Thinking As One Mind

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

It has occurred before in times of great persecution and trauma, where of one mind becomes apparent, obvious to many minds. The trick is to become of this one mind instead of simply aware of this one mind, in other words instead of participating in being aware of this one mind, observe through this one mind to become of this one mind.

As in science and religion, awareness is one thing, becoming involved in what you are observing is something else.

No, communism and fascism and alike are not of becoming of one mind, it is one mind set simply enslaving all other minds to a mind set. To do this persecution is dealt out in a way to give fear of being locked down, isolated from all other minds except for a particular mind set. Instead of being of a one mind, every mind becomes subservient to a mind set.

Now the difference between being of one mind and being of a mind set, is being of one mind is of the observer, where being of a mind set is being observed. As we are seeing today, especially through the degree of censorship we are seeing, observing this kind of mind set is heavily discouraged. The subservient to this mind set are not allowed to observe, simply learn to become subservient. Yes, you are then no longer of this one mind or even of your own mind.

To a person who has an interest in science and spirituality overall, not being able to freely observe what is observable is a travesty observer wise. You are only able to observe in accordance with the mind set and as any mind set, this is limited to the mind set, however, thinking as one mind has no limitations to what can be observed, in actuality it is of observation of what is observable within it's entirety. It amazes me today how many scientists are content in being subservient to this very limiting mind set, a state of mind often witnessed occurring through being subservient to religious fanaticism, being subservient to a mind set instead of being guided by thinking as one mind.

So we are thinking as one mind and one mind only, is this not very limiting?

If we were all going to just religiously think and not scientifically think as well or visa-versa, this is not being of one mind, one mind is the ability to think as of all minds, be it of different minds. I may think more of spiritual matters, others may think more of science matters, thinking as one they are of one mind. The mind set of communism or fascism on the other hand wants everyone to be of separate minds, within this mind set you are only able to observe in accordance with the mind set, thinking as one mind on the other hand allows all minds to observe all other minds withhold hindrance.

So being subservient to a mind set seems to be all powerful over the subservient mind, this is an illusion of being all powerful. We feel and witnesses the great power and control the mind set has over the subservient. What power and control? So it is all powerful making all other minds subservient to one mind set, minds that are vulnerable to the influence of mind sets like communism and fascism. Notice only in times of great peril and trauma can this occur!!

So this is what the mind set wants you to believe is all powerful and controlling, minds that are vulnerable. Now if this mind set was to hold power and control over an equal devious and immoral mind set, I would say there is some kind of limited power and control but no, having power and control over the vulnerable mind is not all powerful. On top of this, the mind set itself has to stay ignorant to everything else it is unable to control. For a particular mind set to exist takes a particular degree of observational awareness, all else that is observable is ignored or disposed of, as we are seeing today.

Would this supposed all powerful mind set actually hold up to or have some degree of control over a mind thinking as one mind? There is no comparison to begin with, this is why these very limiting and limited mind sets have to always gain control of the influence of thinking as one mind has on minds. Why the persecution of the Christians all over again, and eventually of any spirituality of teaching of one mind? Actually, I have seen science go the same way, the mind set that profits come before science, in the process creating profiteering science as opposed to real science, a real science that puts science before profits and any other bias. I am not sure why spiritual people and atheists are not coming together on this, where we all simply become subservient to a mind set of great limitations.

So you may look at China and see no limitations of technological advancements, the same China that has live organ harvesting, literal slave labour, filthy rich while the poor go hungry, degradation of forests like in Africa at present, the building of hundreds of coal driven power plants, etc. This is the minds set Chinese style globalisation of communism, a country that outlaws males being expressive of femininity in any sense. This is a mind set of communist atheism, where spirituality is only tolerated when under the strictest control of communist mind set, if you are lucky. Was atheism allowed to express itself freely under religious observation in the modern era? This globalisation of communist style mind set is not so gracious or moral, it is it's way or no way. This should sound awfully like religious fanaticism, because that is what it is as of any extremism.

So in saying all this, no, mind sets like this are not all powerful and controlling over this one mind Yes, over minds that are vulnerable but not over this one mind, where all is observed, not just of what is desired to be observed in accordance with a mind set.

You have today a leader of a communist country replacing images of Jesus with his own image, yes, they are this delusional, thinking they have any resemblance to the one mind. I know this one mind idea is hard to imagine for a lot of people, but when we are to freely as a human species allowed to think in our own way, altogether we think as one mind. Excluding one part of this one mind is not of one mind, simply a mind set which scientifically and spiritually we should avoid. Yes, religion once went down this track of mind setting, and now it's communist atheists turn it would seem.

Will we ever start learning from the past instead of suffering from the past as a collective species? Yes, when we start thinking as one mind. I am not just referring to the one mind of the human species either, but that is my preference.

A Surprising Scenario

Written by Mathew Naismith

What happens to energy when oppressed, when constricted into a compressed dense form?

Before we answer this, what happens when you compress an energy form that acquires all it's energy from external sources? It simply folds in on itself, devours itself. It is in line with western atheism, where atheism could not exist without the existence of something to disbelieve in, or have a belief that an existence doesn't exist. Western atheism is totally reliant on an existence atheism simply believes doesn't exist. Sounds awfully irrational to me. Yes, they could be right within their own beliefs and disbelief but this is not the point, atheism totally relies on an external energy form to exist, this is not the same with a belief in an existence, due to everything being of this existence. It is not an external energy existence you devour or try to destroy, for this is impossible.

So what is going to occur when dark energy, that only exists due to the existence of light energy, oppresses or compresses light energy into a dense energy form? Like an old pressure cooker, when this light energy is compressed too much it explodes. Imagine light being compressed into a dense energy form to the point of exploding out from this restricted environment, light is going to shine everywhere.

The most illogical thing dark energy could do is compress/oppress light to the point of exploding out in all directions. Dark simply can't exist within the light. It is like if the beliefs atheists disbelieve in became apparent, atheism would no longer exist.

The wise thing to do for this dark energy is allow light energy to coexist with itself, of course the main driving force and control comes from the ego. As we are seeing today, mass psychosis exist all over the world and so do psychopathic tendencies, as explained in my blog COVID-19 Mind Control.

https://covid9mindcontrol.blogspot.com/ 

The ego is in control wants total autonomy thus control over the light, in the process in a very unwise way compressing/oppressing light energy.

Donald Trump was labelled a Nazi, which is really irrational because he wasn't the one burning books, censoring information, knowledge, history and free speech. Actually, it is the socialists /communists that are doing this today. Yes, censoring information, knowledge, history and free speech, is obviously of this dark energy, a very oppressive energy and an energy totally reliant on fear to orchestrate it's desires. There is nothing wise about the dark energy, in fact it is an energy form that is of the absence of wisdom, for wisdom of course is of the light as we are clearly seeing today.

The last thing you want to do is compress light into a dense form to the point of exploding, but lucky enough for the light energy this is what the dark energy is doing and does all the times. As foretold, a 1000+ years of peace/light, created by the very same energy trying to stop this occurring.

What is Defined as Meditation

Written by Mathew Naismith

This is difficult to determine because each spiritual practice has it's own definition in what is meditation, this is in accordance with the implementation of meditation. I am not going to look at the various implementations of meditation here, but what I will look at is what all meditations are governed by.

Meditation is of quietening the mind to one degree or another, the quieter the mind becomes, the more of enlightened kind of meditation the consciousness of the mind becomes. Keep in mind that not all meditation techniques lead to enlightenment, many meditation techniques are of simply quietening the mind. It is not the mind that becomes enlightened, it is the consciousness of the mind that becomes enlightened.

So firstly what is quietening the mind?

Quietening the mind is of the absence of participation, the less your mind therefore body participates within an environment, the quieter the mind becomes. Now we may think that praying or chanting is not a form of meditation because we are still mentally and/or physically active, therefore of participating in the environment. Praying and chanting can be like focusing on your breath which is still of participation be it of limited participation, however, we are far less of partition of the environment. In this case we are only participating in praying or chanting, just like focusing on your breath. You could imagine the benefits of quietening your mind with meditative techniques like this.

This may sound strange to some people, but every kind of participation is due to observation, participation cannot exist without being observed. Look at it like this. The universe itself simply exists because it is being observed, without the observation from a consciousness the universe could not exist. It is like the double slit science experiment, where the act of a determining observation changes the outcome. It is how we observe to what is going to be created from this observation.

This brings us to observation itself which leads to enlightenment through meditation. We are all observing our own participation, the reason we are unaware of this because we become involved in what we are observing. Meditation that leads to enlightenment is of observation in the absence of participation. The further your consciousness becomes conditioned to participation, the more likely you are going to become of participation in the absence of observation. This is where meditation comes into it, where you condition your consciousness to become less of participation but further from this, more of observation of participation.

Meditation is simply the reconditioning of consciousness to become more of observation than participation. Yes, this can take time but this time is shortened if you are aware that you are in observation of your own participation, you are never not. Observe more without participating.

Meditation that leads to enlightenment is not of a consciousness that is conditioned to inhumanities, so if your observer self is conditioned to inhumanities, what you will create in observation will create an environment in accordance with the way a consciousness observes. Inhumanities is of a great deal of participation, mainly due to the extent of abuse of energy involved. The less abusive an observing consciousness becomes, the less of participation a consciousness becomes conditioned to. Yes, after a human life cycle has ended, what our observer self is conditioned to makes a different to what we will experience in the after life. Meditation in a really big way just doesn't help us to cope better in life's participation's, meditation also helps in what we will experience in the after life.

I hope this helps some people because what is and is not meditation can be confusing. Also, what I have stated here are of my own words that can be similar or dissimilar to other views in relation to meditation.

The Sacred Life

Written by Mathew Naismith

The truth is only of fear when we fear the truth, for only when the truth becomes negative has the lies become the truth. Words to remember the truth by, I mean really.

What is dividing us so much at present? What is sacred to some is not to others and visa-versa.

To people like me, life is sacred but this doesn't stop with physical life but is also of spiritual life. Now is this the same with people who's only sacredness is money, power and control? Often there is only a perception of physical life, even after the human life ends, this is why in human life money, power and control become sacred and life itself is only there to be used and abused. It is sad but it does seem like the case because look at the difference between people of the sacredness of life to those of the sacredness of money, power and control.

As I wrote recently:

“Looking at the research material lately makes me wonder how did so many people became coerced into supporting hate groups. The now obvious anti-freedom of choice movement is astonishing, now creating hate for people who don't want to get the covid vaccine. What next, hate for people who value life above all else, especially above material wealth? You have been duped big time people and you don't even know it, but the program is elaborate to say the least.

The anti-freedom of choice movement is simply those who go with all the leftist hate groups and movements like BLM, ANTIFA, CRT, woke, communism, etc. Don't get me wrong, I am certainly not for right wing hate groups either. All hate groups like this should be discouraged as they are of simply suffering from the past instead of learning from the past. Wisdom is certainly struggling to survive in the present environment.”

Also:

“People like us take note and learn from the past instead of suffering from the past. What do hate groups want to do? Destroy or censor the past before they learn from the past, in the process keep suffering from the past. I am so disappointed that people are allowing themselves to be continually coerced down this hate group path. It feels like I shouldn't even be hear, that I don't belong, this is no big deal though for people like me, for this is only of the finite.

I am looking at writing a post to do with sacred life, where people like us are of the sacred life and needs, where life is precious, to people who think material possessions and desires are sacred, where life is abused.”

It is awkward times for the truth to prevail, as it is for the people of sacred life, for both are a representation of the same thing. In this prevailing times would you rather be not of the truth therefore not of sacred life, where life is sacred like a child is to it's mother? The mother will suffer for her prevalence but solace comes from this prevalence of suffering.

It is more than okay to suffer, embrace this suffering for it tells of one thing, that life is indeed sacred for one to suffer for.

It is funny, these are my own words and it sounds as if I am preaching!!

The Eternal Being

"You are an eternal being now on the 

pathway of endless unfoldment,

 never less but always more yourself." 

Written by Mathew Naismith

A very short post but to me a very important message considering what is occurring in the present.

I have been accused of over thinking in regards to covid and the authorities responses, in other words rationally thinking. Is there such a thing as overreacting to traumas while not thinking enough? Think on this, can overreaction to trauma be associated to irrationality, overreacting while not thinking enough? Let's now look at people who are more of the eternal being to people who are more of the ephemeral being.

Death to the eternal consciousness is simply a transition of energy, within this, the fear of death is transient if not absent altogether. It is of science as well, where energy can't be destroyed, only transformed!! This is the same with possessions, where you actually own nothing even when in acquisition of energy.

Death to the ephemeral consciousness will understandably react differently to death and possessions, in the process creating even more fear, not less fear, as we are presently seeing. You will also understandably witness more immorality and inhumanity within what this ephemeral consciousness creates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEtekn6NoV8

The Higher Self!!

Written by Mathew Naismith

This subject for people like me is very important, mainly due to our comprehension of this subject. This doesn't mean we completely understand what we are aware of, it just means we comprehend what we don't completely understand. This is very important to comprehend in the first place.

So, would the higher self see itself as being a higher form of consciousness, of a higher stature?

While of this higher self, can a consciousness of this higher self abuse energy? The answer is no, it is utterly impossible for this higher consciousness to abuse energy due to the inability to abuse energy, this mainly because it is this inability to abuse energy that makes this consciousness of a higher plain. A more aware and wiser consciousness has no need or more importantly desire to abuse energy, in actuality to do otherwise is not of the higher self.

As we look around today in the world, what kind of consciousness is of a higher stature? As we are experiencing in the present, the now, in regards to COVID, abuse reigns supreme. The more abusive you become, the higher the stature you are elevated to.

This brings us back to the initial question, would the higher self see itself as being a higher form of consciousness, of a higher stature? To elevate yourself to something higher is of stature, but as we know, a higher stature or even a perception of doesn't mean you are of a more aware and wiser consciousness, in truth, quite the opposite.

To be of this higher self is to not perceive you are of a higher self, simply that you are in a state of consciousness of awareness that is governed by wisdom. As we find ourselves today, we are more aware today than ever but far more abusive towards energy than ever. Why? Probably due to the lack or even absence of wisdom. It is like democracy. If not governed by a just governing system, democracy can be just as dictatorial, corrupt and of inhumanity as governing systems such as fascism and communism. Now imagine having a perception of being of a higher self in the absence of wisdom, the higher self simply becomes of a higher stature, in this case to abuse/ostracise anything not of this higher self/stature.

We often think that a higher state of consciousness would avoid being of any part of a lower consciousness, the bad vibrations from a lower consciousness would be too much to handle. In actuality it is the other way around. If you are able to put yourself into an environment of discord and not become abusive, which also means not ostracising and demeaning people of a lower stature than yourself, you are of this higher state of consciousness. No amount of bad or negative vibrations are able to penetrate this consciousness. The reason for this is the absence of status and segregation of the higher self to the lower self.

In all honestly, we are utterly surrounded by material and non-material consciousness that is of this deemed higher self. So you may ask why is not this more apparent to most of us? Because we are still looking for a higher status within ourselves and in other forms of consciousness. This consciousness that we call the higher self does not in anyway deem itself to be of a higher stature, but it is understandable why a less aware and wiser consciousness would do so. The trick is to go beyond the perceptions of higher and lower statures, in the process become less abusive towards energy, as a whole. We just don't become less abusive towards each other but less abusive towards energy as a whole.

We have got ourselves into a bit of a dilemma though, where actual truths, that can hurt our egos, are felt by the ego as being abusive, we then add to this dilemma by only desiring what makes the ego feel good. Of course what makes the ego feel good is of desired truths rather than actual truths, as always.

New Religion COVID

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

I am so saddened. An old friend of mine that I have had a good deal of respect for just blew me away. I am the one who is pushing their own opinions religiously onto other people, even though people like me have not been indoctrinated into the new religion, COVID, and it's many indoctrinating programs and enforced mandatory restrictions based primarily on, you guessed it, fear!!

It was the following that lead to a very sad moment for me.

https://www.ise.media/video/tdwu-clips-new-study-finds-pathogenic-pneumonia-causing-bacteria-in-kid-s-masks-june-17-2021-111.html?fbclid=IwAR0XqlAuB6PtVxnxX97DXW662LbJfgFvEV10Dow-H1IrR4NQvxE0f2YwH9Y

Is this new religion COVID and it's indoctrination's based on fact, remembering that covid in no way came from a lab? Of course the so-called conspiracy theorists were right, it did come from a lab.

What restrictions do people like me impose on other people, but to look outside the square of this new religion? Yes, how dare people like me even hint at looking beyond the doctrines of this new religion!!

Literary thousands of health professionals, some now assassinated, are risking their livelihood, being persecuted and falsely prosecuted, risking their actual lives, etc, for speaking out. We are not talking about fools here but people of high esteem and moral values to the point of being Nobel prise winners.

Okay, if you want to become indoctrinated into the new religion COVID, that is fine, just leave the rest of us alone but we know this is not going to happen in regards to a religion gone extremist.

Should we have fear of this new extremist religion? No, but we should be aware of it's extremist indoctrination's, enforced restrictions and inhumane directives.

The following comes across as being anti-religion but is still worth reading the COVID content. I am not anti-religion/spirituality but very cautious of anything expressive of religious/spiritual extremism, as the COVID religion clearly exemplifies.

https://thegrumpyowl.co.uk/2021/01/24/covid-is-the-new-religion/

“For thousands of years, religion has been used as a tool to keep control of the ‘ignorant masses’.”

I will rephrase this. For thousands of years, religion has been misused as a tool to keep control of the ‘ignorant masses’.

Actual spiritual religions are not based primarily on fear but this new religion is!!