Time; a Reflection of Eternity

Written by Mathew Naismith

Titus: “Eternity is not in a length, it is a briefer moment, it is full as much it can be.”

Me: “This is interesting Titus, we often look at eternity through the eye's of time, in the process giving eternity a perception of length as in time, volume, value, space, etc.

The definition of eternity; time without end.

We are relating and comparing eternity to time, now do the opposite, relate time through the eyes of eternity, you come up with a different perspective. Everything within time is a fleeting moment of eternity. Everything of time is a passing reflection of eternity.

You seem to have been guided well by your fathers wisdom Titus. You can read all you like in the absence of wisdom, within this only of what you desire can only be learnt.”

Titus: “Time/sequential time can never measure eternity. Humanity is engaged in envisioning eternity, it is usually somewhere far and distant, it is never here. Eternity is more a converging event, it happens as many wholes all around. Seeing it as somewhere far turns it all unreal.”

Me: “I find it interesting Titus how some of us can see this, that you can't measure or size up eternity at the same time seeing eternity all around us. Science; you can't destroy energy, which makes it eternal, but you can change what energy transforms into. Some of us can perceive to some extent from the eternal, scientifically and spiritually.”

What would have to occur to change the present situation of excessive focus on time based existence, where life itself is based primarily on time?

Without uttering a word, the eternal consciousness would just have to become present in time to us and all of what time based reality created would become non-consequential, leading then to a reality based eternal consciousness. The more intense a consciousness becomes focused on time based reality, the bigger the impact of an eternal consciousness presence. It is good to see so many people more of an eternal consciousness than a time based consciousness.

Freedom from Time

Written by Mathew Naismith

There are infinite scenarios that can be experienced. Infinite refers to endless numbers of choices which refers to freewill. If there are infinite choices, there is freewill. Time alone, which is based on starting and ending points, are limited to certain variables, even though these variables can be of infinite scenarios. Even when the subtle body and gross body are limited by starting and ending points, these scenarios that are able to be experienced are not really limited. As I have stated a number of times before, we have freewill but we don't, depending on how we perceive. 

Yes, destiny seems to only affect gross and subtle bodies as destiny can only be experienced in time, being that destiny relies on starting and ending points. Only in relation to time can freewill seem non-existent, because of the perception that time limits a consciousness to.  

Time = motion, space, finite consciousness, limitations, starting and ending points, separation. 

Timelessness = motionlessness, spacelessness, infinite consciousness, unlimited, no starting or ending points, oneness. 

Actually, in all, only the gross and subtle body limited by and to time can perceive that we have no freewill, even when infinite scenarios therefore choices therefore freewill obviously exist outside the limitations of time. 

Can a consciousness only conditioned to time perceive in a timeless mode of thought? Utterly impossible no matter what is presented, this is why it is pointless continually conducting ourselves in a one sided conversation. You have made the fundamental mistake that time conditions a consciousness to, especially when mentioning that I present evidence based only on time, limitations, and, that freewill is only perceived by the gross body.

Actual freewill is determined by states of timelessness, motionlessness, spacelessness, infinite consciousness, unlimited, no starting or ending points, oneness, not the other way around xxxxxxx. 

You seem to be chasing knowledge, where I simply allow for awareness to abode. You are well read, where I am simply aware. I have actually read and studied very little. I was told at a young age not to read and study, but to simply allow awareness to abode by allowing awareness space to abode in. Giving space for awareness to abode in simply takes one to release one from control of the ego and being in control. To be perfectly honest, reading and studying is often of taking control. Yes, read and study but do it in the absence of taking or being controlled by what you read and study. When a consciousness is primarily conditioned to time, this is virtually impossible to do. For starters, becoming aware of this in states of time is virtually impossible. 

You are milking me, in other words trying to gain knowledge through me to gain more control. I am not doing you any good in continuing this discussion, however, is this discussion really to do with you as a singular entity trying to gain more control?  

Going Beyond Time Based Perceptions

Written by Mathew Naismith

Once you are able to perceive beyond time based realities therefore consciousness, having a discussion with people, whose consciousness is only of time based realities, about life as a whole becomes quite difficult or awkward. Should you expect to have a reasonable discussion with an atheist or a scientist conditioned only to time based realities, consciousness? Time limits our consciousness to only part of life as a whole, so discussing life as a whole, which includes realities and consciousness beyond time, is going to be difficult in some way at times. When you realise this, having a discussion with other people about life as a whole becomes a lot easier. At no time expect a consciousness, conditioned only to time based perceptions and perspectives, to comprehend what you are trying to relay to them.  

The discussion continues.......

        

Man naturally bases his perceptions and perspectives on bias, often in line with his desires, this is also of natural law in regards to bias and desires. Natural law isn't just to do with 100% pure, natural law is to do with everything natural, as it is natural for a bias consciousness to perceive everything around it in a certain way, often inline with its desires or conditioning. You seem to desire that natural law is only to do with 100% pure, or in this case 100% truth, a huge mistake in my mind.

I would prefer 5% honest truth, a truth in the absence of bias, to 100% truth based primarily on bias and desires. This is the big difference between you and me. Another big difference is that natural law to me isn't based on 100% pure only. There are deep sea fish that will deceptively lure their pray to their death. As of bias and desire that naturally creates human deception, so it is of creatures of nature. It is as natural to be of deception as it is to be of truth. The laws of oneness don't deceptively separate one from the other, just because one is desired to be 100% pure and the other not.

What you seem to be totally ignoring is a state of timelessness, where all of what is, is only in the present. Reason is only effective in time, not timelessness xxxxxxxx, therefore there is freewill, the will to choose which scenario one will experience, however, no matter what the scenario is, it is already written as the Koran points to.

As there are states of time and timelessness, there are states of freewill and states in the absence of freewill. You can't ignore or throw away yin in favour of yang, in other words ignore an undesired in favour of a desired 100%......

You can't also base natural law just on the material world or environment as a whole, no matter how natural the material world proves your points. You seem to be only basing your points purely on time, the material world. The material world around us doesn't prove too much of the immaterial, as it is of natural law that one can't be in the presence of the other, for one would neutralise the other. However, one is never not of the other!!

We exist in different worlds, but worlds not disconnected from or in opposition to each other, we really need to leave it at that xxxxxxxx.

OK, look at it like this in relation to freewill. Our motion is determined by our environment, this means our will is always determined by our environment, giving us a perception that we don't have freewill. Now, imagine that you are not a separate entity to your environment, no matter what the environment is. This is how Yogis, shamans and alike can influence their environment, they become aware that their environment is who they are, it is all of one entity making real choices, not separate entities influencing your choices. The external environment is seen as your internal environment as well, no matter what we desire our own separate environment to be of. I have lost count how many spiritually aware people describe their external environment being separate or different to their internal environment.  

If you perceive you are separate to your environment, that the environment you are experiencing is a separate entity to you, your choice is made up for you, giving a perception that you don't have freewill. If you think that you are a separate entity to your environment, yes, there is no freewill. 

So many so-called spiritually aware people today make this fundamental mistake, that they are a separate entity to their environment, often in line with their desires/bias. I have lost count how many people are trying to escape their present environment, or, refuse to become aware that they are their environment, even of environments they are unaware of. 

It comes down to this xxxxxxxx, you have to be aware of when to move on from a discussion and when to continue a discussion. 

You are not getting it xxxxxxxx, either not willing to get it or unable to become aware of where I am coming from. Yogis, shamans and alike are able to become apart of any environment, either that be of a past, present or future. When everything is of the present, destiny has no influence upon you, but you have an influence upon destiny, however, when you are influenced by all the laws you mention, destiny influences you. The laws you so often refer to limit consciousness to certain variables, however, a consciousness not governed by time therefore destiny is of infinite variables.  

"Can you give me an example of an action that is based on my freewill at any moment? An example like: I want coffee or tea now, do I have freewill? Do I have a choice?"

You still want me to produce material examples based, not just primarily on time but purely on time!!  Forget about time, destiny, past and future and all the so-called natural laws xxxxxxxx, and then come back to me. All that you are referring to time and time again is a consciousness purely based on time. Unless you can make reference to a consciousness beyond time based realities, this discussion is only a one sided discussion, as it always has been. I am actually showing you a great deal of patience, more than you could imagine. No yogi or shaman would continually become involved in a one sided discussion like this, especially with the same person over and over again on the exact same topics.

Do you have any idea how frustrating it is when after how long you still want me to produce examples purely based on time? I am either failing you or you are failing yourself, failing to go beyond time based reality!! As I stated before, once you can perceive past time based realities, come back to me, not before xxxxxxxx. 

Consciousness of an Enlightened One

Written by Mathew Naismith

An enlightened one (person) is confronted with a positive loving person and a negative hateful person, according to the ego, within their own immediate environment. Neither person is treated any different to the other. So wouldn't the enlightened one feel negative vibrations from the person who is negative and hateful, and positive vibrations from the person who is positive and loving?

If you understand this kind of enlightened consciousness, you will be aware that this kind of consciousness is unable to feel negative or positive vibrations, for all separation of negatives and positives are determined and created by the ego. The only way that any consciousness can feel negative and positive vibrations, is to separate consciousness into parts. Of course the only part of us that does this is the ego. Make no mistake though, only the ego can determine if the ego is negative because of it's separation of consciousness. The main natural attribute of the ego is to separate thus create motion, therefore all that is motion is ego.

Take speeding along in a car, the ego has separated its immediate environment, the vehicle, from the rest of the environment. The perception of speed can only be determined through the separation of one environment from another.   

https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2536852 

We might then think to get from one point to another we need motion which relates to distance/space therefore time.

Motion is not time but can be determined or influenced by time, however, ego directly relates to motion but motion is not always related to time. Why? I remember hearing about a traveller who stopped in one town in outback Australia, who saw the same exact aboriginal boy in one town than in another hundreds of kilometres away in the same day. Consciousness, even being of time, isn't always determined by the factors of distance therefore time, but motion is always determined or created by the ego. The ego determined to be in one place one minute and in another place in another minute.  

For the enlightened one, a consciousness that is not determined or influenced by time, motion or ego, therefore not of separation, will understandably treat each person as being simply expressive of motion therefore ego.

Is one vibration or motion more pleasant or unpleasant than another? To an enlightened one, all that one is aware of is that one existence is of the ego (motion), and the other of egoless (motionless), all else is simply a perception created by the ego. In saying this, there is still no separation of the ego or egoless consciousness.

How many people today think we all came from a starting point, being it love and light, a state absent of the ego or of some higher state of being? Considering this higher state not to be determined by time/motion, when did the starting point of a lower consciousness begin in a timeless motionless state? As of the egoless self, the ego self has always existed, it's just that the ego can seem more in motion within time. Make no mistake, the ego always desires to be of some kind of higher state of being, and to have only started off from this higher state.

In all honesty, the ego can just as much if not more so be expressional of motion in the absence of time. As what we call physical is not really all that physical compared to other existences, just denser within its motion, within its physicality. When a consciousness is determined by time, the consciousness in this kind of motion naturally becomes denser; giving the experiencer an incorrect perception of what represents a physical existence. All of what is physical within the universe is simply a reflection of what is truly physical, of the ego. Time doesn't determine what is more physical, but motion/ego does. Time simply makes a consciousness denser in motion, not more physical.

Think on this. A mathematician will often visualise a mathematical formula to then express this visualisation in a denser format which is then determined by time, space and distance. An architect or inventor will do the same, thus creating what seemed non-physical into something physical, something that takes up space therefore is determined to be more physical, not just simply denser!!

So why doesn't an enlightened one treat or see a difference in a negative hatful person compared to a positive loving person? As of myself, a very difficult conscious state to truly comprehend to any great extent, probably because of our conscious conditioning to motions determined by time. 

Self-Honesty

Written by Mathew Naismith

Most often our past determines our future and most often our past, especially when related to trauma in some way, to something we desire to stay unaware of, isn't something we desire to be self-honest with. So what do we do? We only live within the present while saying the past and future are irrelevant or an illusion. This is while time is the predominant influence in our everyday life at present!! See how dishonest we can be to ourselves? Time of course represents a past, present and future, a state of union instead of separation, especially the separation of one energy source from another to escape facing our traumas personally and collectively.

It is common practice for a consciousness in trauma, either personally or collectively, to use every means possible to escape facing trauma. Of course to do this, we must turn away from being of self-honesty and become dishonest with ourselves, and of course everybody else.             

https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/finding-true-refuge/201703/radical-self-honesty

Extract: Throughout history, deception has been an effective survival strategy. Yet, like all primitive survival strategies, when deception becomes habitual and is not directly about survival, it prevents us from continuing growth. For each of us, to the degree that we are not real with ourselves or that we withhold important truths from others, we just cannot keep evolving.

I wrote the following reply to a query in relation to my last post, "Assisting a Consciousness in Trauma".  

Basically, what you are doing is guiding them instead of pushing them towards a goal.

My father was trained to do this as a foreman. I tend to do this myself, my downfall is I also express self-honesty, it is funny how this psychologically freaks people out. Actually, when it does freak people out, their reactions tell me a lot about them. It is not that people react, it is how they react and what they react to. 

Our consciousness collectively isn't conditioned to being self-honest. How many of us don't look at what our own country/culture has done and is doing to others in the world, but we will point the finger at other cultures. Bringing a person out of the affects of trauma takes one to become gradually self-honest, not an easy thing to face, especially when we are conditioned to be self-dishonest with ourselves.

I have someone at present under my wing that is not good physically and mentally, the fits, blackouts and the scaring to the brain certainly don't help. I am slowly coaxing (guiding) them to be self-honest without causing more anxiety attacks.

This has done it, I am going to right up something about self-honesty. 

Spiritually, how dare I turn to science and psychology for the answers, this is while our minds are predominantly influenced psychology. On the other hand, how dare I turn to spirituality for the answers, even though science has proven a number of spiritual practices to be highly beneficial to us!! From atheism/materialism to spirituality/religion, dishonesty predominantly influences our lives, this is instead of self-honesty.

The article I have inserted is worth reading through, but only if you are a self-honest atheist/materialist or spiritual/religious, etc, person. If you are not into self-honesty, the article supplied will only represent a threat to your psyche and be promptly denounced in some way. Yes, by all means go into protective state of mind but do this honestly. All that dishonesty will create, either personally or collectively, is more of the same trauma, if not to you someone else.

Yes, I can get into a conscious state of timelessness, where there is no past or future, only the present moment, a state perceived by my ego to be of utter bliss.  At no time is this separate to time where a past and future exist. Of course when a consciousness experiences time, a past and future, trauma is sure to exist as time is of cycles and endless changes. Spirituality is about how you cope with the associated trauma in relation to time, not how you try to escape from time and times association with trauma. I could not think of a higher level of fear and self-deceptiveness, which spiritually is suppose to be not about, or am I simply being naive here?

A number of people might relate better to the following article. 

https://medium.com/@zaiderrr/why-you-should-practice-brutal-self-honesty-3b6088e05346

Extract: The topic of brutal self-honesty is consciously looked upon as worthy of pursuing but the majority of people don’t have the emotional maturity to follow through with such a concept.

Brutal self-honesty requires hard, emotional labor. It requires the individual to engage with the following:

Ego Dissolution

The ego wants you to stay unconscious. It doesn’t want you to be brutally honest with yourself because that means that the ego must change and change is not what it wants —comfort is what the ego wants.

A consciousness outside the square

Written by Mathew Naismith

"This is the first lesson ye should learn. There is so much good in the worst of us, and so much bad in the best of us, it doesn't behoove any of us to speak evil of the rest of us. This is a universal law, and until one begins to make application of same, one may not go very far in spiritual or soul development." 

Edgar Cayce

The following makes reference to past lives (reincarnation), the phenomena of time and ancient Egypt. Keep in mind that I have an open mind that is often free of our present conscious limitations. It is okay to think I am delusional, I just see it being able to look outside the square, outside our present conscious conditioning. The following is copy of a discussion I had with another person who is also able to look outside the square. It is quite a long post though, sorry for that.      

Reply

The ancient Egyptians felt all souls are offered two paths.

People can enter into the process of reincarnation and learn life's spiritual truths in this physical dimension. Or they can choose to remain in the spiritual realm.

The Egyptians associated Osiris with the reincarnation path I think. This is interesting for me because Edgar Cayce was I believe the reincarnation of Osiris. And reincarnation was one of the central themes for Edgar Cayce.

Cayce had the ability to tell people about their past lives going back to Egypt and even Atlantis. And he didn't just tell them about their past lives. He told them how those experiences were affecting them in their current life and the deeper meaning about those experiences.

Here's a classic book about reincarnation. During a past life experience in Egypt Elisabeth Haich experienced the Egyptian initiation rites. She was shown her future lifetimes and given the choice of whether or not she wanted to have those experiences in this physical world.

Elisabeth Haich chose to have those experiences even though it would involve a lot of suffering.

Initiation
[Paperback – July 28, 2000]
by Elisabeth Haich

https://www.amazon.com/Initiation-Elisabeth-Haich/dp/0943358507/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1539097902&sr=1-1&keywords=initiation+by+elizabeth+haich

There's theories about what exactly reality is.

Some people say there are an infinite number of universes. Although I have read and believe there are 12 universes.

However the following message gets into some very strange questions about the nature of time.

Time is a very mysterious subject that is not well understood by scientists today.

There are strange theories about reincarnation like people can be reincarnated into any time period past or future or even live the same life over again to try to change something they deeply regret.

The idea that someone could live the same life over again raises many strange a paradoxical questions about the true nature of time. It implies that time is something other than a strictly sequential, linear process.

It also implies that everyone, everything, and really the entire universe exists in an infinite number of possible futures which may or may not actually play out in this physical dimension. Because to be reincarnated for the same life and change even one thing creates a different path into the future.

If I recall correctly Edgar Cayce said he repeated a life experience in the American Old West time period. During the first incarnation Edgar used his psychic abilities in bad ways like to win money gambling. That incarnation ended in disaster for Edgar. Then when Edgar repeated that incarnation he lived his life differently.

This starts to get into questions that are far beyond human comprehension I think. It may be an indication of how all of our destinies are intertwined in ways that are very subtle and complex.

The Lives of Edgar Cayce
[Paperback – August 1, 1995]
by W. H. Church

https://www.amazon.com/Lives-Edgar-Cayce-W-Church/dp/0876043503/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1539097838&sr=1-1&keywords=the+lives+of+edgar+cayce

My Reply

As of always, very informative Jeff, thank you.

Yes, if we limit ourselves to only living one life that is all we will remember, this of course doesn't mean we only lived one life. It's the same with astral travelling, they say everyone astral travels, it's just we are unaware of it or choose to be unaware of it.

I was aware I had a choice in how I was going to lead the rest of my life from my late teens. I chose ignorance over awareness, or, a common normal life to a spiritual life. I didn't like being able to ask any question and get an immediate correct answer. Sounds stupid doesn't it but it's true. Being able to ask any question and get a correct answer out of the blue felt normal within myself but it wasn't normal in regards to the rest of my environment.

However, I tried to be average in relation to my environment, this did not always eventuate. I at one time I could feel and know of the thoughts and feelings of perpetrators and victims of crime. Not the best of experiences to have but it gave me a better understanding of how human consciousness works.

Yes, souls can choose to exist as a God (immortal) or of a mortal being. Can a soul that chose a mortal existence choose at any time a God like existence? Time is a strange phenomena, can you go back from choosing an immortal or mortal existence again and choose differently? It's the same as choosing to relive a life again in my mind.

I always smile at one of my lives in ancient Egypt, even when we ended being separated and banished in outlying areas of Egypt. We were so aware and consciously advanced compared to the rest of our environment. Being banished was a part of our lives at the time.

NOTE: Unable at this time to fix the font to the rest of this post, my apologies.  

Reply

Wow it sounds like you can remember a past life.

Even though consciously most people don't remember their past lives the memories are still there in our subconscious nonetheless.

Some people can be put into the deep hypnotic state required for past life recall.

I've been able to find out about quite a few of my past lives.

I've been wondering if I was a guy named Imhotep in a past life in Egypt. I don't know if that's correct but I think it could be true.

The name Imhotep means 'I come in peace !'.

One of the best books I've ever read about mysterious subjects is called Initiation by Elisabeth Haich. Elisabeth experienced the Egyptian initiation rites thousands of years ago. Because of those experiences she was able to remember her past life in Egypt in vivid detail.

Elisabeth said she witnessed spaceships arriving in Egypt. I can't remember who she said came to Egypt in this way but Imhotep may have been one of those people.

It's interesting because the Egyptologists cannot find any references about Imhotep's parents and things like this. It's like this guy just appeared out of nowhere.

This is all very strange for me. Because I did not come to this world in a spaceship.

What could it mean? That somehow in another life I was some sort of advanced entity living on another planet ?

https://www.amazon.com/Same-Soul-Many-Bodies-Progression/dp/0743264347/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1539200977&sr=1-1

My Reply

I concur with everything you have stated here Jeff. Our group was in direct contact to what humans call Gods at the time; I remember how amazing it was in comparison to the rest of the environment at the time. As of today, so many people were kept in the dark to serve the ego of the very few.

It seemed so natural to be a part of this kind of aware consciousness, in fact human consciousness seemed unnatural to us. As of today, I am still trying to help human consciousness to become more aware of itself. Will I be banished again by the same repressive consciousness? When you are dealing with an ego that is completely in control and controlling of most of the populous, anything can happen.

It is sad that we have to become aware of our truer being through books and workshops when it should just come to us. We have always been what we become aware of, it's that we have simply forgotten.

I am thinking of sharing our interaction here if that is alright with you. Yes, a lot of people are kept in the dark but there are a lot of people who are not kept entirely in the dark as well.

What was disappointing of the Pharaohs and their constituents is that the Pharaohs could have created something far more grandiose than they did. To lead human consciousness out of the dark and into the light would have been amazing.

Of course what they actually did was quite the opposite. As they were warned, don't excessively abuse energy, which of course included conscious energy. I remember them paying a huge price for their indiscretions, not unlike we are today. You could say abusing energy like this is sacrilegious (profane) to consciousness as a whole.

Reply

There are a few people I can think of who I believe remembered their past life experiences in Egypt.

One was Edgar Cayce. Edgar was I believe the great Osiris and also Ra returned to our modern world. And I don't think there's ever been anyone else like him.

Edgar told how him and his wife 'Isis' (a lovely temple dancer) were kicked out of Egypt. Edgar had another wife but when he saw Isis he could not resist her. This was a violation of the laws of monogamy that Ra Ta himself had set up in Egypt.

Two other people I can think of who wrote about their past life experiences in Egypt are Elisabeth Haich and Earlyne Chaney. I found both of their books fascinating.

Egyptian Heritage: Based on the Edgar Cayce Readings
[Paperback – June 1, 1974]
by Mark Lehner

https://www.amazon.com/Egyptian-Heritage-Based-Edgar-Readings/dp/0876040717/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1539225667&sr=1-1&keywords=egyptian+heritage

Speaking with the Universe

Written by Mathew Naismith

An actual act in speaking with, not to, the universe seems like a strange concept or perception does it not? Not to a lot of people. To a lot of people, talking with the universe is talking directly to God or source of creation. To a lot of other people it's more to do with oneness, being that all energy isn't perceived to be separate but of one source. Only to the ego is energy perceived to be only of separate entities, therefore only of the ego is time and space perceived thus creating a perception of separate entities. It is then quite understandable why time is going to quickly these days, how much separation is perceived these days by the collective consciousness?

The separation and division between rich and poor is greater.

The separation and division between negative and positive is greater.

The separation and division between light and dark is greater.

How much above do we portray human physical beauty above all other beauty? This is all simply an abuse of energy through separation and division.

Yes, media has brought us more together, to simply show how separate we are to each other!! Through the media, we seem to perceive more through separation and division in what is positive and negative, bad and good, wrong and right, black and white. How many people, through mass communication (media), are now trying to separate themselves more from the present negative (toxic) reality? Of course time is going to be perceived to go quicker, energy as a whole is separated into so many different divisions.

Imagine yourself within a universe that has no stars or planets, within this reality there is no separation of energy into any kind of individual entities. Within this state, what would then define time? With no perceptions of separation of energy, time doesn't just slow down, it ceases to exist. Now, what does the perception of time going faster and faster denote? The answer is obvious, the act of separating energy more and more. The perception of time going faster certainly isn't a sign of less separation and division but more separation and division of energy. The controlling ego has deceived many of us to perceive that we are becoming more at one and of unconditional love when in truth, the perception of time going faster and faster tells the true story in this.

This is exactly why people like me, who observe human consciousness, observe it as a consciousness lost within its own creation. When it is said that this is the age of false prophets, they mean that the ego in control will be at its most deceptive and receptive to deceit. Human consciousness will simply deceive its own consciousness, this is while the signs, like the perception of time quickening, clearly tell us we are being deceived. In a way, this is the universe, an undivided energy source, speaking to us and telling us that we are deceiving ourselves. How can you talk about oneness and unconditional love, while at the same time trying to separate yourself from everything that doesn't make you feel good?

Is this why so many parents these days don't chastise their children, it doesn't feel good for the parent to personally to do so, even though it's good for the child? We have simply separated what is good for us personally to what is good for the child. Being as one is what is good for the child is also good for the parent, no matter what the parent has to sacrifice for the good of the collective, of the family as a whole. We are simply individualising reality to serve individual desires. This is the controlling ego.

Consider the universe. The universe has many children as in many galaxies, solar systems, suns, planets and many other entities such as black holes. The universe works as one while at the same time each entity within this universe also works individually. Children within a family unit act as individuals while being a part of a family unit, a collective. What humans don't often perceive is that we are a part of a family unit called the universe. How many of us have even separated ourselves from Gaia, mother Earths family. Within our ongoing separation, we are abusing energy and hurting the family unit, the Earth itself!!

I must make a correction here; it's the Western mind in all of us that doesn't see itself as part of a family unit in regards to the universe and even Gaia, this is because the Western mind is all about individualisation, the separation of energy. Note: To separate yourself from the Western mind is of the Western mind of individuation; this is why the Eastern mind, while being of the Eastern mind, will not separate one mind from the other. Imagine the universe itself separating itself from its own children, its own creations, because each creation of the universe also works individually to the universe but not separate from universe. No matter how individually the Western mind works separate to the mind over all, it's still working within the mind as a unit, a collective.  It's the same within the universe. No matter how individually human consciousness divides itself from the universe as a whole, human consciousness is still working within the universe.

Imagine communicating with the universe itself exactly like you would with another person, the only exception being that the ego is not in control. When you take away the desires and attachments of a controlling ego, like perceptions of negatives and positives, light and dark, God and man, in other words all separations and divisions of energy as a whole, communicating with the universe one on one becomes easy. What occurs when you have no sense of separation with your parents? Communication becomes easy; the Eastern mind relates this to the universe as well, remember though, the Western mind won't as this is its natural state to individualise and divide like all the entities within the universe seem to be.

I am presently in a state where I have no desire to separate myself from a state of separation, to desire this would be of separation and division and we should know what separation and division of energy creates. The world at present is a prime example. Simply being aware of my own collectiveness with the universe as whole is well and truly all I need at present in my life. Avoid at all cost in any concept, ideology or ism that is all about the separation and division of energy in any sense. The collective human consciousness, in my mind, needs more union not less, especially to be able to hear what the universe is trying to say. How often, as children, don't' we hear what our parents have to say when not working in unison and harmony with our parents, with the family unit as a whole? The same is with the universe, however, the Western mind in all of us won't want to comprehend this, this is why the balance between the Western and Eastern thinking is always wise in my mind.

By the way, many people say they are speaking to and not with God or the universe; this is also a sign of separation and division. To hear the universe speak, you must be speaking with the universe; everything else is a fallacy, a deception by individual entities within the universe itself.      

            

https://www.craigbeck.com/hear-the-universe-speaking/

Extract: Good & Bad Don’t Exist

Did the city worker do a bad thing? No. As we have previously stated, good and bad are always subjective, the homeless man may have used that money to clean himself up and eat a decent meal, or he could just have likely spent it on alcohol or hard drugs. No act is either good or bad, but rather it is a decision that either serves us or it doesn’t serve us.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLh02XFm4ww

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVX36aPq-10

Living Consciousness

Written by Mathew Naismith

There are a number of different sources of information in relation to living consciousness, each has their own views on living consciousness but what is living consciousness? I have included two sources in relation to this topic further on in my post.

Living consciousness is basically perceived as representing an energy source in motion while in participation; this is instead of a consciousness not in motion. To get an idea what represents a consciousness in motion and not in motion, imagine being an observer to participation. Being a participator is obviously of motion, however, being an observer judging or perceiving, for example, a negative or positive, is also of participation. Full on observation is observing participation void of any motion (participation) what so ever. Participation refers directly to motion therefore a living consciousness, however, as I will explain further on in this post, this only represents a consciousness that is half alive, half aware.

So does this mean a consciousness not of motion is dead as opposed to living?

In true state of observation therefore motionlessness/timelessness, nothing is in opposition as there are no perceptions of opposites. In this state everything is as one, for only in time is there starting and ending points therefore opposing forces like birth and death, light and dark, high and low, etc. Does consciousness actually go into a state of death from a state of life after our demise? Time, therefore motion and participation, tells us it does but timelessness, therefore motionlessness and observation, tells us something quite different. If you perceive that a major shift in energy flows from one state to another, like from birth to death, is a state where consciousness dies, a complete state of death is perceived. However, when we truly observe without participation, no true form of separation of one state to another has occurred. In a state of observation there are no perceptions, there is only awareness void of any separation therefore motion what so ever.

Perceived living consciousness = motion + participation + time + perceptions + separation

Non-living consciousness = motionlessness + observation + timelessness + awareness + oneness

It's really advisable not to perceive that a non-living consciousness is dead or represents the death of a consciousness. Within this state you actually become more alive as you become more aware. Yes, there is a connection with being aware and life. How aware is an insect to life, to its own existence, than man? Man is more aware of life than an insect, however, how many people are aware of an existence of consciousness after death? It's as though we are only half alive when not of the awareness of consciousness's existence after our so-called death. We are basically living in participation wile excluding observation, a separation of participation and observation. What occurs when we become more observant? We become more aware even in our present state!!

Living consciousness actually refers to both motions and motionlessness, time and timelessness, participation and observation, etc, void of separation of one to the other. 

A good way to practice in observation is to go on an internet forum and simply observe without judgment. It's a lot better if you observe what you perceive to be negative in some way; this can include anything that questions your own personal and professional beliefs/concepts to anyone's actions that disgusts you. Condition your consciousness to wholly observe at first and when you feel comfortable in observation, interact/participate with other people. Note, when in participation, avoid any participation with anyone who is obvious within their aggression towards you at first. You will soon be able to participate with people who are obvious within their aggression latter on. It's actually advisable to do this, only when comfortable to do so, as this will condition you to then observe your own participation under duress or strain. Yes, you will have to still block some people. I don't ignore people while in participation; I see this as being rude and disrespectful so I block certain people instead but only after a certain amount of interaction.                                

http://www.sunypress.edu/p-5291-living-consciousness.aspx

Extract: Throughout the work, Barnard offers “ruminations” or neo-Bergsonian responses to a series of vitally important questions such as: What does it mean to live consciously, authentically, and attuned to our inner depths? Is there a philosophically sophisticated way to claim that the survival of consciousness after physical death is not only possible but likely?

https://zenhabits.net/wake-up-a-guide-to-living-your-life-consciously/

Extract: Living consciously is about taking control of your life, about thinking about your decisions rather than making them without thought, about having a life that we want rather than settling for the one that befalls us.

_______________________________

I don't actually conform to taking control of our life. For me, it's more about letting go of control of motions; this gives us more free will to choose how we want to live our lives while living a life in motion. You really don't have to be in control therefore controlled by motion to be of a living consciousness.......        

Simultaneous Existence part3

Written by Mathew Naismith

Philosophical presentism is the view that neither the future nor the past exist.^[1] In some versions of presentism, this view is extended to timeless objects or ideas (such as numbers). According to presentism, events and entities that are wholly past or wholly future do not exist at all. 
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_presentism

You project aspects of your consciousness into many different timeframes, simultaneously. You, at the human level, receive information from your other selves, in different amounts and at different moments, as you need them. There is much more influencing us than what we recognize.

Source: http://goldenageofgaia.com/2016/03/29/we-are-living-a-simultaneous-existence/

Time = motion

Timelessness = motionless

It's impossible for a simultaneous existence to exist while we have a perception of time, of course time being of motion. The perception of motion gives us an idea that everything is governed by time, basically, everything is governed and perceived through motion. The perception of motion then gives us a perception of a past and future, within this singular perception, simultaneous existence is impossible, however, time, therefore motion, is only one part of what we are apart of as a whole. We must also consider our motionless self, our self that is not governed by the perception of time therefore motion.

Time as we know it seems to be man made. We live on a planet that revolves around a sun that gives us a perception of day and night, of course this perception of time is created from motion, the motion of a revolving planet, however time is not just governed by a revolving planet, distance or space also determines time and motion. Man didn't create this universe that is predominantly governed by motion therefore time. It is obvious man didn't create time as he didn't create motion. Man instead is governed by time and motion, this is all, and it's this influence that denies the possibility of being of a simultaneous existence.

It's basically a time (motion) based consciousness denying the existence of a timeless (motionless) based existence. Now, how many timeless based consciousness's deny the existence of time based existences, time being an illusion which was created by man? Within this perception, all time based existences are an illusion, however, time based consciousness's also perceive that timeless based existences are an illusion, which perception is right over the other? Neither, because we really exist within a simultaneous existence, existences of time and timelessness, of motion and motionlessness void of the denial of other existences. Only a limited consciousness would deny an existence of other existences not of it's own existence or comprehension!!

Where is our balance? It has to be one or the other, not a simultaneous existence of time/motion and timelessness/motionlessness. This again is a black and white mentality which I don't conform to. Where is the balance between our motion and motionless existences when one is an illusion and the other is not an illusion? Which one is the illusion to what conscious existence either of time or timelessness? Of course one will always state the other is the illusion, until you realise we do indeed exist within a simultaneous existence, not one or the other.        

A time based consciousness states that timeless based existences are an illusion, only time based existences truly exist.

A timeless based consciousness states time based existences are an illusion, only timeless based existences truly exist.       

   

It is wise to remember that time, therefore motion, was not created by man, man is only a participator of time, not the creator of time.

Time = participation

Timelessness = observer

I thought the following response, to my last post, from a good internet friend of mine was interesting.

If one's Memory is good, one can remember many lifetimes and even other dimensional life's and forms that are not human. There is also the between realms.

ms world besides. It all is complicated in human form to remember and can cause problems if one has lost their balance.

My reply

Absolutely Michael, well stated.

I don't think human consciousness itself is able to comprehend anything beyond it's own existence, if it tries to do so, one can cause oneself unnecessary trauma. What makes human consciousness human is it's limitations.

However, we are certainly not just of human existence and consciousness, we are all of what is. Within this knowing state, we are able to comprehend, to one extent or another, other existences, basically becoming aware of our whole being.

As the world around us is going to hell, people like us are becoming more aware of our truer being. We no longer feel we belong as the present existence is only a part of one part of our whole being, I think the present situation on Earth is bringing this awareness forward.

                                                                                                         

It would seem we have lost balance between human existence and all our other existences that represent our whole self, we are just not of one existence but of all existences. However, I do understand why human consciousness is unable to comprehend this. To comprehend this, we need a balance between this existence and all other existences. This just isn't occurring for a lot of us, we are becoming more human while denouncing all other existences that are also a part of us.

_______________________________

Through this, you get the idea  how infinite we really are as a whole, even within time itself as time based existences are endless within their motions, expressions and perceptions. As is timelessness infinite, so too is time within it's endless motion.

Freedom comes with the need to become aware of the whole, not what we desire the whole to be!!