Obscurity v Exposure

Written by Mathew Naismith

The following is going to be quite controversial for a number of people, especially where I supported some of these views. One thing to note with what I write as always, nothing that I write is either right or wrong, negative or positive, bad or good, I'm really not sure why it has to be one or the other all the times. While explaining about consciousness, it is unwise to write about consciousness in cement or rock, it's just too variable, knowing this, there is no true right or wrong, just an expression of a particular variable.

            

___________________________

I recently received some interesting perspectives in regards to my post titled, " Matrix and Finite Consciousness, the following was in response to these perspectives.

___________________________

WWIII started some years back, it's certainly not a conventional war. Many other wars were to obscure the real war and assist this darkness in the mean time.

The more we become aware, especially of the dark, the more of the light we become. It's actually a good thing in becoming aware of the dark, as it shows how much of the light we have become. The dark is all about obscurity and secrecy, this needs to be exposed for all to witness, only in this will we purge the dark within ourselves.

Many people are tying to avoid exposing the dark because it's a lower vibration. This is exactly what the dark wants us to do, keep it obscured as opposed to exposed.

The perception of light basically represents awareness and freedom, the dark represents deliberate ignorance and servitude.

The matrix needn't have represented ignorance and servitude, it could have been far more of the light than what it is at present.

You presented some interesting perspectives here WT, thank you.

P.S. The more of the dark we become aware of, the better. No one of the dark is able to see their light because it's obscured, the exposure of so much darkness is a very good sign.

 ___________________________

First of all, as I have stated in my reply to WT as above, obscurity represents the dark, a state of consciousness that exists in deliberate ignorance, an ignorance to it's truer being, in this case represented by the perception of light.

Exposure represents the light, a state of consciousness that exists in deliberate awareness, an awareness to it's truer being, in this case or our case,  represented by the perception of light.

So is our truer being the light as opposed to the dark?

The ego within us all would love to think this but in truth, we are truly neither one or the other nor are we not of one or the other, within this, all is neutral until we perceive one is above the other in some sense. Basically, the exact same perception of light neutralises the dark and visa-versa. It's really not a good sign that we need to perceive/create so much light, as this depicts how much dark  has been created in the first place. People like me are quite happy existing in a reality of the perceptions of neither dark nor light, negative or positive, as each is attributed to the other. Basically, one can't exist without the other in the whole scheme of existence as a whole.

Yes I know, this is very hard to comprehend as it's of no known teachings, as I have presented it here, that I know of.

WWIII, when did it actually start?

How do you give a starting date when our infinite consciousness started exposing our finite consciousness for what it's created, especially considering infinite consciousness is not based on time? The sixties seem to come to mind but was not the sixties just a prelude to war between our finite and infinite consciousness? Sorry, no date comes to mind but what I do know is this war is between our finite and infinite consciousness. When did our infinite consciousness, overall or collectively, became threatened by finite consciousness, a consciousness of obscurity and deliberate ignorance?

Actually, the real question is, when did our infinite consciousness  truly start exposing finite consciousness for what it created? The sixties is only a prelude to this because finite consciousness was not predominantly in control of this reality, the sixties is a sure sign of this because we could still express freedom without being oppressed to any great degree.

Music is a good indication here of the time when we started to really become repressed. Disco music was certainly still of the same freedom of the sixties, however, when did the love of the sixties turn into blatant lust for example? Blatant lust really started in the disco era but freedom of expression was still very evident. If you know anything about the disco era, it was deliberately crushed by numerous people.

Another good indication of a starting date of WWIII, is when rap music was deliberately introduced to fill privately run prisons in the US.

http://www.hiphopisread.com/2012/04/secret-meeting-that-changed-rap-music.html

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/former-music-exec-describes-the-scary-meeting-that-resulted-in-todays-violent-rap-music-2012-5?r=US&IR=T

I find it strange that WWIII is seemingly attributed to the US in almost everyway. Don't get me wrong, this isn't stating that US citizens are the cause of this, it's the oppression within the US, upon it's citizens by dark energies, that is the root cause of WWIII.

This now brings us to the perception of dark and light energies. Anything that is perceived/judged to be dark and light, negative and positive, good and bad, is but a perception that creates a particular reality depending on what is being perceived.

If you observe the whole world, each and every person around the world has a different perception of what is negative or positive, so which negative and positive is truly negative or positive? You see they are only perceptions, however, what is and isn't destructive is another matter but in saying this, there are people who will state that war is constructive!!

Our actual perception of light and dark, refers to the light being of awareness and freedom where's the dark refers to deliberate ignorance and servitude. Basically, one consciousness is limited where's the other is limitless, one consciousness is finite where's the other is infinite. Basically, the dark doesn't want to be exposed where's the light wants to be exposed.

Being unwilling to being apart in exposing the dark because it's too negative, is assisting the dark to stay obscured. We might think while deliberately ignoring the dark and becoming the light, that the light will expose the dark. Light is based on awareness, not obscurity or deliberate ignorance, the perception of light is purely based on exposing the dark, not the exposure of light. The last thing the dark needs is to be exposed for what it creates. We basically need the perception of the darkness within human consciousness to be exposed before we can evolve, this also means that humans will indeed be expressive of this darkness at times.

The process of evolving from one state to another, relies on cycles to give consciousness motion, without this motion, human consciousness is unable to evolve. Human consciousness is noticeably in a cycle, if we take motion away from this cycle, all that will occur is that human consciousness will stagnate and basically rot away from within. All consciousness that is based on time/finite consciousness, needs motion to evolve. It's highly unadvisable to help hide or ignore a destructive part of any consciousness.

Obscurity has nothing to do with freedom, so free yourself of your obscurities that will in the end free your consciousness from it's created limitations. Be exposed and unlimited within your own consciousness.    

Change the World - Expose Internet Bullies

Written by Mathew Naismith

Not too recently I came a cross a lass who was being bullied on the net by a number of people, basically, being accused of presenting fake material to support her views and falsely so. It turns our that this lass was being bellied by people who belonged to a certain group/ism.

I am often accused of being brash, aggressive and plainly negative on the net, especially after giving evidence to support my views.

I have lost count how many times I have come across other people being bullied on the net, what's worse still, numerous onlookers just sit by allowing this to occur. The most funniest thing is here, these are usually the same people who want to help change the world the way it is.

Do you find something ironical here? If you are unwilling to change the little things in life, how is one to help change the world? It's plainly not going to happen.

Expose bullies for who they are.

It's obvious to be a bully, one must express a certain amount of ignorance, of course deliberate incognisance will create bullies and abusers alike. Yes, bullies are indeed abusers in their own right because of their ignorant status. They are also controllers who want to control a situation, discussion or a discussing board as a whole.

It's simple, expose these people as bullies, abusers and controllers and most of all, expose how ignorant these people are. Don't sit by and let this occur because it's judged as being negative, conflictive or of some kind of expression of a lower vibration. Is it of a lower vibration if we sit by and allow this to occur, without lifting a finger, to help other people who are obviously being bullied?

This act of so may people allowing other people being bullied on the net, just shows people like me how little we truly want to change the world, it's this simple.

Exposing people in the way they are expressing themselves, isn't negative or of a lower vibration or bad, it's just simply expressing the truth of the matter. If the truth seems this vile to you, the world will obviously stay as it is, this is true.

Start off with the little things in life to help change the world as it is, it couldn't get simpler than this. Freedom comes through starting off from the little things and letting it grow, plant the seeds of freedom that will eventually outgrow these kind of actions and expressions.                 

The Matrix!!

Written by Mathew Naismith

At present, it is obvious we exist in a reality of a kind and not a reality entirely created by our own thoughts and perceptions, yes, our thoughts and perceptions influence this reality but they don't define this reality, this matrix system. Basically, our conscious influence isn't what determines the essential quality of realities like this, they are only apart or created from these essential qualities within a reality. All matrix systems are created from finite consciousness, a consciousness that is limited to certain specifics, time and space are certainly essential qualities to all matrix systems.

However as of always, the extent of motion of a matrix system is squarely on our shoulders as we are the creators of excessive motion within a matrix. The matrix just couldn't and wouldn't exist to excess without our participation.

The question still remains, have we created the perception of time therefore created the matrix itself through these perceptions?

As I have explained many times before, time has always existed like timelessness, how could time be created from timelessness if timelessness has no starting point to create from. There just isn't a from in relation to time. We are supposed to be initially from this timeless nothingness or oneness, but how would this be the case if there is no starting point of creation to start with? We within our individual perceptions, didn't create time or space but we did create the perception of there prominently only being time and space.

Indestructible Energy: They say God created everything, this of course must include all the destruction and chaos as well!! The perception of God relates to our infinite consciousness which is within all things, now think on this, you can't destroy energy but you can transform energy. God to me represents this indestructible creative energy source, however, within a finite consciousness, a matrix system, energy has the perception of being able to be destroyed as opposed to just being transformed. We, not God, created the perception of energy being able to be destroyed, basically, creating a starting and ending point to an excess.

As timelessness is of this God's consciousness, so is time, time of course refers to matrix system, a system based primarily on time, finite consciousness. Matrix systems were already created but void of excessive motion. This excessive motion was created from our own perceptions and interactions, God's consciousness didn't create these kinds of  interactions, we did. So in all, this God consciousness didn't create the perception of destroying energy, we did, as we didn't create time and space.

Note: You can replace the perception of God's consciousness with anything that defines infinite existence and consciousness, this is included in practices and beliefs like Taoism, Buddhism, Shamanism and so on. Anything that refers to our infinite being or state is in relevance to God's consciousness, a creative consciousness of immeasurable creativeness. You can plainly see why many people call this indestructible creative infinite energy source a God, the funny thing is, we are this God, it's just we have become too much of finite consciousness to acknowledge this.

The following is in reply to a good internet friend of mine, a friend who is well known for his awareness of our infinite being.      

      

G'day siggy

Good to here from you again, hope all is well with you and your family.

Yes indeed siggy,  the so called matrix, this is inline to what we deem as God in my mind, it's all of human perception, which we should be honest, is limited.

"What do I think", absolutely, my last post goes into how, what we call matrix systems, starts off passive, it's this over interaction or excessive conscious motion that distorts the matrix to the extent it becomes primarily destructive.

Do we need to experience the full destructive power of matrix systems? My wife and I have been talking about catabolism and how it's more prominent today as ever, it's just expressed in a different way. How many politicians and multinationals are feeding off of live people? We  are indeed cattle to them, it's actually a more brutal kind of catabolism in that it slowly feeds off of people until the day they die.

Human consciousness need not have become so brutal and acceptingly brutal. Brutality is fine if we denounce it, it's not so fine if we accept it and/or ignore it and that is where we are at, at present.

Virus, yes indeed, this acceptance is a virus that has distorted the matrix to the extent of the matrix becoming primarily destructive, even onto itself. We have in affect become that virus. 

Is there a their in that a malign consciousness is behind all this brutality?

We would like to think so because human consciousness needs conformation and comprehension, without this, human consciousness is lost for an answer. In my mind, we are all feeding the matrix. If you think of these matrix systems as consciousness, and like any consciousness, is able to be influenced one way or the other by other conscious energy sources, you begin to understand that we are what the matrix is. An ego in control will not accept this in any sense, it's really funny how it works.

Is the matrix of the mind, as a creation of our mind, or is it a consciousness of finite existences which our own divided minds influence?

We totally underestimate ourselves in my mind. The matrix systems, as in time related, has always existed as timeliness has always existed, however, the way these matrix systems have developed, is completely due to our own making. We have purposely forgotten about our infinite consciousness and taken on finite consciousness as who we are. This is fine, however on top of this, many of the practices that kept us in touch with our infinite consciousness, is now being replaced by practices primarily of finite consciousness in my mind.

Because there is no balance between finite an infinite consciousness, we are becoming more destructive for only in ignorance can a consciousness be destructive.

The matrix to me is real in that the matrix represents time therefore limited finite consciousness, however, this finite consciousness was always balanced out with the awareness of our infinite self in various ways, this is no longer the case on a collective scale. Time has always existed to me, because matrix systems are governed by time, they too have always existed but in a more passive way as my recent post goes into.

What we seem to have done is believed that we are trapped by the matrix, this has never or ever will be the case, we hugely underestimate our truer being. So yes, because we are the matrix the way it is now, there is no true limitations or boundaries, these are perceived projections of thought influenced by a finite existence which we ourselves created.     

It would seem I need to catch up with your thoughts and insights siggy.

 

Much Blessings always,

Mathew

          

The Passive Matrix

Written by Mathew Naismith

I've never written about finite consciousness in reference to the matrix before, it's usually only in reference to finite consciousness which to me the matrix is all about. Finite consciousness is all about a starting and ending point, this is driven by a perception of time. The universe itself is based on a starting point and it is governed by time because it also has an ending point. The physical universe is certainly of the matrix, as is the consciousness behind the creation of the universe, or more precisely, (of) the universe. You could say when the universe was created, so was the consciousness that is governed by time, finite consciousness

Infinite Consciousness: We are that governed or conditioned to finite consciousness, that we don't see the consciousness that is influencing the universe. And yes, the universe is the matrix as it's governed by time, time being of finite consciousness, a consciousness limited to time based perceptions.

The strange thing is, there is no end to time because time wasn't created from a starting point, how would have infinite consciousness created time when there is no starting or ending point to infinite consciousness? Time has always existed but matrix systems haven't, not as they are or turn out to be. Time, finite consciousness, is the starting blocks to matrix systems, it's further interaction/motion by consciousness that creates the matrix systems as they are.  Basically, motion creates matrix systems and the more motion  created within a matrix, the more destructive a matrix system becomes.

Finite = ego + motion + matrix systems + time

Infinite = egoless + motionless + no matrix systems + timelessness 

Time basically gives consciousness motion which creates various matrix systems, in a sense, matrix systems have always existed but in a more passive way until excessive motion is applied through various interactions. Time separates consciousness into various quantum's or forms, within this separation, we get interaction which is excessive motion. It's funny to think we are all expressive of excessive motion in matrix systems!!

On the other hand a consciousness void of time, has no motion because time gives consciousness it's motion. We can so easily presume this motionlessness isn't of energy or God if you like, it's that anything of motion is unable to detect an energy field within this motionless state. I should say here that I refer to God as energy, the spirit within all things is energy to me, all energy to me is also in reference to consciousness, energy is of one form or another of  consciousness. I think certain science experiments recently found that protons communicate/interact with each other over vast distances, this obviously represents some kind of conscious interaction!!  

The following probably isn't going to go to well for a lot of people, I tend to be able to perceive beyond limited boundaries, this means I will present certain things that aren't in-line or accepted by perceptions limited to a certain consciousness.

Higher Consciousness!!: Let's take a look at this motionless, timeless state of the infinite, a state that is often referred to as oneness, zero point, nothingness, a state void of ego and motion.

This state seems to be of oneness therefore ego has no way of existing in a state of true oneness. The ego is unable to exist in this state because there is no separation, no division of consciousness, consciousness is one. The ego needs a comparison to exist, in a state of oneness or nothingness, there is nothing to compare one to another so the ego is unable to exist in this state.

Would a consciousness that has no ego, compare or even be aware that one state of consciousness is of a higher stature, vibration or pinnacle? We often see nothingness or oneness being of a higher pinnacle to all other states, it's something we should aspire to, especially compared to finite conscious states. To a state that has no ego, there is no pinnacle to aspire to, so wouldn't this egoless state experience all of what is without judgment or what is or isn't worthy? An egoless conscious state is able to experience everything void of bias. It's like people who humble themselves, one state of existence is never less worthy than a another state to experience, our so called higher vibrational oneness state is no different.

This is how matrix systems are able to exist as they are. There is no ego within infinite state of consciousness, it's no less worthy experiencing time, finite consciousness and matrix systems than a so called higher conscious state, a state often seen as the pinnacle to all of existence. It's exactly like saying God is this higher pinnacle when God to me represents all energy of finite and infinite conscious existence, there is no true separation therefore there is no true worthy or unworthy of an existence to experience.

When you have a consciousness that is unable to define what is more or less worthy, this kind of consciousness will experience all of what is, it's only when this consciousness sees itself divided from other conscious states, that it will judge that there is a higher state of existence, a more worthy state to experience. There is no worthy or unworthy state of existence as there is no pinnacle of existence, or non-existence, that is above all other existences, only can the ego perceive like this.

Passive Matrix: Matrix systems are at first passive even when they are of time, of ongoing starting and ending points. This is because this interacting consciousness is still conditioned to infinite consciousness, at this point it hasn't become conditioned to finite consciousness.

Finite consciousness relates to various consciousness's in motion, the more motion being expressed, the more separation we have between various conscious states. Basically, the more motion we express, the less passive a matrix becomes, however, the less passive a matrix becomes, isn't due to excessive physical motion as such, it's primarily due to conscious motion particularly of thought, it's this thought that gives motion to the physical. Change the way we think and perceive in a more passive way, the less physically chaotic we will express ourselves.

All matrix systems can be passive, this is due to a consciousness still being conditioned to infinite consciousness, however, not conditioned in opposition to finite consciousness, this is very important. It's wise to find a balance between infinite and finite consciousness while experiencing an existence based on finite existence. Because within a finite existence, such as matrix systems, we have excessive finite conscious awareness and perceptions, this always needs to be balanced out by infinite consciousness to keep a matrix system passive and not overly destructive. Religion and spirituality over all, has always played a part in this, this is until these practices also become predominately of finite consciousness, this of course has been evident numerous times in human history. Once we lose the awareness of our infinite self, we lose the ability to create passive existences, matrix systems.      

Recycled Energy of the Matrix

Written by Mathew Naismith

I find the matrix's or finite conscious realities quite fascinating in many ways. These realities limit consciousness to a certain quantum, being that consciousness is limited within these matrix's, and in accordance with these matrix's, it's understandable that a lesser value of a whole is only going to be able to be expressed. The whole basically pertains to infinite consciousness as opposed to finite consciousness. Finite consciousness is of a lesser value in that it's less aware than infinite consciousness, it's the awareness within a consciousness that determines if a consciousness is of finite or infinite consciousness. As soon as any part of a consciousness becomes unaware from an infinite state of consciousness, it basically becomes of a matrix, and yes there is more than one matrix like their is more than one dimension.

The universe is of a matrix, so does this mean all conscious forms react in the same way in the matrix?

No, as each creature reacts differently in this matrix, so do beings and other animal forms  to each other, for example, does a beetle act and look like an elephant, does an elephant act and look like a human being? The reason for this is that each consciousness reacts differently to the matrix, the funny thing is, the more aware a consciousness becomes, the more it's influenced by the matrix, this is until it awakens to it's infinite self that is.

I find it strange that in reference to the matrix, we often only refer to ourselves being in the matrix, we often exclude animals and rocks and trees. Everything of finite consciousness is within the matrix, actually, nothing that isn't of  consciousness, is able to be within a matrix as everything of these matrix's is of a form of consciousness.

We might presume that a rock compared to ourselves, is of a lesser value, in that a rock is less aware than ourselves, basically, it's less conscious to it's environment. However, a rock for instance exists within it's environment in accordance to it's environment, a more aware conscious form doesn't. The more aware a consciousness becomes, the less it lives within the environment and of course the more destructive it becomes to this environment. Is an owl for instance more destructive to it's environment than a rock? A rock doesn't need to kill to survive to start with thus destroying part of it's environment, there is no conscious involvement of a rock even compared to an owl.

What about volcanos that are of recycled energy, they can be highly destructive, however, they can also at the same time be highly constructive in numerous ways towards it's environment, actually, many fertile environments have been created by volcanic activity. So, the more aware a consciousness becomes, the more destructive it seems to become to it's environment, human consciousness today couldn't be compared to volcanos that is for sure.

So the more aware human consciousness becomes, the more destructive this kind of consciousness became, this is evident. The point is, how is human consciousness becoming aware, what influences human consciousness to become more destructive the more aware human consciousness becomes? The matrix. Being that matrix's are of finite consciousness, a starting and ending point of recycled energy, it is understandable that the matrix is naturally destructive. The more a consciousness becomes aware, the more the matrix is able to influence it. How many rocks are aware of time or a starting and ending point of it's own transition? As soon as a consciousness is aware of time (finite consciousness), the more destructive it naturally becomes, and yes, it's natural but only within a matrix.

However, its how we become aware within a matrix that makes all the difference. The less the matrix itself influences us, the less destructive we naturally become. Think on this, how passive are the people on their environment who become more aware of their infinite self? Giving thanks before eating is one example, avoiding unpleasant killings to keep our own energy up is another example. Ok, we might not eat meat but we still eat plants that are a living breathing conscious energy form. Being aware of our infinite self, yes, even if it's a belief in a God/Goddess, is allowing our infinite self to influence us as apposed to our finite self within the matrix. Yes, I did say our finite self within the matrix because the matrix couldn't exist without finite interactions by a consciousness, in our case human beings. We are the matrix, without being of a finite consciousness, matrix's couldn't exists. The matrix has no true power over us, it's we who give it it's power over us!!

Now for the matrix itself. Like everything within a matrix, the matrix itself is of  recycled energy. Being that the matrix is naturally destructive, there is an end of this destruction when the finite consciousness that creates the matrix either awakens to it's infinite self or destroys itself. Don't get the idea that the matrix itself is destroyed, it only destroys all consciousness within the matrix to start up all over again and again. It's funny, nothing can destroy a matrix but the finite consciousness behind a created matrix!!

I do believe that matrix's have destroyed themselves, it's like a dimension that become that imbalanced that it destroys itself from within, suns are  prime examples of this once an imbalance of energy occurs within a sun. What occurs when a matrix actually destroys itself from within, as it tries to extend it's existence beyond it's own cycle? Think on this, only of finite consciousness can an ego exist and be controlling, what would a controlling imbalanced ego want to occur when a cycle is at it's end? It certainly not going to want to start up all over again to repeat everything within the cycles of a matrix, it wants to keep building up it's empire.

However, there are matrix's that have a very long cycle, they seem to last for eternity but in the end the cycle of a matrix always wins out to start the process up all over again from the very start. Being that matrix's are of finite consciousness, basically, of starting and ending points governed by some kind of time, it's understandable that all matrix's are governed by cycles of starting and ending points. It's also funny to think that these cycles of matrix's are eternal in nature, they will go on forever unless the consciousness behind the matrix destroys itself from within.  

Note: Please do not take anything I have stated here as being fact in any sense, most of what I know is channelled/conveyed through me from external sources.   

Matrix and Finite Consciousness

Written by Mathew Naismith

As of anything I write about, it's advisable not to take it as fact or fiction as there is usually very little black and white mentality involved in my writings/thinking. This means I often bring forth the middle ground, an awareness between black an white perceptions. The matrix to me is the condition of a black and white mentality, this means our conscious awareness has to be limited to one and/or the other, there is no middle ground within the matrix.

So what is this matrix?

Matrix: - (mathematics) a rectangular array of quantities or expressions set out by rows and columns; treated as a single element and manipulated according to rules.

             - An enclosure within which something originates or develops.

When we invasion a straight sided border around a human being, we usually get a rectangular shape thus a rectangular array of quantities or expressions is evident. These quantities or expressions are also often treated as singular groups, for example, male or female, young or old, poor or rich, atheist or religious, black or white and so on and so on it goes.

Within this matrix, these rectangular quantities or expressions are limited to these set values, this is due to the fact that once we define ourselves as a singular element, we become easier to manipulate. It's this manipulation that sets values to singular elements.

Elements is interesting here because the word element defines a certain quantum, a quantum that is separated by manipulation, basically, the deliberate action of separating one element from another thus creating singular elements. Have you ever heard of the saying divide and conquer, well the matrix itself is all conducive to actions like this. It's simular to the perception of how time separates one moment from another, within this perception, we create finite consciousness, a consciousness that is usually only aware of everything being separated. This in turn creates a black and white mentality, a mentality that can only perceive in finite consciousness.

To me, the second definition of the word matrix should really go like this," An enclosure within which something originates or develops from. The reason for this is you can't create finite consciousness outside of this enclosure of the matrix, this is due to everything that is outside this enclosure, is of infinite consciousness, it has no limitations. The matrix itself exists primarily due to infinite consciousness, a consciousness that is limited through being divided or separated from everything else. We have limitations because we have a perception of division, everything is treated as a single element either singularly or in groups of singular elements.

The matrix is an enclosure of a consciousness that has limitations due to finite perceptions, meaning, everything has a starting and ending point and is singular to others elements. The matrix is a consciousness of division therefore limitations, however, believe it or not, this consciousness is a natural occurrence, we are existing in a natural consciousness of division. As finite consciousness is natural, so is infinite consciousness, just because one existence of a type of consciousness is divided, doesn't mean it's an unnatural occurrence. It's wise not to divide one consciousness or existence as being natural and the other unnatural, this kind of thinking is of a black and white mentality which is of the matrix itself. We have indeed been conditioned to think through and from divisions/separation.

I actually find the matrix itself quite amazing, what it created within itself, within it's limitations, is extraordinary. If we can create so much within such a limited consciousness, how much would we create in a consciousness that isn't limited? To me, the matrix is an awakening to our unlimited self, a self that is not limited consciously, a consciousness defined and influenced by infinite possibilities.

Within the natural course of the matrix becoming more and more limiting, we are awakening to our unlimited potential, our infinite self that isn't divided. What I am saying is it's natural for a matrix, like this, to develop further into a limiting consciousness for us to awaken to our truer being. We are in actuality becoming less trapped within this rectangle, the matrix itself, the more limiting the matrix becomes. Basically, the more naturally destructive this matrix becomes, the more we become aware of its' destructive potential. In effect, the matrix's own limitations are going to be the end of the matrix's illusions, the illusions that all we are is singular elements and only finite in consciousness. The more a consciousness is limited, the more it naturally becomes destructive.

Freedom will come to those who free themselves from the matrix, all this will take is to really know you are within yourself infinite. How many of us believe that death is the end when all it is, is a transition from one state to another. There is no true starting or ending point, there is no limitations to our potential, only in the matrix itself is this true, we are far more than what the matrix represents.                

Outside The Comfort Zone

Written by Mathew Naismith

It's funny, we so often avoid going outside our comfort zone, a zone that we feel most comfortable and secure in. The emphasis is really on security here, if we don't feel secure, how comfortable are we going to feel? So security seems to be one of the main factors of our comfort zone.

Yes, our comfort zone is of security or relative security compared to the rest of our environment, it's also something we create ourselves within ourselves. Yes, we can be secure in our external environment that's created by others, but if we have no inner security, no amount of external security will create a true secure comfort zone for us, this has to come from within.

Now, if we feel insecure in our external environment, our internal environment, our comfort zone, becomes even more precious to us, at this point, we can indeed get to the point we no longer want to venture out from our comfort zone. The desire to go out of our comfort zone is no longer present. It's amazing how many people have done this and understandably so, especially when you consider the present world environment. I lot of people in the US presently feel just like this, very insecure and again understandably so.

Once our comfort zone is threatened, or seems to be threatened by external influences, we lose the security of our comfort zone, we then instinctively try to bring this back into order in anyway we can. For a lot of people in the US, they are way outside their comfort zone, it's pretty scary for anyone who hasn't been this far out from their comfort zone before. In true reality, our comfort zone should  have nothing to do with external influences even when it seems our comfort zone is threatened by external influences.

When our comfort zone is created through and from external securities, our inner comfort zone will also be in peril of external influences. The reason for this lies in that our comfort zone relies on our external securities, it exists because of our external securities, this is why any comfort zone, created from external securities, are most vulnerable to our external environment.

Never should our comfort zone be created from and through our external environment, our external environment should have nothing to do with our inner internal comfort zone, especially spiritually and/or psychologically. How many people's happiness and security solely relies on our external environment? Wealth and power are good examples and so is prestige, take away these things from people who rely on them for their security, they go to pieces, their comfort zone totally disintegrates.

You will also find that any comfort zone created from and through our external environment, will entrap us within this environment making us quite unaware of the rest of our external environment. For an example, how many billionaires freely giveaway their comfort zone, meaning, how many freely giveaway all their fortune to go outside their comfort zone? They are seemingly observing what is going on outside their comfort zone but there not really observing, they are actually only participating while being encased in their comfort zone. Actual observation takes one to participate as well, especially observing one's own participation outside one's own comfort zone. You can only be a true observer if you observe your own participation, especially if it's outside your comfort zone.

Spiritual awareness is supposed to be about becoming more aware, not less. This means we are supposed to go out from our comfort zone and participate as well as observe our own participation. However, it's advisable not to do this if your comfort zone was created from and through our external environment, this is because our comfort zone in this case is vulnerable to the external environment.

At all times, it is advisable that our comfort zone be created from within, within our internal environment. A lot of spiritual practices teach us this, at times unbeknownst to us. Again, if your comfort zone is created from and through our external environment, it's advisable not to venture out too far from your comfort zone, this is because your comfort zone is vulnerable to our external environment.

Once you have created your comfort zone through your inner internal being, no amount of external influences can disintegrate or influence this kind of zone. You will get to a point where you just smile at everything that is going on around you externally as your security is assured. However, the more we become evolved in our participation of our external environment, the less we will smile. You see, the observer will always smile where's the participator will not and understandably so, this is because the participators comfort zone is always reliant on the external environment, of course the observers security isn't, it's totally reliant on a comfort zone that can't be influenced by our external environment. This is only one reason why we smile in this state.

If you want true internal peace, don't create your comfort zone from and through our external environment, it's too insecure within it's own participation, just be and observe in full comfort of your internal security zone that you created, not someone else.