Written by Mathew Naismith
Mother's,
I need your assistance please.
Do
the children make the mother a mother?
Considering a child isn't a child without a mother, is it not the child
who makes a mother a mother? Also, is not a mother only a mother when of a
child?
Without
a child, is not a person only of a person when not of a child, meaning, not
influenced by a child maternally?
The
reason I query this has to do with how numerous spiritually aware people put
themselves first and foremost. For example, it's about themselves feeling good
over and above other people who are suppose to be less aware like a child is.
It's
funny to think, but it's the less aware child that makes a mother a mother, and
of course, the child always comes first for the mother, especially above any
personal feel good sensations!!
Note:
If any mother's replies to this, it is likely I will insert their reply in one
of my posts for my blog unless otherwise stipulated. Also, names will be
excluded unless otherwise stipulated.
____________________________
What is one of the major mistakes of
churches? The church comes first and then the hierarchy and then God and maybe
the people of the church.
What is a church without it's people? Like
a mother, a church is not a church without it's people like a mother is not a
mother without a child. Maternally, the unaware child comes first. Now what is
occurring in Westernised spirituality today? The mother or the church is still
coming first and foremost. The church in this case being ones own personal well
being and pleasure/desire. As long as the mother/church is well and feeling
good, this will automatically pass onto the child. Of course in this case the
child would be lucky to come second, most often other hierarchy of the same
awareness level comes second, where does this leave the child that makes the
mother/the church?
So what is the aware without the unaware as
what is the church without it's people or a mother without a child? As of the
true spiritually aware, the unaware comes first, look at people like myself who
really put themselves out there because it's not about ourselves and our own
well being. It's almost maternal if not maternal, the child comes first.
As within myself, my child, my unaware
state, comes first for it needs to be nurtured, not put on a list that it comes
second best to all else, particularly in relation to my desires and feel good
sensations. Yes, people like me could just sit within our feel good desired
states and ignore all these deemed negatives, dark and toxic energies but we
don't, for the children come first and foremost.
The child simply represents an unaware
state that needs to be nurtured, mothered, for the mother is not a mother
without it's children. What is the yin without the yang? Basically, what is the
aware self without unaware self? Would we judge our children as toxic or
negative and then ignore them because of these judged vibrations? Of course
this occurs in certain situations when the maternal mothering instinct isn't
present. We are supposed to be one; there is simply no oneness without maternal
mothering instincts. Ignoring the child, the people of a church, the unaware
self, because we have judged it so in accordance with our own personal level of
hierarchy, is not oneness or maternally mothering, it's simply a depiction of
an ego in control.
Too many spiritual teachings these days
teach to put the self first and foremost, it all starts from you when it's the
children that make the mother a mother. We spend all the money and time on our
personal selves, when all we need to do is simply put the children first above
our own desires and feeling of self-gratifications. If we spend all this time
and money on ourselves to feel good, this has to benefit the rest of the world
in the long run as this will flow on. Of course while we are doing this, we are
neglecting the children by judging them toxic, negative, bad, dark, and on and
on it goes. Yes indeed, what many spiritually aware people have expressed has
been passed on; the world at present represents this.
Yes, without the mother a child can't be a
child, so the mother must also be mothered by these same motherly instincts,
but at no point should the mother be put above all else but this is exactly what
is occurring in spirituality today to a large extent. Only a perfect balance
between the child self and the motherly self can true peace and love reside.
Neglecting one over and above the other will create anything but peace and
love, only a falsified and fabricated peace and love. One is infinite, the
other finite, we are both and not of one or the other as we are the child and
the mother, the church and the people, the aware and unaware.
People like me are simply aware that we are
just as much of the aware as the unaware, the child and the mother without
neglecting one over and above the other.
Did
people like Buddha face their own ego or the ego as a whole, as one entity?
Do
not the children of a mother naturally quell the ego within the mother?
Focusing all this energy on the self to
feel good while at the same time avoiding what is deemed as toxic/negative is
pure ego. No, it doesn't start from the self, the (I); it starts from the
collective as a whole, as people like Buddha eventually find out.
As not all mothers controlling egos will be
quelled, not everyone will be able to face the controlling ego face on without acceptation;
the ego has simply too much control, it is wise to be aware of this in my mind.
It is wise the child comes first before the
ego.........Mathew G
______________________________
If you are interested, the following
replies to my request from mothers are as follow. The mother in all of us has a
lot to teach as the child has to learn, but are we willing or ready to listen
to child as yet, basically, learning from and through the unaware, something a
lot of us critically judge??
Mathew....I found the Divine Mother
Within.... there is the perfect vibration of mothering within us all.... and I
think when that Vibration becomes or is Remembered then One would act in
accordance with exactly how Devine Mother would act... there is no room then
for egotistical actions... Thank you for asking!!....btw....I have Mothered 13
kids in this life time.
Also
Hey
so here's my answer.... If so....my answer is this. Spiritually awakened people
realize that their children come through them not to them. The spiritually
awakened person knows the child has a closer connection to source because of
their innocence and lack of cognitive dissonance. The spiritually awakened
person knows they are here to guide and also learn from their children.
Understanding that there is no right or wrong but an observation of the
contrast they see, hear, and feel and then choose the perspective of the person
they want to be. Before coming into this physicality the child knows what he or
she wishes to experience and will choose the parents that will guide them in
experiencing it.
Also
Motherhood makes one whole. As Heath
Ledger put it, parenthood is an extension of oneself the knowledge that a small
being was borne from the union of two people is a miraculous event; that one's
blood runs through the veins of another. One's life changes immediately.
However, even if you are not a mother by bearing another, you can still give
those qualities to others and feel whole in yourself on a different level.
My
Reply
Yes, it's all to do with the maternal
instincts; you express this quite often Susan even though you are not an actual
mother yourself. Are gay people negative or toxic because they express
themselves different to ourselves? Are children toxic because they express
themselves different to adults? Same thing in my mind. Once you embrace instead
of avoid, you have become the maternal mother.
I
certainly appreciate your response here Susan, thank you.
I
give thanks to all the mothers within for your participation here, most
appreciated, as I needed assistance in expressing deep seated maternal
instincts over and above the controlling ways of the controlling ego.
