Outer Guidance

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

Outer guidance often only comes once in a persons life, it will never come again within a life for a good reason.

Often when we fumble through life, guidance is forthcoming, an outer external guidance to the inner guidance that may not be working as it should. It is up to the individual or the individuals circle/group to embrace this or not.

I tried to recently give guidance to such a group governed by a person I promoted in my last post, JC Kay. I was direct and up front, JC Kay and her circle did quite the opposite, in truth, were quite underhanded. It seems to be the order of the day, label people an undesirable who don't follow your agenda to then persecute. How many people are labelled an undesirable like conspiracy theorist to then persecute, often underhandedly these days? The Nazis did this and I am afraid many people today label people negative to then persecute in some way, often underhandedly. You can see why I try to stay away from perceptions of negatives and positives, these perceptions simply distort reality.

As expressed consciously and physically, this group thought I was trying to steal some of the light from them when all I was offering is giving them more light/guidance. Today, I have a number of very appreciative people I guide as I am myself appreciative of guidance. For some reason today, it is all about the internal guidance, in the process dispelling outer guidance often as something negative because it is of a different perspective.

Try to remember, the gift of insight is not necessarily linked or likened to a consciousness of enlightenment, especially when outer guidance is dispelled so quickly and underhandedly. When JC Kay said that she doesn't understand the positive response her circle has received, I find this a strange statement to make for a person of so greater insight as JC Kay often portrays.

Yes, give people hope in times of trauma by all means but not false hope. You may think that false hope is better than no hope, until that false hope is dashed. Yes, it is all written, but the writings are not set in concrete due to the numerous variations of what is written!!

This kind of openness is often seen by the western mind as something negative to once again dispel. The reason for this is it is well known that the western mind in all of us is easily offended, even in and even especially in regards to helpful guidance. Outer guidance is often shun because the western mind often sees outer guidance as a flaw to the inner guidance of the western mind. As it is known, the western mind often takes offence to being shown what they simply judge as flaws. You only focus on the strengths while ignoring the weaknesses, as is another trait of the western mind.

I am going to say something here that may offend some people. I often state that we should be learning from our past instead of suffering from our past. Which mind do you think in all of us is of learning from the past? I will give you a hint, it is not the western mind. It is the eastern mind in all of us that is of learning, wisdom and awareness. Make no mistake though, a consciousness/soul most often has to learn through suffering, this is where the western mind comes into it's own.

Think of yin and yang, inner and outer awareness working in unison and in balance with each other, but also be aware the the ego in control often distorts consciousness and reality to suite the agenda of the ego in control. JC Kay, in my mind, has a beautiful soul lost within an ego in control like many of us have or are still lost in, this is when outer guidance/awareness is most helpful if allowed to be.

Going Beyond the Inner Self Projection

Written by Mathew Naismith

We most often perceive an inner and outer self, the inner self being our truer being and the outer self being our projected being. The truer being or self pertains to the self that is not influenced by external environments, where the outer self is primarily of and created by our external environment. For example, our five senses are primarily of our outer self thus giving us a projected image of our outer environment. Our inner self at no time is influenced by our five senses thus giving us a projected image of our inner environment. Of course if you are totally reliant on the five senses, nothing beyond the five senses can be comprehended therefore exist, this is quite understandable.

When we talk about the inner self, this is still projecting an inner environment as opposed to an outer environment through the five senses. Only through the five senses can the existence of an inner and outer environment or self exist, this is because in out, back forth, up down, are all based on our five senses. Our five senses were created by our physical environment and our physical environment is completely determined to what is in out, back forth, up down, in other words time based realities or existences. We, through our five senses, have projected an existence of day and night on a revolving planet going around the sun. We are completely conditioned to a reality of days and nights therefore time. Is not the projection of day and night the same as the inner and outer self? The projection being, one is inner so the other is outer. This is still based primarily of the conditioning of the five senses.

As in night and day, we are still projecting an image of an inner and outer self which is still primarily based on time therefore our five senses. The inner self exist only because the outer self exists as in day only exists because night exists. These are simply projections governed by our physical environment, no more. Isn't the perception of an inner self reliant on the existence of an outer self, in other words the inner self owes it's existence to the perception of an outer self, as in day and night. Within this, we are still primarily reliant on a physical existence and time to give us a projected image of an inner self. Now imagine going beyond this projection.

I have inserted a small article bellow where Sadhguru mentions the inner self. In my own words, the atman, the eternal self, refers to the real self beyond ego; this is what is known as the inner self, a self in the absence of ego. This egoless self is projected to being inner only because the present environment we are experiencing is ego. The ego is projected as being of the outer self and the self in the absence of ego is projected as being the inner self. What makes an inner and outer state in the absence of ego? Ego completely relies on time to exist, in other words motion like in out, back forth, up down, starting and ending points. In a state in the absence of ego, inner and outer selves simply don't exist, only in existences based on time and motion can inner and outer selves exist. What we project to be our eternal self is not governed by time because in this state there is no starting or ending points, it's simply an eternal state of being. Instead of stating an eternal state of being, we most often state inner self, how else is the ego self going to relate to the eternal self otherwise? This is exactly like nothing beyond the five senses can be comprehended therefore exist, this is unless we use what the five senses comprehends, in out, back forth, up down, starting and ending points.

Once you comprehend the inner self, the eternal self, let go of this projection of the inner self. In reality though, once you truly comprehend the eternal self, there is no ego in control to stay attached to the projection of the inner self as opposed to the outer self.

I truly hope this is comprehensible as I am aware where this kind of awareness can lead.       

https://isha.sadhguru.org/in/en/wisdom/article/a-perception-beyond-the-physical

Extract: People are always asking me, “Sadhguru, you are talking about so many subjects. Where do you get the time to read?” I say, “I don’t read.” What is there in front of me, I perceive it as it is and that is it. There is no need to carry the burden of knowledge on your head if your perception is keen enough. So perception can be raised to various levels through certain inner instruments. “Is it very difficult? Can I rise beyond my senses? Do I have to withdraw to a Himalayan cave to do this?”