Written by Mathew Naismith
It has occurred before in times of great persecution and trauma, where of one mind becomes apparent, obvious to many minds. The trick is to become of this one mind instead of simply aware of this one mind, in other words instead of participating in being aware of this one mind, observe through this one mind to become of this one mind.
As in science and religion, awareness is one thing, becoming involved in what you are observing is something else.
No, communism and fascism and alike are not of becoming of one mind, it is one mind set simply enslaving all other minds to a mind set. To do this persecution is dealt out in a way to give fear of being locked down, isolated from all other minds except for a particular mind set. Instead of being of a one mind, every mind becomes subservient to a mind set.
Now the difference between being of one mind and being of a mind set, is being of one mind is of the observer, where being of a mind set is being observed. As we are seeing today, especially through the degree of censorship we are seeing, observing this kind of mind set is heavily discouraged. The subservient to this mind set are not allowed to observe, simply learn to become subservient. Yes, you are then no longer of this one mind or even of your own mind.
To a person who has an interest in science and spirituality overall, not being able to freely observe what is observable is a travesty observer wise. You are only able to observe in accordance with the mind set and as any mind set, this is limited to the mind set, however, thinking as one mind has no limitations to what can be observed, in actuality it is of observation of what is observable within it's entirety. It amazes me today how many scientists are content in being subservient to this very limiting mind set, a state of mind often witnessed occurring through being subservient to religious fanaticism, being subservient to a mind set instead of being guided by thinking as one mind.
So we are thinking as one mind and one mind only, is this not very limiting?
If we were all going to just religiously think and not scientifically think as well or visa-versa, this is not being of one mind, one mind is the ability to think as of all minds, be it of different minds. I may think more of spiritual matters, others may think more of science matters, thinking as one they are of one mind. The mind set of communism or fascism on the other hand wants everyone to be of separate minds, within this mind set you are only able to observe in accordance with the mind set, thinking as one mind on the other hand allows all minds to observe all other minds withhold hindrance.
So being subservient to a mind set seems to be all powerful over the subservient mind, this is an illusion of being all powerful. We feel and witnesses the great power and control the mind set has over the subservient. What power and control? So it is all powerful making all other minds subservient to one mind set, minds that are vulnerable to the influence of mind sets like communism and fascism. Notice only in times of great peril and trauma can this occur!!
So this is what the mind set wants you to believe is all powerful and controlling, minds that are vulnerable. Now if this mind set was to hold power and control over an equal devious and immoral mind set, I would say there is some kind of limited power and control but no, having power and control over the vulnerable mind is not all powerful. On top of this, the mind set itself has to stay ignorant to everything else it is unable to control. For a particular mind set to exist takes a particular degree of observational awareness, all else that is observable is ignored or disposed of, as we are seeing today.
Would this supposed all powerful mind set actually hold up to or have some degree of control over a mind thinking as one mind? There is no comparison to begin with, this is why these very limiting and limited mind sets have to always gain control of the influence of thinking as one mind has on minds. Why the persecution of the Christians all over again, and eventually of any spirituality of teaching of one mind? Actually, I have seen science go the same way, the mind set that profits come before science, in the process creating profiteering science as opposed to real science, a real science that puts science before profits and any other bias. I am not sure why spiritual people and atheists are not coming together on this, where we all simply become subservient to a mind set of great limitations.
So you may look at China and see no limitations of technological advancements, the same China that has live organ harvesting, literal slave labour, filthy rich while the poor go hungry, degradation of forests like in Africa at present, the building of hundreds of coal driven power plants, etc. This is the minds set Chinese style globalisation of communism, a country that outlaws males being expressive of femininity in any sense. This is a mind set of communist atheism, where spirituality is only tolerated when under the strictest control of communist mind set, if you are lucky. Was atheism allowed to express itself freely under religious observation in the modern era? This globalisation of communist style mind set is not so gracious or moral, it is it's way or no way. This should sound awfully like religious fanaticism, because that is what it is as of any extremism.
So in saying all this, no, mind sets like this are not all powerful and controlling over this one mind Yes, over minds that are vulnerable but not over this one mind, where all is observed, not just of what is desired to be observed in accordance with a mind set.
You have today a leader of a communist country replacing images of Jesus with his own image, yes, they are this delusional, thinking they have any resemblance to the one mind. I know this one mind idea is hard to imagine for a lot of people, but when we are to freely as a human species allowed to think in our own way, altogether we think as one mind. Excluding one part of this one mind is not of one mind, simply a mind set which scientifically and spiritually we should avoid. Yes, religion once went down this track of mind setting, and now it's communist atheists turn it would seem.
Will we ever start learning from the past instead of suffering from the past as a collective species? Yes, when we start thinking as one mind. I am not just referring to the one mind of the human species either, but that is my preference.
