Written by Mathew Naismith
There are infinite scenarios that can be experienced.
Infinite refers to endless numbers of choices which refers to freewill. If
there are infinite choices, there is freewill. Time alone, which is based on
starting and ending points, are limited to certain variables, even though these
variables can be of infinite scenarios. Even when the subtle body and
gross body are limited by starting and ending points, these scenarios that are
able to be experienced are not really limited. As I have stated a number of
times before, we have freewill but we don't, depending on how we
perceive.
Yes,
destiny seems to only affect gross and subtle bodies as destiny can only be
experienced in time, being that destiny relies on starting and ending points.
Only in relation to time can freewill seem non-existent, because of the
perception that time limits a consciousness to.
Time
= motion, space, finite consciousness, limitations, starting and ending points,
separation.
Timelessness
= motionlessness, spacelessness, infinite consciousness, unlimited, no starting
or ending points, oneness.
Actually,
in all, only the gross and subtle body limited by and to time can perceive that
we have no freewill, even when infinite scenarios therefore choices
therefore freewill obviously exist outside the limitations of time.
Can
a consciousness only conditioned to time perceive in a timeless mode of
thought? Utterly impossible no matter what is presented, this is why it is
pointless continually conducting ourselves in a one sided conversation. You
have made the fundamental mistake that time conditions a consciousness to,
especially when mentioning that I present evidence based only on time,
limitations, and, that freewill is only perceived by the gross body.
Actual
freewill is determined by states of timelessness, motionlessness,
spacelessness, infinite consciousness, unlimited, no starting or ending points,
oneness, not the other way around xxxxxxx.
You
seem to be chasing knowledge, where I simply allow for awareness to abode. You
are well read, where I am simply aware. I have actually read and studied very
little. I was told at a young age not to read and study, but to simply allow
awareness to abode by allowing awareness space to abode in. Giving space for
awareness to abode in simply takes one to release one from control of the ego
and being in control. To be perfectly honest, reading and studying is often of
taking control. Yes, read and study but do it in the absence of taking or being
controlled by what you read and study. When a consciousness is primarily
conditioned to time, this is virtually impossible to do. For starters, becoming
aware of this in states of time is virtually impossible.
You
are milking me, in other words trying to gain knowledge through me to gain more
control. I am not doing you any good in continuing this discussion, however, is
this discussion really to do with you as a singular entity trying to gain more
control?
No comments:
Post a Comment