The Passiveness of Love

Written by Mathew Naismith

Love is a passive expression.

Love is not about judging everything

else that is not of this love negative.

Love is neither negative nor positive

for it is passive by nature.

Love does not limit itself to

judgment or extremes.

Love has no boundaries,

for only in harsh judgment are

there so many negatives/boundaries.

Love is simply freedom from these

inhibiting aggressive expressions

of today's expressions of love and light.

~Mathew G~

Has this new movement of love and light become highly aggressive?

Considering the conversations I have had with a number of people on this topic, and that anyone apart of this new movement often judge more, especially more of what is negative, it certainly seems it is highly aggressive. It is amazing what is negative today that wasn't before, and we are suppose to be judging less, not more!!

Yes, the perception of love and light is observed by many as being a movement and a new movement. As of any new movement, it becomes a be and end all, the ultimate answer to our troubling world and minds. This alone reminds me of the religious Dark Ages, my movement/religion is the ultimate answer. 

This movement is also new because it does not emulate the ancient teachings of love and light. These ancient teachings of love and light are and were not about extreme expressions to start with. They are also not about being in judgment more, in effect, judging more of what is negative. What wasn't judged as negative before is now judged as negative by this new movement today, for example, expressing a balanced view is negative. Balance of course pertains to wisdom. 

Speaking with other people as well on this topic, they mention how telling it how it actually is, is negative by this new movement, meaning, the truth is negative which pertains that this new movement is really of the non-acceptance of truths. This of course pertain that this new movement is really about lies. The similarities between this new movement of today and the religious Dark Age movements are obvious, not they are exactly the same but there are some significant similarities. Basing a movement on the non-acceptance of truths is but one of them, excluding wisdom and balance from a movement is another.

It is quite disheartening for people like me to observe this occurring all over again; we are just not willing to free ourselves from these boundaries that we are conditioned to.

I was repeatedly told, at an early age, not to read or study on certain subjects that were going to condition me to  certain ways of thinking; this included a lot of new age spiritual teachings at the time. Even today this is the case. Only now can I see why, through my interactions with other people, I was told not to condition myself to certain teachings.      

Materialism is only apart of that conditioning, the other part is to do with spiritual conditioning, especially the spiritual conditionings that pertain to fear. How many people today fear expressing the ego, judgment and negativity? If you fear the so called dark side of life at all, you are conditioned to fear, however, it is also advisable not to fear being in fear either.

Being fearful is part of the process of negating or neutralising fear altogether, it is wise to treat this as part of the process. It is also wise to treat fearing being fearful of negativity as apart of the process as well. No one part of the process is a be and end all, it is wise to be aware of this in my mind. 

The Feebleness of Love and Light

Written by Mathew Naismith

As I have shown is previous posts, I'm all for love and light, what I am not for is love and light being used and abused in the same way as we have religion/spirituality as a whole. Perceiving and using anything as a be and end all to start with, is usually a prelude to abuse to a significant magnitude. For starters, we have an extreme within these expression of a be and end all. As many eastern teachings teach us to become less of motion (quietened), we instead us more motion within this excessive action of yet another be and end all. 

I find it awfully strange that views and expressions like mine, that are balanced unbiased, are often judged as being negative and even toxic by people of love and light. When did balanced views and expressions become toxic or negative?  Probably at the same time that extremist expressions became normal and an acceptable way of expressing ourselves. Seen as wisdom is anything but of extremist views and expressions, it is obvious that wisdom has been replaced by these kinds of excessive actions. You take away wisdom; you take away even the slightest comprehension of balance. Of course within this state void of wisdom, balanced views and expressions are going to be judged as negative and toxic, primarily from people who are abusing this perception of love and light.

The question is now, why isn't this love and light winning out over it's opposite, for example, ominous expressions and motions? To express an unbiased view, the world isn't becoming less ominous in nature but more. As of usual, this kind of reflection judged as negative and toxic, what I don't get is that spiritually aware people are supposed to be judging less, not more. When I look upon spirituality as a whole over mans entire existence, I find our present state of spiritual expressions just as radical as any other time in human history, this includes the religious Dark Ages. When balanced unbiased views and expressions become toxic, just like in the religious Dark Ages, it is obvious where spirituality is at, at present.

What I also find strange is this love and light is suppose to be of unconditional love, this couldn't be further from the truth, not when balanced unbiased views and expressions become toxic. As of unconditional love, it is too obvious that many people trying to express love and light have no idea what a true sense of love and light denotes.

Let's unbiasedly look at love and light overcoming ominous or destructive motions. How many people in human history have been killed or burnt alive, even within their own temples and churches like Buddhist monks for example, were of this love and light?  If this love and light was that powerful, why did this occur in the first place? Why hasn't love and light overcome it's opposing opposite in human history? Of course this unbiased view is but another toxic expression, a strange expression of love and light I must say!!

Let's look at the antediluvian period where we have opposing realms like Lemuria and Atlantis. Why was Lemuria, which was of love and light, overcome by Atlantis's materialism and power? Considering that Lemuria was of a much greater size realm than Atlantis, how did this love and light succumb to materialism and power?  

Ironical, I just received the following from a friend of mine.

http://www.riseearth.com/2017/03/naval-officer-tells-us-exactly-what-he.html

A true sense of love and light is indeed expressional of unconditional love; this includes expressing this to ominous destructive forces. It is obvious that these forces will always overcome a true sense of love and light, but only in realities of motion. Actually, a true sense of love and light doesn't belong in realities and dimensions of motion, however, a balanced perspective of love and light within these kinds of realities do. When you get abused for expressing balance, especially from so called light workers, this within itself is ominous. In actuality, anything not of balance is going to be ominous/destructive by nature, please expect this to be true.

We are simply not using and utilising light and love in the correct manner in accordance with realities of motion. To me, we are simply being too excessive within our expressions of love and light in realities of motion. If we expressed this kind of love and light in a motionless reality, all would be fine but we are clearly not in a motionless reality.

Consider this. No true expression of love and light would desire to change realities based of motion, the unconditional love of love and light stops this from occurring. Unconditional love also means to unconditionally love realities based on excessive motions, no matter how destructive they are. Love and light expressed to excess does not belong within these kinds of realities, these kinds of realities are not of love and lights reality to change, it's this simple. 

The way we continually use love and light is feeble within realities of motion and always will be. In all, our freedom will only come from balanced perspectives and expressions within realities of motion.   

Porthole or Portal Dimensions!!

Written by Mathew Naismith

There not dimensional portholes, its portals. A gateway to other realities/dimensions is called a portal, not a porthole!! I often think outside the square, calling a portal a porthole is by no exception, in actually, by no mistake. I actually gave no thought to the difference or separation that these two words create; this is something I often do.

We often think to the language we are most fluent in, as of any language, language is conducive to separation and to concise labelling, usually to give our human consciousness concise comprehension of our environment. Of course separating everything through language understanding isn't really that concise. As an example, concise meaning is to express much in few words, why so many labels then that refer to so many separate identities that can often be very simular in nature?

Imagine you are looking at a ships porthole from within a ship and that the porthole is closed by a porthole that you can't see out of. Now imagine opening up this porthole, what do you see? A completely different reality than what is in the ship itself. What occurs when you see into a dimensional portal is a completely different reality? This is exactly the same as if you were looking out of a ships porthole, often a completely different reality to your present reality inside the ship.

Now imagine climbing out of a ships porthole and falling into the ocean while the ship is at sea. You instantly find yourself in a completely different reality to what is on the ship; this is no different to going through an actual dimensional portal.

Like any dimensional portal, once you find yourself in the middle of an ocean, you may make it back to your initial or previous reality and you may not. Of course death is but another porthole/portal one will enter into to find themselves in another completely different reality, in actuality, entering into porthole/portals is a fact of life.

As a porthole of a ship has a doorway/gateway to another reality to what is in the ship itself, so are demesnial portals, they really represent the same exact thing, a view to a different reality that we may or may not enter into.

I am not into using language to separate everything and label everything within their given slots. Language, especially the English language, is into separating everything by looking at the dissimilarities within everything, not the similarities.

Most people are unaware that they are conditioned to primarily looking at the dissimilarities within everything, for example, how often do we use the label negative or positive in turn creating more separation. As we become more spiritual, how often do we separate ourselves from everything else that we judge as negative or even toxic? How often do we use language to give ourselves separate labels to everything else that is judged as being non-spiritual?

One of the reasons why my expressions are often incomprehensible to a lot of people, is to do with my views to life. Instead of looking for and at the dissimilarities of my environment, I look at the similarities. Of course in a reality based on looking at and for the dissimilarities, it is obvious that people like me are going to be incomprehensible to a lot of people. I suppose my semi-illiterate state doesn't help either, but only to a person into separatism and looking at and for dissimilarities instead of the similarities within our environment.

Try to free yourself from the conditioning of looking for and at the dissimilarities of life, and try to use language to see these similarities instead of the dissimilarities.  

Love and Light v Ominous Creations

Written by Mathew Naismith

I received a few responses, in regards to my last post, referring to the inability to protect ourselves from portholes/doors that open up into ominous existences. You can liken this to a person who robs a bank thus instantly changing their own reality, especially when they are imprisoned. Our own reality can instantly change in a few seconds; incurring brain damage in an accident is another example. By having these doors open to us, our reality instantly changes, this can also occur when our minds enter through these reality changing doors, for example, inducing potent drugs or through mental projection.

As we become spiritually aware or aware period, we do have more of an opportunity to open up more doors to other realities; this of course makes sense because we are becoming more aware. The doors to other realities we can open up to just through out of body experiences are amazing. Each door opens up to a new awareness, of course it is up to us if we are willing to become aware more by leaving the door open, or, stay unaware by closing the door again. Of course spiritual awareness is about an awareness of all of what is, not just what we desire to be aware of. This brings us to protecting ourselves in a better way.

First of all, I don't judge what is or isn't negative or positive. To judge an ominous existence negative is exactly what the ominous existence or entity wants you to do. As soon as you judge like this, you instantly give power or energy to what you have judged in this way. No ominous existence or entity can exist without this energy flow for which we seemingly freely give energy to. Negatives instantly denote fear; through fear is exactly how these ominous existences and entities obtain their energy to exist.

Being of love and light, as soon as we judge anything negative, we instantly ignore or separate ourselves from these kinds of energy flows. Again, this is exactly what this kind of ominous energy flow wants you to do, ignore it or stay ignorant to it because it is negative. We think the best way to stay of the love and light is to stay ignorant to these energy flows. Being that spiritual awareness is about becoming more ware, not less, I find this reaction quit strange.

We are a part of everything void of separation; of course separation is due to our desires. We are apart of everything which includes what is ominous, of course a controlling ego will always go with the desire while denouncing it is apart of anything ominous. We are the ones that feed ominous existences and entities the energy they need to exist, this alone proves we are also apart of this kind of energy flow, however, this also means they are also apart of us, even while in love and light. This too is important to remember when opening up portholes/doorways to other existences/realities, you are always of this love and light no matter what.

Think on this, how powerful would the financial elite be without the populous feeding them the energy they need to use against us to gain even more energy, more power and wealth? Everything that is ominous can only exist through sucking off energy from other sources, usually light sources that create enormous amounts of energy. The more energy a light source emanates, the more energy ominous energy sources have to use to exist by, and we ask why the world is noticeably becoming more destructive and uncaring.

As I said, the more of the light and love we become, the more we desire to stay as this light and love, in the process, deliberately ignoring ominous energy flows to the extent of totally denying we are any part of these kinds of energy flows. How can't we be apart of something we are feeding so it can exist?

So knowing that we are also apart of these ominous energy sources, why aren't people like me of these kinds of energy flows?

This question is quite simple and the answer to this, which was once personally proven to me to be correct in every sense, is that we are all apart of one thing. It is not just the knowing that we are of, what Buddhism calls nothing or pure awareness or religions call God, but it's actually being this one thing in essence in every sense.

It is advisable to focus on the essence within all things, religiously; this is known to be the spirit of God within all things, the spirit within all things. It is an essence that is within all things no matter how ominous an energy source becomes; this essence can never be touched or influenced by any other energy source. A lot of people these days also call this essence love, an untouchable energy source that is unable to be influenced in any sense. No matter what you call this untouchable unchangeable energy source, it is all of the same source.

The answer is of course to not just know of this essence but be of this essence. Why are some religious people untouchable, even when their physical life is being destroyed? They know they are untouchable while being this essence within all things; Jesus is a prime example of this.

I personally experienced this first hand when approached by ominous sources. All I did was express my awareness and being of this essence, this indestructible essence, and they fled in fear, not in fear of me but in fear of knowing they too are still of this same essence. No ominous source of energy wants to become aware, especially to this extent, for only can this kind of energy source exist in ignorance. Any kind of a pure display of awareness is most unbecoming to ominous energy sources, for their existence is purely based on existing in ignorance. Anyone of love and light, who expresses any kind of ignorance because they judge what is and isn't negative, is feeding this energy flow, it is this simple.

The last thing we need to be is more expressive of ignorance to protect our love and light. Only through a true sense of awareness and being of this essence, can we stop the energy flow to these ominous energy sources. Realise these energy sources can only exist through us, which is very much the same as the financially elite in the world. As I often say, our environment often tells us what we need to know.

Yes, I put Buddhism's nothingness and pure awareness under the same label as the spirit of God. As of pure awareness and nothingness, the spirit of God is also motionless; it all represents peace and tranquilly which is only obtained through being motionless. Pure awareness is motionless; this is why this state is often referred to as being nothingness in Buddhism. How motional is ominous energy sources? The motion at times is unmeasurable because it can only exist through other energy sources and for this to occur, a lot of motion is expressed. We are basically talking about pure ignorance here for if this source of energy was aware, they couldn't exist as they do.

Why would a pure aware tranquil state of energy express motion, especially considering it creates its own energy? Of course we also perceive that all sources of energy are in motion, they are all vibrating therefore in motion. As I have done, you must find this out yourself that not all energy sources are in motion and vibrate. Our own conditioning in a physical reality has conditioned us to perceive otherwise.

My advice is stay away from anything that makes you fear, even fear being of or expressing negativity or the ego period. It is too obvious that a lot of people of this love and light fear tarnishing or diminishing their love and light in any way, they also fear negativity or what they have judged as being negative, this is all based on fear.

Mental illness is usually seen a negative and so are disabled people, do we stay away from these people because we are of love and light? When these people need so much of our assistance, we stay away from them because they are negative!! I look at it this way, anyone who is obvious within their ominous behaviour are seriously disabled through utter ignorance. To egotistically save our own love and light, we ignore and stay away from these negative people.

The present perception is to primarily look after yourself first and foremost so that this energy can envelope the world. This perception sounds awfully like the (I) to me which truly represents egotism and ignorance from anything we judge negative. It is too obvious that this kind of love and light is based on fear, it certainly not the way to use love and light in my mind.

People like me don't fear expressing the ego or being negative is some way, we instead become aware, usually through the help of the environment, of the ego and try to stay away from judging what is or isn't negative. Like I stated before, once you judge a negative, you are in turn feeding this negative exactly what it wants to exist. If we didn't judge so many negatives, could these negatives exist? They simply need our energy to exist and this is exactly what we are presently doing. We certainly need to free ourselves from this entanglement in my mind, however, as usual, what will be will be!!     

Transcending Mind, A Gateway To The Infinite

Written by Mathew Naismith

This is most peculiar, a gateway that can be open or closed or even partially open or closed. What is peculiar about this is when we relate the gateway to the mind, which can be open or shut or partially ajar, a gateway to other realities and existences. When closed, the mind is no longer transcending beyond its own understanding. When open, the mind is subjected to relatives that are usually beyond the minds comprehension, this is until the mind finds recognisable familiarities within these relatives. The only reason we comprehend these relatives is due to these familiarities.

These familiarities occur through the mind remembering bits and peaces of what it is; only in this can the mind comprehend these relatives. If the mind is closed, the mind is unable to relate to these relatives no matter how hard it tries to comprehend beyond its present understanding of what it is. A closed mind sees itself being only of the physical brain, it's closed off from comprehending the mind being anything else but of the physical brain. A closed mind will never comprehend beyond what it is unable to relate to, this is until the closed mind finds something it is familiar with beyond its present understanding. If nothing is familiar to the mind, the gateway will close again. For the gateway to stay open, the mind must find something or remember something of what it is beyond this closed mind, only in this is the mind able to comprehend these experiences thus keeping the gateway (mind) open.

It's wise to look at the mind as being a gateway to other realities and existences, within this; our comprehensibility becomes acute and so much more prevalent. However, no matter how open your mind is, if you still look upon the mind as being a physical entity, your comprehensibility beyond physicality will be hindered. It's handy to look upon the mind as a star-gate as the mind after death and through various out of body experiences, can transcend time and space. The mind isn't what we are conditioned to think it is, it's not just physical or of the ego mind, it transcends way beyond this, this is why I often mention the ego and divine mind in my posts. The ego mind is often related to the physical and the divine mind is often related to the non-physical.

We also relate the mind to thought, it's only attribute is thinking, even when it's the mind that helps us enter into thoughtlessness. A mind that thinks its own mind is only of physicality and ego, will only comprehend to this limitation, which the only attribute the mind has, is to think. This is true for a closed mind but not for a mind that is truly open.

A truly open mind relates to the mind also being silent, non-physical and egoless. As consciousness itself has no limitations, neither does the mind, it's not limited to physicality or ego. The mind can transcend these limitations as it transcends beyond these limitations in death or through various out of body experiences. A good way to comprehend this is again see your mind as a star-gate, a gateway that goes beyond all physical limitations.

It's difficult for a closed or partially open mind to comprehend that the mind itself is a gateway to start with. Think of this then. When we daydream, use our imagination or dream, it's our mind that is opening up to all these experiences; it is the mind that is the gateway to these other realities. If you like, also see the mind as porthole to other dimensions.

So the question is now, is the mind only a gateway to other dimensions, realties and experiences especially when open?

Imagine the energy that is needed to feed this gateway, especially when open. I look at the rest of the body being this energy source for the mind, this gateway, no energy input to the gateway, no open gateway.

The energy involved to feed the mind, comes from what supports the mind that is physical, the physical body as a whole. The body that supports the mind has to also be sustained by a constant energy source, usually from other physical energy sources, however, a mind that is non-physical is sustained by non-physical energy sources and of course this stands to reason.

To answer the question, the mind is primarily a gateway, a door to other dimensions, realities and experiences, however, the energy that sustains the gateways is also apart of these gateways, the human physical mind is prime example of this. The energy source that supports the physical mind, is also apart of the brain that the mind resides in.

Now this is interesting, we have an energy source that feeds the mind, we also have an energy source as the brain to support the mind. We then have the mind itself that relies on energy sources to exist; this is while the mind is residing in physical sources of energy as in the physical body and brain. What then supports the mind in non-physical realities? The soul of course which seems to act as the physical body including the brain. As a soul, the body and brain seem to be of one entity, this is where the spirit or the essence of life itself within all things comes into it. As the human body acts as a vessel for the brain to support the mind to reside in, the soul becomes the body and the spirit becomes the brain for the mind to reside in.

Physical = body + brain + mind

Non-physical = soul + spirit + mind

It makes sense to relate the physical brain to the spirit within all things. Consider this, what would we be without the physical brain? Now, what would we be like without the spirit within all things? In both instances the mind couldn't exist for there is no support for the mind, the gateway, to gain energy to function. Yes, the physical brain to me represents the spirit within all things.

What about the things that don't have a brain, have they then no spirit?

This is going to hurt a lot off egos. Any existing thing without a brain is more of the non-physical spirit within all things than anything with a brain. The physical brain disconnects us from this non-physical spirit within all things by just purely existing, of course it is the mind that determines how disconnected we become. Imagine existing on pure spirit void of a physical brain, it is difficult for a lot of us to comprehend this as we are conditioned to the brain, not this pure spirit within all things. We are indeed conditioned to separate one from the other, to separate the human body from the soul, the brain for the spirit within all things. Through this separation, we are unable to comprehend the connections between physical and non-physical entities and relatives. Within this there will be no familiarities thus keeping the gateway closed.        

You can see where the energy and support comes from for the mind to be able exist and open up to various possibilities which are truly endless. The possibilities are indeed infinite but only if we keep the gateway, the star-gate, the porthole, the mind, open.

Note: I should point out; none of the above came from any other source but through channelling. There was no observation or analytical thought process involved here; this primarily all came to me as I wrote this post.  

Conditioned to Incomprehensibility

Written by Mathew Naismith

My lovely wife came across the following rhyme after hearing me speak of how wisdom is no longer apparent within our daily existence. My wife only observed the wisdom of the rhyme, not what the rhyme was actually portraying, that men do not hear or listen enough. The wisdom being that we can speak too much and not hear enough of what we are speaking about, this was basically what the discussion with my wife was about. My darling wife did not observe the actual meaning of the rhyme but the wisdom of the rhyme. There was no depiction of a negative or positive, black or white, within her observation of the rhyme. This kind of observation is very rare it seems, observing the wisdom in things before anything else.           

"There was an owl who lived in an oak tree. The more he heard, the less he spoke. The less he spoke, the more he heard. Oh, if men were like that wise bird."

The following was in response to the question of making allowances for people who are unable to comprehend anything beyond their own conditioning. The conditioning here is pertaining to expressing extremes as opposed to expressing balance.  

In the west in particular it would seem, we are conditioned from birth to exist in separation with our environment, is this a relative excuse to ignore what our natural surroundings can teach us about balance?

When you also consider a lack of being conditioned to wisdom, I think this is a relative excuse to ignore what our environment can teach us.

However, I think many of us are at the stage where we are deliberately ignoring what our environment can teach us. Of course when we gain wisdom, we see it quite differently as you seem to have done. Wisdom is an important relative towards observing the balance in our environment.

We seem to have gotten to the point of deliberately ignoring instead of just being unaware, probably because of the lack of wisdom.

I think any consciousness existing void of wisdom is going to be imbalanced therefore extreme and destructive by nature. There is nothing wrong with existing like this, however, if we are serious in changing our ways, we need to be aware and more conditioned to wisdom than separation it would seem, this clearly isn't occurring.

The reason I say this isn't occurring, is we are obviously still fixated to extremes.  Any expressions of extremes indicate that the said consciousness is any thing but conditioned to wisdom. All extremes to me indicate separation to excess; it is obvious this kind of existence/consciousness is void of wisdom thus unable to observe balance within the environment.

Basically, we no longer have the tools to observe and learn balance from our environment any more. We instead replaced wisdom with separation through excess expressions of extremes.

_______________________

The following is another response I gave in relation to comprehending anything not of our own mind set, especially words of wisdom. Wisdom is certainly being replaced with extreme reactions and counteractions these days. 

The means of learning from wisdom is still there, it's just we seem to have gotten to a point where we no longer able to comprehend wisdom as this, particularly in the west.

We might become aware of this kind of wisdom, but we don't truly comprehend its meaning, we have lost this ability through our fixations to extremes it would seem.

Spirituality is being used and abused once again as a feel good practice; it was never intended for this. Spirituality to me is about connections beyond human conscious understanding, feeling good comes at best to this, actually, feeling good is apart of the natural process of becoming connected. We have indeed abused this once again for self-gratification.         

Wisdom is the ability to observe without bias, at no time is this kind of observation a state of excessive thinking and analysing; it's a pure state of observation. As an example, there are no true black and white's, negative and positives; there is only observation of motion void of analytical analysis. There are no true wrong and rights, only expressions of motions.

As spirituality is suppose to be about connections, it's also supposed to be about wisdom, this again is no longer the case it would seem. Extreme expressions and self-gratifications have nothing to do with a true sense of spirituality and wisdom to me. It's sad to see spirituality being once again abused in this fashion.

  _______________________

I also wrote the following in response that all validation is of external sources. Also, the mind is a doorway to other worlds, realms and realities; we often comprehend that the mind is just of a physical spectrum.    

Indeed, to know you are abundance takes a balanced mind to realise this in the first place. A mind focused on extremes will never realise this abundance, only the abundance found externally which is often transitory. All extreme expressions are external.

The mind to me is a doorway to external and internal worlds/realms. We often make the mistake and think that the mind is of external worlds only, of the physical worlds.

Having balanced views assists us to use the mind as a doorway to our inner world, a world we have often forgotten about.

External validation isn't quite correct because it's the mind that needs validation, and it's but a doorway to all worlds. If this doorway is not balanced within itself, the worlds we experience through these doorways will be the same.

How many people look upon the mind as being a doorway, a gate to other worlds and dimensions? It's obviously important we have a balanced perceptions/mind.

The mind is a stargate, this is obvious for the mind still exists after so-called death. The mind indeed transcends realities, if the mind is imbalanced, so is the realities experienced, even after death.

We look upon the mind as an external entity that needs external validation, big mistake in my mind. My mind receives more validation from internal sources than external sources these days, only because my mind is open and aware to all I am, not just to all I desire to be of!!

How many people truly comprehend that the mind is but a doorway to other worlds, realities and realms? We have been conditioned to think the mind is only a physical entity and anything of the mind is of the ego mind. Everyone's mind is indeed a stargate, a gate/doorway to limitless infinite conscious occurrences. 

Yes, most of what I write about is incomprehensible to a lot of people; this has been stated to me a number of times. As the ego mind often does, anything incomprehensible, especially when it questions our own perceptions, is often refuted and denounced. If I did this myself, I would be aware of very little these days.

We desire to be free from our environment around us, but we are at the same time unwilling to let go of extreme expressions that negate wisdom. Only in and through wisdom will we truly be free, the problem being, one has to be wise to some extent in the first place to start being truly free of our own extreme expressions.

Can a consciousness become that extreme within there expressions, that the said consciousness will be unable to free itself from these limiting extreme expressions? I have observed that many of us have reached this stage, in the process, denounce any wisdom in the contrary to their own extreme expressions. Collectively, we are in a mess, a mess we have created ourselves, however, there is an answer to this, but we must be willing to free ourselves from our extreme expressions.     

As The Wise Say, Balance Is The Key

Written by Mathew Naismith

Interesting, it was said to me that humans as a whole don't like peace; it certainly seems that way to me as well.

The reason why came to me when this was said to me, peace represents a consciousness of little or no controlling expressions.

The human ego mind feels it always has to be either controlled or controlling, within this, there is no peace, only what control (motion) creates.

___________________________

Why do we refuse to learn from our environment, an environment human existence is reliant on in almost everyway?

Do we not learn from this environment because we think of ourselves as being far more intelligent and/or aware?

Take the sun for instant, too much light emitted from the sun, everything dies. Too little sun emitted from the sun, everything dies.

The right amount of light emitted from the sun, everything flourishes, not just biologically but in everyway including spiritually.

The reason for this is simple, balance that neutralises extremes which in turn allows everything to flourish.

When the wise and ancient teachings teach balance is the key, they are not just talking the talk, as in stating something because it sounds right. They are stating it because it's true, especially in accordance with the present environment.

No matter what environment you find yourself in, it will show you how to exist in a balanced way.

Now, how intelligent and aware are we, in relation to our natural environment, when we are in total ignorance of its expressions of balance?

___________________________

It's too hot, so we bring on another ice age.

It's too cold, so we bring on a continuous heatwave.

Its' too light, so we bring on excessive dark.

It's too dark, so we bring on excessive light.

Our present existence is too chaotically destructive, so we bring on the extreme opposite.

Excessive extreme reactions is what makes human consciousness human, otherwise this consciousness would be something else other than human.

It would seem we don't want to evolve from human consciousness, as it would seem we are too fixated to its extremes.

As extremes denote limitations, any consciousness of extremes is always going to be limited. Free yourself of these extremes and associated limitations and see what develops, you won't be disappointed.  

___________________________

- It is better to rise from life as from a banquet - neither thirsty nor drunken. Aristotle

- Be moderate in order to taste the joys of life in abundance. Epicurus

- They are sick that surfeit with too much, as they that starve with nothing. William Shakespeare

- Your hand opens and closes, opens and closes. If it were always a fist or always stretched open, you would be paralysed. Your deepest presence is in every small contracting and expanding, the two as beautifully balanced and coordinated as birds' wings.

Rumi

- Balance is the key to abundance, an equal amount of abundance pertaining to all things within all things.

~Mathew G~