Written by Mathew Naismith
Being of humanity is one thing, being of humility while of humanity is something else.
Humanity means being human and of being humane, but is being of humanity being humane?
How many people are expressive of inhumanity while being of humanity? There is one question to be of humanity and there is another question of being of humanity. One can be of love which includes desires and lusts, this is different to being of love. There is no lust or desire in being of love as to just be of love. To be of love relies on desires and lusts where's being of love is actually in the absence of lusts and desires.
What this means is even though you are of humanity, doesn't mean you are being of humanity. Why are some humans humane and other inhumane? The difference is between to be of humanity to being of humanity. There is no bonding in to be of humanity but there is a huge bonding in being of humanity. There is actually a separation of consciousness of to be of humanity, on the other hand there is a huge unity of consciousness when being of humanity. How many billion or trillionaires would give half their fortune to help humanity deal with a plague or pandemic? In truth quite the opposite occurred. Now, how many people are putting their lives on the line for the good of man kind at present? The difference being one group consciousness is simply to be of humanity and the other being of humanity.
Now this brings us to humility which is to simply be humble. I don't mean being of humility in looking down at yourself in the face of a greater being, I mean being of humility in being of humanity no matter what humanity is of. You can be poor without looking up at the rich, desiring to be of this higher stature. Once you desire as a poor person to be of a higher financial stature, you are no longer truly humble, just simply desiring.
Being of humility is actually of absence of lusts and desires again. So being of humanity and being of humility is simply the absence of lusts and desires.
Lately, a number of people of humanity want/desire retribution of the people being obviously of inhumanity, this includes the billion and trillionaires and paedophiles alike who have been obvious in their abuse of humanity. There is also another kind of person who doesn't want or desire retribution no matter what.
Should these people be incarcerated? No, because incarceration is simply of abuse. You only need to make sure a consciousness of humanity is aware of this consciousness of inhumanity, within this alone inhumanity will become an undesirable rather than a desirable unlike at present. Watch carefully how a consciousness behaves when in the absence of desires, especially lustful desires.
Should they have all their assets taken from them? Only what is gained through ill-gains, through criminal activities gained from the abuse of humanity, all other assets should not be touched. You need to show a precedence where anything not of inhumanity, and not necessary of humanity, is encouraged. Yes, anything of inhumanity, unlike today, should be simply discouraged in the absence of abuse. Today, we are discouraged in telling the truth and being of humanity as well as of humility.
Yes, understandably but not wisely, people of humanity while in the absence of humility desire to hang people of inhumanity, to desire retribution. Once you become aware of people of humanity and the people of humanity and humility, you begin to look at yourself as just being of humanity differently. You become aware of the lack of humility within your own humanity, the humility of understanding the plight of being inhumane. Yes, this kind of awareness takes a great deal of humility.
