty
conscious environment. A true sense of honesty has always been present within
human consciousness, no matter what environment human consciousness creates.
This honesty is present within an awareness of all and the wisdom this kind of
awareness creates. If this kind of environment was a threat to the present
environment of dishonesty, this created environment of dishonesty, or of
partial honesty, would have long ago been enveloped or totally eradicated an
environment of dishonesty and partial honesty.
So why isn't this kind of honesty more
influential upon an environment not of it's own?
A dishonest consciousness has the desire to
be only of one environment or the other, be it of a material environment or an
immaterial environment. Being of an environment of honesty, no matter what our
desires may be, is of all environments, of material and immaterial
environments. Why would such an environment desire to force change upon one environment
on the other, while in favour of one environment over the other?
As depicted in the documentary, Earth is
our home, not just the place we live on Earth. This is forgoing, in all
honesty, that the universe is our home, materially, but so is our immaterial
environment.
An
honest environment isn't by force or trickery, but by choice.....