Written by Mathew Naismith
Once you are able to perceive beyond time
based realities therefore consciousness, having a discussion with people, whose
consciousness is only of time based realities, about life as a whole becomes
quite difficult or awkward. Should you expect to have a reasonable discussion
with an atheist or a scientist conditioned only to time based realities,
consciousness? Time limits our consciousness to only part of life as a whole,
so discussing life as a whole, which includes realities and consciousness
beyond time, is going to be difficult in some way at times. When you realise
this, having a discussion with other people about life as a whole becomes a lot
easier. At no time expect a consciousness, conditioned only to time based
perceptions and perspectives, to comprehend what you are trying to relay to
them.
The discussion continues.......
Man
naturally bases his perceptions and perspectives on bias, often in line with
his desires, this is also of natural law in regards to bias and desires.
Natural law isn't just to do with 100% pure, natural law is to do with
everything natural, as it is natural for a bias consciousness to perceive
everything around it in a certain way, often inline with its desires or
conditioning. You seem to desire that natural law is only to do with 100% pure,
or in this case 100% truth, a huge mistake in my mind.
I
would prefer 5% honest truth, a truth in the absence of bias, to 100% truth
based primarily on bias and desires. This is the big difference between you and
me. Another big difference is that natural law to me isn't based on 100% pure
only. There are deep sea fish that will deceptively lure their pray to their
death. As of bias and desire that naturally creates human deception, so it is
of creatures of nature. It is as natural to be of deception as it is to be of
truth. The laws of oneness don't deceptively separate one from the other, just
because one is desired to be 100% pure and the other not.
What
you seem to be totally ignoring is a state of timelessness, where all of what
is, is only in the present. Reason is only effective in time, not timelessness xxxxxxxx, therefore there is freewill, the will to
choose which scenario one will experience, however, no matter what the scenario
is, it is already written as the Koran points to.
As
there are states of time and timelessness, there are states of freewill and
states in the absence of freewill. You can't ignore or throw away yin in favour
of yang, in other words ignore an undesired in favour of a desired 100%......
You
can't also base natural law just on the material world or environment as a
whole, no matter how natural the material world proves your points. You seem to
be only basing your points purely on time, the material world. The material
world around us doesn't prove too much of the immaterial, as it is of natural
law that one can't be in the presence of the other, for one would neutralise
the other. However, one is never not of
the other!!
We
exist in different worlds, but worlds not disconnected from or in opposition to
each other, we really need to leave it at that xxxxxxxx.
OK, look at it like this in relation to
freewill. Our motion is determined by our environment, this means our will is
always determined by our environment, giving us a perception that we don't have
freewill. Now, imagine that you are not a separate entity to your environment,
no matter what the environment is. This is how Yogis, shamans and alike can
influence their environment, they become aware that their environment is who
they are, it is all of one entity making real choices, not separate entities
influencing your choices. The external environment is seen as your
internal environment as well, no matter what we desire our own separate
environment to be of. I have lost count how many spiritually aware people
describe their external environment being separate or different to their
internal environment.
If you perceive you are separate to your environment,
that the environment you are experiencing is a separate entity to you, your
choice is made up for you, giving a perception that you don't have freewill. If
you think that you are a separate entity to your environment, yes, there is no
freewill.
So many so-called spiritually aware people today make
this fundamental mistake, that they are a separate entity to their environment,
often in line with their desires/bias. I have lost count how many people are
trying to escape their present environment, or, refuse to become aware that
they are their environment, even of environments they are unaware of.
It comes down to this xxxxxxxx, you have to be aware of
when to move on from a discussion and when to continue a discussion.
You are not getting it xxxxxxxx,
either not willing to get it or unable to become aware of where I am
coming from. Yogis, shamans and alike are able to become apart of any
environment, either that be of a past, present or future. When everything is of
the present, destiny has no influence upon you, but you have an influence upon
destiny, however, when you are influenced by all the laws you mention, destiny
influences you. The laws you so often refer to limit consciousness to certain
variables, however, a consciousness not governed by time therefore destiny is of
infinite variables.
"Can you give me an example of an action that is
based on my freewill at any moment? An example like: I want coffee or tea now,
do I have freewill? Do I have a choice?"
You still want me to produce material examples based, not
just primarily on time but purely on time!! Forget about time, destiny,
past and future and all the so-called natural laws xxxxxxxx, and then come back
to me. All that you are referring to time and time again is a consciousness
purely based on time. Unless you can make reference to a consciousness beyond
time based realities, this discussion is only a one sided discussion, as it
always has been. I am actually showing you a great deal of patience, more than
you could imagine. No yogi or shaman would continually become involved in a one
sided discussion like this, especially with the same person over and over again
on the exact same topics.
Do you have any idea how frustrating it is when after how
long you still want me to produce examples purely based on time? I am either
failing you or you are failing yourself, failing to go beyond time based
reality!! As I stated before, once you can perceive past time based realities,
come back to me, not before xxxxxxxx.
