The Signs of Decency

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

How does one know, in the absence of speculating or desiring that oneself is showing signs of decency, is actually in real life of decency? To do this one would seem to have to know what the signs of being of decency is. Is being a society built around decency a big deal?

One can say that being of decadency is of the traits or meaning of decency. “The quality of conforming to standards of propriety and morality”, also, “The quality of being polite and respectable”, as the internet word web states it is. To other people it is simply being of some kind of faith or ideology. The faith or ideology followed automatically makes you virtuous therefore of decency!!

Would our actions and especially inaction's determine the level of decadency or indecency regardless of faith or ideology one adopts in life?

There are a number of factors determining if we are of decency or indecency but what are the actual signs that we are of decency?

We are actually quite fortunate today as we have a present occurrence that quite clearly defines if we are of decency or not. I don't think any person of decency would participate or justify any kind of genocide or racial cleansing, even if all the people being racially cleansed are of a terrorist group. It would be like saying that all Germans should have been wiped off the face of the Earth just because Nazism emotionally hijacked and dominated the German populous in the mid 1900's. Would a decent person want all Jews ethnic cleansed, considering that Zionism has never been an undeclared terrorist organisation from being a declared terrorist organisation from the start?

So our left wing Prime Minister in Australia wanting to recognise Palestine as a state a sign of decency? How far right is Zionism? Now, how far left is communism? Is our Australian Prime Minister wanting to be payed out by Zionists​? How many Christians are for genocide and even worse, justify genocide to the bitter end? It is one thing to participate in genocide, it is another thing to justify such genocide, ethnic cleansing.

So being of a particular faith, ideology or political faction does not automatically make one virtuous, in fact can do the complete opposite.

So what is a sign that someone is of decency, of virtuous embodiment?

Should we judge people by their skin colour rather than their character? We often judge people by their faith, ideology, political faction, culture, if they are vaccinated or not, being labelled a terrorist group or not, etc. To a decent person, none of this comes into play, all should be treated equally in accordance with their actions and inaction's, in other words treated in accordance to their character. This however does not mean participating or justifying genocide or ethnic cleansing no matter what. One of the signs of indecency is the participation and justification of genocide, therefore one of the signs of decency is not participating and justifying genocide.

My wife and I agree, that even if all the Palestinians were terrorists due to decades of Zionist oppression and slaughter, justifying genocide would not come into. Look at the West Bank , where settlers are given arms to shoot Palestinians that resist in moving on, an area where there is no HAMAS or hostages. So it's not about HAMAS or hostages, it is simply about being Palestinian.

So the sign of being decent is not of judgement or prejudiced towards a certain group or faction just because they are of a certain group or faction. I know people of indecency can't comprehend this, but no decent person can justify genocide no matter what, it's utterly impossible, in a literal sense.

The Spiritually Aware

 

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

It is not within if we react or not to our present environment, it is within how we react to our present environment.

To start with, what does it mean to be spiritually aware?

We all have our own perspective on this but to me, spiritually aware is simply of being aware of energies beyond third dimensional aspects and perceptions, of a person or consciousness not entirely being of physical and mental aspects and perceptions, a person who is aware or knowing of energies beyond these third dimensional boundaries.

So any consciousness fixated to teachings and learning purely based on third dimensional aspects and perceptions, will of course deny the existence of any energies beyond what can be proven to exist, like DNA could not have existed until proven to exist!! It can not exist until proven to exist, a very strange concept to base our entire life and reality on, while denying any evidence proving otherwise.

Should a spiritually aware person react or interact to the present environment that is distracting, abusive and destructive beyond reasoning​?

Recently I wrote a post on the topic of Donald Trump, the present acting US president. Basically, I stated that if Trump is some kind of monster, the rest of the leaders in the western world must surly be utterly sinister in nature. Trump may be for genocide and supporting known fascist style governments like Zionism and Ukraine, and supporting terrorists organisations, like in Syria, hacking off people's heads, but Trump seems to be working for his country and country men. The tariffs for starters seem encouraging manufacturers back to the US. The people now employed in the health department are not bribed by pharmaceutical companies. On the other hand, numerous other western countries are being bought out and sold off while at the same time supporting endless abuse and destruction in their own country and other countries around the world.

One of the responses I received, for example, made reference to me hating Zionism. To react in accordance with our present environment is to hate, as this person wanted to believe I do as they obviously would to anything they themselves found undesirable. So to these people anything you find undesirable you must also hate as they do!! These people have no idea how other people of different mentalities actually think, obviously. This is how different it is when it is within how we react to our present environment and being aware of energies beyond third dimensional aspects and perceptions. Why would I hate what I find undesirable, abusive and destructive? Why would I hate countries, like Iran and Russia and their leaders, two of the only major bastions that are not controlled by the world banking system​?

It is like making the best of life as it is instead of the worst. It is how we react to an environment we are all apart of if we desire this to be or not, not if we react or not to our present environment. It is like I am suppose to hate the people I have pulled away from due to their abusive ways, as they obviously would, but people like me exist in a quite a different created reality.

Look at this in a different way. Some people judge others by the colour of their skin, culture, religion, race, gender, political preference, etc, while others will judge people in accordance with their character first and foremost. I have found myself that what you are aware of can determine your character.

So it is understandable that spiritually aware people can be of quite a different character, and will most often judge people in accordance with their character, this however should not mean that we don't interact or react to our present environment that judges everyone but by their character. By doing this we are virtually judging people by their skin colour, the skin colour of their character. Vibrations produce different colours if we were able to see them, this is how we see various different colours and yes, different characters would produce different colours. So it gets back to we don't interact with different characters due to their different colours, this is not true spiritual awareness. Each character produces a different colour, so we are in fact back or still judging people by the colour of their skin!!

Am I going to judge this present reality controlled and run by a certain character​ of a certain colour, therefore avoid reacting to it? Just by being present within the present reality we are interacting with this reality, to try to avoid reacting to this reality due to the colour of the skin of this reality is being less spiritually aware, not more spiritually aware. It is purely in how we react, while avoiding not reacting due to it's colour.

So is judging someone by their character also of judging in accordance to their colour? No, for it is within how you react to the colour, for example, I will remove myself away from an abusive environment if able to, while not hating or having disdain of the environment I am extracting myself away from just because it is not of my own character colour.

So because we are spirituality aware, we should extract ourselves from the present environment not of our own character colour, like extracting yourself from an abusive environment on a personal level!! It is not if you extract yourself from an abusive environment or not, it is how you extract yourself from an abusive environment. So if you feel the colour you are extracting yourself away from is beneath you, you are not extracting yourself in a spiritual aware way. I remember people of colour who were ignored and shown disdain due to the colour of their skin alone!! The present environment is of a lost environment within it's own created reality. How does anyone judge lost souls so critically like this just for being lost within their own creation? Yes react, while being aware in how you are reacting.

I can't go back to judging people just by the colour of their skin, because this is exactly what I would be doing if I did not react or interact with this reality due to it's colour as I know, “It is not within if we react or not to our present environment, it is within how we react to our present environment.”

My favourite part of being spiritually aware is the bliss one can go in and out of, virtually at will.

Living a Life of Distractions

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

From the time we are conceived, we begin our life of distractions in relation to DNA, hormones, ego, pain and pleasure, hunger and plenty, etc, of course the older we become, the more distractions are presented within our own reality and consciousness. Look at the distractions presently occurring in the world, it is phenomenal.

So what are we being distracted from to begin with?

When I ask what we truly are to who we truly are I get a different answer. Are we being distracted away from what we are to then focus more on who we are, the same who that is of all these distractions?

When you take away some of these distractions, you become more of what you are in it's truer form or conscious inception. Conscious inception is simply a state of consciousness in the absence of enacted physical distractions. The more consciousness is enacted out physically, the more distractions we create, the trick is to try to stay aware of your innate conscious inception, where your consciousness is not yet conditioned to a way of certain conditioning and learning. I kept getting a message inside my head to not read books at an early age, at the same time I could ask any question and get an immediate answer, as long as I asked an appropriate question that is.

An appropriate question is of the absence of distractions, the less distractions, the more appropriate the question will be that then formulates a truer answer not based on what is desired, needed or wanted in accordance with the distractions at hand. All our desires, needs and wants are created by distractions.

Does God exist or not is a distraction based question, a truer question is something like the following. Could have a far more aware and wiser consciousness created this universe? The answer, considering what man has created while in a high state of distraction, is yes.

What we are being distracted from is a consciousness of the absence of distractions, a state of consciousness that would feel like pure bliss to us, in actuality is of pure bliss due to the absence of distractions therefore distortions.

So why would people like me deliberately choose a life of distortions over a life of pure bliss?

I don't think there is one of us who has not chosen at the soul level to live a life of distortions to start with. Secondly, simply being aware of this pure blissful state of no distortions assures me that I won't make the worst of my life of distortions, instead make the best out of my distorted experiences. The trick is to make the best out of a situation, not the worst. Would a distorted consciousness that created the present reality want you to make the worst of it, seen as it benefits greatly from the misery created from this kind of distorted state? The answer is obvious.

In truth though, it is not about choosing one above the other, it is simply of choosing to make the best out of a situation instead of the worst. You are not choosing to live a life of distractions in the absence of also being aware of a pure blissful state of consciousness, our innate conscious state. Innate means to not being established based on conditioning and learning. This pure blissful conscious state is not based on conditioning and learning, it is simply a pure blissful conscious state of awareness and knowing in the absence of distractions created by conditioning and learning, especially human created conditioning and learning.

It is not within living a life of distractions, it is within living a life based on our innate conscious state, our truer state of consciousnesses. It is not that you should not learn, read and study either, it is within the way you learn, read and study, live a life of distractions.

The Rise of Human Vibrations

 

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

It is hard to think of how human consciousnesses is on the rise, where human consciousness enters into a higher vibrational state while ruled and heavily influenced by a lower vibrational consciousness, a consciousness very much inline with something like Vlad the impaler, a 15^th century prince of today's Romania. In truth, today's ruling class are of an even lower vibrational level than someone like Vlad the impaler, if you are aware of what the ruling class today are into.

It is hard to imagine the present world being ruled by a lesser vibrational consciousness than someone like Vlad the impaler, therefore it is hard to also imagine how human consciousness could rise up from one of humanities lowest levels of consciousness in human history.

To understand how human consciousness can arise out of the depth of this degree of depravity, you have to comprehend what it means to be of a lower and higher consciousness.

A lower consciousness or vibration notably represents a consciousness of distortions, the lower the consciousness, the higher the distortions, on the other hand a higher consciousness or vibration notably represents a consciousness of less distortions. The less distorted a consciousness is, the higher the vibration. A high vibration simply makes reference to a less distorted consciousness.

What if I told you that consciousnesses of the highest level can instantly change the level of the lowest vibrations, of the lowest conscious human form in existence at a click of a finger. Just being aware of this within such a reality of depravity is a quite significant. It is strange to think that this level of notable depravity could lead to the rise of human consciousness.

Everything is of consciousness: Everything that man has created/built and is represented of comes from consciousness. Yes, I also believe the universe itself has come from some kind of consciousness, as above so below but only in relation to a consciousness, not in relation to the level of consciousness. Could you imagine the type of universe today's human consciousness would create, it would be completely distorted and chaotic, as of today's human reality. Look at how NATO has planed to continue the Ukraine war for another 10 years. Look at how our own prime minister in Australia is sending more troops to Ukraine. Look at how bad Russia is deemed and is being persecuted, while Israel is deemed anything but bad and has not one embargo placed on it. The distortions are beyond belief, however, are many of us at present, due to these notable distortions, waking up to how distorted the present human reality is? The answer is most definitely yes.

So is the rise of human vibrations/consciousness from a state of notable depravity a sure thing?The answer is no.

I think in the times of depravity, one of the lowest human vibrations in human history, if the clear majority of people just go long with this degree of depravity, human vibrations could fall even lower and stay there. What is notable at present is that a significant number of people have woken up to the depravity of human consciousness, a significant regression of human mentality. To realise that a consciousness of the highest level of vibrations exists is quite significant on it's own.

Once the oligarchs of today normalised brutality and cannibalism, you know that you are under the rule of people likened to Vlad the impaler and their mentality, the trick is to allow this kind of vibration to awaken you instead of enveloping you.

Giving to Not Take Relationships

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

It's been awhile since I posted, this is simply to do with the sign of the times, also, I do go off grid, meaning, I get away from using a communicative device. I don't even own a mobile phone which allows me to really go off grid. This is going to occur more often in the future.

Giving to not take refers to people who give without expecting a return in what they give, in other words not expecting a return from what was given. The opposite is of expecting a greater return for services rendered. So many relationships and family structures today are based on a return, often a greater return for services rendered. Once an invested service no longer has a greater return or profit, the relationship often folds. This is the difference between a relationship and a partnership. In an actual relationship, both parties give to the relationship without expecting a return, especially a greater return. In a partnership, be it of marriage, family, friends, work colleagues, etc, the return of what is given is expected, even to the point of a greater return or profit, this also includes what is often falsely called a marriage relationships. It is no longer a relationship when expecting or demanding a payout or output, especially when the return is greater than the input.

Is society as a whole at this point of expecting a greater return than what they give, in fact expect a return in the absence of any input at all?

"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country,"

This is a JFK, John F Kennedy, quote, a quote from the 35^th president of the United States. This quote basically refers to what you can do for your country without expecting a return or profit from your investment. Once when we were all tribal, we gave a lot more to the tribe than you did to yourself, today, it would seem the human structure is based on quite the opposite, expect or demand what the country can do for you. Under this influence of this kind of social structure, relationships were going to end up being based on a return or profit structure. If you understand the influence the world is dominated by today, a greater return from investments influence, it is no wonder so many relationships are no longer of a true form of a relationship but a partnership.

The human social structure used to be based on what we as a tribe could do for your country/tribe, where we used to have a social structure based on relationships, not partnerships. As soon as the multinationals, who are only multinationals because of the greater return from investments, influenced and controlled human society to become more based on partnerships rather than relationships, the less and less we became givers thus base our own lives on a partnership of profiteering.

I see so many marriages today base their marriage on profiteering it is scary, but expected considering the influence we are all under today. The trick is being aware of this influence.

I see so many people into spiritual awareness that give without the thought of profiteering from this giving, I also see a lot of people who say they are spiritually aware who give only to profiteer from. My wife is a EMMETT therapist, similar to a Bowen therapist, my wife would not take money for services rendered if she did not have to, if she did not live in a reality purely based on a system on having to receive payment for services rendered. The thought of a taker not receiving payment for services rendered just does not occur, they have got to have a return no matter what. Many have no idea of others people thinking otherwise.

It is interesting how different of a reality people live by, base their whole lives on.

Living by Informed Decisions

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

It look as though I will be getting off grid a lot more in the future, this means I will be living more of a life off the computer. When I go away anyway I am often off grid.

So what do I mean living by informed decisions?

I recently came across a video of a gay atheist who stated that they experienced an after life occurrence of a divine nature. They were heavily into the LGBTQIA+

movement/hysteria, this is until their after life experience. Yes, each letter in this predominant western movement has a certain meaning.

It would seem that the LGBTQIA+ community, that has notably excluded sexually straight people, are living a lie, a lie, according to this gay man, that the people of this LGBTQIA+ community will suffer the consequences of in the after life for not living a life of informed decisions. If you are living by lies and influencing people around you to also live by these lies, there are repercussions and not just in this life it would seem. Because this man built his life around these lies, he had to give up his present life, including his partner, but he gave up one life of uniformed decisions that lead to a more fulfilling life of informed decisions. Being gay or lesbian is not the problem, the problem seems to be more related to the LGBTQIA+ movement/hysteria in regards to the after life.

Note: I had to also state hysteria because I don't want to offend or exclude people who see this movement as a psychoneurotic hysteric episode. Psychoneurotic makes reference to an emotional disorder.

I should also point out at this point that informed decision making is not of judgement, it is simply of making informed decisions based on facts that are themselves based on unbiased truths. In other words facts that are based on informed decisions as opposed to uninformed decisions. You will see a lot of informed decision making in the spiritual community, this is very different to today's science community or as it seems the LGBTQIA+ community. The uninformed decision making by the science community in recent times is a testament to a hysterical emotional disorder, as proven during the lock downs and proceeding false inoculations.

Have you noticed or experienced the difference between people living by informed decisions to people living by uninformed decisions? The difference between these two groups seem to have become a lot more notable in recent years, to the point that these two groups have very little in common. People living by informed decision making are not making judgement, they are simply making an informed decision, like in regards to the pandemic related mandates and proceeding false inoculations. I went along with the mandates to start with, this is until I became more informed as of this gay man it would seem.

Being more informed is not of judgement but more of common sense reasoning. Yes, people living by uniformed decision making will see this or want to see this as judgement, but to the informed it's not and understandably so.

I should state that this testimony by this gay man could be false and misleading, this is why I have not shared it, this however does not take away from noting the difference between people who live by informed decisions to those who notably live by uninformed decision, as of the science backed pandemic and preceding false inoculations. I for one try to live by informed decision making.

The Qualities of Being Human

 

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

If you know your human history, what is going on today is, “water off a ducks back”, meaning, things like criticism or insults has no effect on a person. What is occurring in the world at present is very much like water off a ducks back for people like me, we don't hold on to it as something personal. “It is not that you become numb to what you become aware of, it is that you become wise to what you become aware of.” Wisdom was once a revered human trait believe it or not.

This is interesting.

As I often do, I look up the different definitions of words to define how I will use the said word. I recently looked up fodder, in relation to an animal course food source, and I came across the following definition of fodder.

Fodder: People or material to be used for a specific purpose.

To comprehend this you have to realise that to be a person is to be human, however, once you lose these traits that make us human, a person/people, you lose the definition of what it is to be human. Traits like decency, humane, integrity, reasoning, wisdom, etc, are some of the traits that define us as being human. As past history clearly shows, losing these traits dehumanise us and society. Nazism is a good example dehumanisation as of Zionism in relation to today's Syria and Gaza/West Bank. The dehumanising that is occurring in Syria and Gaza/West Bank is definitive to being dehumanised.

Now dehumanise means that a human being is deprived of human qualities, in other words of the absence of human traits like mentioned above, of course in the absence of these traits, one simply becomes fodder. This does not mean human beings used as fodder are fodder, it simply means the entities that define humans as fodder are a dehumanised form of life, this is too obvious in relation to what traits make us human.

Qualities: An essential and comprehensible attribute or trait of something or someone.

The qualities that define us as being human is changing, this is too evident. Like in relation to vaccines these days, they could also change the definition of what it means to be human, while realising that the definition of human is of the characteristics of humanity. Of course one of the definitions of humanity is of the quality of being humane!!

I wake up virtually every morning thankful for what I am aware of, especially when I don't take this obvious dehumanising on a personal level. Like the NWO, which is actually a very Old World Order made to seem new, this dehumanising of human society is nothing new either. If you are aware, it is indeed water off a ducks back.

What is occurring in the world is making me more and more appreciative of what it means to be human, I of course also appropriate my present state of mind, the very same mentality that makes me of the qualities of being human.