Written by Mathew Naismith
At the present time I must sit back and
watch a person who is not being properly clinically examined or analysed. Knowing
what I know, this is very difficult to do. This eighty year plus person simply
can't be bothered helping themselves live, even though there is nothing
physically wrong with them to any great degree. This person is trying so hard
to become ill or physically disabled. No doctor or social working has bothered
asking the four key questions of psycho analysis. As a lot of our ailments come
from our mind set, I find it strange that doctors (physicians) are not trained
to ask the four key questions of psychology.
The four key questions can vary in
accordance to the situation, but the four key questions are fundamentally of
the same attribute. In other words strive to bring about the same outcome
through simular means, no matter what the circumstances are. It is important
that you ask these questions in sequence for one question leads to ask another
particular question, not any question by chance or luck.
Question 1; gives an outline of where to
start, for instance, "Are you married or single?" You would ask this
even if you knew if they were married or not as you want to set a precedence in
relation to the four key questioning process.
Question 2; Depending on the answer to
question one, question two is to do with starting to find the problem. A
question like, "Are you happy with your partner or being single?"
Question 3; is a vital question. From
question three there are a number of directions the patient can go, for
instance, I am happy, while you observe the clinching of fists and looking
down, or, clinching fists and looking straight at the psychoanalyst angrily. Of
course if you say I am good in that area with a show of palms, yet another
direction can be followed.
Question 4: After a number of other non-key
questions relating to question three, question four is primarily to do with
conformation of the analysis of the first three questions. This can vary
greatly but in this case, "So you do have a problem with your
partner?"
Yes, spiritual gurus psychoanalyse
themselves. Try to remember, psychology is simply a derivative of philosophy,
an analysis of natural life. As modern day science owes its existence to both
mysticism and philosophy, psychology owes its existence to philosophy.
Mysticism is of course the forbearer of alchemy and today's chemistry.
No true spiritually aware person
psychoanalyses the external environment they are experiencing, they analyse
their own inner environment. The four key questions are not relating to their
external environment but their internal environment.
Question 1- How many spiritually aware
people today wish to escape the present environment?
Question 2 - Why do they want to escape
this environment?
Question 3 - Question three relates to if
the environment is stated as being negative and/or toxic," So why do you
think the external environment is negative and/or toxic?
Question 4 - Relates to the conformation
that they are not looking within but are instead critically judgmental of the
external environment. This is while one is suppose to be going in and analysing
the inner environment or self, not the outer self or environment!!
The external environment is what it is; it
is how we react to this environment that makes the external environment what it
is. This is like anyone who has suffered trauma from external sources; it all
comes down to how they psychologically handle the trauma involved. If handled
badly, they will not want to rejoin the external environment as it is too toxic
to their psyche. In all self-honesty, are not a lot of western spiritually
aware people suffering from trauma attributed to the external environment? The
external environment is only as toxic as we perceive it is. To manifest such a
mentality of negativity and toxicity, will only bring about more trauma
associated with the external environment, not less.
As Jesus stated, "Father, forgive
them, for they know not what they do." I am not a Christian myself but
this statement is still very true today. As of the 80 year plus person who
knows not what they do, hurting themselves and others around them through not
being self-honest, so are a lot of other people in westernised spirituality.
Try to remember; it is the western mind in all of us that doesn't like to be
shown there is something not quite right with itself, even through
self-analysis. Like a mentally ill person, often as illusionary inner reality
will replace the external reality, how many western minds will be offended by
this kind of self-honesty? If you are offended, try asking yourself the four
key questions, the following should give an idea of this but please be honest
with yourself.
