Written by Mathew Naismith
One can never be too positive!!
In a known age of false prophets, if the
cover is not all glossy and glittery, what is in between the covers can't be
positive. You have to play up to each others ego's to be positive it would
seem, otherwise you are simply negative, something to penalise and/or incarcerate
in some way. Yes, it is the same old consciousness being played out. The
responses I receive at times is, well, hmmm. I responded to this as below.
"We
think quite differently on this matter PL. It is well known in psychology that
one can become too positive for a number of different reasons. Also, leaders
like Hitler and Trump are/were well and truly overly positive, what about
multinationals, etc!!
How
many people who think they are truly positive separate energy into positives
and negatives? I couldn't think of anything more negative, to separate energy
into various parts even further, most often to do with escapism which is
another factor.
How
many truly positive people ignore the negatives to retain a positive? Usually
at the cost of people being abused, Yemen
and Palestine
We
often use the positives to feed the ego even more, nothing more, you can't do
this while being in a neutral state of consciousness. In a true neutral state,
which I haven't attained myself, it is just energy, not negative and positive
energy. If you think in negatives and positives, you think in black and white,
which includes people. Often the conscious is unaware of how the subconscious
works so will deny this, as expected.
I
won't build up other people's ego on a lie, but I am often helpful in getting
people to look at life in a different way. Getting away from separating energy
more is but one of them. Yes, we could sit within our own created humour and
build up each others ego's, but not on the back of the abused, which in all
honesty is occurring even more today.
Sadly,
a lot of people in the west can't comprehend what a true neutral state is,
actually, a lot of ego's just simply don't won't to. Also, the fear of being negative is purely based on fear, which a lot of
excessively positive people have unknowingly got themselves into. Actually,
they simply don't won't to know and deceptively deny it to the bitter end.
The
ego will often judge by the cover. Even when between the covers have been read,
the cover still takes precedence. Often so-called self-proclaimed positive
people will only read the cover to feed their ego's even more, this is too
obvious.
The
funny thing is, I am personally known as a light hearted humorous person. It
has been known that women will come up to my wife and I and state I wish my
husband was like me instead of a grumpy bum. My own cover isn't all
glossy and sparkly, so is often misread, but between the covers is another
story. Very few excessively positive people desire to know my story, proffering
to read the cover instead for obvious reasons. The reason for this is very
interesting.
In
what I have gone through in life, if I was anywhere near as negative as these
people need to believe, I wouldn't
like to think where I would be now. It takes a lot of honest collective
conscious awareness to be were I am now, considering the circumstances. In the end, our own ego's will only believe
and desire to know what feeds the ego, all else is penalised or incarcerated in
some way, a sign that a consciousness has not evolved for thousands of years.
I never penalise or incarcerate people into negatives and positives, as a lot of
excessively positive humourous people do. A lot of times, it is simply a
consciousness lost within its own creation."
I recall a time that people feeding off of
each others ego's was deemed to be also positive, all else of course being
negative to this extreme positive. As I recall my past lives lived to some
extent, people feeding off of each others ego was nullified or neutralised,
this act of balance is just not occurring today.
In days of past, excluding empires built up
feeding off of each others ego's, people of wisdom were revered. Today, any
sense of wisdom, which includes honest truth, is penalised and/or incarcerated
in some way, usually by people who are excessive within their own positiveness
or negativeness. When a consciousness becomes expressive of extremes, extreme
ideological views are understandably created.
It is the way the collective consciousness
has chosen to go, it is what it is what it is. As I try to often relay, make
the best of what you have, not the worse. Making the best of what is, isn't of
some extreme expression of positiveness or of feeding off of each others ego, it
is simply of awareness and wisdom, if you like, honest commonsense reasoning.
Commonsense reasoning must be of the absence of bias or desire therefore honest
truth.
I am bewildered that so many people have
put themselves in a predicament as to dreadfully fear being negative in
any sense. We often read of wisdom and awareness while only taking on that for
which serves the ego the most. The present state of the human collective
consciousness determines this, this can be averted.
This reminds of the question have humans
created their present extreme weather occurrences, or, is
this just a part of a natural cycle? A bewildering question of separatism
created by bias. Extremes are a part of natural cycles, as is extremes of human
consciousness. The answer of course is that our present extreme weather is a
part of a natural cycle, but a cycle we are making far worse through our own
actions and inactions. You would think that a consciousness guided by wisdom
would counterbalance this natural cycle of extremes, instead, in the absence of
wisdom, we exasperate it to an extreme.
Yes, our natural environment can be of
extremes, this doesn't mean we have to exasperate these extremes to become even
more extreme. Yes, consciousness is influenced by its environment, but a wise
consciousness knows not to exasperate these extremes even further. Sadly, human
consciousness is seemingly going right along with the present natural extremes,
further expressing extremes to an extreme.......
