Written by Mathew Naismith
"When
one door closes, another opens; but we often look so long and so regretfully
upon the closed door that we do not see the one which has opened for us.
Alexander Graham Bell"
Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alexanderg409116.html
Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alexanderg409116.html
As one door closes, so too will another one
open, this is an inevitability that is governed by motion. It's sort of like
one of the laws of motion, for a door to close, another door has to be on the
verge of opening otherwise all motion becomes motionless. Could you imagine
being in a reality that you are fixed to because there is no motion to open
another door!! Motion naturally opens other doors, however, at times to open
other doors, excessive and extreme motions are needed to open these other
doors, I think this is what we are presently experiencing.
Meltdown: Recently, I experienced a mental meltdown, basically, my mind broke
down to an extent, it no longer wanted to cope with what I was presently focusing
on. In my situation, as soon as I become too unfocused from my inner being, the
mind couldn't handle this, my mind basically chucked a patty, meaning, my mind
became upset/disturbed. As soon as you condition yourself to focusing on your
inner being, this is what your mind becomes accustom to, anything other than
this, the mind becomes disturbed in a sense it becomes maladjusted to it's
present focus. In my case, I had to focus on something else other than my inner
being, the mind acted in accordance to this kind of motion thus creating a
mental meltdown.
It's like closing a door to your inner
being and reopening a door once closed. A mind conditioned to our inner being,
will react to a situation when the inner self is no longer the main focus. Its
like being rejected by beloved loved one's, such a rejection will incur a
unbecoming reaction of a kind. Yes, it feels apocalyptic because the mind is no
longer accustomed to this kind of motion. This in all isn't a bad or negative
sign, it's actually good sign that we have indeed begun to enter another door,
we are no longer accustomed to the door or reality we are closing. However, until
we fully close a door, we can never fully open another door, it's like being in
limbo or no man's land.
It's like a closet with two doors, shut one
door, the other door automatically opens. The harder or more motion we shut one
door with, the further the other door opens. We are collectively slamming one
door to a reality to fully open another door to another reality, by doing so,
our time in limbo should be shortened. This is how I think an existence in
motion works.
Motion: If our mind is conditioned to motion, this experience of limbo will
feel rather unsettled to us, however, if we conditioned our mind to motionlessness,
this state of limbo will feel comforting. The problem with this is now we will
feel uncomfortable in an existence of motion. To get around this, balance is
the key, a balance between motion and motionlessness. Condition your mind to
both motion and motionlessness, within this, every door we close to open
another door, will be less discomforting to us.
I recently lost this balance when I
conditioned my mind to balance. Yes, even when we condition ourselves to
balance, experiencing an imbalance will
incur a degree of discomfort brought about by the mind becoming disturbed in
some way. It's therefore also a good idea, while experiencing an existence of
motion, to condition yourself to imbalance as well. Yes, experiencing an
existence of motion is tricky in any sense, the trick is, balance within all
things.
Collectively, the present reality we are experiencing seems
to be apocalyptic, an a existence of self-destructiveness. What it truly is, is
that one door is being slammed shut to instantly open another door to anther
reality, of course we could do this more gently
but I don't think too many people want to expedience too much of limbo,
a state that is motionless, a state between two doors. The reason why a lot of
us don't like a state of motionlessness, is to do with conditioning ourselves
to motion, anything other than motion becomes discomforting to us.
Physicality: Motion is indeed related to physicality, a state of mind
conditioned to the preoccupation of physical being as opposed to inner being.
Of course the physical being is only opposed to the inner being when we become
too preoccupied with physical attributes and existences. All physical existence
is attributed to motion, so we could presume that all non-physical existence is attributed to
motionless, this of course isn't the case or so it seems.
You can indeed experience motion void of an
actual physical existence as in solid mass, the problem with this is that we
often relate physical existence with something solid or 3 dimensional. The
strange thing is, physical existence isn't reliant on mass, it reliant on
motion alone. Basically, motion can exist void of a solid form of mass, in
actuality, there are existences of motion that have no mass to speak of, these
realities are as much, if not more, physical than our own reality that is based
on mass. To me, motion creates physical existences, not mass.
So what's has this got to do with the
meltdown and the apocalypse, the closing of one door to open another?
Balance: Because we are conditioned to relating motion with mass, we will
open yet anther door to a reality based on mass. The reason for this lies in
our conditionings to physical being only being of mass when physical existences
are based on motion alone. Why do so many spiritual practices condition us to
the inner being? Of course no spiritual practices should condition us to our
inner being while fully negating our physical being in my mind. The reason for
this is there is no balance between our physical being and our inner being
within this, being that all being is who we are as a whole. It's wise to
balance the whole, not what we desire to be the whole....!!
The creation of the meltdown and the
apocalypse, is due to our reaction to our present reality. Being that our physical
being is a representative of our physical being (motion), our inner being must
be of our non-physical being (motionless). Any preoccupation of our physical
being, will naturally create meltdowns and apocalypses, this is inevitable,
especially when at the same time we negate or stay ignorant to our inner being.
The answer is simple, as I have personally
found out just recently once again, a balance between our inner being and our
physical being will negate the existence of a meltdown and an apocalypse.
Basically, balance between our physical and inner being nullifies or
neutralises the existence of meltdowns and apocalypses. Balance gives us the
key to the next door of evolution, otherwise all we will do is stay fixated to
the present reality, or, open another door to a reality of even more excessive
motion than our present reality. Yes, there are realities that exist that are
more ignorant to their inner being than our own, however, there too exists
realities that are far more aware than our own, the choice is indeed ours,
balance or imbalance of our inner and physical being.....
