Humility within Humanity

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

Being of humanity is one thing, being of humility while of humanity is something else.

Humanity means being human and of being humane, but is being of humanity being humane?

How many people are expressive of inhumanity while being of humanity? There is one question to be of humanity and there is another question of being of humanity. One can be of love which includes desires and lusts, this is different to being of love. There is no lust or desire in being of love as to just be of love. To be of love relies on desires and lusts where's being of love is actually in the absence of lusts and desires.

What this means is even though you are of humanity, doesn't mean you are being of humanity. Why are some humans humane and other inhumane? The difference is between to be of humanity to being of humanity. There is no bonding in to be of humanity but there is a huge bonding in being of humanity. There is actually a separation of consciousness of to be of humanity, on the other hand there is a huge unity of consciousness when being of humanity. How many billion or trillionaires would give half their fortune to help humanity deal with a plague or pandemic? In truth quite the opposite occurred. Now, how many people are putting their lives on the line for the good of man kind at present? The difference being one group consciousness is simply to be of humanity and the other being of humanity.

Now this brings us to humility which is to simply be humble. I don't mean being of humility in looking down at yourself in the face of a greater being, I mean being of humility in being of humanity no matter what humanity is of. You can be poor without looking up at the rich, desiring to be of this higher stature. Once you desire as a poor person to be of a higher financial stature, you are no longer truly humble, just simply desiring.

Being of humility is actually of absence of lusts and desires again. So being of humanity and being of humility is simply the absence of lusts and desires.

Lately, a number of people of humanity want/desire retribution of the people being obviously of inhumanity, this includes the billion and trillionaires and paedophiles alike who have been obvious in their abuse of humanity. There is also another kind of person who doesn't want or desire retribution no matter what.

Should these people be incarcerated? No, because incarceration is simply of abuse. You only need to make sure a consciousness of humanity is aware of this consciousness of inhumanity, within this alone inhumanity will become an undesirable rather than a desirable unlike at present. Watch carefully how a consciousness behaves when in the absence of desires, especially lustful desires.

Should they have all their assets taken from them? Only what is gained through ill-gains, through criminal activities gained from the abuse of humanity, all other assets should not be touched. You need to show a precedence where anything not of inhumanity, and not necessary of humanity, is encouraged. Yes, anything of inhumanity, unlike today, should be simply discouraged in the absence of abuse. Today, we are discouraged in telling the truth and being of humanity as well as of humility.

Yes, understandably but not wisely, people of humanity while in the absence of humility desire to hang people of inhumanity, to desire retribution. Once you become aware of people of humanity and the people of humanity and humility, you begin to look at yourself as just being of humanity differently. You become aware of the lack of humility within your own humanity, the humility of understanding the plight of being inhumane. Yes, this kind of awareness takes a great deal of humility.

Living by Honesty

Written by Mathew Naismith

"While the benefits of and motivations for choosing “honesty” in life are many — including that truthfulness and honesty are integral to one’s sense of moral integrity — living a life of honesty ultimately means having little to regret."

https://daveursillo.com/the-beauty-of-living-with-honesty/

After observing my own and other people's ego in control, importantly in the absence of participation, you realise that the western mind in all of us, of the west or east, is more of a desired existence than an honest existence. Just in stating this kind of honesty, the ego in control has become offended. Make no mistake; the ego in control is this feeble and the only way the ego can gain control over our lives is through living by desires instead of honesty. Living by desires, especially predominantly, is based on biases, the very same biases that feed our desires and destroys what's left of honesty in ourselves and others.

Recently, once again, a person of love and light responded back to me in a kind and seemingly genuine way. As soon as they realised who they were kind to, they deleted their response to me. Is my ego offended or emotionally hurt? I have accumulated a lot of detractors on the net by the way. No, because I am completely aware of how the ego in control is so easily offended. Any honesty remotely threatening the existence of desired truths over and above honest truth, is obviously going to be dealt with in an offensive way. I have lost count how many times I have been called negative, toxic, wrong, bad, etc, by so-called people supposedly of unconditional love and light. This is while I don't respond in the same manner but to these people I am far more offensive than they are!! Why?

I have lost count how many people I disagreed with that have become estrange from me or become yet another detractor. You do not get the same response from a mind balanced out with the eastern mind, mainly because the eastern mind is aware of how their own controlling egos are only of desired truths, not honest truths.

In recent times, I ended up extracting myself away from a person, who is of eastern origin. We agreed on some topics as we disagreed on other topics. At no time in our interactions did we disrespectfully state that the other person was of negative or toxic vibrations in any sense of the word just because our truths were different to each other. The honesty within our own truths was different though, which lead to me extracting myself from our interaction, especially when the other person started yelling at me by using a lot of high caps in response to me. You are not doing them any favours if you allow yourself to be disrespected in this manner.

Yes, it is known that the western mind is easily offended. Any honest truth to the western mind that detracts from desired truth is of an offensive act, far worse than any act of offensiveness orchestrated by an ego conditioned to desired truths over and above honest truth!! Is this view by the ego in control of honest truth? If we are honest with ourselves, we will find in human history that the western mind is highly offensive, while at the same time takes the smallest of things offensively.

Awareness in one's honest truth can never be offended,

where one's desired truth is often easily offended.......

Ego, Intuition and Desire

Written by Mathew Naismith

The ego is exceptionally versatile and adaptable, with the ability to be conditioned to just about any circumstance or environment. I suppose this is why humans are able to adapt to various environments, as depicted in human history. Ego is simply a conscious aware of one's own existence or being or even importance. One example of this is being aware of our own importance to our children, each other or society as a whole, of course egotism, which is an exaggerated opinion of our own personal importance, is something else.

As often depicted in human history, the ego can be conditioned to numerous environments, including environments such as spiritual/religious, material, conflictive, harmonious, loving, hateful, and so on. The ego can also be conditioned to an environment of intuition or desire. As the ego can't be conditioned to conflict and harmony, love and hate, simultaneously, the ego can either be conditioned to be more intuitive or desiring. It is interesting why the ego can't be conditioned to an environment of intuition and desire simultaneously.

Often intuition is thought to be a feeling we get that something is presumed to be the case, an assumption purely based on feelings. When you actually condition your ego to become less desiring therefore more intuitive, intuitiveness takes on a different meaning. Intuitiveness is no longer just a feeling but an awareness. The less desiring we become, the more aware we become.

Desire is more to do with an ego conditioned to egotism. Yes, as we can condition our egos to desire, we can condition our egos to an environment of egotism. Actually, both desire and egotism go hand in hand, one not being able to exist without the other. To become egotistical takes desire as to desire takes egotism. Even if we desire to help human kind, the desire of even being seen to help creates egotism, an exaggerated importance. How many people today desire to be seen helping human consciousness?

Intuition on the other hand has nothing to do with desire. Try truly becoming aware without the things we don't desire to become aware of or feel. Intuition has no preference or desire; this means anything from hate to love, conflict to harmony, negative to positive, and so on, the ego can intuitively become aware of. In other words the honest truth is presented to the ego through intuition, not a desired truth, a dishonest truth. What ego conditioned to desire wishes to become truly aware or intuitive? It can't occur because our desires take control of the ego, conditioning the ego to desires rather than intuition.

If I endangered my own life to help others and was called a hero, I would tell these people where to go. My own ego would detest being called a hero, now, how many people would do this? An ego conditioned to desire will always react differently to an ego conditioned to intuition. Intuition, an awareness of my own ego, instinctively tells me that I wouldn't like be called a hero, even before becoming a hero. Of course an ego conditioned to desire would relish in being called a hero.

When I lived in the bush/forest as a younger person, I had a feeling when I was going to come across a snake, every time without exception. As we did as children, we walked around the bush in our bare feet so this intuition was highly beneficial for my well being. My intuition didn't tell me where the snake was going to be, only that I was going to come a cross a snake that day. If I expressed less desire, would have my feelings become more of an awareness?  An awareness, as opposed to just a feeling, would have also told me where I was going to come a cross a snake in the bush.

You can desire one moment and become intuitive in the next moment, remembering that the more we desire, the less intuitive we become.  When we desire, this is often in the absence of intuition and visa-versa. We will often only perceive through desire what we will experience, not what we will actually experience.

  

The following doesn't totally endorse what I have stated here but they are an interesting read, in my mind anyway.

    

https://www.forbes.com/sites/investor/2018/06/23/is-intuition-a-form-of-intelligence/#fb12c1715fdc

https://innerself.com/content/personal/intuition-awareness/intuitive-awareness/6031-awareness-a-intuition.html

http://www.equisyncoaching.com/intuition.html

Seeing It As It Is

Written by Mathew Naismith

Seeing it as it is, not how I would desire to see it, gets me into a lot of trouble with other people. It is like with love, just because I don't desire to feel the affects of love, in other words lust after what the feelings of love gives to the ego, I am not of love. I simply don't desire to feel the affects of love but allow these feelings to naturally exist, without effort, within certain conscious states. It is natural that within certain conscious states, the ego will experience feelings of love, giving the ego a false ideology that these states are simply of love.

I also don't desire being positive over and above being negative, in all honesty, I simply allow myself to be neutral as much as possible. I have learnt so much from the so-called negatives, way more than from the positives. In all honesty, my ego has learnt from these experiences instead of suffering from these experiences. To me, to suffer from an experience is to counteract a negative experience with a positive experience. This is the same in counteracting hate with love, most often to the same degree or to the same excess. Within this, one to me is still suffering from the collective consciousness experience rather than learning from the collective conscious experience.

How shocking it was practicing in cannibalism or going to see people fight to the death in a Roman arena, but it is alright to deliberately make people ill so you can live/feed off of them. I recently read an article in how doctors who dared find cancer enzymes in vaccines systematically died/murdered. And how many people are fighting for there very existence, not just in wars but materialistically? The whole planet has become an arena that was deliberately created to serve the few materialistically. In all honesty, are we learning from what human consciousness has experienced or are we still suffering from these experiences?

I will always be hated or despised for my honesty; I would rather this than the alternative of course. Simply, self-dishonesty isn't an alternative for people like me, we must see it how it is, not how our egos would desire to see it. As I am not into separation as in black and white people instead of just people, I am not into negatives and positives. Don't' be conned by the controlling ego that desires to separate through perceptions of black and white, negative and positive perceptions, negative and positives are simply perceptions created by the ego. You really don't need to be positive, just not negative, within this you will be able to see everything for what it really is, not how the ego desires to only see it, in black and white, negatives and positives!!