Dieting the Ego

Written by Mathew Naismith

Sounds funny doesn't it? It is what it exactly states, putting the ego on a diet. From psychology to spirituality is it often mentioned, in one way or the other, about putting the ego on a diet, in other words quelling the ego from its thirst, its lustful ways.

I have deliberately put myself into various different environments to see which environment is less about feeding off of each others ego, and more about putting the ego on a diet. Sadly, very few environments were about quelling the ego, putting the ego on a diet, especially on the internet, instead the feeding off of each others egos seems epidemic.

Why don't people like me feel comfortable within these environments? Why do so many others feel comfortable within these environment and uncomfortable within environments of dieting the ego? The same old adage, you are meant to be where you are most comfortable, for what ever reason.

Imagine threatening to take a multinationals wealth and power away from them to any extent, the normal response is to penalise and/or incarcerate this threat in some way, any way. Now, imagine exposing a spiritually aware person feeding off of other people's ego is going to lead to. Often the same old act of penalisation and incarceration in some way, any way, is implemented, as experienced by myself and by others many times over by light and love and/or unconditional loving people.                    

So pointing out an obvious is negative and even of toxic vibrations, but to call anyone not of your own negative or of toxic vibrations isn't!!

This is exactly the way it is today, sadly enough. Any ego gorging itself off of other people's egos seems to react in the same old way, but the present gorging in the spiritual sector is suppose to represent a new more advanced or higher vibrative consciousness!! Now imagine being one of a few people trying to guide people to put their own egos on a diet, in other words quelling the control the ego has over us at present. What new more advanced or higher vibrative consciousness? The same old adage in relation to the ego, penalise and incarcerate anything that threatens our feeding off of other people's egos.     

Yes, by all means learn to support each other in a more loving peaceful manner, but not at the cost of fattening up the ego. As it is of the present question of climate change, our ego, while gorging on what the multinationals have created, will be in defence of our own participation in climate change. The threat of further taxes exasperates this threat even further.

As I replied to the questioning of climate change: Yes, another argument against climate change is that weather, simular to what we are presently experiencing, occurred many times over human history.  

Yes June, but how many glaciers where around back in the 1800's? How many explored glaciers of the 1800's are still around today? Couple this with things like how much forest is still standing, that we are polluting the earth on a massive scale, that the ozone layer is thin and wholly and that we are phenomenally abusing energy on a huge scale, today is nothing like anything in the past. It all makes a difference to the environment therefore the weather June.

So should we have to pay higher taxes for our indiscretions? No, for the multinational have been feeding off of our ego's for years now, they are the one's that should have to pay, not the people they are feeding off of.      

https://ideas.ted.com/yes-glaciers-are-disappearing-but-thats-far-from-their-only-story/

Extract: You’ll be glad you did: Needing fewer ego-boosts gives you your mind back to focus on your priorities, making the best use of your options and opportunities. A leaner ego diet also makes you less gullible. Like a kid with a sweet-tooth who can be lured into danger by anyone dangling candy, people who need lots of praise can be readily manipulated. The hungry are soon eaten. When you’re hungry for praise, it shows. People can tell you crave to hear. They’ll sing your praises until you’re feeding out of their hands. When your ego-appetite is tamed, you are put in solid possession of your soul, your life and what you want to do about it, less distracted by your need for approval.

Yes, as I have stated many times over, making the best of what is, not the worse. A fat ego will always desire to see everything not of itself as being negative, the worse scenario. Is feeding off of other people's egos negative to people like me? My ego, to be honest, would most definitely say yes, but wisdom just says to my ego, "It is simply a consciousness lost within its own creation, nothing more, nothing less." The creation being, that we are epidemically feeding off of each other s egos. It is epidemic because this is the conscious environment the multinational's egos have deliberately created, it is purposely epidemic. Of course the natural remedy for this is to put the ego on a diet. How many obese people desire to go on a diet unless they have to or desire to?

As is stated in the above," A leaner ego diet also makes you less gullible. Like a kid with a sweet-tooth who can be lured into danger by anyone dangling candy, people who need lots of praise can be readily manipulated."

Look at how the approval rating for people like me has dropped since the epidemic of feeding off of other people's egos has escalated, it doesn't worry me for a very good reason. Yes, as I have stated in previous posts, tame the ego, put the ego on a diet, which is becoming even more disdainful to more and more people it would seem.

So what is the remedy? It is so simple, become aware but at the same time self-honestly become aware. For starters, become aware of egoistic epidemics as of feeding off of each others egos, however, as I stated before, "you are meant to be where you are most comfortable." Try to also become aware, that when the ego is at its most comfortable, is when the biggest price for the ego to be comfortable is payed. My ego is not comfortable in being of honest truth and of self-honesty but that is how the ego works and plays with us.  

Exasperated Egoistic Extremes

Written by Mathew Naismith

One can never be too positive!!

In a known age of false prophets, if the cover is not all glossy and glittery, what is in between the covers can't be positive. You have to play up to each others ego's to be positive it would seem, otherwise you are simply negative, something to penalise and/or incarcerate in some way. Yes, it is the same old consciousness being played out. The responses I receive at times is, well, hmmm. I responded to this as below.     

"We think quite differently on this matter PL. It is well known in psychology that one can become too positive for a number of different reasons. Also, leaders like Hitler and Trump are/were well and truly overly positive, what about multinationals, etc!!

How many people who think they are truly positive separate energy into positives and negatives? I couldn't think of anything more negative, to separate energy into various parts even further, most often to do with escapism which is another factor.

How many truly positive people ignore the negatives to retain a positive? Usually at the cost of people being abused, Yemen and Palestine come to mind.

We often use the positives to feed the ego even more, nothing more, you can't do this while being in a neutral state of consciousness. In a true neutral state, which I haven't attained myself, it is just energy, not negative and positive energy. If you think in negatives and positives, you think in black and white, which includes people. Often the conscious is unaware of how the subconscious works so will deny this, as expected.

I won't build up other people's ego on a lie, but I am often helpful in getting people to look at life in a different way. Getting away from separating energy more is but one of them. Yes, we could sit within our own created humour and build up each others ego's, but not on the back of the abused, which in all honesty is occurring even more today.

Sadly, a lot of people in the west can't comprehend what a true neutral state is, actually, a lot of ego's just simply don't won't to. Also, the fear of being negative is purely based on fear, which a lot of excessively positive people have unknowingly got themselves into. Actually, they simply don't won't to know and deceptively deny it to the bitter end.

The ego will often judge by the cover. Even when between the covers have been read, the cover still takes precedence. Often so-called self-proclaimed positive people will only read the cover to feed their ego's even more, this is too obvious.

The funny thing is, I am personally known as a light hearted humorous person. It has been known that women will come up to my wife and I and state I wish my husband was like me instead of a grumpy bum.  My own cover isn't all glossy and sparkly, so is often misread, but between the covers is another story. Very few excessively positive people desire to know my story, proffering to read the cover instead for obvious reasons. The reason for this is very interesting.

In what I have gone through in life, if I was anywhere near as negative as these people need to believe, I wouldn't like to think where I would be now. It takes a lot of honest collective conscious awareness to be were I am now, considering the circumstances. In the end, our own ego's will only believe and desire to know what feeds the ego, all else is penalised or incarcerated in some way, a sign that a consciousness has not evolved for thousands of years. I never penalise or incarcerate people into negatives and positives, as a lot of excessively positive humourous people do. A lot of times, it is simply a consciousness lost within its own creation."

I recall a time that people feeding off of each others ego's was deemed to be also positive, all else of course being negative to this extreme positive. As I recall my past lives lived to some extent, people feeding off of each others ego was nullified or neutralised, this act of balance is just not occurring today.

In days of past, excluding empires built up feeding off of each others ego's, people of wisdom were revered. Today, any sense of wisdom, which includes honest truth, is penalised and/or incarcerated in some way, usually by people who are excessive within their own positiveness or negativeness. When a consciousness becomes expressive of extremes, extreme ideological views are understandably created.

It is the way the collective consciousness has chosen to go, it is what it is what it is. As I try to often relay, make the best of what you have, not the worse. Making the best of what is, isn't of some extreme expression of positiveness or of feeding off of each others ego, it is simply of awareness and wisdom, if you like, honest commonsense reasoning. Commonsense reasoning must be of the absence of bias or desire therefore honest truth.

I am bewildered that so many people have put themselves in a predicament as to dreadfully fear being negative in any sense. We often read of wisdom and awareness while only taking on that for which serves the ego the most. The present state of the human collective consciousness determines this, this can be averted. 

This reminds of the question have humans created their present extreme weather occurrences, or, is this just a part of a natural cycle? A bewildering question of separatism created by bias. Extremes are a part of natural cycles, as is extremes of human consciousness. The answer of course is that our present extreme weather is a part of a natural cycle, but a cycle we are making far worse through our own actions and inactions. You would think that a consciousness guided by wisdom would counterbalance this natural cycle of extremes, instead, in the absence of wisdom, we exasperate it to an extreme. 

Yes, our natural environment can be of extremes, this doesn't mean we have to exasperate these extremes to become even more extreme. Yes, consciousness is influenced by its environment, but a wise consciousness knows not to exasperate these extremes even further. Sadly, human consciousness is seemingly going right along with the present natural extremes, further expressing extremes to an extreme.......                  

Penalisation for Being Neutral

Written by Mathew Naismith

Imagine separating two dogs that strongly desire to rule over the other, now imagine being the neutral party trying to separate these two strongly opposing dogs......                                

To some people, the following post may seem a little too complicated to understand, I apologise for this, I couldn't simplify what I wrote any further. 

Yes, accept it, we are in an age where people who speak the honest truth are being penalised and even incarcerated for doing so. Even in Australia, journalists are being penalised and incarcerated for speaking the honest truth to a more preferred desired truth.

A desired truth is either of a negative or a positive disposition, depending on a person's desired train of thought of course. On the other hand, honest truths are neither of a negative or a positive, or, of both attributes, usually in balance with each other. Life as a whole is governed by a to-and fro action, if you like, a negative and positive motion. Often being born is deemed as a positive where death is a negative, however, others think that neither birth nor death is negative or positive.

Of course being penalised for being neutral, in other words of honest truth as opposed to desired truths, on the internet is becoming more prominent as well these days. In an age of desired truths, the separation of negatives from positives is most desired. Of course being honest, the separation of energy in any sense is only going to create a desired truth, a truth that sees any neutral state as a threat to its own existence.

So is honest truth, a neutral state of thought, a threat to the existence of desired truths, a mind partial to one side or the other, usually in opposition?

When people like me warn about the effects of being too positive, this is usually deemed to be a negative when all it is, is the honest truth. When there is a deemed opposition, as in negatives to positives, anything not deemed to be of a certain positive is deemed negative. Even when of a negative disposition, anything positive is seen as a threat therefore a negative.

The problem with being neutral, of honest truth, which people from both negative and positive dispositions deem, is that being neutral is deemed to be a huge threat to the existence of both opposing dispositions of negatives and positives. In the camp of both negative and positive camps, the camp of both camps, of a neutral existence of negatives and positives, is deemed to be their biggest threat. Why?

When you get an extreme separation of energy, as is obviously occurring presently, extreme factions see an opposing faction or camp as an enemy to be avoided (penalised) or exterminated (incarcerated). Any neutral camp trying to neutralise the situation is obviously going to be the seen as a huge threat to the extermination or avoidance of the other faction or camp. It is quite obvious that the positive camp desires to wipe out the negative camp and visa-versa. Any camp trying to neutralise this situation is going to be the enemy of both camps. As of my past lives recalled, I wouldn't have it any other way.

If you are of a neutral disposition or camp, trying to neutralise the situation is understandably going to lead to avoidance (penalisation) and/or extermination (incarceration) by either opposing camps or factions of the separation of energy, not the union of energy. Yes, being neutral isn't just to do with being of honest truth, to the best of one's ability, but of a true union of energy, however, neither camp or faction of negative or positive is seen as a threat to the neutral camp or faction. As it is, both camps will see the neutral camp as being its biggest threat, as always.

A scientist in recent years tried to get a job at a lab; he had perfect credentials for the job. At he's last and final interview, he was rejected because in College he wrote a paper that expressed an honest point of view of truth. This is a true story, where a person is penalised for being too honest within their truth in the past.

How many people are penalised on the internet by certain groups, from materialism to immaterialism, for speaking the honest truth as opposed to a desired truth? How often are people penalised for not speaking a certain desired truth in accordance with a certain group's desired truths? From materialist ideology to immaterialist ideology are people of neutral disposition being penalised and/or incarcerated. This is worsening which simply shows that human consciousness is not developing any further from the separation of energy. In truth, human consciousness is separating energy even more, not uniting energy even more.  

As I have learnt from recalling parts of my past lives, any neutral party trying to neutralise the situation will always be seen as a huge threat to both parties, camps or factions. Our mentality of throwing rocks and sticks at each to throwing bombs and missiles at each other shows a clear lack of mental progression. Attacking a neutral party or camp for trying to neutralise the situation, is further proof of our lack of mental progression. However, the existence of neutral parties trying to neutralise the situation shows that human consciousness can still evolve further in mentality and consciousness.

A neutral disposition is unable to speak of everything in negative and positive terminologies. This kind of disposition isn't in opposition to any party, camp or faction, therefore no real threat to any party, camp or faction. However, any party, camp or faction of extreme opposing ideological views, will see a neutral disposition as being their biggest threat therefore a deemed negative to either penalise or incarcerate. I am not myself truly at this stage but I am at least aware.  

A camp of both camps, of both dispositions, in an age of the extreme separation of energy seems like a mistake when trying to separate the two heavily opposing dogs. Wisdom on the other hand sees that the neutral party will become mauled, probably by both dogs, but the outcome of the neutralisation of the dog fight for supremacy over the other is all worth it in the end. As it can be painful in bringing up children, the same is with dealing with life as a whole, but the pain is certainly worth it in the end if a neutral reality, a favourable outcome, was created.                  

The Untouchable You

Quote: Ninety-nine percent of who you are is invisible and untouchable.

R Buckminster Fuller

Written by Mathew Naismith

Imagine experiencing a reality, any reality, and not being subject to the control of such a reality. Yes, you have chosen to become a part of such a reality but you are not subject to the control of the said reality, in that you have chosen to experience a controlling reality as of the present human reality.

As we all should be aware of, certain multinationals are trying to control all the resources on this planet including all human resources without exception.

I laugh because not all human resources are subject or can be subjected to this kind of control. At no time, for example, was Jesus subjected or gave into the control of Roman control over him. Yes, Jesus experienced the full force of Roman control multinationally, but at no time did Jesus allow himself to be of this kind of control. He was subjected to this kind of control, in other words experienced this kind of control, but never became a subject to this kind of control even under severe duress. You could say that he never sold he's soul to the devil.

There are people who can't be subjugated to the control of today's multinationals, not just immaterially but materially. Yes, these untouchables will experience what is of the present reality in some way, but they are in a state that this is a choice. No amount of subjugation immaterially or materially by today's multinationals can touch them without them choosing so. For a good reason, Jesus chose to be controlled materially but not immaterially.

Without exception, anyone can become an untouchable; it is a choice but a choice that seems to becoming less of a choice for the majority of people. Why?

Firstly, look at how you become an untouchable, even materially. You must have the will to give up all that is material, not that you actually do give up all that is material, you just have to be willing to give up all that is material. In this case the immaterial takes precedence over the material at all times, even when of great material wealth. Think on this, Jesus chose to forfeit his life, not just some kind of material possession, which shows the state Jesus was in. How many multinationals would be willing to give up their material possessions for the good of humanity as a whole? Well, they certainly wouldn't forfeit their own lives for the good of humanity as a whole, for they are themselves primarily controlled by material desires.

Becoming an untouchable is not about taking control of anything, including your thoughts or a controlling ego. Allow your thoughts or ego to freely express itself at will, while being aware of how controlling the ego can be over us and how destructive this kind of control can be, at the same time, not giving into the control and destructiveness of a controlling ego. Yes, allow your ego to express itself at will, but at no time allow yourself to be subjugated to the egos control, like the multinationals of old and new are.

The untouchable you has nothing to do with control in any sense but an awareness in the absence of bias, desires and control. As we have used awareness throughout human history to gain more control, thus to feed our desires, we have created a reality to be controlled by a very small minority, in the process creating demi-God's.

For only can a demi-God exist within such a week willed consciousness as itself......Mathew G

An Undivided Entity

Written by Mathew Naismith

"Yes, it all becomes of one energy source; often any energy beyond this source of oneness is divided therefore conflictive of and to itself as a separate entity. This is why this oneness feels so loving in a true sense, and why any sense of love beyond this oneness isn't of a true sense of love."

A simple message from me yet complex to those who are unable or unwilling to even imagine such a state of conscious being, a state where all energies are of one source, one entity. Imagine that all the egos perceived and even desired positives and negatives, wrong and rights, good and bad, light and dark became as one. As the ego would ask, how could negatives and positives became as one to start with, being that they are separate entities, often opposing separate entities?

People like myself always know where a persons awareness or consciousness is at, especially when they talk in divided entities or energies. I have lost count how many times I have been called wrong or negative by people who think they are more in touch, of the light, of God or enlightened. If you have the smallest idea what this one source is about, the question of anything being negative or of toxic vibrations simply doesn't exist. The reason for this lies in that all energies become as one, an undivided entity, and of course any energies beyond this undivided entity naturally becomes divided into various variables as mentioned above. The variables of positives and negatives, wrong and rights, good and bad, light and dark, simply don't exist within this state of unity.

Yes, as you could imagine, the further a consciousness separates itself from this uniting undivided source of energy, the more divided a consciousness becomes. What hasn't become negative or positive these days? This wasn't always the case even within my time; human consciousness has change quite rapidly in the sense of dividing, often in separating oneself from what is negative. I have lost count in how many ego perceived negatives there are today compared to 20 years ago.

So is the new consciousness more about dividing consciousness, this is instead of unifying consciousness? 

All divided consciousness is limited to its variables; this is like bias which is limited to accepting anything beyond these biases, I am white which instantly creates a bias, consciously or subconsciously. This is different to that I am a person and so are you. To go further, I am energy and so is everything else no matter how different the motion is compared to my own motion. If you prefer, I am of God and so is everything else no matter how different our energies are.

No, the new predicted consciousness is not about more division but less division. So why are so many more people from materialism to spirituality into the division of energies these days?

Imagine a collective consciousness whispering and not being heard, then imagine a collective consciousness talking and not being heard. Now imagine a collective consciousness shouting to be heard!! It matters not if a consciousness is of unity or division of consciousness, all energies have their reason to exist.

So the trick is, to be of an aware unifying consciousness (entity) when the collective consciousness starts to shout, for when it gets to the shouting stage, is when a change is on the horizon (visible).

In The Absence Of

Written by Mathew Naismith

Only in avoidance of egoistic complications can human consciousness evolve further consciously......Mathew G

Yes, I have decided to come back to using my Google blog. 

As I sit at a function, I person I know of the opposite sex comes over and sits on my knee in complete comfort, in the absence of egoistic complications and implicated suggestions. This has occurred to me on a number of occasions, even with women who have known me for a short time. Am I that transparent in regards to the lack of egoistic complications and implicated suggestions?

It is what it is, no more, for only the ego in control would desire to make more of it than what it is, an affectionate comforting expression from one person to another person.

As it has been researched, an atheist will trust a religious person morally before another atheist. Now imagine if we were all atheistic, no one would sit on anyone's knee unless an act of indiscretion, due to egoistic complications and implicated suggestions, were being expressed. It is certainly not the kind of reality I would desire to create myself, but of course one that is simply being created around us all.

I am not talking about myself here in relation to the lack of egoistic complications and implicated suggestions; this is just a normal state of being for a lot of people, even today with what has been created around us. Yes, the majority seems to have gone the way of egoistic complications and implicated suggestions, but it has nothing to do with the quantity of numbers but the quality of numbers. If you put a100 soldiers of poor quality against ten soldiers of high quality, which side will win the day in the end?

Spiritually, it is not about winning or even about being of a higher quality, it is simply being in the absence of what keeps us being of egoistic complications and implicated suggestions. To the ego or for the ego to recognise this state, a quality of motion or state of being is perceived by the ego. This perception actually helps the ego to obtain a state of, "In the absence of", as long as it is not for egoistic purposes that is.  

It is within the absence that for which keeps us aware and wise.....Mathew G

Note: I have found Medium and Wix to be too commercialised for me so I am back with Google blogs.   

Reassuring Presence

Written by Mathew Naismith

Reassuring is simply an act of support, asserting that one is not alone on their journey and that assistance is at hand, if needed. If you are a materialist in any sense, there probably is no point in reading on as this post is about immaterial existences, not primarily or inclusively of material existences.

After three and a half years of my mother's material transition to the immaterial, my mother's assumed death, my mother is finally at peace. Yes, due to my mother's regretful life existence, my mother wasn't totally at rest until recently. I am so glad that my mother never ended up haunting herself. When you have an immaterial spirit or soul that is haunting a certain place, they are not really haunting the material, as in people, they are actually haunted by their own traumas and regrets in a past life or lives. Materially, we often think we are the one's being haunted, when in actuality it is the ghost/spirit/soul that is being haunted.

https://mgnaismith.wixsite.com/website/post/reassuring-presence

Please note, I won't be posting anymore of my posts on Google Blogger, all my posts from now on will be posted in the address above. I won't delete my blogs on blogger until I am sure of Wix site blogging is for me. I am really sorry for this inconvenience, one must change their envirnamnt that best depicts their consciousness at times, blogger simply isn't doing this.