Limitless Awareness

Written by Mathew Naismith

This is what I mean about wisdom and synchronicity, words of wisdom leading to synchronicity, creating a synchronistic moment within the present. Considering that I was going to write about how we don't become aware but simply become less consciously limited, the follow remarks by Kim were well timed.      

Reply

Onederfully said Mathew <3 The separation is illusionary. So basically the collective is all there is, where simultaneously the collective is an illusion as well. I hear what you say and recognize this in me. Question is how separated we truly are when we experience ourselves to be separated...

My Reply

As you said Kim, separation is an illusion as we only perceive separation.

This is inline with the next topic I am going to write about; we don't become aware, we simply become less consciously limited to certain specifics like 3rd dimensional aspects. There is nothing new in knowledge or awareness as knowledge and awareness are not governed by time, however, aspectual time related consciousness is limited by perspectives and perceptions. Perspectives and perceptions fragment awareness, therefore consciousness, giving a perception of a new awareness/knowledge.

__________________________

Indeed, awareness is not of time therefore governed by the same limitations as time or 3rd dimensional aspects. No matter what we become aware of or create through knowledge, the creations that awareness has created have always existed as a pure state of awareness. What I mean by a pure awareness is there are no separation of awareness therefore bias therefore limitations within this state. For an example, a state of bliss is not preferred over and above a state of chaos; only in conscious states of limitations can this be the case.

States of limitations simply refer to states of consciousness where awareness is fragmented (divided) in numerous ways, usually through specific ideologies, especially the ideologies that are consciously limiting. Of course not all ideologies are consciously limiting to certain specifics.

Look for ideologies that teach unconditional acceptance, for only in unconditional acceptance can a true sense of unconditional love exist. An unlimited ideology will teach you acceptance rather than separation from desired aspects over others, yin from yang, negative from positive and so forth, of course this isn't for everyone as always........      

Looking Beyond

Written by Mathew Naismith

I do receive some interesting queries and replies at times that send me off writing again, it's as though some people are able to incite the inner most awareness from other people without much effort.

Sorry for this Mike, you started me off again which isn't unusual for you; you seem to have a knack, an ability for it.  

Enlightenment: Education that results in understanding and the spread of knowledge.

(Hinduism and Buddhism) the beatitude that transcends the cycle of reincarnation; characterized by the extinction of desire and suffering and individual consciousness.

Enlightenment to me is of a state of the extinction of desire and suffering and individual consciousness that is reached through awareness. Could a collective consciousness, as opposed to an individual consciousness, become this aware? Looking from a human perspective, I would say no. Looking from a more open and aware consciousness, most probably and likely.

Indeed Mike, 3 dimensional realities consist of both polarities, after all it's these polarities, and at times opposing polarities, that create 3 dimensional realities like this. We do have a choice to be either expressive of opposing or unifying polarities or both. Our present human reality is imbalanced because there are few unifying expressive polarities being expressed; it's either one or the other in opposition to the other to an extreme.

If I was to counteract the negative opposing polarities, people and their expression, with extreme positivity, does this give balance to a reality? There is no balance to be had in separation, only further imbalance; it's basically what a lot of new age spiritually aware people are doing.

Imagine an old fashion scale; one side represents positive and the other negative. Now imagine the positive being further extended on the arm than the negative, how is this balance? It's the same if both polities of a scale were excessively extended, the further away both polarities are away from each other, the harder it is to obtain balance. The last thing we should be doing is distancing (separating) ourselves from the whole, from the pole that holds the arm of the scale. The closer we are to the pole, the easier it is to obtain balance.

You could look at the pole and the base of the scale representing the source of creation (God), the closer we become to this pole (the creative source), the easier it is to obtain balance in any dimension. You can't ascend into another so-called higher dimension without first being accepting, especially if the dimension is of unconditional love. How can you become unconditionally loving without first being unconditionally accepting? This is exactly what a lot of people are trying to do, become unconditionally loving void of being unconditionally accepting period. In actuality, people who are supposed to be more unconditionally loving, void of being unconditionally accepting, have less and less acceptance, not more acceptance.

It would seem on their part we are simply against these people and their ideologies, this couldn't be further from the truth, it is the way they think sadly enough. We are simply trying to help them to become aware that you can't be unconditionally loving without first becoming unconditionally accepting, even and especially while in a 3rd dimensional reality.

Acceptance doesn't mean we have to become what you accept, it simply means accepting what is for what it is. We know not what we do, if we did, we simply couldn't and wouldn't do it; this is the way it is.

Can we ascend (evolve) to a more aware consciousness in turn giving us piece on Earth?  If our consciousness is going to stay 3 dimensional, I would say not. We must evolve on from being of human consciousness, what a lot of people call ascend, to obtain this on a collective scale, a huge ask. It would have to take a huge shift in consciousness, a shift away from being non-unconditionally accepting to start with. As we personally know ourselves Mike, this is not easy under the present circumstances.

Kim Passie also brought foreword some interesting queries within his remarks.   

My Reply

Human perception is that neutrality is between negative and positive, it's the balancing force between negative and positive like old fashion scales. This is true in a sense.

However, neutrality is an entity all of its own, it's not really a part of negative and positive but it can balance out negatives and positives. Negative and positive acting/being as one is simply neutrality, it basically neutralises negatives and positives in a state they are no longer needed in.

Indeed Kim, just because neutrality can exist between positive and negative, doesn't make it of positive and negative, it's a completely different entity. It's like a triangle; neutrality is the pinnacle of the triangle so neutrality is indeed above positive and negative. Neutrality is between negative and positive but more importantly above more than between.

If neutrality was on the same line or level as positive and negative, you could clearly say neutrality is between positive and negative but as you say it's not, not really.

Reply

Wow Mathew <3 This is Onderfully put.... I actually felt this, this morning <3 I realized that neutrality can be seen as the space in which positive and negative happen...

My Reply

Well stated Kim, you seem to have grasped wisdom very well. To comprehend wisdom is one thing, to understand wisdom is another. You can tell who is really aware and who isn't in the queries and remarks they express. The people who have wisely learnt from their environment instead of suffered from their environment. You seem to have stopped suffering from your environment, you have basically neutralised the environment around you it would seem. 

A good example of suffering is excessive positivity in counteraction to suffering. Suffering has created a reaction of excess positivity, in actuality the positivity in this case is primarily based on negative suffering. There is a difference between negative and positive suffering. What is neutrality based on? Neither or both in neutrality to each other, this is why this state is so aware; there are no biases to start with.

Today's westernised spirituality is all about feeling good, usually in counteraction to the suffering, insurmountable biases. How do caring loving parents treat their children? They will suffer for their children so their children may not suffer, they will often give while going without themselves, is this negative? 

Spirituality, wisdom and awareness isn't all about us feeling good, it's about finding a balance in life while suffering yourself to save others from suffering at times, like caring loving parents. Is suffering negative when we learn from it and give so much? Feeling good quite naturally occurs when we become aware of this neutral state; this is without feeling good on the back of suffering. This feel good isn't based on suffering but a state of neutrality as neutrality isn't in counteraction to anything.

Good to hear that you don't just comprehend neutrality but understand it too.

In Hope or despair??

Written by Mathew Naismith

Indeed, many people today are disheartened, discouraged and/or less hopeful of the future of humanity, humanity, to more and more people, seems to be descending into its own demise, its own end.

It's important not to discount atheists feeling like this, in actuality they can feel just as much if not more disheartenment than anyone else of any other ideology or ism. The atheist dilemma is seeing that ideologies that promise the world or deliverance, deliver very little, in fact deliver quite the opposite. If the ideology of love and light is so powerful void of lifting a finger, why are things noticeably getting worse instead of better in the world? Understanding about a true sense of unconditional love and acceptance myself, that is beyond 3rd dimension aspects, the ideology of love and light should work in this way but its not, quite the opposite is occurring.

One of the fundamental elements a quantum physicist needs to be a good quantum physicist is to be able to perceive beyond 3rd dimensional aspects. Two particular ideologies come to mind that do this as well, Taoism and Hinduism. To one degree or another, religion gives us a perception beyond 3rd dimensional aspect, the perception of God, void of being just of a 3rd dimensional man that is, is a prime example of this.

It seems that the 3rd dimension is going to hell; there is no hope, only despair!!

The 3rd dimension isn't going to hell, its only man's perception of a 3rd dimension that is going to hell. Is the rest of the 3rd dimensional aspect of the universe going to hell? No, even when the universe has reached the end of its cycle, as everything does that is created and governed by time, 3rd dimensional aspects still exist beyond 3rd dimensional aspects and perceptions. Just because there are different dimensions or some perceive, levels of dimensions, doesn't mean one perception of a dimension, a so-called higher dimension, instantly destroys a so-called lower dimension once a consciousness becomes aware of a so-called higher dimension.

Everything exists simultaneously, all at the same time, just because a consciousness has become aware of a more aware consciousness, doesn't mean the less aware consciousness no longer exists, it simply seems to not exist within the presence of a more aware consciousness. I do say seems to not exist for a good reason, the reason being that everything exists in the now, the present, even what was created by time.

To comprehend this you need to first comprehend and then understand beyond 3rd dimensional aspects, this is not easy because we are primarily conditioned to think in 3rd dimensional aspects. Within other dimensions, 3rd dimensions exist without the perceptions of physicality, in actuality 3rd dimensional aspects don't need mass or physical being to exist. Some scientists have concluded that atoms are not of a solid substance, considering it's these atoms that mass are perceived to be created from!!

Once you become wealthy, does this mean poor people no longer exist? So once you become more aware, does this mean a consciousness being less aware no longer exists?  It simply means your own conscious perceptions have become more aware, this doesn't negate all other kinds of awareness; only within your own perceptions can this be so.

Within any dimension, 3rd dimensional aspects can be experienced; it's just that 3rd dimensional aspects are but a part of a reality instead of primarily being most of, if not all of, a reality, a perception. In actuality the more aware a consciousness become, the more everything becomes as one. Just because man's perception of his 3rd dimensional reality is going to hell, doesn't mean that all 3rd dimensional realities are going to hell. Trying to run away from this kind of reality by becoming more aware is simply not going to work, not in reality. Where is the oneness in this?

Are ideologies like love and light supposed to influence man's 3rd dimensional reality?

The main consensuses is that, on a personal level, we are suppose to go onto a 5th dimension, in truth, it's a separation from one level of consciousness from another, from a toxic (negative) vibration to something far more positive.

I can't think of too many truly aware and wise like Jesus, Buddha, Sama Darshanam, Rumi, Confucius, etc, that desired to personally only be aware of a consciousness outside of 3rd dimensional conscious aspects. If one kind of conscious awareness is present within another kind of conscious awareness, the influence of change is meant to be. For example, if a 5th dimensional aspectual consciousness is present within the 3rd dimensional consciousness, the presence of the 5th dimensional consciousness, within the 3rd dimension, is meant to influence 3rd dimensional consciousness.

If you know your human history, you will know that we are playing out the same cycle over and over again; we are simply not evolving from this cycle as I am sure we are meant to do. If we were not meant to, why have a perception of God, giving us a perception outside 3rd dimensional aspects? Why have so many other consciousnesses that exemplified a consciousness outside of 3rd dimensional aspects?

As quantum physics is proving, we are simply not just of 3rd dimensional aspects and we are indeed meant to evolve from this as a collective.

So is there hope or is hope simply a fantasy, a delusion of circumstance? One must look beyond 3rd dimensional aspects to have hope, if not, only despair will exist for those on the receiving end of man's 3rd dimensional aspectual reality.

Note: These words are my own so please don't take them to heart, they simply reflect my own reflections and experiences.                             

A True Positive Perception

Written by Mathew Naismith

First of all perceptions are, "The representation of what is perceived; basic component in the formation of a concept". Concepts are often based on a negative and positive, bad and good, wrong and right, etc; perceptions are simply to do with the way we look at our environment and ourselves. A good example is the formation of an ism or ideology which is often based on these concepts of opposing polarities, two opposite attributes or tendencies, atheism and religion, God and man, yin and yang, etc.

When one side or attribute is perceived as excessively positive, this instantly makes the opposing side excessively negative. The more perceived the positive is of one side, the more negative the opposing side becomes. So being excessively positive actually creates more and excessive negatives, not less. This is not a true example of positiveness; a true example of positiveness is perceiving the perceived negatives less negatively, not more negatively. In actuality working with the negative rather than running away from them or ignoring them because they are so negative!!

I will explain myself better by using a scenario as follow.

Who would a wealthy person embrace if there was only a choice of another wealthy person, a positive, or a wretched poor person, a negative, to embrace? Now, who would a spiritually aware person embrace, if there was only a choice of a positive spiritual person and a negative non-spiritual person to embrace? The scenario outcome is exactly the same, as the perceived positive person will always be embraced over and above a negative person. What if I told you that a true positive person would always embrace the negative person first and foremost, even if this takes them out of their own comfort zone?

What you have is the same exact mentality between a wealthy materialist and a spiritual aware person. The western spiritual perception of this is, materialism is of a 3rd dimensional consciousness where the spiritual is of a 5th dimensional consciousness. Not sure how this works when both mentalities express the same attributes or behavioural patterns!!

A 5th dimensional consciousness is supposed to entail a consciousness to be unconditionally loving, unconditionally accepting, unconditionally compassionate, etc. What we are talking about here is levels where human consciousness evolves to. The main point here is levels, where normally with levels one level is successfully completed to go onto the next level of consciousness. What level of completion, in a 3rd dimension, is there while excluding all excessively perceived negatives from the equation? A 3rd dimensional level can't be completed unless one can embrace all as one. This is clearly not occurring and in actuality quite the opposite is occurring.

Being excessively positive is simply creating excessive negatives in the first place, to go on from this and create even more negatives isn't of a 5th dimension consciousness, it's purely of a 3rd dimensional conscious mentality. 

A 5th dimensional consciousness simply neutralises the negatives by embracing them first and foremost. Being positive has nothing to do with creating excessive negatives and more negatives overall, or, ignoring these insurmountable negatives because they are excessively negative, it's about embracing all as one.

You must understand, this age is known as the age of false prophets, this simply means an age of trickery and deceit especially upon ourselves by ourselves. If you look at the world around us, where isn't there trickery and deceitfulness? We have simply been tricked into thinking we are positive in our thinking when we are not; to someone like me this is too obvious. We are simply trying to separate ourselves to what we have perceived and critically judged as being negative, separation just simply doesn't exist within a 5th dimensional consciousness.

To put it plainly, human consciousness will not evolve to the next level of consciousness with this kind of mentality of separation, not that I believe in levels myself. Levels simply give us the perception we are not at a certain stage or level of evolving, it really is just a perception we have. To see this one must first see everything as one, if everything is as one, where are the levels? Evolving to me simply means awakening, an awakening that everything is as one no matter how much we desire to separate ourselves from what we desire not to be of. 

Does yin and yang, positive and negative exist? Yes, but the perception of how negative and positive they are is really just based on our personal perceptions, no more. To evolve from human consciousness, as we have evolved before, doesn't incorporate us to accept less and separate ourselves more from everything, it takes quite the opposite.

To a lot of spiritually aware people, posts like this are excessively negative; I have simply lost count how many times I have been called negative just by simply pointing out the obvious and truth. Labelling everything that is not of our own vibrations negative is simply not being positive, far from it. This kind of separatist mentality certainly will not lead to evolving consciously, if anything a regression of consciousness.

True positiveness isn't excessive expressions of positiveness, far from it. True positiveness is all about embracing the negatives, in turn, turning them around to become anything but excessive negatives that need to be avoided at all cost.

Fear of what is negative will only create excessive negatives to be feared even more......M G Naismith   

Existence of Circumstance

Written by Mathew Naismith

How often do circumstances in life determine an outcome or an existence? For an example, the Rothschild's are supposed to be worth 500 trillion giving them a false demigod status. The offspring (children) of this family will be immediately influenced by this demigod status; this is the circumstance they are born into. It's the same with everything in life, our lives are all determined by circumstance and it's these circumstances in life that create the existence we will experience.

Imagine if the Earth stopped spinning just through circumstance or there was no demigod status in existence to start with, our existence would be quite different than it is now. Of course a demigod always tries to create their own circumstances, often creating detrimental circumstances for other people and the environment in the mean time.

We might then look at, for example, the Rothschild's in a negative sense. This label of negativity, in my mind, is not warranted simply due to circumstance.

The circumstance of greed, wealth, power and control has been around since the dawn of man, it is a circumstance of this status quo that creates an existence like this, in turn creating false demigods. Human consciousness is simply conditioned to this kind of status quo; it knows no other way to exist. Even when a more balanced and constructive way of existence is portrayed or exemplified, who really wants to go outside of their comfort zone and take a risk at another way of existing?

Once a spiritually aware person creates a comfort zone, do they desire to go outside this comfort zone? Then why is it expected for other people within their own comfort zone to go outside of their created zone? One must lead by example; otherwise it's simply an example of a possibility, not a reality!!

Do we, through simple circumstance, judge as we please everything within our environment either negative or positive? This of course is usually done by being in judgment in relation to ourselves, to our own created comfort zone.

The kind of mentality I am portraying here isn't easy to comprehend to start with, so how can you understand something you can't even comprehend? You don't unless circumstances allow you to. My own circumstances in life have created the kind of mentality I am expressing today. Nothing created by circumstance can be labelled either negative or positive, to do so would be of a false demigod status where judgment of negatives and positives give us control over circumstance.         

Being Truly Spiritual

Written by Mathew Naismith

Spiritual to me is a comprehension beyond normal 3rd dimensional aspects, aspects which are defined as being of material body, form or substance. Being spiritual is also the awareness and comprehension that consciousness isn't just of and created by the physical brain.

Is being spiritual extricating oneself from 3rd dimensional aspects thus creating a safe haven from human existence? What did the truly aware and wise do? What did Buddha, Jesus, Confucius, Rumi and so on do in their lives? Seen as I have a good friend who is a Hindu, the following is the Hindu equivalent to the above mentioned. Sama Darshanam (Equal Views) Samana Darshana (Aligned Views) Manava Shastra (Human Science).  

These very wise and aware consciousnesses went out of their safe havens even while and especially while enlightening themselves. What are we doing? Protecting our safe havens from all that can enlighten us!!

Buddha and Jesus sacrificed their human safe havens. If you are not willing to lose what you have gained, you really haven't gained anything. Any fixated attachments we are not willing to sacrifice for the good of all is what we really should be avoiding, not what could be enlightening us.

Look at Jesus, Buddha, Confucius, Indian spiritualists for example; they sacrificed their haven to be truly spiritual, wise and aware, what are a lot of western spiritual people doing today? Sacrificing everything else to create and protect their haven, they are not willing, like the wise and aware, to come close to sacrificing their haven for other people. Anything remotely threatening their haven is usually deemed as negative/toxic!!

Being Human: Can we have a human experience without being human? This is like; can we have an experience of being a mother without being a mother of a child? It's the so-called lower qualities (vibrations) that make the higher qualities so high. Could the existence or perception of a God exist if it wasn't for the lower qualities?

On the other hand, experiencing being human doesn't mean we will be of humaneness as being a mother doesn't mean we will be a mother to our child.

To the true wise and aware, there are no lower qualities, just simply less aware consciousness, it's these less aware consciousnesses that create a perception of lower and higher qualities of being human. It really does take a perception of a lower quality to perceive a higher quality.

Consider this, what would a truly wise and aware consciousness desire or even need while in a state of complete contentment? This state is often referred to as a higher realm, vibration or ultimate state of reality by human consciousness. Desire or need within this state has no purpose, it simply doesn't exist. There is also no desire or need to be in this state so this kind of consciousness can find itself in any state at any given time. This kind of consciousness has no need or desire to be in this co-called ultimate state, desiring or even needing to be in this state is human. What makes human consciousness human? Its awareness, every state of consciousness is based on awareness and the wisdom to know how to use that awareness.

God's and Demigod's: We are simply still trying to be demi-gods, how many people in wealth and power today act as they are God's and Goddess's? The Rothschild's are worth over 500 trillion, the God like power and status this wealth has gives them is beyond words, they are able to do as they please as they can buy anyone and anything. Of course if they have no need or desire to buy certain people or countries, these people and countries are often dealt with.

An actual demigod is of divine nature, being that they are descendants of God's and Goddesses, basically, descendants from an aware and wise consciousness beyond most human comprehension. The people in power today are not God's or even true demigod's, they are simply human beings of a basic human consciousness, an awareness not much above other humans in certain areas but a consciousness way below other humans in other areas. The truly aware and wise have no need or desire for wealth, power and control, just to simply serve.

It's basically the age of false demigod's, an age of conditioned ignorance as opposed to an age of true awareness. How many of us are still trying to reach this ultimate state of reality, in other words a demigod status? To do this of course takes one to negate everything that isn't of themselves by judging everything not of their own vibrations as being negative or toxic, something to be avoided instead of assisted. What are the false demigod's in power over the world doing? It's all of a false demigod status.

Only a false demigod will desire or see a need of a higher status or higher quality of being. All I see is that people need to stop trying to be of a demigod status, or of a lower status, and be of what they truly are. Within this simple act, all will reveal itself to what you truly are which is everything without question or exception.

Do we desire to be everything without exception? We only desire to be of what we desire, no more, this is simply a false demigod status, a consciousness of false bearing (standing). We are much more than we could humanly perceive, of course to perceive this takes a consciousness beyond human conscious understanding. Simply don't limit yourself to a demigod status, especially a false one.

This is to me a true depiction of what being truly spiritual is......           

The Face of Mockery Revealed

Written by Mathew Naismith

The above quote for translation purposes: "Mockery is the means used by the comlexed ignorant to feel wise."  

Exposing mockery (contempt) and revealing mockery shouldn't be critically judged as negative. I'm not sure any awareness should be critically judged simply as negative thus showing contempt. Revealing anything for what it is, is truth, of course today a lot of truth is simply judged as being negative. While having so much contempt for the truth, evolving from a state of lies, deceit and contempt, is going to be impossible.  

I was recently insistently mocked on the post titled, "Simply not Knowing". I think simply stating, "They know not what they do, if they did, they wouldn't and couldn't be abusive or bullying, they simply couldn't be", related to Christianity therefore something to have contempt for. I also mentioned atheism and religion in the same context in my replies.

If at anytime we are mocking therefore showing contempt for anything, is a sign we are well and truly still of a 3rd dimensional reality, a reality that ignores awareness due to its negativity. To judge any kind of awareness negative is mockery, a state of contempt. Revealing mockery (contempt) within our environment isn't negative, it's revealing therefore of awareness. To reveal anything of our environment void of contempt is awareness, however, to reveal anything of our environment while in contempt isn't awareness, it's simply ignorance of what is of our environment.

How many people are aware that by judging so many negatives, especially when they are seen as toxic, are a show of contempt? Our present 3rd dimensional reality is highly contemptuous, how is expressing more contempt going to allow us to evolve further than our present 3rd dimensional reality or mentality? 

This is the trick while evolving in such a reality; desist in expressing contempt in a highly contemptuous reality. Mockery therefore contempt is flourishing (thriving) in our present reality because we are simply not aware of how contemptuous we have become.

One thing to remember, you are your environment, this includes everyone and everything around you. You are not in judgment of others when revealing contempt; you are simply becoming more aware of your environment which is you. Never separate yourself or think you are not of your environment, to do so is a show of contempt, a desired separation to what you think or desire you are not. 

The following was I reply I submitted in relation to this topic, I hope it's more informative.                              

___________________________

I don't want to mock people who mock others of different views and beliefs, but I do want to expose them. The funny thing is they often expose themselves without much effort. These people actually mock themselves.

People who are conditioned to mockery therefore contempt, are not bad or negative, they simply know not what they do, if they did, they wouldn't and couldn't do what they do.

Within people like me, there is no contempt, a lack of respect accompanied by a feeling of intense dislike. Because some people are conditioned to contempt, they think everyone is conditioned to contempt. Again, they simply know not what they do.

Extremist atheists have not got contempt on their own, people of new age spirituality often show contempt, not just to people but the whole of reality. To judge everything an illusion that isn't of our views is also a sign of contempt. These are the same people who think they are going onto some 5th dimension while still expressing 3rd dimensional traits like contempt to excess!!  

And we wonder why mockery (contempt) has exasperated into what it is today!!

The problem with the truth is it can seem contemptuous to some people when this isn't the case.