What is Defined as Meditation

Written by Mathew Naismith

This is difficult to determine because each spiritual practice has it's own definition in what is meditation, this is in accordance with the implementation of meditation. I am not going to look at the various implementations of meditation here, but what I will look at is what all meditations are governed by.

Meditation is of quietening the mind to one degree or another, the quieter the mind becomes, the more of enlightened kind of meditation the consciousness of the mind becomes. Keep in mind that not all meditation techniques lead to enlightenment, many meditation techniques are of simply quietening the mind. It is not the mind that becomes enlightened, it is the consciousness of the mind that becomes enlightened.

So firstly what is quietening the mind?

Quietening the mind is of the absence of participation, the less your mind therefore body participates within an environment, the quieter the mind becomes. Now we may think that praying or chanting is not a form of meditation because we are still mentally and/or physically active, therefore of participating in the environment. Praying and chanting can be like focusing on your breath which is still of participation be it of limited participation, however, we are far less of partition of the environment. In this case we are only participating in praying or chanting, just like focusing on your breath. You could imagine the benefits of quietening your mind with meditative techniques like this.

This may sound strange to some people, but every kind of participation is due to observation, participation cannot exist without being observed. Look at it like this. The universe itself simply exists because it is being observed, without the observation from a consciousness the universe could not exist. It is like the double slit science experiment, where the act of a determining observation changes the outcome. It is how we observe to what is going to be created from this observation.

This brings us to observation itself which leads to enlightenment through meditation. We are all observing our own participation, the reason we are unaware of this because we become involved in what we are observing. Meditation that leads to enlightenment is of observation in the absence of participation. The further your consciousness becomes conditioned to participation, the more likely you are going to become of participation in the absence of observation. This is where meditation comes into it, where you condition your consciousness to become less of participation but further from this, more of observation of participation.

Meditation is simply the reconditioning of consciousness to become more of observation than participation. Yes, this can take time but this time is shortened if you are aware that you are in observation of your own participation, you are never not. Observe more without participating.

Meditation that leads to enlightenment is not of a consciousness that is conditioned to inhumanities, so if your observer self is conditioned to inhumanities, what you will create in observation will create an environment in accordance with the way a consciousness observes. Inhumanities is of a great deal of participation, mainly due to the extent of abuse of energy involved. The less abusive an observing consciousness becomes, the less of participation a consciousness becomes conditioned to. Yes, after a human life cycle has ended, what our observer self is conditioned to makes a different to what we will experience in the after life. Meditation in a really big way just doesn't help us to cope better in life's participation's, meditation also helps in what we will experience in the after life.

I hope this helps some people because what is and is not meditation can be confusing. Also, what I have stated here are of my own words that can be similar or dissimilar to other views in relation to meditation.

A Seemingly Stronger Consciousness

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

I have been participating a lot recently, even participating in the absence of being aware of my own observation of my participation. In science, participant observation is where scientists interact with what is being studied, in other words being a subjective participant without losing the ability to observe. In observation bias is expressed which can give a false perspective of what is being observed, so to avoid this you become interactive with the participants of what is being observed without losing the ability to observe.

This works a little differently spiritually, in that even in participation in the absence of observation of participation, you are still being observed. It matters not if you are aware that you are in observation or not, the act of observation is still in progress. In scientific observation there is only the awareness of scientific observation, this is the small picture, the big picture is perceived spiritually, where a far more aware consciousness beyond most scientific evaluations and acceptance is in observation. In my own mind it would be silly to discount that a far more aware and wiser consciousness is not in observation of our own participation.

Look at it like this, are ants or insects aware of our observation of them when not in participation with them? Only in the act of participation of the observer do you realise you are being observed so yes, in every way we are just like ants or insects when unaware of being observed. Spirituality gives us an idea of being observed, in the process giving us a perception of a bigger picture than that of our own observation. Many of us have simply made the mistake that we are the observers of participation, in the process are quite unaware we are ourselves being observed.

So the question is now, what kind of subjective observation are we under?

Subjective: Taking place within the mind and modified by individual bias.

Imagine for a moment an observer with a bias intent, what will eventuate from this action of bias, especially if the observer is malign, of self-gratifying harmful intent?

When I observe my own participation, a certain degree of bias is present, however, when I participate in the absence of my own observation of participation, this bias is no longer present. You experience first hand what other participants are experiencing. In the awareness of observation you do interact differently.

How many people are aware of a malign observation of human participation? Of course this malign consciousness is not just in observation either but in full participation, as we are certainly observing and experiencing today. So many people are under this kind of observation of participation. Look at how the authorities are wanting to observe every move you make, in the process participate in how to influence you in how you participate right inline with the malign consciousness.

It is really important not to condemn those most influenced by this kind of consciousness. If you are made unaware, how is one to know? While in full participation without becoming what I am participating in, I observed that it is too easy to stray from being decent to being indecent, in other words being benign to being malign.

Yes, the malign consciousness makes itself out to be the stronger more controlling consciousness, in the process easily manipulating people away from being benign, a seemingly meek consciousness. The benign is not meek, in fact the benign is resilient to malign observational participation without being duped into being destructively controlling. In actuality, being duped into being malign is exceptionally meek within itself, so the meek inheriting the Earth seems like the malign!! No, the perceived meek, the benign, shall inherit the Earth. There is certainly nothing meek in people staying true to virtues of the benign while under the full influence of observational and partition of the malign.

Yes, the malign is this influential through it's controlling ways that all seems to be at the mercy of the malign. Now, when I simply observe, it is the malign that is truly at the mercy of the benign, just because the benign is not controlling, doesn't mean the benign is not present and in full observation. It is within the realisation of this observation that people will free themselves from the malign. It is simply of the awareness of being observed by the benign that will influence how participators of observation react to being also observed by the benign. As I often state, many are simply lost within their own creation, of being observed by the malign. Take no notice of how people are manipulated in being of the malign, going astray from being decent, for this observing malign consciousness is highly deceptive and manipulative.

It is really strange because it looks as though the malign is shooting itself in the foot, in other words being self-destructive even though the malign is unaware of this. The malign is all about deception, even and probably more deceptive unto itself. As the malign seems to be growing in strength in it's control, material wealth and observation, the truly benign also become more resilient. It is the most unintelligent move a so-called intelligence can enact upon the benign. In a real show of strength, the malign should be overseeing the benign, interestingly quite the opposite is occurring.

I know that the Freemasons seem to be recent, but the root core of Freemasons consciousness goes way back in ancient times. It would seem when the pharaohs stopped overseeing the benign, is when the Freemasons root core consciousness stopped overseeing the benign. The pharaohs themselves saw themselves as Gods, the all seeing eye, and become the persecutors of the benign instead of the overseers of the benign. What multinational today does not see themselves as some kind of demigod or actual God like? Take away their servants, their commodities, what are they? They are nothing without their servants, their human commodities, they owe their own existence to who they see as simply a commodity. Did the pharaohs end up treating their servants as simply a commodity when they really owed their own existence to these servants? I believe this to have occurred as early as the fourth dynasty.

Yes, the benign is of servitude, but servitude to a consciousness that appreciates this servitude instead of depreciates this servitude of the benign. In the end this depreciation of the benign will come down around their ears, in other words their world will end up destroying itself from within, leaving the benign to begin a new age in the absence of being ungratefully subservient to the malign. I think a lot of the benign know this to be true.

Unlocking Down

Written by Mathew Naismith

Coronavirus (COVID-19) free post.

I found this funny, my blog address is titled, “freedom immunity”, this is without knowing consciously what was about to occur as such. I actually thought when creating this address of freedom through immunity!!  

I am for unlocking down our mind, body and soul/spirit, for a number of different reasons. Yes, for the people who can just sit within observation, mediation, praying, chanting, etc, this is fine but not for the majority of people. Think on this, how many people solely rely on natural remedies and interactions to simply survive to start with?

Before the America’s were invaded by westerners, westerners didn’t over populate a planet in the presence of vaccines, but in the presence of herd immunity. Herd immunity is were people are subjected to diseases and through the survivors building up a natural immunity to these diseases. This at the moment is being stopped on a grand scale but not in every country.

When westerners invaded the America’s, the local indigenous inhabitance had no natural immunity to western diseases, they died in droves until they could build up their immunity which they did but at a heavy cost. This was in the absence of vaccines by the way. The heavy cost was due to the deliberate introduction of these diseases in relation to the indigenous inhabitants. Somehow sounds familiar to our present circumstances!! 

Most countries have some form of forced lockdown but as I say, make the best of life, not the worse of life, this also means becoming aware by the way.

In my case, I can simply think of being an observer in the absence of participation no matter what I become aware of. Within this an immunity is created to what I become aware of simply by being an observer. Make no mistake; I am often a participator, especially at present, knowing that this state of participation is weakening my immune system in many ways. I am finding it difficult at present observing my own participation which keeps my immune system while in participation strong.

To someone like me, the material is of a limited (finite) state of being and has no greater importance than an unlimited (infinite) state of being. If in the process of helping other with their own immune system in mind, body and soul, ends my finite existence, it matters not to me. This is unlikely because I still find it easy getting into a state of being simply the observer.

So how do I enter into a state of observation? Simply and without effort imagine being the observer in the absence of participating. This means not reacting to any kind of participation especially in relation to emotions, ego period.  Just be in the absence of intentions or expectations, which includes expecting to be within a state of being of the observer. Don’t think of any of this just be, within this one process your mind, body and soul builds up an immunity quite naturally and quite quickly to our present environment. Like I say quite often, make the best of life, not the worse of life.

The following is more information in how to build up your body’s immune system even more, and how this is being purposely hindered by today’s governmental system.    

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/no_author/modern-medicine-knew-of-zinc-cure-for-coronavirus-infections-a-decade-ago-but-failed-to-put-into-practice/

“Actually, the combination of zinc and Hydroxychloroquine is proven to be highly beneficial in helping to stop the replication of viruses across the board. Viruses are basically replicators.

However, because prescription drugs in particular kill off the zinc in our bodies, using Hydroxychloroquine in the absence of zinc is virtually pointless in cases like this.

So how did this virus take such a hold on us? This is partly and probably mostly due to the lack of zinc and other minerals in our bodies caused by modern day living conditions. Make no mistake, the authorities know how beneficial zinc is to combating viruses.”

A Separation of Energy/Consciousness

Written by Mathew Naismith

Yes, there is a separation of energies, but one not need to worry about this separation as long as the soul is not conditioned to materialism.

So many souls are now being primarily or exclusively conditioned to materialism, it is though the immaterial part of the soul never existed. Yes, even after the demise of the material self, material reality still can exist for souls primarily or exclusively conditioned to materialism through the attachments to material realities. The gap between souls also of the immaterial and souls primarily or exclusively of materialism is growing, giving a sense of separation of soul energies. To put it another way, when our souls are conditioned to material realities, our souls are no longer the observer but simply become a participator. The observing soul is of the immaterial, while observing the material, where the participating soul is of the material in the absence of the observer.

Observing soul = the immaterial while aware of the material, oneness.

Participating soul = the material while unaware of the immaterial, but also, only aware of the material that is desired to become aware of thus creating a further separation of energy. Lost souls.

It is impossible for the immaterial observer to separate immaterial energy from material energy. This includes not separating energy into positives and negatives, good and bad, wrong and right, black and white, etc, which seems to be very popular in today western spirituality.

Even today when I approach souls wholly conditioned to materialism, there is no negative or positive perceptions, just simply a perception of a soul simply lost within its own creation. I am often smiling at this point in realisation of how unaware such a soul has become. To a soul that is lost, this would be called narcism, an exceptional interest in and admiration for yourself, when this is simply a state of awareness and immaterialism in observation of the material.

While a soul is also in observation of the material, even of their own participation in the material, there is no sense of separation, just an observation of lost soul's perception of the separation of energies. At no time are material realities not being observed, this means that perceptions of separation of energies are illusionary. You can't create for which is not being observed, for in observation is everything created. 

So the egos query might now be, so this means the observer created material illusions as well!!

The observing soul simply observes what the soul participates in. Often an illusion is created through the observed participation when souls become primarily or exclusively conditioned to materialism. Lost souls cannot exist in the absence of observation of participation. It is the observation of participation that creates lost souls. If you like, nothing can exist unless of God's creation. If all observing souls observed souls primarily or exclusively conditioned to the immaterial, the existence of lost souls simply couldn't exist.

So why doesn't the immaterial soul just stop observing lost souls?

Ignorance or an unawareness in relation to desires is of a soul in participation, not of a soul in observation. An observing soul doesn't desire or even choose what to observe, the observing soul observes all of what is and could be, which includes lost souls existing in an illusion of separated energy. It is simply observed that souls have and will become lost to materialism. This was always going to occur when souls also become a participator, especially when a soul becomes primarily or exclusively conditioned to materiam.

As there has always been it would seem, a number of people stay aware of the soul and the immaterial, while also aware and even participating in the material. The separation of souls has eventuated through quite a number of souls becoming primarily or exclusively conditioned to the material. It would seem that a soul primarily or exclusively conditioned to the material will become lost, lost within its own creation of materialism, often in the absence of the immaterial. You could say in the absence of the divine if you like.

To me, it is wise that a soul keeps a balance between the material and the immaterial while in participation of the material. One way or the other often leads to a soul becoming lost it would seem. Yes, even souls primarily or exclusively conditioned to the immaterial can also become lost, while in participation of the material. In the absence of balance, there can only be imbalance. This imbalance to me can only lead to souls becoming lost within their own creation.

For myself, at times I find it quite difficult in maintaining this balance, for so often I become too much of a participator in the absence of the observer. You know what, this is called being human. There is nothing wrong in experiencing a lost soul, it is just when the soul becomes excessively lost is when the human self and even the soul becomes destructive unto itself and everything else. Lucky for humans, there seems to be souls that are not lost right throughout human history, the trick is, all we need is the wisdom to listen to them. 

To Be Spiritual in Essence

Written by Mathew Naismith

"Essence is a deep word: it drives our souls and is the engine which our spirit revolves around. Essence transcends each of our stories and follows us no matter which forms we may take. To see and accept the essence of another is to have power in how you work and flow with another. To embrace your style is to never work against yourself. Essence can have other meanings, but for a human being, this definition of style is one that will take you far."

Source: https://personaltao.com/soul-spirit/discovering-essence/

A part of our own spiritual essence is to observe, at times without participating in what we observe, and accept the essence of other people, animals and the environment as a whole. Spiritual essence is about observing the connection with other essences with the environment as a whole. How many spiritual people feel this essence where non-spiritual people don't? Being spiritual is really to do with your own spiritual essence and the connection this has with all other essences within the environment. Yes, the perception of a God also gives us this spiritual connection that all is connected even when perceived to be separate. Sorry, but the perception of God is not disdainful to me in anyway. 

A lot of spiritually aware people think we should simply observe as this is a more spiritual. To accept that everything has a connection is spiritual, this means accepting being a participator as well, for there is no observation without something to observe and visa-versa!!

How many spiritually aware people desire to separate themselves from the present participation, the present reality?  A lot of people but you need to understand that our own spiritual essence is not comfortable being this out of balance, in fact the more of the spiritual essence we become, the less we desire to feel out of balance with the rest of our environments spiritual essences.

Yes, as we become more of the spiritual essence, we desire to feel more balanced with our environment, not less balanced. However, you come to a point where you also observe, in the absence of desire, that accepting the present reality as it is, is just as spiritual if not more spiritual no matter how imbalanced it is. Once our desires (ego) no longer control us, we are free to observe and participate in all of what creation is for what it is, not what we desire it to be. This simply means any true spiritual person can exist in any environment. Many of us today are a good depiction of this.

In my early teenage years, I had a choice to either become more of an observer or become more of a participator. Even though I had to endure discomfort from a chronic injury from six rears of age, I chose to be more of a participator than an observer. The trick in this is the ability to observe your own participation but also accept simply being a participator at times. I allowed my participation to be free of my own observations thus allowing me more freedom to express myself as a participator. To be honest, even if we know it or not, a lot of us are doing just this, allowing our own participation to express itself without the influence of observation from any source.

I don't find it strange that while we are being observed by the authorities within our participation, a lot of us react differently to if we weren't being observed. Why do multinationals do as they please? Because they have a perception they are not being observed as they have no authority above them observing them. They would indeed change the way they participate when observed by a higher authority, this is why many of them stay ignorant to any other higher authority observing them!! Actually, a lot of people do this, stay ignorant to any other higher authority or consciousness observing their own participation.

Of course if you are spiritual in essence, it seems no amount of observation will change the way you participate in life. Actually, knowing you are being observed influences you to become more of the spiritual essence within all things. However, you will find when you come to a point of spiritual growth, you will accept participating while not under the influence of observation just as much as accepting being influenced by observation. It is amazing how people react when they truly believe that God, a higher authority, is observing there participation. This of course changes when the Church or sect becomes the higher authority!!     

Hard to imagine isn't it, that a person of true spiritual essence accepts participating as much as observing? This is only hard to imagine because many of us desire to be and feel a desire of being spiritual in essence only, in all honesty, desires and feelings have nothing to do with spiritual essence. A truly spiritual person will not desire to be in any one state over and above other states no matter what they feel or desire. Of course feelings and desires are of participation which is as accepted as being totally egoless!!

In a reality of imbalances, you will desire to feel balanced; this is so natural for a person spiritual in essence. Once you connect, not only with your own spiritual essence but with the spiritual essence of your entire environment, you will see the balance within the environment. It is like looking at the small picture, your own spiritual essence, as opposed to looking at the big picture, the spiritual essence within all things.

Should we accept the imbalances that are created in the absence of perceiving that we are not being observed by a higher authority? Let's be honest, why are multinationals so expressive of imbalances? They perceive they are not being observed for only in knowing we are being observed do we express more balance. How many criminals act more in a balanced way within their present environment when being observed? How many religious people, who believe in God, act differently when God is the higher authority, not the churches or sects? If you don't accept being part of this imbalance, it is most likely you are a part of bringing human reality back into balance with the rest of the environment. To bring natural balance back in human reality, we must also accept being non-accepting of being imbalanced as well, a true sense of acceptance.

http://humansarefree.com/2016/05/spiritual-awakening-stages-path-of.html                           

Living Consciousness

Written by Mathew Naismith

There are a number of different sources of information in relation to living consciousness, each has their own views on living consciousness but what is living consciousness? I have included two sources in relation to this topic further on in my post.

Living consciousness is basically perceived as representing an energy source in motion while in participation; this is instead of a consciousness not in motion. To get an idea what represents a consciousness in motion and not in motion, imagine being an observer to participation. Being a participator is obviously of motion, however, being an observer judging or perceiving, for example, a negative or positive, is also of participation. Full on observation is observing participation void of any motion (participation) what so ever. Participation refers directly to motion therefore a living consciousness, however, as I will explain further on in this post, this only represents a consciousness that is half alive, half aware.

So does this mean a consciousness not of motion is dead as opposed to living?

In true state of observation therefore motionlessness/timelessness, nothing is in opposition as there are no perceptions of opposites. In this state everything is as one, for only in time is there starting and ending points therefore opposing forces like birth and death, light and dark, high and low, etc. Does consciousness actually go into a state of death from a state of life after our demise? Time, therefore motion and participation, tells us it does but timelessness, therefore motionlessness and observation, tells us something quite different. If you perceive that a major shift in energy flows from one state to another, like from birth to death, is a state where consciousness dies, a complete state of death is perceived. However, when we truly observe without participation, no true form of separation of one state to another has occurred. In a state of observation there are no perceptions, there is only awareness void of any separation therefore motion what so ever.

Perceived living consciousness = motion + participation + time + perceptions + separation

Non-living consciousness = motionlessness + observation + timelessness + awareness + oneness

It's really advisable not to perceive that a non-living consciousness is dead or represents the death of a consciousness. Within this state you actually become more alive as you become more aware. Yes, there is a connection with being aware and life. How aware is an insect to life, to its own existence, than man? Man is more aware of life than an insect, however, how many people are aware of an existence of consciousness after death? It's as though we are only half alive when not of the awareness of consciousness's existence after our so-called death. We are basically living in participation wile excluding observation, a separation of participation and observation. What occurs when we become more observant? We become more aware even in our present state!!

Living consciousness actually refers to both motions and motionlessness, time and timelessness, participation and observation, etc, void of separation of one to the other. 

A good way to practice in observation is to go on an internet forum and simply observe without judgment. It's a lot better if you observe what you perceive to be negative in some way; this can include anything that questions your own personal and professional beliefs/concepts to anyone's actions that disgusts you. Condition your consciousness to wholly observe at first and when you feel comfortable in observation, interact/participate with other people. Note, when in participation, avoid any participation with anyone who is obvious within their aggression towards you at first. You will soon be able to participate with people who are obvious within their aggression latter on. It's actually advisable to do this, only when comfortable to do so, as this will condition you to then observe your own participation under duress or strain. Yes, you will have to still block some people. I don't ignore people while in participation; I see this as being rude and disrespectful so I block certain people instead but only after a certain amount of interaction.                                

http://www.sunypress.edu/p-5291-living-consciousness.aspx

Extract: Throughout the work, Barnard offers “ruminations” or neo-Bergsonian responses to a series of vitally important questions such as: What does it mean to live consciously, authentically, and attuned to our inner depths? Is there a philosophically sophisticated way to claim that the survival of consciousness after physical death is not only possible but likely?

https://zenhabits.net/wake-up-a-guide-to-living-your-life-consciously/

Extract: Living consciously is about taking control of your life, about thinking about your decisions rather than making them without thought, about having a life that we want rather than settling for the one that befalls us.

_______________________________

I don't actually conform to taking control of our life. For me, it's more about letting go of control of motions; this gives us more free will to choose how we want to live our lives while living a life in motion. You really don't have to be in control therefore controlled by motion to be of a living consciousness.......        

Like a Butterfly

Written by Mathew Naismith

What is wise to understand is that when people like me seem derogative, we are not really being derogative, only a perception of negatives and positives will judge like this. If I call the human race a virus that is devouring its host, this isn't being derogative as there is no perception of a negative, it's simply stating a fact of how humans can behave. This kind of behaviour is quite natural for the human species to express up to date, of course if the human species allowed itself to consciously evolve even further, this kind of behaviour simply wouldn't and couldn't exist, I will explain.              

What is or isn't negative or positive to the observer is completely different the participator, mainly because there are no negatives or positives perceptions when of the observer. The more of the observer we become, the less motion is expressed therefore the less of the perceptions of negatives and positives we judge/perceive. Also, the more of the observer we become, the less we feel love and light because we are love and light. Feelings are of a high degree of motion therefore participation.  

The participator judges more negatives and positives the more of the participator we become, this is probably why the expressions like toxic and negative are used so frequently these days in Westernised spirituality. You see the more of the participator we become, the more perceived negatives and positive we perceive/judge.

OK, on one end of the scale negatives are ignored and/or denounced because they are toxic to our own positive vibrations. On the other end of the scale we have materialists who ignore what they have created, for example, child and adolescent prostitution. In the middle of the scale we have people like me who are not ignorant to these things, this is simply because these motions are not critically judged as being negative as it's natural for a leech to leech/sponge off of a victim/host.

How many of the elite create and then live off of sick dying people? How many of the elite create a reality that feeds off of other people in one sense or another? Cannibalism comes to mind which was and still is a part of some people's reality around the world, it's certainly a part of the elite's reality which is then forced upon the rest of humanity.

Is the human species acting like a virus, a leach and a cannibal negative?

Is an actual leach type creature negative because it naturally feeds off of other animals? Is a virus negative because it naturally devours its host and is a cannibal negative while naturally existing within its own environment?

A spiritual person goes into a forest and immediately feels all these positive vibrations, this is while at the same time the forest is all about a dog eat dog world. Are other animals praying off of other animals, each other and plants negative, why is it then negative for the human species to act in this way?

The human species is a part of the natural environment, this is too obvious in the way the human species mimics so much of the natural environment, the difference is, the human species somehow puts itself above what it mimics. Also, a leech is a leach as a virus is a virus as a cannibal is a cannibal, they are what they are void of being like each other, however, the human species is expressive of all of these motions and more, the question is now, is the expression of all these motions, all these participation's, representative of an evolving consciousness?

Yes, the observer observes that some parts of the human species is expressive of these motions of the natural environment, this is completely natural for a species to do when it puts itself above all other species and forms of existence, the point is, not everyone of the human species expresses themselves in this way.

Yes, the human species is a part of nature but it's also a part of a different natural state of existence, an existence that is of the observer rather than a participator.

The universe itself is all about participation, motion, everything it creates is of participation; this is what we call nature, a natural environment of motion. This however is not the only natural environment we are a part of; we are also a part of the observer of participation.

The observer can be of love void of having to feel love first to be of love, in actuality the feeling of love is negated through being love instead of just feeling love. The participator on the other hand has to feel love, within this motion it will never become truly of love because there is simply no observation of love, just participation of love. Can we stop acting like a leech, a virus and a cannibal if we are still in participation of these motions? Only through observation is human consciousness able to evolve, of course observation is of awareness, the more we observe, the more we become aware.

Yes, it's hard to imagine, in a reality, a universe, of a high degrees of motion, one seemingly has to express love to be of love, basically, to put love into motion. Imagine being love without having to feel love. It's hard to imagine only because we are conditioned to participation rather than observation. As there are no perceptions of negatives or positives in observation, there are no feelings of love, joy, harmony and so on, they are simply not needed to be of these motions. Imagine being of motions void of motions, simply a motionless state of being of everything void of judgment or bias.

Yes, the natural environment of motion, the universe, tricks us to think we have to put everything into motion to be of that motion, this could not be further from the truth for we are more than motion could ever express in one state of motion. Motion represents a very tiny part of who we are as a whole; only through being aware of this will human consciousness evolve. Yes, we are a part of our environment but only a tiny part, the rest is often obscured through excessive motion.

All of creation is not based on the perceptions of negatives and positives, good and bad, wrong and right, love or not love and so on, separation period, perceptions are simply created and perceived, they are not the bases of all of creation.

Yes, man could have been a butterfly, he simply chose differently........

The Observer - A Passive Existence

Written by Mathew Naismith

I cannot personally think of a more passive existence than being an observer. An observer being an observer of motion or participation even of one's own participation. It's this involvement or participation of any motion that detracts away from our passive nature, the more the participator we become, the less passive of an existence we create. Of course the more the observer we become, the more passive of  an existence we create, it's all to do with how passive we are and more importantly, more of the observer we become.

It's impossible for a true observer to be anything but passive, Buddha and Jesus are prime examples of this passive existence or being. You can't be aggressive and be a true observer, this means any existence or reality that is noticeably aggressive, is created from other sources, this is why it is said that God's consciousness didn't create realities like we are presently experiencing. No true observer can create a reality that is primarily based on destruction. Basically, the present human mentality wasn't created from anything like a God consciousness, a consciousness that is able to perceive, or more precisely, observe, beyond human conscious perceptions.

A true observer, or if you like, a higher consciousness, is able to observe the bigger picture as it's unlimited within it's observation, basically, there is absolutely no bias within this kind of observation. Human consciousness on the other hand can only observe through it's bias, thus limiting this kind of consciousness to observing a smaller picture. As I have said many times before, what makes human consciousness human, is it's limitations, otherwise it's not human. This is the same with God's consciousness or any simular consciousness to God's consciousness, it's the limitlessness that makes a God like consciousness, a higher consciousness, what it is.

This kind of consciousness is also known as the divine inner self within all things, basically, it's an energy that connects all things no matter how unobservant a consciousness becomes, even of itself.  This energy is divine, in that no matter how disconnected a consciousness feels, it is always connected to everything else through this energy within all things. It's quite understandable why we call this kind of energy divine, and this is why it's also said that we never truly became disconnected to this divine energy. I have personally come across consciousness's that tried to disconnect themselves from this energy flow, all I did was smile, while being aware that they will always be connected to this consciousness no matter how hard they try to disconnect themselves from this inner divine energy.

All we have done is stopped being a true observer while experiencing human consciousness. Being that human consciousness limitations also include being unaware of our truer being, it's quite understandable why we have stopped being an observer in lieu of being a participator, a consciousness that is unable to perceive beyond it's numerous limitations. True freedom from our present situation, can only obtained through the awareness of how limited human consciousness actually is, of course a controlling ego will tell you otherwise as always!!