Written by Mathew Naismith
Love is a passive expression.
Love is not about judging everything
else that is not of this love negative.
Love is neither negative nor positive
for it is passive by nature.
Love does not limit itself to
judgment or extremes.
Love has no boundaries,
for only in harsh judgment are
there so many negatives/boundaries.
Love is simply freedom from these
inhibiting aggressive expressions
of today's expressions of love and light.
~Mathew
G~
Has this new movement of love and light
become highly aggressive?
Considering the conversations I have had
with a number of people on this topic, and that anyone apart of this new
movement often judge more, especially more of what is negative, it certainly
seems it is highly aggressive. It is amazing what is negative today that wasn't
before, and we are suppose to be judging less, not more!!
Yes, the perception of love and light is
observed by many as being a movement and a new movement. As of any new movement,
it becomes a be and end all, the ultimate answer to our troubling world and
minds. This alone reminds me of the religious Dark Ages, my movement/religion
is the ultimate answer.
This movement is also new because it does
not emulate the ancient teachings of love and light. These ancient teachings of
love and light are and were not about extreme expressions to start with. They
are also not about being in judgment more, in effect, judging more of what is
negative. What wasn't judged as negative before is now judged as negative by
this new movement today, for example, expressing a balanced view is negative.
Balance of course pertains to wisdom.
Speaking with other people as well on this
topic, they mention how telling it how it actually is, is negative by this new
movement, meaning, the truth is negative which pertains that this new movement
is really of the non-acceptance of truths. This of course pertain that this new
movement is really about lies. The similarities between this new movement of
today and the religious Dark Age movements are obvious, not they are exactly
the same but there are some significant similarities. Basing a movement on the
non-acceptance of truths is but one of them, excluding wisdom and balance from
a movement is another.
It is quite disheartening for people like
me to observe this occurring all over again; we are just not willing to free
ourselves from these boundaries that we are conditioned to.
I was repeatedly told, at an early age, not
to read or study on certain subjects that were going to condition me to certain ways of thinking; this included a lot
of new age spiritual teachings at the time. Even today this is the case. Only
now can I see why, through my interactions with other people, I was told not to
condition myself to certain teachings.
Materialism is only apart of that
conditioning, the other part is to do with spiritual conditioning, especially
the spiritual conditionings that pertain to fear. How many people today fear
expressing the ego, judgment and negativity? If you fear the so called dark
side of life at all, you are conditioned to fear, however, it is also advisable
not to fear being in fear either.
Being fearful is part of the process of
negating or neutralising fear altogether, it is wise to treat this as part of
the process. It is also wise to treat fearing being fearful of negativity as
apart of the process as well. No one part of the process is a be and end all,
it is wise to be aware of this in my mind.
