Lily Pond Propagation!!

Written by Mathew Naismith

“Even without the flower being present, the lily still has a purpose for existing in the pond.”

I will explain what this is referring to latter on but first honesty within the truth needs to endure over what is not so honest.

The 100 monkey theory, where it is said that one monkey cleaning sweet potato's eventually turned into thousands of monkeys even in another contentment doing the same. A transference of consciousness seemed to have occurred even over vast distances of water. This theory is backed up by more science where protons have been noted to seemingly communicate over vast distances.

Existence is not necessarily smaller than we think, it simply acts as one more than we think, of course the act of not being aware of this reflects in how existence as a whole reacts to this train of thought. Today, even though existence is known to act more like one entity, we could not be more separated mentally in the world if we tried.

Yes, 100 monkeys of love and light exist, while at the same time 100 thousand monkeys of hate and dark exist. Yes, this 100 has turned into many more monkeys, at the same time this 100 thousand monkeys have done the same.

“It is not the quantity of numbers that will prevail, it is the quality of numbers that will prevail.”

How many of this 100 monkeys perceives that the hateful dark 100 thousand monkeys is negative and toxic to it's existence? Now, how many of the 100 thousand monkeys think the same of the 100 monkeys of love and light? What consciousness is going to prevail? It is of the same consciousness be it of different perspectives so this is the consciousness that will prevail, however.

The following and my quotes above are but of my own perspective here, as such.

Two monkeys are at a ponds edge, both monkeys have their own perspectives but compete in the same way. In competition, both monkeys try to out do the other by throwing pebbles in the water to see whose ripples can overcome the other. In the end, the pond ends up full of pebbles instead of water. The point is to not fill the pond full of pebbles but to create opposing ripples.

What if one of the monkeys started growing lilies instead of trying to outdo the other monkey by throwing even more pebbles in the pond!!

As each lilly grows, the dampening affect of the pebbles caused by the lilies is evident, in the end the pond is full of lilies which stops the ripples from forming. Once the monkey throwing pebbles in the pond to create competing ripples is evidently pointless, the monkey throwing the pebbles gives up on it's actions and sees how growing lilies in the pond is more practical.

You see the 100 thousand monkeys wants you to see them as they do you, even while being of different perspectives, in the process winning in the competition from the start.

Is the growing of the lilies to dampen the ripples in competition or simply of a different approach that is more practical?

You see it is not the vastness of consciousness that counts, but the quality of consciousness that counts. The quantity only makes a difference when in competition, especially when using the same techniques be it of different perspectives.

To be honest, which monkey are you, while avoiding to think that the opposing monkey is negative and toxic to your way of existing as your way of existing is to them?

Yes, at times I also throw pebbles but the trick is also knowing at the same time that growing lilies is a much better way to exist in harmony, in the process creating a very different pond.

Passive Analogies and Insights

Written by Mathew Naismith

"The pond of life is still and tranquil, this is until the still pond is put into motion by countermanding motions of human differences".......Mathew G

The pond of life: Look upon life as a still pond, it is still, tranquil and clear, this is until the still tranquilness of the pond is disrupted by opposing motions, not necessarily opposing motions to the water but opposition motions on each side of the pond. These opposing motions are likened to, bad and good, negative and positive, light and dark, hate and love and so on. Now imagine that these opposing motions are throwing stones at each other from their side of the pond, as opposing motions naturally do. Of course many of these stones end up in the water as do some of the opposing motions themselves, is the still tranquil pond still clear and calm? 

In the end, the pond ends up not being a pond anymore but a quagmire of embattlement, this is because both opposing forces end up opposing the pond which gave life to all motion to begin with.  It's strange to think, no pond, no motion, even when the pond itself is motionless. It's this motionlessness that gives life and its motion that can take the life of the pond away, but only when motion becomes extreme within its own motion. Opposing motions only see dissimilarities, not also, the way too obvious, similarities.

To people like me, the similarities are obvious, for example, the similarities between dark and light. Both want to control or destroy each other. Both have opposing views. Both know they are more powerful than the other. Both want to become the dominate force. Both are using the same motion but with very slightly dissimilar motives. One's motive is for the collective good of the (I), the other is for the collective good of the collective as a whole. Of course many religions have tried to control the collective by dominating it, this is why love and light should never be used as an opposing force but it clearly is being used in this way.

While existing in a chaotic existence, we perceive that the still tranquil clear pond indicates love and light, thus perceiving love has no opposites; of course what is then the opposite of hate!!

The tranquil still clear pond of life doesn't represent love and light, it represents exactly what it is, still, tranquil and clear; this is all. Because we exist within a chaotic existence, we perceive that the pond is of love and light and quite understandably so. Any kind of tranquilness will feel more loving and of the light while experiencing chaos in any form. The pond doesn't have to be of love and light because it has no opposition, the pond of life isn't in opposition to motion but motion can be in opposition to the pond, to life itself. The pond of life is what it is, motionless except for the life that the pond creates/supports. When the life that the pond creates becomes too expressively of motion, it's quite understandable that this will upset the tranquilness of the pond.

The universe: Now think of how tranquil the pond that the universe exists in was before the universe was created. Yes, I look at what the universe was created in as a pond as well. The universe represents all living form that exists within pond/space itself.

In a pond, a fish is hatched from roe which was conceived through the integration of yin and yang, what is the pond to the fish? The pond is everything to the fish which makes the pond more precious than life itself. Now look at the universe as being this fish, how important is the pond/space to the fish/universe to us? We of course perceived that the universe is far more special than the space that the universe was conceived in, this is very much unlike the fish that sees the pond/space far more special for it gave it its life to begin with. I think one day we will find out how special this seemingly nothingness space that the universe was born into. There is far more to this empty space than we perceive in my mind. 

Fish = universe

Pond = Space

Yes, I also see that the universe was conceived, which comes from the idea that matter and antimatter created the universe through integration of these two motions.

Matter = yang + male

Antimatter = yin + female

I should state here that matter could also be perceived as being female and visa-versa for argument sake.

Oneness, God: So where does the idea of God or oneness fit within all of this? Let's look at the human race; it takes two to create another living energy source, what actually integrates these two energy sources to create another energy source?  Try integrating without consciousness; you need to be consciousness of another energy source, and the right energy source, to integrate to start with, this of course takes a singular source of energy, such as consciousness, to begin with.

You can see where the hidden perception of oneness and a God comes from. I say hidden because our ego minds perceive in a structured way in accordance to our five senses. Our structured perceptions perceive God as a man, Christ as man and not as a consciousness. 

Oneness equals God as God equals consciousness that is seemingly behind all of creation, very simular to humans and the creation of the universe which again took the integration of yin and yang, two different but also indifferent energy sources that were conceived from a consciousness in my mind.

I should state that the analogies and insights used in this post come wholly from and through me, please at no time take them as being absolutely true........