Written by Mathew Naismith
I'm sorry for the syntax errors and
non-legible grammar of recent; trying to assist the painter is causing a lot of
physical and mental discomfort, especially at present. My grammatical coherency
isn't fully coherent within it's structuring at present.
To a lot of people, the situation I am in
would be judged as being highly negative, the inability to properly structurally
form legible posts is debilitating to what I am writing. This of course can be
debilitating to the reader by impairing the readers coherency in what I am writing,
to a lot of people, this is negative but not to people like me.
When you start reading something that isn't
altogether coherent, you decide at that point if to read on or not. If you
decide not to read on because of the incoherency in what you are reading, you
are simply not meant to read it, it's not for you.
I often read posts and threads that are not
altogether structured properly, just because it's not structured properly doesn't
mean it isn't insightful. We often judge in accordance inline with the kind of
structured coherency expressed, if it's not up to our standards, it becomes
non-legible, if it's up to our standards, it's of course legible.
The personal standards we judge everything
in accordance with can be highly critical, just because something isn't up to
our own personal standards doesn't mean it's negative or bad in someway, it
simply means it's not up to our critical personal standards. When we express
certain standards, we limit ourselves to these standards, all else other than
our own personal standards become unrecognisable.
When we fixate ourselves to certain
ideologies, most often all other ideologies become incoherent to us, they
simply become an unrecognisable ideology we can't possibly relate to. Within
this very action, we have limited ourselves to certain set perspectives and
perceptions. I think by doing this we lose our connection with the infinite
side of life, of course all we are left with is the finite, a consciousness of
limited range and possibilities.
The reason why trauma isn't a big deal or
negative for people like me is that trauma is finite in nature. If a
consciousness predominantly focuses on the finite, the consciousness involved
would naturally become limited within it's range and understanding, and yes,
this quite naturally occurs. You will also find that a consciousness that
focusing on the finite will judge more negatives within their environment than
someone who focuses on the infinite.
Focusing on the infinite instead of the
finite allows one to cohere and understand more of their present environment,
this includes a reality that is in and creates it's own traumas. How often do
we cohere and want to understand anything we have judged as negative when
focused on the finite?
This is funny; by focusing on the finite we
create standards, however, by focusing on the infinite there are no standards,
standards simply don't and can't exist within the infinite. When a
consciousness has no set standards, what naturally occurs? Awareness and quite
naturally without effort, of course the opposite naturally occurs when we do
have set standards. This is understandable because standards mean limitations
and the more set our standards become, the more limited our consciousness
naturally becomes.
Once our own vibrations are conditioned to
certain set standards, we will of course naturally feel that any other
vibrations that our own set standards are incoherent towards will feel
negative. The reason for this lays in that our own set standards which make
everything else not of these standards incoherent, it's this incoherency that
gives us bad vibrations.
There are no bad vibrations, this is until
our own standards create these vibrations, they simply don't exist until we
create them which can only be created if we focus on the finite.
Try to relate the finite with ego, finite
existence is ego where's infinite existence is egoless, of course to the ego,
infinite existence is hard to comprehend because infinite existence is incoherent
to the egos standards. This is due to the egos standards being set to
everything relating to the ego, to finite existence, there is nothing beyond
ego according to the ego. How many Western minded atheists believe consciousness
couldn't exist beyond the physical limits of the brain? This is even after
science is proving otherwise!!
To me, finite existence is ego and infinite
existence is egoless, the reason for this is that there are no standards within
an infinite state of existence. By simply releasing ourselves from our set
standards, our limitations set by these standards, infinite existence
automatically replaces finite existence.
Look at it this way. You have a clean body
of water until the ego pollutes the water. By simply releasing the water from
this pollution the water becomes clean again, the water is freed from the
limitation that the pollution limited the water to. The water is limited
because you can't drink it and nothing can live in it, it is therefore limited
and subjected to certain set standards until these standards are lifted. Take
away our own set standards, what are we naturally left with? A pure state of
existence that isn't hindered by limitations, a state of infinite existence.
The ego is naturally limiting and is only able to create finite existences,
this is it's natural limitations brought about by it's own set standards.
