Written by Mathew Naismith
It has occurred before in times of
great persecution and trauma, where of one mind becomes apparent,
obvious to many minds. The trick is to become of this one mind
instead of simply aware of this one mind, in other words instead of
participating in being aware of this one mind, observe through this
one mind to become of this one mind.
As in science and religion, awareness
is one thing, becoming involved in what you are observing is
something else.
No, communism and fascism and alike are
not of becoming of one mind, it is one mind set simply enslaving all
other minds to a mind set. To do this persecution is dealt out in a
way to give fear of being locked down, isolated from all other minds
except for a particular mind set. Instead of being of a one mind,
every mind becomes subservient to a mind set.
Now the difference between being of one
mind and being of a mind set, is being of one mind is of the
observer, where being of a mind set is being observed. As we are
seeing today, especially through the degree of censorship we are
seeing, observing this kind of mind set is heavily discouraged. The
subservient to this mind set are not allowed to observe, simply learn
to become subservient. Yes, you are then no longer of this one mind
or even of your own mind.
To a person who has an interest in
science and spirituality overall, not being able to freely observe
what is observable is a travesty observer wise. You are only able to
observe in accordance with the mind set and as any mind set, this is
limited to the mind set, however, thinking as one mind has no
limitations to what can be observed, in actuality it is of
observation of what is observable within it's entirety. It amazes me
today how many scientists are content in being subservient to this
very limiting mind set, a state of mind often witnessed occurring
through being subservient to religious fanaticism, being subservient
to a mind set instead of being guided by thinking as one mind.
So we are thinking as one mind and one
mind only, is this not very limiting?
If we were all going to just
religiously think and not scientifically think as well or visa-versa,
this is not being of one mind, one mind is the ability to think as of
all minds, be it of different minds. I may think more of spiritual
matters, others may think more of science matters, thinking as one
they are of one mind. The mind set of communism or fascism on the
other hand wants everyone to be of separate minds, within this mind
set you are only able to observe in accordance with the mind set,
thinking as one mind on the other hand allows all minds to observe
all other minds withhold hindrance.
So being subservient to a mind set
seems to be all powerful over the subservient mind, this is an
illusion of being all powerful. We feel and witnesses the great power
and control the mind set has over the subservient. What power and
control? So it is all powerful making all other minds subservient to
one mind set, minds that are vulnerable to the influence of mind sets
like communism and fascism. Notice only in times of great peril and
trauma can this occur!!
So this is what the mind set wants you
to believe is all powerful and controlling, minds that are
vulnerable. Now if this mind set was to hold power and control over
an equal devious and immoral mind set, I would say there is some kind
of limited power and control but no, having power and control over
the vulnerable mind is not all powerful. On top of this, the mind set
itself has to stay ignorant to everything else it is unable to
control. For a particular mind set to exist takes a particular
degree of observational awareness, all else that is observable is
ignored or disposed of, as we are seeing today.
Would this supposed all powerful mind
set actually hold up to or have some degree of control over a mind
thinking as one mind? There is no comparison to begin with, this is
why these very limiting and limited mind sets have to always gain
control of the influence of thinking as one mind has on minds. Why
the persecution of the Christians all over again, and eventually of
any spirituality of teaching of one mind? Actually, I have seen
science go the same way, the mind set that profits come before
science, in the process creating profiteering science as opposed to
real science, a real science that puts science before profits and any
other bias. I am not sure why spiritual people and atheists are not
coming together on this, where we all simply become subservient to a
mind set of great limitations.
So you may look at China and see no
limitations of technological advancements, the same China that has
live organ harvesting, literal slave labour, filthy rich while the
poor go hungry, degradation of forests like in Africa at present, the
building of hundreds of coal driven power plants, etc. This is the
minds set Chinese style globalisation of communism, a country that
outlaws males being expressive of femininity in any sense. This is a
mind set of communist atheism, where spirituality is only tolerated
when under the strictest control of communist mind set, if you are
lucky. Was atheism allowed to express itself freely under religious
observation in the modern era? This globalisation of communist style
mind set is not so gracious or moral, it is it's way or no way. This
should sound awfully like religious fanaticism, because that is what
it is as of any extremism.
So in saying all this, no, mind sets
like this are not all powerful and controlling over this one mind
Yes, over minds that are vulnerable but not over this one mind, where
all is observed, not just of what is desired to be observed in
accordance with a mind set.
You have today a leader of a communist
country replacing images of Jesus with his own image, yes, they are
this delusional, thinking they have any resemblance to the one mind.
I know this one mind idea is hard to imagine for a lot of people, but
when we are to freely as a human species allowed to think in our own
way, altogether we think as one mind. Excluding one part of this one
mind is not of one mind, simply a mind set which scientifically and
spiritually we should avoid. Yes, religion once went down this track
of mind setting, and now it's communist atheists turn it would seem.
Will we ever start learning from the
past instead of suffering from the past as a collective species? Yes,
when we start thinking as one mind. I am not just referring to the
one mind of the human species either, but that is my preference.