Written by Mathew Naismith
Before I get into the right and wrongs we create as
religions, I would like to broach on the topic of inspiration, even of a guru.
I went through a stage where I did not need inspiration from
anyone as I inspired myself. I then entered a stage in my life where other
worldly wise and aware people inspired me; at this stage, I did call certain
people gurus as they did at times inspire me to the depth of guru. I then came
to a very silly stage where I listened to external forces that said gurus,
inspiring wise people, were just being expressive of ego. This stage did not
last long, today; many people inspire me these days.
What is frightening these days is there seems to be more and
more groups cropping up slamming anyone who expresses wisdom and awareness. It
is as if you are not allowed to inspire other people in ways that are not of
other people's structured beliefs. You certainly cannot be seen as having
experienced more than these people in any sense of the word, in this case you
are often labelled egotistical and that you are not my guru or far worse.
We seem to have entered a stage where we think, void of
actual experiences, we are just as wise and aware as anyone, within this belief,
we don't need to be inspired by anyone else, this is unless the inspiration is
in accordance with our own views that is. If you are going to be inspiring and wise,
it must be within their right as opposed to your right even if you do not live
by a right. Actually, if you do not live by a right, this is worse than living
by an opposing right; you are seen as not being right at all and are often
treated as such.
I wrote the following for a particular group, it is about
being void of right and wrongs, good and bad, negative and positive. It is a
state of being, not just void of wrongs (negatives), but also a state of being
void of rights (positives). We need to be honest with ourselves, as soon as we
talk about a positive; we are talking about a right, an absolute.
You get to a point
where, as of wrong and rights, love, light and positivity, are no longer
needed. Love, light and positivity are highlighted for a very good reason, this
often occurs in a chaotic existence.
As there are no wrong
and rights, there will be no true or excessive positivity and negativity
either. The yin is no longer seen as indifferent to yang, within this, all
wrong and rights, positive and negative, are neutralised.
Trying to live by
the yang void of the yin, negates the yang's purpose of existing in the end,
both must be embraced thus neutralised.
It is often asked
of me why I embrace so-called unbecoming people, negative people, why don't I
feel their negative vibrations?
Once you
neutralise positive and negatives, wrong and rights, bad and good, these so
called negative vibrations no longer exist. You no longer need a positive
(right) to negate negatives (wrong), they simply do not exist as they are no
longer needed.
The neutralising
of positive (right) and negative (wrong) is pure bliss, everything else is only
a perception of this bliss.
However, love,
light and positivity, can be a stepping to this neutralisation, but only if we
do not become too attached though. I cannot wait for the time we no longer need
love and light and positivity in our lives any more. I think human
consciousness needs to evolve from these wrong and rights.
We tend to attach
ourselves to a certain right, what ever that may be, and turn it into another
religion, another be and end all. We then talk about that there are no right or
wrongs but then talk in positives and love and light, but another right!!
In a reality of
natural chaos, it is understandable that we attach ourselves to these rights,
in doing so though; we often box ourselves into another religion, another
right. This action of course adds to the chaos even though we are in relative
peace in accordance to our right. We create another right often in opposition
to other created rights, collectively; it is obvious this is only going to add
to the collective chaos.
To exist in peace
within an existence of natural chaos, we need to stop adding to this chaos with
another right. We need to detach ourselves from these right and wrongs
completely to bring real peace and harmony, instead of doing this, we create
another right!!
The funny thing
is, it is natural do act in this way in a reality of chaos. The universe was
created through chaos, this is it's natural state, we need to exist in this
kind of existence more wisely in my mind.
I would like to further add to this, it is impossible for a
true observer to perceive in right and wrongs of any kind, only a participator
is able to perceive like this, or, an observer of one's own participation can
perceive like this too, be it to a much lesser extreme. The less of a
participator we become, the less we naturally perceive in right and wrongs. The
middle ground here is being able to observe your own participation in life,
this allows us to perceive void of extreme right and wrongs. Within this
action, we are able to quell the chaos in a naturally chaotic existence. In my
mind, we are not supposed to totally be of an observer while in a natural
environment of chaos, this is unnatural to this kind of environment, but we can
quell the chaos we experience.
In this case, quelling means to neutralise, you still have a
right and wrong, yin and yang, but they are in harmony or balance with each
other; there are no extreme expressions of these rights and wrongs.
Freedom can only comes through releasing ourselves from
extremes expressions we so often attach ourselves to.
