Written by Mathew Naismith
It is funny but spirituality as a whole within its wisdom
looks for the truth, even in the absence of facts, where’s science looks for
the facts often in the absence of truth!!
This may sound strange, “At no time is fact directly related
to truth, only when facts have been verified to be true.” As I will explain
through my reply to a self-proclaimed atheist, facts don’t necessarily lead to truth.
Actually, quite often facts can distort the truth, also, truth is often found
within beliefs in the absence of facts. I also gave an example of this. Facts
don’t verify the truth, truth verifies the facts or beliefs. A belief can
simply be a hypothesis and still be truth in the absence of facts. Facts are
simply of perceptions until they become verified truths, however, a belief can
be of truth in the absence of facts. There is no truth within a fact until
verified as being of truth!!
Science is simply of facts, not truth, and atheism is of
neither facts nor truth within itself. Atheism, unlike other belief systems, is
an empty shell on its own but other belief systems on the other hand can be of facts
and/or truths. A belief system of doctrines of disbeliefs, such as atheism, has
no substance to it, no value to become aware or knowing but to simply
disbelieve in the absence of facts and truth on its own, unlike other belief
systems. As one of the atheist doctrines state, “A lack of belief”, is a play
on words to deceive that atheists simply believe there are no proven existing
deities.
“Here are scientific facts
that were verified to be fact but obviously not true, of truth.
If facts were directly
related to truth, why would one then need truth to begin with? Not all facts
produce truth to start with, even when seemingly verified. No, facts often
don’t lead to truth. On top of this, you have a science that is known to be
fraudulent at times.
It is obvious that
truth is simply in the absence of untruths be it of verified facts or not.
Science or atheism isn’t
about truth, to the lead up to a hopeful truth, science is simply about facts.
Why do atheists only refer to science being about facts instead of truth? Because
science isn’t about truth, it can only hopefully lead to truth.
Actually, science
should never be about truth itself, but to lead to truth. Why? Because once
truth is discovered, that is the end of the story. Science is meant to keep evolving,
it has to, which is different to religion. Sadly, unlike spirituality as a whole,
atheism itself is neither about truth nor facts, itself. Beliefs can lead to
truths like hypothesises where unbelief’s are simply an empty shell on their
own. Facts can be distorted, truth can’t.
Hypothesising: To
believe especially on uncertain or tentative grounds
Belief systems can
lead to truths, where unbelief’s systems on their own lead to, an empty shell.
Atheism has only science it would seem to find truth, which isn’t within itself
about truth, obviously!! Don’t get me wrong, science often leads to truth as
well but so do beliefs. Facts have been known to distort the truth, probably on
the same level as beliefs.
Before DNA was known
to exist, DNA couldn’t have existed without science proving so, even when it
did!! However, in the absence of facts, beliefs could tell us otherwise as in a
Hypothesis. Facts often distort reality and truth. No, facts don’t always lead
to truth but beliefs can lead to truth in the absence of facts.
Mistakenly in my mind, atheists search for facts through
science instead of the truth through science. To an atheist, DNA couldn’t have
ever or ever will exist in the absence of facts, even when the belief in the
existence of DNA was of truth in the absence of facts!! Without a doubt, facts can often distort the
truth either leading to falsehood’s (fraud) or lead to missing the truth
altogether.
Facts are of science therefore atheism. Faith is of
spirituality as a whole. I think it is the faith that allows us in spirituality
to look for the truth instead of unwisely looking for the facts instead. Faith
won’t always lead to the truth but neither will the facts, so don’t be fooled
in relying on the facts in the absence of truth.
Some people think what I write about is dysfunctional (negative). I don't ever find the truth negative in any sense, unless the truth is distorted through facts and reasoning based on biases. I don't have bias in favour of the positives as truth also comes in negatives as well.
Some people think what I write about is dysfunctional (negative). I don't ever find the truth negative in any sense, unless the truth is distorted through facts and reasoning based on biases. I don't have bias in favour of the positives as truth also comes in negatives as well.