Hypothetical Hypothesis's?!!

Written by Mathew Naismith

Would a far more aware and wiser consciousness create what human consciousness has created?

The answer is interesting hypothetically which in this case is in direct relation to hypothesis's, where certain facts or observations are explained in a hypothetical way, where adequate human contrived evidence is not altogether present. When you distort reality through the lack of wisdom and awareness, you distort evidence, in this case the evidence is contrived in accordance with a certain criteria, a criteria that is based on a lack of wisdom and awareness and more on corruption and distortion.

Hypothetical: Based primarily on surmise rather than adequate evidence.

Hypothesis: A proposal intended to explain certain facts or observations.

One can be of the same but not necessarily of the same, as not all atheists follow the same doctrines and as not all religious people, this is the same with the western and eastern mind. Some western people can think in an eastern way as some eastern people can think in a western way. Even though it comes from the same origin, be it west or east, it is not necessarily of the same thinking process even though the origin is the same.

Hypothetically; imagine a reality based on far more wisdom and awareness. Imagine a reality that has no need for weapons, now imagine if humanity was governed by a far more aware and wiser consciousness!! Imagine for a moment that all weapons controlled by corrupt entities, in other words controlled by a distorted consciousness, were neutralised, including psychological weaponry!!

We may think this is completely hypothetical, there is no supporting hypothesis or relevant evidence to support this supposition.

How were guns created? Initially from human consciousness. Human consciousness thought that black powder propels projectiles, all you need is a device to hold the powder, an igniter and something to contain a projectile. Did a wise and aware consciousness create black powder to be used in this way? The answer is no. Black powder was simply used in a distorted way. A far less wiser and aware consciousness created what from what? What I am saying is that in a distorted reality everything that man creates is from consciousness. Everything we detect through all our senses is based on the consciousness at hand, meaning, everything is primarily based on consciousness. Everything is consciousness first and foremost, way before what is created from this consciousness.

The hypothesis is, a far less distorted consciousness is able to neutralise anything pertaining to consciousness, as a corrupt society can neutralise what it desires to neutralise within it's distorted reality, but on a much larger scale. The hypotheses is, that a far more aware and wiser consciousness would be able to neutralise every weapon that is used by a corrupt entity. Imagine if this occurred, that only the non-corrupt entities were still able to use their weaponry. It would be a huge incentive for human consciousness to become incorrupt, for human consciousness to become less distorted. I don't think their would be too many workable weaponry systems left in the world if this occurred.

So does this mean that certain vaccines, or any health procedure, used by the corrupt is also neutralised? Yes.

I could go on but I won't, I think I need to stop it here.

But Another Fear Based Existence!!

Written by Mathew Naismith

I have been busy communicating with a number of different people again. I often get out of my comfort zone like this, which of course makes me even more appreciative of my comfort zone. This also allows me to observe different views and actions, my own views and actions are a little mundane at times to me.

The following is an interesting reply I received on the discussion of being overly positive. I am also going to insert links to other sources that explain why positive thinking is not all it's cracked up to be, they are certainly worth browsing through in my mind.

 ___________________________

Reply:

There is a difference between living with rose coloured glasses in order to avoid looking at the hard stuff...like ourselves, and finding balance enough that we can distance ourselves and not get pulled into drama, including our own. We do need to acknowledge those aspects of self, allow ourselves to feel those emotions we like to avoid, before we are able to release them.

My Reply:

We do need to acknowledge these negative aspects and in the process neutralize them. Having fear of negativity, ego and judgment, is not neutralizing anything, it is running way from them.

When it gets to a stage when balance views become negative, I think this is taking positive thinking way too far. To this excess (extreme) is when positive thinking becomes destructive and highly judgmental in my mind.

Honestly, it's all based on fear, I thought we were supposed to distance ourselves from fear based existences, not just create yet another slightly different fear based existence than what we are experiencing at present!!

Take my dreams for instance; they have at times been quite traumatic. If I did not face these horrid negatives face on, I would be still in fear of them. The world around us is like our dreams, face what is going on and neutralise them, do not just judge them as negative and ignore them.

In all, if we want to create another fear based existence, we are going the right way about it. Fancy having fear in talking about the atrocities in the world in fear of being negative. Observe what is truly going on but at the same time avoid being a participator as much as possible. 

 ___________________________

I do not get this mentality, more is better especially if it is positive, when is enough not enough? Take Donald Trump for instance, he will never obtain enough power and money to serve his desires like any multinational, these people are on a treadmill they are unable or unwilling to get off. To these people, it is exceptionally positive to keep trying to obtain more money and power; there will never be enough, is this any different to positive thinking? To be honest, of course it is not because if a bit is beneficial, more has to be even more beneficial and on and on it goes.

As people like Donald Trump obviously fear being poor and powerless, spiritually positive people obviously also fear negatives, so more of a good thing as being positive has to be more beneficial!!

Once we start limiting our own consciousness to fears and the attachments to more has to be better, all we will create is more of the same, albeit in a different format.

Yes, it is predicted that man's consciousness will evolve into a more loving caring consciousness, however, this will occur naturally void of fearing so called negatives of the world. I could not stress to my readers more, please do not be drawn into an existence that is still based on fear and lies, especially if it feels all worm and fluffy. Yes, by all means take in this love and oneness but please don't do this in ignorance of our present condition. My advice is to not look at negatives as being negative or positives as being positive, and please don't get to a point where balance is just seen as negative.

As I stated to certain people recently, "The only thing balance is limiting of is extremes. The reason for this lies in that extremes are highly limiting. Balance has no true limitations accept to these limitations, makes perfect sense to me."

Free yourself of this fear and never get into an existence based on any kind of fear of who we are at present, this also means not fearing being limited either!!

                  

http://greatist.com/happiness/positive-thinking-negative-benefits

Extract: It turns out there’s some science behind my feelings: A look at the research reveals positive thinking isn’t always all it’s cracked up to be. In fact, researchers are asking: What if embracing so-called “negative” states like failure, pessimism, insecurity, and uncertainty actually has a positive outcome?

http://www.cammipham.com/positive/

http://katenasser.com/the-negative-side-to-being-positive/