Written by Mathew Naismith
As there is a primary source of all
physical existences, there is also a primary source of non-physical existences.
A non-physical existence isn't when we pass on (die) either. Being that all
physical existences need motion to exist, we are still in motion after we pass
on. We are just as much if not more physically in motion after we pass on. The
reason for this lies in the choice of not being limited to human perceptions
(consciousness), within this limitless state, we are able to be more
expressive, more of motion, therefore more physically expressive.
Yes, human physicality is limited within
it's own physical limitations, being human
limits us to how physical we can be. Humans are not very physical at all
because they have limited themselves to certain very human perceptions and
perspectives, the more we become predominantly human, the more we limit ourselves. These limitation
limit us to how physically expressive we become and more importantly, how aware
we will be.
The illusion we have is that intelligence
defines how aware and even wise we will be, it's an illusion because this
plainly isn't the case. How wise are we destroying the very thing we rely on
for our existence? How aware is our intelligence in that all of everything is
connected by common denominators such as existence itself? What about
everything being of one consciousness which includes trees, animals and even
rocks, yes, even the Earth as a whole!!
Intelligence, including knowledge,
obviously doesn't define awareness and wisdom and in actuality it's quite the
opposite. What also makes us human is our intelligence and knowledge, the more
we are of these traits, while at the same time denouncing being connected and a
part of other existences, the more we are becoming human. Being human of course
means limitations, a consciousness limited to certain denominators. What we are
mostly unaware of is our whole self, the more human we become, the more unaware
of our whole self we become.
Our intelligence and technological
advancements doesn't come from knowledge, knowledge of course giving us the
illusion that intelligence derives from knowledge. Where does knowledge come
from? Knowledge initially derives from the observation of our environment and
learning from that. Now take away a huge portion of that observation away, how
knowledgeable will we become? By
refuting the existence of other existences and our whole self, we limit our
observations thus limiting our knowledge, intelligence, awareness and wisdom.
This is interesting, what I am saying is
that knowledge, intelligence, awareness and wisdom, derives from observation of
our environment. What is observation void of participation? A motionless
existence, an existence that is non-physical and non-participating, it's this
state that our knowledge, intelligence, awareness and wisdom initially derives
from. We know that knowledge and eventual intelligence is created from
observation, what we are not aware of is that we have limited our observation
by becoming too human, thus in turn limiting our consciousness to certain
denominators. We have become primarily a participator rather than on observer
but now, only an observer of and through human consciousness which is shown to
be limited.
Try existing without arms and legs, how
much harder is life going to be? Try existing without a mouth or a stomach.
Each separate part of the human body represents each and every separate part of
our whole self. How much harder is it going to be to become aware void of
certain a parts of our whole self? As we refute the existence of certain
existences, we are dumbing ourselves down, we are becoming less aware and wise,
not more.
As a collective race, we have never
primarily been of one consciousness and observed through one consciousness in
the history of mankind. Spiritual practices, including religions, have always
conditioned us or made us aware that other existences do indeed exist, the
perception of heaven and hell are prime examples of this in the west in
particular. The belief in a God or God's and Goddesses, also gave us a glimpse
of the creators of existences and consciousness's. Not one thing we invent or
create is new, it all stems from the existences that are more aware of their
whole self. Of course again God or God's and Goddesses, give a depiction of our
whole self, God of course representing everything in existence.
I should point out that God to me
represents my whole self, the ultimate observer, to me this is extremely
relevant.
It is very obvious that our own leaders of
the world are not of the whole self and neither are the so called
elite/multinationals. We really shouldn't be still wondering why our
world/reality is so destructive and chaotic. It stands to reason, dumb a consciousness
down to it's whole self, what then is this consciousness able to observe from?
It's only able to observe from and through a consciousness that is hugely
limited to certain denominators, It's quite natural for a consciousness this
dumbed down to be destructive.
True freedom can only come from the
awareness of the whole self, not from one part of the whole self as we are
trying to do.
