Written by Mathew Naismith
There are a number of different sources of
information in relation to living consciousness, each has their own views on
living consciousness but what is living consciousness? I have included two
sources in relation to this topic further on in my post.
Living consciousness is basically perceived
as representing an energy source in motion while
in participation; this is instead of a consciousness not in motion. To get
an idea what represents a consciousness in motion and not in motion, imagine
being an observer to participation. Being a participator is obviously of
motion, however, being an observer judging or perceiving, for example, a
negative or positive, is also of participation. Full on observation is observing
participation void of any motion (participation) what so ever. Participation
refers directly to motion therefore a living consciousness, however, as I will
explain further on in this post, this only represents a consciousness that is
half alive, half aware.
So does this mean a consciousness not of
motion is dead as opposed to living?
In true state of observation therefore
motionlessness/timelessness, nothing is in opposition as there are no
perceptions of opposites. In this state everything is as one, for only in time
is there starting and ending points therefore opposing forces like birth and
death, light and dark, high and low, etc. Does consciousness actually go into a
state of death from a state of life after our demise? Time, therefore motion
and participation, tells us it does but timelessness, therefore motionlessness
and observation, tells us something quite different. If you perceive that a
major shift in energy flows from one state to another, like from birth to
death, is a state where consciousness dies, a complete state of death is
perceived. However, when we truly observe without participation, no true form
of separation of one state to another has occurred. In a state of observation
there are no perceptions, there is only awareness void of any separation
therefore motion what so ever.
Perceived living consciousness = motion +
participation + time + perceptions + separation
Non-living consciousness = motionlessness +
observation + timelessness + awareness + oneness
It's really advisable not to perceive that
a non-living consciousness is dead or represents the death of a consciousness.
Within this state you actually become more alive as you become more aware. Yes,
there is a connection with being aware and life. How aware is an insect to
life, to its own existence, than man? Man is more aware of life than an insect,
however, how many people are aware of an existence of consciousness after
death? It's as though we are only half alive when not of the awareness of
consciousness's existence after our so-called death. We are basically living in
participation wile excluding observation, a separation of participation and
observation. What occurs when we become more observant? We become more aware
even in our present state!!
Living consciousness actually refers to
both motions and motionlessness, time and timelessness, participation and
observation, etc, void of separation of one to the other.
A good way to practice in observation is to
go on an internet forum and simply observe without judgment. It's a lot better
if you observe what you perceive to be negative in some way; this can include
anything that questions your own personal and professional beliefs/concepts to
anyone's actions that disgusts you. Condition your consciousness to wholly observe
at first and when you feel comfortable in observation, interact/participate
with other people. Note, when in participation, avoid any participation with
anyone who is obvious within their aggression towards you at first. You will
soon be able to participate with people who are obvious within their aggression
latter on. It's actually advisable to do this, only when comfortable to do so,
as this will condition you to then observe your own participation under duress
or strain. Yes, you will have to still block some people. I don't ignore people
while in participation; I see this as being rude and disrespectful so I block
certain people instead but only after a certain amount of interaction.
http://www.sunypress.edu/p-5291-living-consciousness.aspx
Extract: Throughout the work,
Barnard offers “ruminations” or neo-Bergsonian responses to a series of vitally
important questions such as: What does it mean to live consciously,
authentically, and attuned to our inner depths? Is there a philosophically
sophisticated way to claim that the survival of consciousness after physical
death is not only possible but likely?
https://zenhabits.net/wake-up-a-guide-to-living-your-life-consciously/
Extract: Living consciously is
about taking control of your life, about thinking about your decisions rather
than making them without thought, about having a life that we want rather than
settling for the one that befalls us.
_______________________________
I
don't actually conform to taking control of our life. For me, it's more about
letting go of control of motions; this gives us more free will to choose how we
want to live our lives while living a life in motion. You really don't have to
be in control therefore controlled by motion to be of a living consciousness.......
No comments:
Post a Comment