Living Outside the Square

Written by Mathew Naismith

I am as I do.

The garment shown here is a new acquisition of mine, it is an eastern dress garment as of a western dress suite. No, have not warn it at this stage. As I do so as I am, meaning, I live as I think as the way we all think depicts the way we live, in my case outside the square of what my immediate environments depicts. No, I am not woke or transgender, simply a person who is not governed to live and think in accordance with the present immediate environment.

Funny though, being brought up in a country environment you would think that I would do and think in accordance with a country style environment, but I don't, obviously. It is probably why I saw through western atheism, which is very different to eastern atheism, being that western atheism to me is of thinking within a particular square only. From a young age, thinking in such a limited way was just not going to occur. “So it does not exist unless proven to exist, which also means that under western atheist doctrines DNA did not exist until it was scientifically proven to exist, as of many things!!” I was never going to think therefore live by these limited standards.

I don't watch main steam media (MSM). I was recently in a situation that I watched MSM, I could not imagine subjecting my mind to such limiting factors on a regular basis. The influence of never ending lust and desires depicted on MSM to start with is of thinking within this square of lust and desires, now add violence, psychological manipulation and disinformation on a never ending massive scale. Yes, this means thinking within a particular square under these various influences is going to lead to a distorted mindset, of course anyone who is conditioned to think therefore live within a particular square like this is going to see anything outside of this square being of a distorted mindset.

So while living in a particular square, everything outside this square is going to seem distorted, while people who live outside the square see everything inside the square as being distorted in one way or another!! So which mindset is truly distorted? It truly depends on the mindset at hand, however, the ability to think outside the square leads to a mindset based more on honesty than of a mindset living within the square, in all honesty. To me, living within the square, whatever square that may be, is living a lie, leading to this kind of mentality seeing everything living outside the square living a lie. We have all done this to one extent or another while living within a particular square of influence.

 

 In the western square of influence, men wearing so-called dresses and skirts or anything remotely deemed feminine is not masculine therefore is deemed to be a distortion of the masculine energy, in truth though the opposite is true. The English had a hard time subduing kilt wearing Scots, the middle eastern people are not easily subdued either!! Apart from this, the feminine energy actually enhanced the more constructive qualities of masculine energy. Take the yin energy out of yang energy, what are you left with? People living in a square that is distorted beyond recognition.

Today's woke moment is all about the masculine energy dominating the feminine energy. Sports is a prime example of this, where males, the masculine energy, are allowed to dominate the feminine energy and not just in sports. Today's woke moment is not just about taking one energy of influence out of another energy, it is about neutralising these balancing energies period. Imagine dispelling night energy, which balances out day energy, which doing this would destroy many existing life forms. The woke movement is seemingly of this degree of destructive of energy, which is, in all honesty, of what energy? Primarily of the masculine energy that is not balanced by another energy, feminine energy.

If you live in a square of the present western woke movement of feminine energy domination and undermining, everything outside of this square is going to seem a wrong way to live, this is of the same mentality with a male, in a masculine dominated reality, living outside of a certain masculine energy criteria, even though it seem to be the opposite. If you go outside these squares we often fixate our lives to, the woke movement becomes a lie because it is of so many distortions in so many ways. So I am woke or transgender because I am conformable to dress more femininely than the average western male!!

My dress code, as of my mind set, is not seemingly dominated by the masculine energy nor this woke movement, I am not sure what square I am of if any. Are people like me actually living, to one degree or another, outside of all these squares we often find we live by no matter how distorted they are?

To come to realisation that we live within a square of lies therefore distortion, I think one has to look from a perspective outside of the square, otherwise we are not going to realise the lie we live by, which comes to reason. You can't come to reason and start living the truth instead of a lie unless you are able to observe yourself in an unbiased way. Once you learn to observe rather than just participate in life, the ability to look from outside of these squares we fixate our lives to is more likely. In all honesty, the western woke movement is all about participation in the absence of observation, otherwise they would see that the feminine energy is actually being seriously undermined. Look at how aggressive and dominating they can be, which is of what energy?

Living outside the square has not been an easy road to tread, especially when one is of telling the truth in an honest open way. My dress code is simply an expression of open honest living and yes, I have always lived in this way, which made it interesting when I lived in a small country town. Never expect, when living outside of these squares that so many people have become fixated to, that living an open honest life will be easy. It was never going to be easy to live outside of these squares within a reality fixated to these squares, in all honesty. I was never going to live a lie and state that I am not male because I dress outside the criteria of a western masculine energy dominated reality.

It is not an easy road to tread, looking from outside of these squares inwards and expressing this honestly, but to me this is far better than living within a square of lies, domination and distortions as many people are doing it would seem.

I think what is occurring in the world at present is awakening a lot of people, leading to many of us living outside of these squares of lies and distortions. Time will tell if this is enough to overcome what seems like a reality primarily influenced by endless distortions. No matter what occurs though, just stay true to yourself and forever live outside these squares.

All Living Entities

Written by Mathew Naismith

Imagine for a moment that all physical life is but a reflection of a non-physical entity. Now imagine that Gaia or the physical universe as a whole is but a tiny reflection of a non-physical source of creation. Sounds silly doesn't it!! Where does all of what man creates come from? Yes, a physical brain but of thought or consciousness that is not physical until put into motion physically. Now imagine a consciousness that isn't limited to a physical brain or to three dimensional aspects and spheres.

Not easy for the Western part of our mind or consciousness to comprehend, especially if the Western mind is also limited to three dimensional aspects and spheres. If an actual occurrence occurred but no evidence of the occurrence could be three dimensionally produced, the occurrence didn't occur!! This is how the Western mind thinks in all of us, the Eastern mind doesn't think like this. The reason for this is that the Eastern mind doesn't separate one from the other, separate man from nature/Gaia or three dimensional aspects and spheres from all other dimensions. The separation through evidence of three dimensional aspects and spheres is of the Western mind.   

The Western mind often thinks that I am separating the Eastern and Western mind, the Eastern mind in all of us doesn't think like this. The Eastern mind thinks of two spheres of the same mind or consciousness expressed in different ways, there is no true separation, only a difference in motion. Just because man has perceived his separation from the rest of his natural environment, doesn't mean man is a separate entity to the rest of the natural environment. Man is at present simply of a different motion or expression of the whole. It is understandable why man is at present so destructive to his natural environment, he has simply perceived a separation from the whole, from the source of everything.  

https://books.google.com.au/books?id=MXrOseia6W0C&lpg=PA70&ots=5MYWbqXKQz&dq=unformed%20gaia&pg=PA70#v=onepage&q=unformed%20gaia&f=false

To me, all physical entities are seen as a life form and are all a part and connected to the same source of energy. It does not matter if it's physical or non-physical; it's all a part of the same source of energy. To people like me it matters not what you call this source, an awareness or acknowledgment is all that is needed. Note; a true sense of awareness, without bias, naturally and automatically creates a sense of wisdom within a consciousness. 

Imagine being able to influence our environment and the weather. Take note, I purposely stated influence instead of control. Control simply denotes a perception of separation in taking control of another entity, even within ourselves. For example, the perception of taking control of our temper becomes separate to not taking control of our temper. It is then perceived that taking control and not taking control of our temper are completely separate entities when there not. Is the weather or our environment separate to us at any time that it doesn't influence us? This is why the Western mind tries to take control of everything; it separates everything from everything else, most often to excess. It is quite understandable why man is so destructive and self-centred at present.

Yes, we can influence our entire environment, including the weather, by working with it; all we have to do is desist in the perception of separation of ourselves to everything else. Become aware and acknowledge that everything is a living entity of the same source. Remember, it has nothing to do with taking control but influencing our environment in unison with the environment. Yes, you work with the environment as if it's a living entity, no less and no more alive than you are.........

All I can do is smile, while remembering my wife's actions this morning, my wife apologised to an ant for nearly stepping on it. To the Western mind this is a sign of lunacy, to the Eastern mind it's simply a sign of oneness and connectedness to our environment, one could not be saner. We do kill ants when they infringe on our space, it's the way it is of our present environment/reality. A balance between you and the environment, as a whole, needs to be implemented and sustained as much as possible, otherwise we create a reality we are presently experiencing.   

Further reference.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animism

https://www.oshonews.com/2016/05/18/everything-is-alive-conscious/

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/bobby-azarian/post_10079_b_8160914.html

Extract: This has profound consequences. It would mean that consciousness is spread throughout space like a cosmic web of experience. Of course awareness is greatest where there is significant information integration, but in essence, “mind” (or “psyche”) is everywhere. IIT turns out to be a modern twist on an ancient philosophical view known as “panpsychism”. But before you go dismissing the concept because of its name, you should know that intellectual heavy hitters such as Baruch Spinoza, Gottfried Leibniz, and William James are all considered panpsychists. Its central tenant is that all matter has a mental aspect, which makes consciousness universal.             

Living Consciousness

Written by Mathew Naismith

There are a number of different sources of information in relation to living consciousness, each has their own views on living consciousness but what is living consciousness? I have included two sources in relation to this topic further on in my post.

Living consciousness is basically perceived as representing an energy source in motion while in participation; this is instead of a consciousness not in motion. To get an idea what represents a consciousness in motion and not in motion, imagine being an observer to participation. Being a participator is obviously of motion, however, being an observer judging or perceiving, for example, a negative or positive, is also of participation. Full on observation is observing participation void of any motion (participation) what so ever. Participation refers directly to motion therefore a living consciousness, however, as I will explain further on in this post, this only represents a consciousness that is half alive, half aware.

So does this mean a consciousness not of motion is dead as opposed to living?

In true state of observation therefore motionlessness/timelessness, nothing is in opposition as there are no perceptions of opposites. In this state everything is as one, for only in time is there starting and ending points therefore opposing forces like birth and death, light and dark, high and low, etc. Does consciousness actually go into a state of death from a state of life after our demise? Time, therefore motion and participation, tells us it does but timelessness, therefore motionlessness and observation, tells us something quite different. If you perceive that a major shift in energy flows from one state to another, like from birth to death, is a state where consciousness dies, a complete state of death is perceived. However, when we truly observe without participation, no true form of separation of one state to another has occurred. In a state of observation there are no perceptions, there is only awareness void of any separation therefore motion what so ever.

Perceived living consciousness = motion + participation + time + perceptions + separation

Non-living consciousness = motionlessness + observation + timelessness + awareness + oneness

It's really advisable not to perceive that a non-living consciousness is dead or represents the death of a consciousness. Within this state you actually become more alive as you become more aware. Yes, there is a connection with being aware and life. How aware is an insect to life, to its own existence, than man? Man is more aware of life than an insect, however, how many people are aware of an existence of consciousness after death? It's as though we are only half alive when not of the awareness of consciousness's existence after our so-called death. We are basically living in participation wile excluding observation, a separation of participation and observation. What occurs when we become more observant? We become more aware even in our present state!!

Living consciousness actually refers to both motions and motionlessness, time and timelessness, participation and observation, etc, void of separation of one to the other. 

A good way to practice in observation is to go on an internet forum and simply observe without judgment. It's a lot better if you observe what you perceive to be negative in some way; this can include anything that questions your own personal and professional beliefs/concepts to anyone's actions that disgusts you. Condition your consciousness to wholly observe at first and when you feel comfortable in observation, interact/participate with other people. Note, when in participation, avoid any participation with anyone who is obvious within their aggression towards you at first. You will soon be able to participate with people who are obvious within their aggression latter on. It's actually advisable to do this, only when comfortable to do so, as this will condition you to then observe your own participation under duress or strain. Yes, you will have to still block some people. I don't ignore people while in participation; I see this as being rude and disrespectful so I block certain people instead but only after a certain amount of interaction.                                

http://www.sunypress.edu/p-5291-living-consciousness.aspx

Extract: Throughout the work, Barnard offers “ruminations” or neo-Bergsonian responses to a series of vitally important questions such as: What does it mean to live consciously, authentically, and attuned to our inner depths? Is there a philosophically sophisticated way to claim that the survival of consciousness after physical death is not only possible but likely?

https://zenhabits.net/wake-up-a-guide-to-living-your-life-consciously/

Extract: Living consciously is about taking control of your life, about thinking about your decisions rather than making them without thought, about having a life that we want rather than settling for the one that befalls us.

_______________________________

I don't actually conform to taking control of our life. For me, it's more about letting go of control of motions; this gives us more free will to choose how we want to live our lives while living a life in motion. You really don't have to be in control therefore controlled by motion to be of a living consciousness.......