Plato's Truth

 

 

 Written by Mathew Naismith

Out of the blue it just hits me,”Why are you choosing to live like this?” The reference to you seem to be making reference to the collective as well as myself.

“They deem him their worst enemy who tells them the truth.”

Plato

So what energy today, as of ancient Greek philosopher Plato's time, is often deemed offensive, of bad vibrations, negative, etc? I will give you a hint, it is not lies and deception.

“False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil.”

Plato

Strange that so many of us actually choose to live like this to the point of persecuting anyone who tells the truth, especially when they tell the truth in an open honest way. I have lost count how often people like me have been deemed negative or even immoral simply for telling the found truth openly and honestly.

No, it would seem that human consciousness has not evolved, in truth, has seemingly degraded to the point of demonising the truth told openly and honestly to excess, while seemingly embracing or simply accepting lies told openly and dishonestly.

I have lost count how many people have said to me they just don't want to know, in other words don't want to know of the truth told openly and honestly, while quite happy to live with the lies told openly and dishonestly.

So is the truth, especially told openly and honestly, of an actual real life negative vibrations? Yes and no. To a person who has embraced lies told openly and dishonestly, yes, of course the truth is going to be of negative vibrations, as of people who don't want to know the truth told openly and honestly. To the people who embrace the truth told openly and honestly, the truth is anything but deemed negative or of bad vibrations. We can get ourselves into a situation where the truth actually feels physically and mentally of negative vibrations. Yes, it would seem that the human mentality has not changed or evolved from Plato's time.

In saying this, there are a lot of Plato type mentalities in existence in the world today and no, you don't have to be of some kind of great known philosopher to be of this type of mentality where you have a great feeling to know the truth above seemingly infinite accepted lies. As of in Plato's time, anyone of open honest truth is well and truly up against it.

In truth expressed openly and honestly, wisdom is certainly going to be present, the predominant energy flow.

So do I mind being deemed negative or even immoral in a society where so many embrace lies over truths?

“Truth is it's own reward.”

Plato

I would state myself;

“Truth is of it's own reward.”

Honesty Within One's Truth

Written by Mathew Naismith

The following is simply of my own reflection.

As I wrote recently.

“I am so glad I do the research I do, yes, even if it costs me friends and acquaintances.

It is not that I don't value friendship, it is just that I value honesty more than I do friendship, especially when the truth is based on honesty. Yes, I do have friends that value my honesty within my truth as I do theirs, even when we are not of each others or living within each others truth or reality.

Yes, I do become critical of people's reality that are of the truth expressed in the absence of honesty. To be honest in your expressions with your friends and acquaintances, one must first be honest with themselves, this seems to be becoming a rare trait in people these days.”

“No one is more hated than he who speak the truth.”

Plato

Truth told in the absence of honesty is simply a distortion of reality, and the more the truth is told in the absence of honesty, the more one's reality becomes distorted.

Mathew G (me)

In observation of the west, which seems to be severely undermined internally as well as externally, the absence of honesty as well as integrity and wisdom seems to be taking it's toll. It is like observing the inaction's that are going on in the west, inaction's simply being of the absence of actions. The absence of or lacking of honesty, integrity and wisdom are like inaction's. When we only focus on the actions, which seems to be deliberately orchestrated, the inaction's that we are not focusing on distort reality even more so, more than the actions. An example of this. Putin wants a peaceful resolution in regards to Ukraine, but the Wests inaction's to a peaceful resolution is obvious. I think NATO's ever expansion, which is an action, is not to create peace, quite the opposite it would seem. Notice the absence of any peace keeping force in Ukraine and the West bank and Gaza!! Look at the distortion this absence has created!!

Is the western hemisphere of the western mind more focused on actions than inaction's, as it is known that the western mind will focus more on the foreground than the background as opposed to the eastern hemisphere mind? Both western and eastern hemisphere mind sets has it's own truth, which often creates a reality based on what is desired rather than what is of actual reality. This is not of a lie, it is simply of the absence of self-honesty.

So what creates honesty within the truth we tell?

“For only in the absence of bias is there real truth”. This statement of mine says it all, honesty is created in the absence of biases. Where is all the present energy going, like wealth, power and control? Presently to this western NWO, New World Order, agenda. This energy is not being distributed throughout humanity, it is being channelled to a bias entity, the NWO. Yes, this NWO is notably excessively biased therefore of the absence of honesty altogether. Notice that reality for a lot of people in the west is presently distorted, by no mistake? It seems this NWO wants to kill off 95% of the worlds population, which does not include their own NWO top people!!

Once a society is of the absence of honesty, integrity and wisdom, a distorted reality will surely follow. The distortion within this NWO seems to be massive, why anyone would want to be this distorted within themselves is beyond me. Yes, there are many material gains and pleasures to be had distorting reality/energy but in all honesty, imagine a world that could be created by not distorting reality, distorting energy period to suite one's own biases!! A world of the absence of distorted energy flows........

Truth and a Balanced Society

Written by Mathew Naismith

The truth shall set us free, in turn create a balanced society one can only dream of.

As much as the truth can be discomforting, without a doubt truth binds society by creating an environment absent of lies and disinformation. Do lies and disinformation divide society and family units? Lies and disinformation notably divide society by creating an imbalanced environment, an environment often notably absent of truths and accurate information.

I can not think of a more divided society in the west, which infers or confirms the degree of lies and disinformation that is present within such an environment. The environment speaks for itself, meaning, the truth is in the structure of the environment. A well balanced structured environment would represent or naturally create a society of unity, not a society of division. Governments would not be trying to divide society but unite society. A good example of dividing society is the introduction of an apartheid system, be it of racial or medical apartheid. An apartheid system just does not work or can not be introduced within a balanced society, where society is united, not divided.

So you want to know were to look for lies and disinformation, how to tell a lie or reliable information from lies and disinformation.

Well, today we are in luck, for you need to look no further than the source of the created apartheid system and the supporters of an apartheid system, such as governments and MSM. Even if you simply agree with any kind of an apartheid system, you are most likely in an environment conducive to lies and deception and division. In this case become receptive or vulnerable to lies and deception and even conditioned to such an environment.

So is a balanced united society of a balance between lies and truths?

You can not have a united society where lies are present, in any sense, this is why a united society is so elusive. A lie within itself is to divide itself from the truth, the lie in the first place is of division to start with. Yes, a lie of division is to also desire a specific desired reality than that of an actual reality that we don't desire. I don't desire a reality that we are of a society accepting of an apartheid system but in reality we are as presently proven. This truth is mightily uncomfortable at times, but only in an environment conducive to lies and disinformation.

So do lies and disinformation always create an apartheid system, like when whites and blacks were segregated in South Africa under the Afrikaans?

https://www.thoughtco.com/apartheid-definition-4140415

Funny, the link here between apartheid systems, lies and disinformation is in the presence of an authoritarian or autocratic system, by no surprise. An accepted apartheid system does not create lies and disinformation, it is the lies and disinformation that creates an apartheid system, an environment of lies and disinformation most often created by authoritarian or autocratic systems, as proven.

Authoritarian or autocratic systems are not just linked to communism or fascism but capitalist systems as well, were one part of society is notably treated differently by authorities from other parts of society. You also have one part of society dominating the other, while in an apartheid, way looking socially down at them as a separate part of society to themselves, the rich parted from the poor in every sense. Authoritarian or autocratic systems create lies and disinformation that then creates an apartheid system.

You should by now see why we are so divided in the west, especially at present, authoritarian or autocratic systems create lies and disinformation to then create an apartheid system. You can't have an apartheid system without lies and disinformation that seem to be always created by authoritarian or autocratic systems, the true source of division and imbalance.

So how do we bring about a well balanced united society under the control of an authoritarian or autocratic system?

Tell the truth, even if that truth feels uncomfortable.

Don't try to live within your own created desired environment, while in an apartheid way, separate yourself from all other realities you don't desire exist.

You can't expel authoritarian or autocratic systems without first exposing their lies and disinformation. In regards to the related introduced apartheid system, living in truth will expose an apartheid system for what it is, knowing that apartheid systems are created and supported by lies and disinformation.

Just be aware and express the truth for what it is, not for what you only desire to be true.........

Truth of Reality

Written by Mathew Naismith

This is how people like me think, we take notice of what physical, mental and spiritual reality has been distorted, especially in line with lusts and desires. Once you extract the distortion within realities, the lusts and desires, what is left is the truth of reality. Truth does not have to be created, only the extraction of what is lusted and desired within the truth for the truth to be revealed. Telling the truth in how it actually is, is not of critical judgement either, this critical labelling of the truth as critical judgement is within itself of a distorted reality. Be aware of this.

Another good example of a distorted reality is the pandemic and the Ukraine war, where in 2014 the US in a real sense started this war with the full support of the rest of NATO. Look at how the elite desired to become even more wealthier and controlling, now look at how this has distorted reality, where therapeutic treatments are banned and even outlawed. Imagine how many more people during the Spanish flu would have died if they did this during the Spanish flu. Also, it is noted that the Spanish flu derived from vaccinated US soldiers. Notice they called it the Spanish flu!! Yet another distortion of reality.

Another good example is how everything, like health and the environment, is politicised. Political preference and following a particular political agenda is of desires and lusts, in the process distorting reality even more. Religious and atheist fanaticism is the same. Look at how the victor rights the history as well!!

The more a reality is distorted through lusts and desires, the more a reality will become distorted, excessive censorship or ostracising also distorts reality. You must be able to tell the truth in how it is without the truth being labelled critical judgement!! How often does this occur today? New age spirituality is full of critically judging what is and is not of critical judgement. Yes, people like me are often disliked for expressing the truth about the distortion of reality, yet further distorting reality for a more lusted or desired reality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_FFrDoH_WY

Indeed Lorie.

We are not all observers as we are not all just in participation, human consciousness is naturally this diverse. Many of us have learnt to be the observer through spiritual or science teachings, or it is simply from a past life lived. We should appreciate how diverse human consciousness is, but in times of trauma, this appreciation is very hard to do, as to be expected.

The participator is of disconnectedness, as for example globalist elite depict and with mass murderers or war mongers, where observers are of connectedness or of a oneness, where everything is of one entity or organism. Now step back and imagine observing this one organism. It is as an observer to look at it as one organism, for only does the participator separate this one organism into numerous other organisms.

If you take a look at the present reality, how many of us are drawn into participating, while in the absence of observation, in the covid pandemic? In Australia, more people have died and have been maimed by covid vaccines, strangely enough this does not matter to so many Australian's. Due to coercion, very few Australian's observed what was going on, instead choosing to participate.

Lorie to me does not distort reality, this person tells it how it is. I think the reason for this is that people like Lorie participate while still able to stay in observation mode. Yes, it takes conditioning to be an observer, therefore avoiding distorting reality even more. Yes, the mind can also be quite easily conditioned into only participating as well, in the process distorting reality even more, the covid pandemic is a prime example of this, however, the covid pandemic can actually awaken us to how we distort reality.

My advice is, look for people who don't distort reality inline with their own or other people's lusts and desires.

The Sacred Life

Written by Mathew Naismith

The truth is only of fear when we fear the truth, for only when the truth becomes negative has the lies become the truth. Words to remember the truth by, I mean really.

What is dividing us so much at present? What is sacred to some is not to others and visa-versa.

To people like me, life is sacred but this doesn't stop with physical life but is also of spiritual life. Now is this the same with people who's only sacredness is money, power and control? Often there is only a perception of physical life, even after the human life ends, this is why in human life money, power and control become sacred and life itself is only there to be used and abused. It is sad but it does seem like the case because look at the difference between people of the sacredness of life to those of the sacredness of money, power and control.

As I wrote recently:

“Looking at the research material lately makes me wonder how did so many people became coerced into supporting hate groups. The now obvious anti-freedom of choice movement is astonishing, now creating hate for people who don't want to get the covid vaccine. What next, hate for people who value life above all else, especially above material wealth? You have been duped big time people and you don't even know it, but the program is elaborate to say the least.

The anti-freedom of choice movement is simply those who go with all the leftist hate groups and movements like BLM, ANTIFA, CRT, woke, communism, etc. Don't get me wrong, I am certainly not for right wing hate groups either. All hate groups like this should be discouraged as they are of simply suffering from the past instead of learning from the past. Wisdom is certainly struggling to survive in the present environment.”

Also:

“People like us take note and learn from the past instead of suffering from the past. What do hate groups want to do? Destroy or censor the past before they learn from the past, in the process keep suffering from the past. I am so disappointed that people are allowing themselves to be continually coerced down this hate group path. It feels like I shouldn't even be hear, that I don't belong, this is no big deal though for people like me, for this is only of the finite.

I am looking at writing a post to do with sacred life, where people like us are of the sacred life and needs, where life is precious, to people who think material possessions and desires are sacred, where life is abused.”

It is awkward times for the truth to prevail, as it is for the people of sacred life, for both are a representation of the same thing. In this prevailing times would you rather be not of the truth therefore not of sacred life, where life is sacred like a child is to it's mother? The mother will suffer for her prevalence but solace comes from this prevalence of suffering.

It is more than okay to suffer, embrace this suffering for it tells of one thing, that life is indeed sacred for one to suffer for.

It is funny, these are my own words and it sounds as if I am preaching!!

Avoiding Suffering From The Truth

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

If we were truly aware, all we would do is laugh at our own and the collective human trauma we instil on ourselves. Yes, I even sit back in observation of my own participation and laugh, but at the same time being aware of why the human collective has become so engrossed in it's own participative traumas. In all, it is but a human experience.

Even within my 57 years, I have observed how our own human collective consciousness is even more today suffering from truths instead of learning from truths. We today don't chastise our children because it creates negativity, so we allow the children to grow up without responsible guidance. I have never seen in my life as I am today how the truth is judged negative, instead desired truths are seen far more positive because they are far more placid, even when of deliberate lies and deception. In my days growing up, part of our learned behaviour was to avoid abusive actions like lying and deceiving. To people like me, desired truths in opposition to actual truths, even when these truths are painful in their awakening, are far more constructive than destructive learned behavioural desired truths.

How often do we learn from what we simply judge as negative? A negative is simply an indication that we have not learnt from but instead still suffer from. To people like me, this human created reality of immense trauma of suffering and abuse is not even negative, simply an indication of a consciousness lost within it's own creation. So in today's spirituality, it is judged as being negative for calling out a person or even the collective consciousness for what it's expressing, even if this realisation may help this person or collective consciousness to overcome their own destructive tendencies.

Observe yourself or simply imagine awakening the collective consciousness to it's own created traumas. Is this honest caring action going to be seen by the collective consciousness as something positive? No. The reason for this lays in the learned behaviour of suffering from the truth instead of learning from the truth. Even within my short 57 years, I have seen the embracement of desired truths and the growing disdain for actual truths, mainly due to actual truths, like chastising children to create a more constructive learned behaviour, becoming a learned behavioural negative.

For something to be judged a negative is simply a sign of suffering instead of learning. Really, you cannot suffer from learning from trauma, from judged negativeness, you can only suffer from what you don't learn from. As soon as spiritually aware people talk of and avoid what they have judged as simply negative, people like me know this is a sign they are in all honesty still suffering from the truth, in the process replacing actual truths with desired truths.

I wrote the following separately to this post but realised it was of this post.

Proficient Mind

People like me love philosophising. To a lot of people, people into philosophy think more when in actuality it is the opposite.

Philosophy: The rational investigation of questions about existence and knowledge and ethics.

Any personal belief about how to live or how to deal with a situation.

It is not that philosophers think more, it is that philosophers think differently, imagine for one moment extracting irrational thinking from the mind!! You are actually thinking more proficiently and effectively because the philosophers mind has extracted irrational thinking from the mind to one extent or another. As present circumstances have proven, irrational thinking abounds in human consciousness, of course it is the irrational mind that is the easiest to scam and control!!

And yes, the irrational part of our minds often takes offence to what the rational part of our mind is thinking. Why? Because the rational mind is not of desired truths but of actual truths. Today, it is obvious that desired truths are far more desirable and acceptable than actual truths, to a philosopher, this is disheartening. Why is it disheartening? Because it is a sign we are becoming more irrational, cluttering our mind with irrational thinking instead of uncluttering our minds with rational thinking.

And yes, the irrational part of our mind will see the rational mind as being too busy and complicated when in actuality it is the other way around, for a very good reason, the thinking process becomes less cluttered therefore more proficient and effective for the rational mind. No, I am not totally proficient in thinking totally in the absence of irrationality, probably never will be and this is the actual truth rather than a desired truth.

The mind is only as proficient and effective as the environment the mind resides in........Mathew G

Yes, it would seem the irrational part of our mind will suffer the most because it learns the least from suffering and judged negatives. And yes, the irrational mind may feel good within it's desired truths, but this state has always been finite in nature!!

An Awakening - Guru!!

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

You may ask how can this be an awakening, when inhumanity and not humanity has infiltrated humanity as a whole to undermine the values of humanity. To put it another way, love and light was supposed to do exactly what hate and dark has done, infiltrate humanity to it's core structure, in the process create a much harmonious loving reality.

So you may ask what went wrong!!

Nothing went wrong, the inhumanity that has been plaguing humanity for centuries has now exposed or revealed itself to all of humanity and inhumanity. I observed this very dark infiltration occurring and unfolding for many years now, into every crevice of humanity, including consciousnesses of love and light, the humanity within humanity.

Not being directly involved in love and light or hate and dark, one could observe what was occurring without being drawn into becoming a participant. A lot of spiritually aware people can do this, simply observe, even in relation to their own beliefs and practices, you know this when they avoid judging what is or is not negative or positive. How many people of said love and light mislead other people for their own purposes. Usually these same people were preaching other people to stay away from gurus, often people of proven wisdom, but at the same time act as of a guru. I follow people's proven wisdom as I do my own, in other words I follow other people's and my own proven wisdom, the guru. You will however find that it is of the same wisdom, with an exception, often we become too much of a participant instead of an observer of our own perceived wisdom. Also, often our egos inflate our own wisdom, in other words our wisdom becomes of desired truths instead of actual truths.

It is like this woke, where only desired truths are accepted while denouncing proven actual truths. The denouncement of other people's wisdom through this woke and the infiltration of the dark of the light, is not of proven wisdom. Often these people will talk in negatives and positives, the light against the dark. Light, actual truth, is never in opposition to the dark, as the dark, of desired truths, through it's desired truth is never in actuality in opposition to the light. The dark desires to believe this and infiltrate the light to believe this as well, as it has clearly done.

A true sense of love and light, the humanity within humanity, is all about actual truths in the absence of desired truths. Desired truths simply come to fruition through participation, even of your own wisdom. Gurus have to often watch for this when they are of a guru, to avoid participating in their own wisdom, to simply observe wisdom, a wisdom that is not just of their own. This means you never become your own guru as is often taught by so many people, you simply become the guru, a person of proven wisdom.

Yes I know, this kind of actual truth is often seen negative and toxic to the participator but this is expected. It makes sense as the participator is often of desired truths and the observer of actual truths.

Look people, I know it feels good to follow what is of desired truths but this is the dark's (inhumanities) infiltration of the light (humanity). It is meant to feel that it is of good positive vibrations but try to remember, we are indeed in the age of false prophets, where false consciousness therefore false feelings resides in.

All I can say now is to follow true wisdom, a true reflection of the guru, within this you will be fine, if not in this life I am sure your soul will thank you for this effort. Be kind and thoughtful to your soul.

Wisdom of Truth

Written by Mathew Naismith

A very short post but a post that I feel is immensely in-depth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gS12HIF-t4Q&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR2vVoY0G0Rw4WHZIrPQ09MGnNlmGc67zIHCQ1GY67dE7KbiXKTfQUNBRyg

Now this is interesting after hearing this. The truth, the wisdom of truth, sings to me like this no matter what that truth is. I think coming out of a consciousness no longer governed and controlled by ignorance, leaves us with a signature based on harmonious vibrations. It is funny, these harmonious vibrations have always been there, they were simply obscured. This is our distinctive feature that precisely identifies us, it is indeed our true signature, not the falsified/forged signature so many of us have identified with as being who we are. Expose the untruths we took on as being true and all we are left with is our true harmonious signature. 

Freedom from Letting Go

Mathew Naismith

So how do you simply let go of things that are no longer of your reality?

In reality, it is your ego that is letting go. Your ego simply learns or becomes conditioned to letting go of what is harmful to itself and even the soul. In reality, at present our egos are conditioned to hanging on, even to the bitter end. This occurs a lot in personal relationships and in business, where you try to hang onto the material. In a lot of people's personal relationship, the primarily attachments are based on the material, be it monitory or lustfully, of course there are a number of relationships that go a lot deeper than this, in the process negating material attachments.

In recent months, Tom Hanks the actor has been linked to paedophilia, even to the point of satanist paedophilia. Another actor my ego adored is Kevin Spacey, who has had three known complaints in relation to indecent sexual orientated behaviour. These three complainants are now mysteriously deceased!! My ego was in shock but mysteriously my ego had very little problems in letting go of these materiel attachments, as I found out, very different to other people's reactions.

This is inline with presenting a clarity of truth in relation to vaccines, covid-19 and proceeding lock-downs, 5G, etc, where clarity of truth for me allowed my ego to become aware, unlike what is experienced through obscurity of truth. For a prime example, how many western atheists would accept that the universe could have well been created by a far more aware and wiser consciousness than human consciousness? To stay an atheist, a high degree of bias has to be implemented in this case, in the process creating or becoming conditioned to the obscurity of truth. Let's be honest, if an atheist knew this they would either have to stop being an atheist or obscure the truth. I should say that a more aware and wiser consciousness may or may not be labelled a God, this is within each persons perceptions.

If you have not guessed it, clarity of truth is all about awareness where obscurity of truth is all about a deliberate induced unawareness (ignorant) state of consciousnesses therefore reality.

Yes, it is understandably quite difficult for the ego to let go of attachments when of obscurity of truth, but when the ego is conditioned to clarity of truth, the ego letting go of attachments becomes a lot easier. The reason for this is that the ego becomes less bias. The less bias an ego becomes, the more of clarity of truth the ego becomes. Yes, this means the more bias the ego becomes, the more of obscurity of truth the ego becomes. In a sense, there are no lies, only clarity and obscurity of truth. In the absence of clarity of truth, there is only obscurity of truth. Think on this, what part of you is learning or become of clarity or obscurity of truth? Your ego. Once the ego becomes conditioned to less bias, the more of clarity of truth the ego becomes. Are biases of direct lies? No, biases are simply of obscurity of truth where clarity of truth in absent.

What a test, in testing my egos attachments and associated biases in relation to Tom Hanks and Kevin Spacey. The clarity of truth of my ego stood up to the obscurity of truth, where my ego could have simply obscured the truth quite easily as it seemed to have for a number of people's egos in denial. For me, spirituality is all about awareness, not an unawareness to serve my ego of obscurity inline with my egos biases.

The Clarity of Truth

Written by Mathew Naismith

So what am I talking about when I state clarity of truth?

Clarity of truth is simply truth expressed in the absence of as much bias as possible. An example of this is vaccines. I am neither for vaccination nor against vaccination, but I am not for vaccines that are only 10% to 40% effective with a 0.6% fatality rate like flu vaccines that are of a higher fatality rate than that of covid-19 fatality rate of 0.26 or lower.

How many people knowing these figures are still for vaccinations no matter what? This is a prime example of obscurity of truth, where a high degree of bias is evident. There are people who don't even want to know these figures which simply represents an obscurity of truth to an extreme.

There is a problem with expressing a clarity of truth, it is too close to the truth for a lot of people. Yes, people like me could be more subtle in expressing clarity of truth to influence more people, but we are not here to influence people, we are here to inform people of clarity of truth, nothing more. Clarity of truth simply speaks for itself on its own terms, playing up to people's egos to be accepted is not needed.

Clarity of truth is not something you accept or don't accept, it is simply a truth in the absence of bias to one degree or another. Just being aware that you are bias within your own truth is of clarity of truth, of course avoiding being aware of your own bias truths is of obscurity of truth.

I was brought up in an abusive family situation, yes, this has made me bias against abuse because I have learnt from my past. I have family members who are still suffering from this past by either continuing the abuse or defending the abuse. Even though I am of a bias in relation to abuse, I am still of clarity of truth because I am aware of my biases, especially when being so open with these biases.

Obscurity of truth will continue the abuse and/or defend the abuse, most often to the point of falsely accusing others of abuse. This is called deflective tactics. As I have noticed in regards to politics and main media as of recent times, deflective tactics are often used and abused to excess to obscure the real truth. An example of this is to focus away from the fatality rate of covid-19 by primarily focusing on the infection rate of covid-19.

Sadly, a lot of people are drawn into focusing on the bigger numbers, the infection rates, while deliberately ignoring the fatality rates of lower numbers. It is called mind control, where the winner is of a higher figure so that is the figure we are cohered to mainly focus on. Yes, a huge degree of obscurity of truth is being implemented especially at present. I have lost count of how many relative information that goes against obscurity of truth is being removed from the internet. If clarity of truth exposes obscurity of truth, is often labelled an undesirable, like a conspiracy theory (Jew), which is very similar to the tactics used by Nazis in the mid 1900's.

The point is not to try to be unbiased, simply be of clarity of truth and our own biases will simply fade away. I don't label child abusers as negative, toxic, wrong, etc, because the truth is they are simply lost within their own or someone else's creation. This is a prime example of clarity of truth for to do otherwise is of obscurity of truth impelled by biases.

Clarity of truth is not about absolute truth or even individual truth, it is simply a truth told in the absence of bias as much as possible. Yes, this means obscurity of truth is not absolutely about lies either but can be of lies. I simply try to keep true to the clarity of truth, this is all.

Back in the Comfort Zone

Written by Mathew Naismith

There are some fundamental differences between atheism and theism/agnosticism/oneness psychology as I will explain. My own sense of oneness is of a different psychology to atheism for a very good reason.     

Gee whiz, what a discomforting experience to experience. Yes, I am back from experiencing something exceptionally distorted and discomforting but on the other hand also very aware building or enlightening. If you wonder why you get that creepy feeling up the spine being a spiritually aware person who is aware and probably empathic, this is why. To be simply in the absence of fear in any environment, this is what truly being fearless really is. Unbeknownst to these people, they had no hope in instilling fear in me or recruiting me. Yes, they tried a number of times to recruit me in their ranks as well.

Yes, atheists are on a big pilgrimage or recruiting drive. I say pilgrimage because quite a number of atheists are on a road to a world of total atheistic domination, of course along the way they must try to recruit more people to accomplish this world domination. Of course this takes a fair amount of atheistic preaching, deceitfulness and trickery. It would seem one of their exceptionally dogmatic doctrines quite clearly states, “If you are not a theist, you must then be an atheist.” Their stance on this seemed dogmatic to an extreme, but there is something a little strange in the psyche implemented here as I will explain.

Under the unbiased definitions of atheism, you have the doctrines of the belief that there are no deities, or, a disbelief that there is no deities. The new atheist doctrine states, which isn’t in the dictionary I use, is atheism is a lack of belief in the existence of deities. This is supposed to be the new up to date atheist doctrine of today, which to me is simply of deception. Why?

Agnosticism: “A person who claims that they cannot have true knowledge about the existence of God (but does not deny that God might exist)”, also, “Someone who is doubtful or noncommittal about something.”

Atheism is strictly of the commitment that the existence of deities don’t exist and can never exist, however, the agnostics stance isn’t of commitment at all in relation to the existence of deities. No joke, it was stated by a very active member of this group that you are then classed an agnostic atheist, under the present atheistic doctrines of course. In all honesty, so many atheists used agnostic principles when their commitment and dogmas where exceptionally evidently atheistic to someone like me.

There is also another difference between agnostics and even theists/spiritually aware people. Atheism, through science, is psychologically governed by facts where agnostics and spiritually aware people as a whole try to be governed by truth. As I have shown in my previous posts, facts can actually distort reality and truth. Add the fact that fraud is obviously a problem in today’s science, going by facts alone using science alone isn’t of wisdom but complete blind faith, as I found out as they didn’t know about the fraud within today’s science. The possibility that they didn’t want to know is probably more probable with some atheists. Yes, in my mind so many seemed to be also of deliberate self-deception.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticism

Extract: Agnosticism; is the view that the existence of God, of the divine or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable. Another definition provided is the view that "human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist."

Atheism: Less broadly, atheism is a rejection of the belief that any deities exist. In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. Atheism is contrasted with theism, which, in its most general form, is the belief that at least one deity exists.

I find it strange psychology and reasoning that you have to be either an atheist, agnostic atheist or an atheist agnostic, or, a theist agnostic or an agnostic theist. Of course simply being an agnostic didn’t come into this kind of psychology by the looks of it. Truly, I didn’t know there were so many difference sects of atheism and there is even more. For someone into oneness, were you have a quality of seeing everything as one, such as energy instead of separated energy entities, this kind of psychology and reasoning is beyond me. Or if you like, behind me.

Oneness; can be described as being One with God, or One with nature or being One with all Life…. but these are only words pointing to the Truth…. they are not the Truth. Oneness closes the gap between the observer and the observed, between a person and God, between a person and nature, between a person and Life.

You could say that facts also point to the truth as well. In theory, facts are supposed to point to truth when in actuality facts can often distort the truth. DNA didn’t exist until the facts proved DNA existed, even when DNA existed way before the facts determined DNA to have existed!! So the universe couldn’t have existed before the facts proved the existence of the universe!! Facts, like the perception of oneness, can point to the truth, but of course not necessarily.

So is oneness governed by the same principles as facts when pointing towards truth?

Through general science, energy is separated into separate entities, where oneness simply sees all energy being as one no matter how different they are to each other. Within the perception of oneness, everything is connected and acts as one entity even though we as humans are unable to detect this. Just because we are unable to detect this, therefore being of facts, doesn’t mean it’s not true but it does to someone whose psyche is totally reliant on facts!!  I would not myself feel comfortable reasoning like this, in all honesty to me, it is not proper practical reasoning pointing towards facts in the absence of truth.

As it is, atheists, through science, are of facts where spirituality and agnostics, which includes oneness, is more pointing towards the truth being the primary source of awareness, not facts. The difference to someone like me is obvious. Don’t make the mistake though, that atheism is a separate entity to spirituality and oneness, what would atheists have to disbelieve if it wasn’t for spiritually and oneness!!                   

Beyond the Comfort Zone II

Written by Mathew Naismith

It is funny but spirituality as a whole within its wisdom looks for the truth, even in the absence of facts, where’s science looks for the facts often in the absence of truth!!

This may sound strange, “At no time is fact directly related to truth, only when facts have been verified to be true.” As I will explain through my reply to a self-proclaimed atheist, facts don’t necessarily lead to truth. Actually, quite often facts can distort the truth, also, truth is often found within beliefs in the absence of facts. I also gave an example of this. Facts don’t verify the truth, truth verifies the facts or beliefs. A belief can simply be a hypothesis and still be truth in the absence of facts. Facts are simply of perceptions until they become verified truths, however, a belief can be of truth in the absence of facts. There is no truth within a fact until verified as being of truth!!

Science is simply of facts, not truth, and atheism is of neither facts nor truth within itself. Atheism, unlike other belief systems, is an empty shell on its own but other belief systems on the other hand can be of facts and/or truths. A belief system of doctrines of disbeliefs, such as atheism, has no substance to it, no value to become aware or knowing but to simply disbelieve in the absence of facts and truth on its own, unlike other belief systems. As one of the atheist doctrines state, “A lack of belief”, is a play on words to deceive that atheists simply believe there are no proven existing deities.       

“Here are scientific facts that were verified to be fact but obviously not true, of truth.

https://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/everyday-myths/10-false-science-facts.htm

https://www.rd.com/culture/science-myths/ 

If facts were directly related to truth, why would one then need truth to begin with? Not all facts produce truth to start with, even when seemingly verified. No, facts often don’t lead to truth. On top of this, you have a science that is known to be fraudulent at times.

It is obvious that truth is simply in the absence of untruths be it of verified facts or not. 

Science or atheism isn’t about truth, to the lead up to a hopeful truth, science is simply about facts. Why do atheists only refer to science being about facts instead of truth? Because science isn’t about truth, it can only hopefully lead to truth.

Actually, science should never be about truth itself, but to lead to truth. Why? Because once truth is discovered, that is the end of the story. Science is meant to keep evolving, it has to, which is different to religion. Sadly, unlike spirituality as a whole, atheism itself is neither about truth nor facts, itself. Beliefs can lead to truths like hypothesises where unbelief’s are simply an empty shell on their own. Facts can be distorted, truth can’t.

Hypothesising: To believe especially on uncertain or tentative grounds

Belief systems can lead to truths, where unbelief’s systems on their own lead to, an empty shell. Atheism has only science it would seem to find truth, which isn’t within itself about truth, obviously!! Don’t get me wrong, science often leads to truth as well but so do beliefs. Facts have been known to distort the truth, probably on the same level as beliefs.

Before DNA was known to exist, DNA couldn’t have existed without science proving so, even when it did!! However, in the absence of facts, beliefs could tell us otherwise as in a Hypothesis. Facts often distort reality and truth. No, facts don’t always lead to truth but beliefs can lead to truth in the absence of facts.  

Mistakenly in my mind, atheists search for facts through science instead of the truth through science. To an atheist, DNA couldn’t have ever or ever will exist in the absence of facts, even when the belief in the existence of DNA was of truth in the absence of facts!! Without a doubt, facts can often distort the truth either leading to falsehood’s (fraud) or lead to missing the truth altogether.

Facts are of science therefore atheism. Faith is of spirituality as a whole. I think it is the faith that allows us in spirituality to look for the truth instead of unwisely looking for the facts instead. Faith won’t always lead to the truth but neither will the facts, so don’t be fooled in relying on the facts in the absence of truth. 

Some people think what I write about is dysfunctional (negative). I don't ever find the truth negative in any sense, unless the truth is distorted through facts and reasoning based on biases. I don't have  bias in favour of the positives as truth also comes in negatives as well.        

Beyond the Comfort Zone

Written by Mathew Naismith

This is what comes from going way outside your comfort zone can reveal at times.

Quote: “At no time is fact directly related to truth, only when facts have been verified to be true. This is interesting, which I never thought of before, atheists often refer to facts instead of truth, but spiritually aware people often refer to truth instead of facts.  Hmmmm, this is why I am not an atheist!!  Let’s be honest, one of the doctrines or laws of atheism is it must be of facts, not truth. Seen as more people are becoming atheistic, is the fraud in today’s science linked to this? Is today’s mess in the world linked to this? Add immoral deceptive militants to this equation, why not!!”

This will make more sense when you read on to the reply I sent to an atheist on the topic of atheist doctrines based on fiction, not facts.  So many atheists also totally believe, obviously in the absence of truth, that we are born an atheist or theist, also, that you can only be an atheist or a theist!! Yes, these two firmly believed doctrines of atheism are simply based on fiction it would seem.     

But, if you are not a theist, you are an atheist does I suppose!! True and false are often used in a different context to fact and fiction, so you are saying fact is exactly the same as true and false is exactly the same as fiction!! This is exactly what you seem to be saying Junious. I did make reference to fact and fiction, not true and false.

Fact:  A piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred

Truth: A fact that has been verified

Fiction: The creation of something in the mind

False: Not in accordance with the fact, reality or actuality

As previously quoted: At no time is fact directly related to truth, only when facts have been verified to be true. This is interesting, which I never thought of before, atheists often refer to facts instead of truth, but spiritually aware people often refer to truth instead of facts.  Hmmmm, this is why I am not an atheist!!  Let’s be honest, one of the doctrines or laws of atheism is it must be of facts, not truth. Seen as more people are becoming atheistic, is the fraud in today’s science linked to this? Is today’s mess in the world linked to this? Add immoral deceptive militants to this equation, why not!!     

In relation to fiction and falseness, they seem the same but there not Junious. Fiction can often be based on fact and even truth, falseness is never based on fact and certainly not truth.

I hope you didn’t do this on purpose, used words manipulatively to serve your own purpose. Junious, we use quite different reasoning processes, I think this should be obvious to you now.

The doctrine of lack of belief, disbelief or whatever you want to change it to, is not based on truth or facts.  So if it is not based on truth or facts, what is it? The only fact there is, at this point in time, is that deities can’t scientifically be proven to exist but can in other ways. Are these other ways accepted by atheists? No, but they are to many others. This is not truth by atheists Junious, as atheists obviously don’t work on truths, which is a huge error in my mind. Hones.yt, I can’t ever remember an atheist making a number of references to truth, only facts which isn’t truth until proven to be true.

The problem with belief systems, including atheism, is militants, and yes, atheism without a doubt has its militants or radicals as well.  Can you now see the way you and so many other atheists, not all, reasoning are quite incorrect?

What you have done here disappoints me, not that should worry you of course.

I was encouraged by the creator of this atheist group to join the discussions on this group. I have a funny feeling they regret this now.  Yes, I am open minded and often honest within my truths, but this also includes being open minded and honest with my truths in relation to beliefs systems like atheism.  I was simply a shock to the system being as openly honest as I was.

It is not about changing people’s minds, it is about freely expressing one’s own views. 

Exposing Hate Groups

Written by Mathew Naismith

It is not the quantity of numbers that will win the day in the end; it is the quality of numbers.

Firstly, hate groups are obvious in the way they work by dividing, divide and conquer. 

My own projected honest truth is not well liked on the net, in actuality it is quite hated and/or despised by many, however, by a few, my own projected open honesty is revered. Some of my written material was used in a College in the US.  I have also been unsuccessfully coaxed into placing my written material on an academia site backed by a well known university in England. On an atheist owned, run and backed social site, my written material was too obviously despised. You see, bias desired truths are always at war with honest truth, but honest truth is never at war with desired truth. Look at it this way; are virtuous people at war with unvirtuous people? No, virtuous people are simply being virtuous but unvirtuous people see this as an attack on their desired truths. When I look at the people who despise me on the net, all I see is how close to the truth I am, sadly enough.

Open honest unbiased truth is not just being ostracised or banished these days, it is being destroyed. Look at the people who are trying to banish hate groups and stop bullying on the net, this is while they are not stopping but fully supporting well known hate groups going into countries like Palestine and Yemen!! On top of this, you have hate groups who hate anything negative, so they simply ignore the obvious honest truth in favour of desired truths.

While on youme.social, I was accused of not liking my views put to the question. This is while I was harassed and bullied into asking to be removed from being a member of youme, as I seriously questioned the falsities and hypocrisies of atheistic ideologies. Because I could see what was going on youme, I purposely posted a post questioning atheistic ideologies. Often, deceptive manipulative people will use deflective tactics, in this case with me, accusing me of not liking my views questioned, when in all honesty these people didn't like their views questioned, obviously.

I am a huge threat to these people because I copied certain parts of my conversation with them. Never play all your cards at once with people like this. I am not at war with people like this, just simply openly expressing honest truths rather than a desired truth in accordance with my own ideologies, isms or beliefs. What hate groups hate the most is anyone who they hate isn't also a part of a hate group in opposition to their own hate group. What occurs in this case is they deceptively make themselves believe that they are also hated, when someone is simply being expressive of honest truth or virtuous attributes.

The average atheist is simply being expressive of atheism, as religious people are simply being expressive of their religion. Hate groups of these ideologies and other ideologies are not just simply being expressive but forceful of their expressions, especially when they perceive that another group is in direct opposition, at war, with their own group. Yes, make no mistake, desired truth is at war with honest truth, the trick is, don't be coaxed in just being another hate group, even of hate groups as a whole. Simply look at hate groups as being lost within their own creation, no more, no less.

Yes, my writing's are not of an academic quality, but what I write about often is it would seem....... 

Living by Honesty

Written by Mathew Naismith

"While the benefits of and motivations for choosing “honesty” in life are many — including that truthfulness and honesty are integral to one’s sense of moral integrity — living a life of honesty ultimately means having little to regret."

https://daveursillo.com/the-beauty-of-living-with-honesty/

After observing my own and other people's ego in control, importantly in the absence of participation, you realise that the western mind in all of us, of the west or east, is more of a desired existence than an honest existence. Just in stating this kind of honesty, the ego in control has become offended. Make no mistake; the ego in control is this feeble and the only way the ego can gain control over our lives is through living by desires instead of honesty. Living by desires, especially predominantly, is based on biases, the very same biases that feed our desires and destroys what's left of honesty in ourselves and others.

Recently, once again, a person of love and light responded back to me in a kind and seemingly genuine way. As soon as they realised who they were kind to, they deleted their response to me. Is my ego offended or emotionally hurt? I have accumulated a lot of detractors on the net by the way. No, because I am completely aware of how the ego in control is so easily offended. Any honesty remotely threatening the existence of desired truths over and above honest truth, is obviously going to be dealt with in an offensive way. I have lost count how many times I have been called negative, toxic, wrong, bad, etc, by so-called people supposedly of unconditional love and light. This is while I don't respond in the same manner but to these people I am far more offensive than they are!! Why?

I have lost count how many people I disagreed with that have become estrange from me or become yet another detractor. You do not get the same response from a mind balanced out with the eastern mind, mainly because the eastern mind is aware of how their own controlling egos are only of desired truths, not honest truths.

In recent times, I ended up extracting myself away from a person, who is of eastern origin. We agreed on some topics as we disagreed on other topics. At no time in our interactions did we disrespectfully state that the other person was of negative or toxic vibrations in any sense of the word just because our truths were different to each other. The honesty within our own truths was different though, which lead to me extracting myself from our interaction, especially when the other person started yelling at me by using a lot of high caps in response to me. You are not doing them any favours if you allow yourself to be disrespected in this manner.

Yes, it is known that the western mind is easily offended. Any honest truth to the western mind that detracts from desired truth is of an offensive act, far worse than any act of offensiveness orchestrated by an ego conditioned to desired truths over and above honest truth!! Is this view by the ego in control of honest truth? If we are honest with ourselves, we will find in human history that the western mind is highly offensive, while at the same time takes the smallest of things offensively.

Awareness in one's honest truth can never be offended,

where one's desired truth is often easily offended.......

A True Warrior

Written by Mathew Naismith

A warrior is one of honest truth and reflection, against those who are of dishonest (desired) truth and reflection.

Living by honest truth isn't a fight, but a right, where living by dishonest truth is a fight with no rights.

A true warrior doesn't pick a fight, but simply defends a right.

My own words and reflections.

To me, it is obvious who is of the fight against those who are simply of a right, the right to be open and honest with one's own honest truths and reflections........