A Seemingly Stronger Consciousness

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

I have been participating a lot recently, even participating in the absence of being aware of my own observation of my participation. In science, participant observation is where scientists interact with what is being studied, in other words being a subjective participant without losing the ability to observe. In observation bias is expressed which can give a false perspective of what is being observed, so to avoid this you become interactive with the participants of what is being observed without losing the ability to observe.

This works a little differently spiritually, in that even in participation in the absence of observation of participation, you are still being observed. It matters not if you are aware that you are in observation or not, the act of observation is still in progress. In scientific observation there is only the awareness of scientific observation, this is the small picture, the big picture is perceived spiritually, where a far more aware consciousness beyond most scientific evaluations and acceptance is in observation. In my own mind it would be silly to discount that a far more aware and wiser consciousness is not in observation of our own participation.

Look at it like this, are ants or insects aware of our observation of them when not in participation with them? Only in the act of participation of the observer do you realise you are being observed so yes, in every way we are just like ants or insects when unaware of being observed. Spirituality gives us an idea of being observed, in the process giving us a perception of a bigger picture than that of our own observation. Many of us have simply made the mistake that we are the observers of participation, in the process are quite unaware we are ourselves being observed.

So the question is now, what kind of subjective observation are we under?

Subjective: Taking place within the mind and modified by individual bias.

Imagine for a moment an observer with a bias intent, what will eventuate from this action of bias, especially if the observer is malign, of self-gratifying harmful intent?

When I observe my own participation, a certain degree of bias is present, however, when I participate in the absence of my own observation of participation, this bias is no longer present. You experience first hand what other participants are experiencing. In the awareness of observation you do interact differently.

How many people are aware of a malign observation of human participation? Of course this malign consciousness is not just in observation either but in full participation, as we are certainly observing and experiencing today. So many people are under this kind of observation of participation. Look at how the authorities are wanting to observe every move you make, in the process participate in how to influence you in how you participate right inline with the malign consciousness.

It is really important not to condemn those most influenced by this kind of consciousness. If you are made unaware, how is one to know? While in full participation without becoming what I am participating in, I observed that it is too easy to stray from being decent to being indecent, in other words being benign to being malign.

Yes, the malign consciousness makes itself out to be the stronger more controlling consciousness, in the process easily manipulating people away from being benign, a seemingly meek consciousness. The benign is not meek, in fact the benign is resilient to malign observational participation without being duped into being destructively controlling. In actuality, being duped into being malign is exceptionally meek within itself, so the meek inheriting the Earth seems like the malign!! No, the perceived meek, the benign, shall inherit the Earth. There is certainly nothing meek in people staying true to virtues of the benign while under the full influence of observational and partition of the malign.

Yes, the malign is this influential through it's controlling ways that all seems to be at the mercy of the malign. Now, when I simply observe, it is the malign that is truly at the mercy of the benign, just because the benign is not controlling, doesn't mean the benign is not present and in full observation. It is within the realisation of this observation that people will free themselves from the malign. It is simply of the awareness of being observed by the benign that will influence how participators of observation react to being also observed by the benign. As I often state, many are simply lost within their own creation, of being observed by the malign. Take no notice of how people are manipulated in being of the malign, going astray from being decent, for this observing malign consciousness is highly deceptive and manipulative.

It is really strange because it looks as though the malign is shooting itself in the foot, in other words being self-destructive even though the malign is unaware of this. The malign is all about deception, even and probably more deceptive unto itself. As the malign seems to be growing in strength in it's control, material wealth and observation, the truly benign also become more resilient. It is the most unintelligent move a so-called intelligence can enact upon the benign. In a real show of strength, the malign should be overseeing the benign, interestingly quite the opposite is occurring.

I know that the Freemasons seem to be recent, but the root core of Freemasons consciousness goes way back in ancient times. It would seem when the pharaohs stopped overseeing the benign, is when the Freemasons root core consciousness stopped overseeing the benign. The pharaohs themselves saw themselves as Gods, the all seeing eye, and become the persecutors of the benign instead of the overseers of the benign. What multinational today does not see themselves as some kind of demigod or actual God like? Take away their servants, their commodities, what are they? They are nothing without their servants, their human commodities, they owe their own existence to who they see as simply a commodity. Did the pharaohs end up treating their servants as simply a commodity when they really owed their own existence to these servants? I believe this to have occurred as early as the fourth dynasty.

Yes, the benign is of servitude, but servitude to a consciousness that appreciates this servitude instead of depreciates this servitude of the benign. In the end this depreciation of the benign will come down around their ears, in other words their world will end up destroying itself from within, leaving the benign to begin a new age in the absence of being ungratefully subservient to the malign. I think a lot of the benign know this to be true.

Switching Back On Consciousness

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs-5eMNXP-I

I think Lorie speaks more of actual truth than she even actually knows. Whatever consciousness you are in tune with is not of the past or future, it is of the present even though this consciousness being channelled or connected to is of a dead persons consciousness of the past. Try to keep this in mind while watching the video. As you can't destroy energy, you can't destroy consciousness.

“Now this is interesting.

My wife practices in a therapeutic treatment called Emmett, a treatment for switching back on points that have been switched off by trauma, for example, a muscle that has been switched off through an injury can be switched back on. Even when a tear in a muscle has healed, the muscle itself at times needs to be switched back on to work effectively.

Have our cells or the collective human consciousness been switched off through centuries of trauma?

Imagine for a moment switching back on our own switched off cells or consciousness. Now imagine switching back on the collective consciousness!!”

It is funny, I am experiencing two quite different realities at present, one of the observer of participation, the other of the participator. I don't always observe my own participation which is within itself an interesting observation. You must allow circumstances to naturally evolve within a reality primarily of participation, yes, this takes one not to observe their own participation, only of observing other people's participation but only while within participation. Yes, the observer can hinder and even stop natural occurrences from occurring to evolve, switching on our consciousness again is but one of these occurrences.

The collective human consciousness is simply switched off due to endless trauma over many centuries. Look at the people who have switch off or retracted into a reality away from the main environmental reality of endless trauma, in the process switched off from consciously evolving further. When a muscle switches off, it is in protective mode to stop further trauma, the collective consciousness is no different. Many of us have switched off, look at how many people only focus on the positives while allowing the negatives free range. How does the eastern mind work? By working on it's weaknesses, while the western mind works on it's strengths, of course the strengths being the positives and the weakness being the negatives. You must also realise that the eastern mind does not see weaknesses as a negative either, they are simply something to focus on to strengthen.

People like me are not meant to be observers only, we are meant to be participators as well, at times in the absence of observation. It is within the participation within a reality of participation that consciousness will evolve. What seems to have occurred is many of us have totally switched off from being an observer altogether. The problem with being an observer for a participator is that you become more aware of trauma, not less, you can even feel more trauma in this state so what does our consciousness do? It switches off and only focuses on it's strengths. A consciousness in this state will not properly evolve, as a traumatised muscle switched off won't!!

I know, what I express a lot of times is not of the main narratives of mainstream thinking, but don't you think it is about time we consciously evolved even further? Yes, realities of participation are traumatising for the ego but if you switch off the traumatising part of consciousness, is this really going to help? Really, try and look at trauma through the eyes of the eastern mind that is in all of us, this certainly helps.

This is funny, I still have Academia trying to entice me over even though I am obviously not academic, simply a free thinker and observer.

One Guru

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

An interesting reply to my last post, An Awakening – Guru.

“Gurukulam was a precinct of holiness and great prestige, its rituals were never easy, the Guru not only taught but was equally adept at making pupil/shisya unlearn what was obstructive and destructive.

We have bigger places of schooling now but far fewer modes of instruction.”

My reply

“This is why people like me don't just follow our own wisdom, become our own guru, wisdom abounds in every culture. They say to become your own guru and stop learning from other gurus, when it is the same guru!! When you stop learning and unlearning from THE guru, you never truly become A guru, this is but of a desired truth.

There is one God with many variants of that one God, as there is only one guru with many variants of that one guru, mythology teaches us this. There is therefore only one wisdom with many variants of that one wisdom. Being your own guru while ignoring all other forms of wisdom is not of wisdom. I do appreciate people like you Titus, really.”

While experiencing a different reality, two large dogs are having a disagreement of differentiated perspectives. It is a consciousnesses differences that create conflicts. There is no way you would on your own try to separate these two large dogs, within this kind of 3^rd dimensional reality.

The dogs are separated by being in some kind of force field at the same time separating these two dogs through a kind of levitation. The levitation is perceived through the consciousness enacted here. Without uttering a word, the energy separating these dogs allows the two dogs to understand they are in actuality of one consciousness. It is within the enacted energy of one that creates quite a different perception therefore reality for these two dogs.

This may sound ridiculous and even delusional to a three dimensional mind of differentiated perceptions, which must be expected, but to a mind of one energy it is not. You see you don't just use your own energy, your guru, you use energy period as though it is one. “So you don't follow the proven wisdom of an external guru, to simply follow your own created guru.” It is the same guru people, be it of external or internal consciousness. Yes, go within but not in the absence or even in disdain of what represents external wisdom, the proven guru. So you really think the external and internal consciousness or self is separated, too different to be of the same!! The separation of consciousness is simply perceived, in turn creating a reality based on desired truths rather than actual truths.

In relation to the dogs, it was of one communication, it was not of a separate external source of energy communicating to the dogs to stop their altercation of differences, it was of simultaneous communication between all three energies. What was interesting is that not a word or sound was uttered.

So how do you change a world going down a destructive path?

You treat it as one energy flow, knowing that at every turn a consciousness of separation will do anything not to become as one energy. It all comes down to what this consciousness of separation desires, this is why at present in particular this energy of separation is trying to stop the actual truth being told. Yes, it may seem it is trying to unite energy but it is not, quite the opposite. The differences between the elite owning everything to the masses owning nothing is not of uniting energy to start with.

An Awakening - Guru!!

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

You may ask how can this be an awakening, when inhumanity and not humanity has infiltrated humanity as a whole to undermine the values of humanity. To put it another way, love and light was supposed to do exactly what hate and dark has done, infiltrate humanity to it's core structure, in the process create a much harmonious loving reality.

So you may ask what went wrong!!

Nothing went wrong, the inhumanity that has been plaguing humanity for centuries has now exposed or revealed itself to all of humanity and inhumanity. I observed this very dark infiltration occurring and unfolding for many years now, into every crevice of humanity, including consciousnesses of love and light, the humanity within humanity.

Not being directly involved in love and light or hate and dark, one could observe what was occurring without being drawn into becoming a participant. A lot of spiritually aware people can do this, simply observe, even in relation to their own beliefs and practices, you know this when they avoid judging what is or is not negative or positive. How many people of said love and light mislead other people for their own purposes. Usually these same people were preaching other people to stay away from gurus, often people of proven wisdom, but at the same time act as of a guru. I follow people's proven wisdom as I do my own, in other words I follow other people's and my own proven wisdom, the guru. You will however find that it is of the same wisdom, with an exception, often we become too much of a participant instead of an observer of our own perceived wisdom. Also, often our egos inflate our own wisdom, in other words our wisdom becomes of desired truths instead of actual truths.

It is like this woke, where only desired truths are accepted while denouncing proven actual truths. The denouncement of other people's wisdom through this woke and the infiltration of the dark of the light, is not of proven wisdom. Often these people will talk in negatives and positives, the light against the dark. Light, actual truth, is never in opposition to the dark, as the dark, of desired truths, through it's desired truth is never in actuality in opposition to the light. The dark desires to believe this and infiltrate the light to believe this as well, as it has clearly done.

A true sense of love and light, the humanity within humanity, is all about actual truths in the absence of desired truths. Desired truths simply come to fruition through participation, even of your own wisdom. Gurus have to often watch for this when they are of a guru, to avoid participating in their own wisdom, to simply observe wisdom, a wisdom that is not just of their own. This means you never become your own guru as is often taught by so many people, you simply become the guru, a person of proven wisdom.

Yes I know, this kind of actual truth is often seen negative and toxic to the participator but this is expected. It makes sense as the participator is often of desired truths and the observer of actual truths.

Look people, I know it feels good to follow what is of desired truths but this is the dark's (inhumanities) infiltration of the light (humanity). It is meant to feel that it is of good positive vibrations but try to remember, we are indeed in the age of false prophets, where false consciousness therefore false feelings resides in.

All I can say now is to follow true wisdom, a true reflection of the guru, within this you will be fine, if not in this life I am sure your soul will thank you for this effort. Be kind and thoughtful to your soul.

The Use of Dramatics

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

What better way to create a created reality, dramatics is perfect to this role especially when you have so many people conditioned to dramatics, in the process creating a near perfect illusion. As desired truths, different from actual truths, often create realities of illusions, so does being conditioned to drama.

So what is the difference between desired truths and actual truths?

If you desire your adversary to look even worse to you and everybody else, all you have to do is create a desired truth, a reality based on an illusion. A good example of this was Donald trump colluded with the Russian's and he encouraged and planed an insurrection. An example of actual truth is, I was once a Labor party member and I certainly don't desire the truth that the Labor party is becoming more and more communist, this is while selling Australia out to the Chinese.

As I wrote recently on Descernable in regards to blocking or expelling people you disagree with.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-iz8q0y-g8

“Keep your friends close and your enemies closer!!

In truth this states emotionally; keep you friends close emotionally and your enemies unemotionally closer. I actually go into the lions den quite a lot, for you may learn more from your enemies than your friends about your enemies, which of course is quite understandable. Simply equate or replace enemies with disagreeable people, for not all disagreeable people are your enemy.

So why do this? A comprehension of what you may not understand, the very thing that creates the environment you too have to live in and may have to deal with. Imagine dealing with an environment you don't even have comprehension of. Even though it is bewildering to me, I comprehend how so many people think it is okay to lock up people on a covid 0.2% fatality rate. It is simple, their desired truth, as opposed the actual truth, is to simply believe the covid fatality rate has to be higher, for the government to act so draconian.

I also comprehend how the draconian tactics work. If you are going to make big bucks, you need to get people's attention and there is no better way than to use dramatics. The bigger the dramatics, the bigger the bucks. In the case of implementing the great reset, an effective dramatist tool was needed, the pandemic, to gain more wealth, power and control over the world. Not everyone is conditioned to dramatics but it is obvious that a lot of people are. Lets be honest here, politicians can be the biggest creator of drama around for their own purposes and gains.

We now should be able to comprehend who is conditioned to dramatics and who is not, and yes, a conditioning to dramatics will of course distort reality and reasoning, as drama often does!!”

Genuine Hope

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

“A huge time in human history, where finally man will learn to never go back to all that only served itself on the back of many. Will the Earth itself suffer from mans ill will or will what man made of the Earth only suffer!! Yes, a huge demise of the malign is evident, leaving the Earth that is not of man's ill will blessed. The truly awakened lands will be untouched.”

As of too many in the age of false prophets, I don't want to give false hope to people but hope is at hand. For starters, people like me put more emphasis on the infinite than the finite, for the finite is governed by a starting and ending point to begin with, where the infinite has no such governing factor, within this there is really no need of hope for all is infinite. Apart form this though, there is real hope in relation to the finite, I would however rather you look at what I am stating in this post as a desired truth of mine, not an actual truth at the point in time.

I think some people will really resonate with the following.

Yes, destruction is evident upon those of the malign consciousness and lands, not at the hands of the benign but of itself. It will turn upon itself, in the process scorching the Earth the malign lays upon. This does not mean the lands this malign consciousness tries to procure, it simply means the lands the malign consciousness primarily lays upon. What this means is that lands primarily of the consciousness of the malign will be scorched and by the maligns own hands. The malign will wake up to losing everything it has worked so hard for and put blame on everything that is malign.

People will look within the lands of the benign and wonder how such lands can be unscathed, in a very real sense. People looking in upon these lands will stare in awe and wonder how did it get to this, that the malign took so much control over humanity, in the process creating a reality of inhumanity for which to feed off of.

As Freemasons have long ago stopped protecting the benign, the children, in fact have done the opposite for a long time now, all that is not protective and even abusive of the benign will perish at it owns hands. At all cost on all levels of consciousness the children must be protected and beloved, not lusted or desired. These people of the malign will wake up to this way too late and will in turn turn upon each other in blame.

What the malign is obviously quite unaware of, the faster the malign tries to take complete control of humanity and the lands humanity lays upon, the faster the malign is coming to it's end. This has occurred many times over in Earths history, recent examples of this is Adolf Hitler's very quick grab for power and control. The present quickening of the maligns intentions is actually going to lead to a quicker awakening of humanity, dispelling the presentably called malign woke, meaning the awakening could occur a lot sooner due to the maligns own actions.

This is strange. If the elite and societies like the Freemason's still protected and beloved the benign, all that they gain would have been theirs to keep. What is even stranger is if the elite and societies like the Freemason's started to truly look after the benign even at the point, they will be able to still keep their ill-gains, but only their ill-gains that are no longer abusive towards the benign.

It is really important at this stage to stay within protecting and/or being benign. Don't be coerced by the present created fear to go outside of the benign consciousness, stay within this land and consciousness. I know this is not easy due to the present situation but at all cost stay within this benign land/consciousness, especially at present.

Protectorate of the Benign

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

Protectorate: A state or territory partly controlled by (but not a possession of) a stronger state but autonomous in internal affairs; protectorates are established by treaty.

I remember a time way before my present life that the true authorities protected the benign of human nature. To be human is to be vulnerable to environments which includes environments of nature and environments of the malign. It was by no mistake that the feminine was revered in the same way as the masculine.

A state of authoritative consciousness that was benign and virtuous by nature, in other words divine, oversaw the development of human consciousness. In this case there was no control but a strong influence of the benign in the absence of possessions. In the case of the malign, possession and control is the main stay of this consciousness, this of course takes the firm use of the masculine while denouncing the feminine. The way the feminine is denounced is through the use and abuse of the feminine, this leads to the feminine simply becoming an object of control and possession by the masculine. No, the masculine does not represent the malign, the masculine is simply used by the malign to take control and possession of whatever is desired and lusted after.

Believe it or not, Freemasonry true beginnings goes way back to the antediluvian period as does Hinduism and yes, both Freemasonry and Hinduism where benign protectorates of the human benign, I mean really. As of many authoritative establishments today, Freemasonry in particular is not for the protection of the benign but the malign, like in Australia where the police and even the arm services literally protect the malign while abusing the benign. This is very evident in the state of Victoria at present.

All of a sudden in ancient Egypt the rulers became the God's, at the same time these authoritative figures stopped protecting the benign. As soon as authority stopped protecting the benign is when establishments like Freemasonry change course from being benign to being malign. Yes, the ego took control even while being aware of the controlling ways of the ego. You see once the ego is in charge, the benign becomes abused at the same time the malign is revered.

So why didn't the benign take control over the malign?

The malign is all about control and possession where's the benign is not of control and possession. The benign must allow a consciousness freedom to do as it will, to develop in the way the consciousness feels fit. If this entails allowing the ego to take control of a collective consciousness, this is the way it will be allowed to go, however, right throughout human history humans have been given directives from the divine. If the human collective consciousness chooses to ignore these directives, then so be it.

Establishments like Freemasonry today couldn't be further away from their initial establishment, their true being if they wanted to. The very fact that they are not protecting but in fact are abusing the benign is a sure sign of their lost initial established beginnings. Once you loose the root core of an establishment like this, the establishment is no longer of the divine. We could not separate more from the core of our being if we wanted to, in the process replacing this core with an illusion, a false representation of who we really are.

What would a true divine nature do, protect the benign or abuse the benign especially in favour of the malign? As I have stated for some time now, we are simply lost within our own creation but like anything with a starting point of creation, there is always an ending point of creation. Watch from here which establishment actually truly protects the benign, for this is a true reflection of our being.