The Rise of Passive Consciousness

 Written by Mathew Naismith

Firstly, I recently watched a young person explain how the masses are being duped. Yes, it is easier for so many people to live in fear than to face fear, as with accepting a lie than facing the truth.

Is it easier living in fear, like under communism or fascism, inhumanity as a whole?

How hard is it for many people to face their own fears and traumas? Today, just take a pill for depression due to not being able to face fears and deal with traumas. Watch the idiot box, TV, and feel elated from a state of a little less elation. Take everything away from the people, now make them happy by giving them a piece of bread. They say you will be happy owning nothing, which includes your own thoughts, even if you are a millionaire!!

Even though I am involved in human traumas, I can still sense a state of great conscious passiveness is becoming a lot more apparent, a catalyst that has been inadvertently created by excessive chaos, fear and aggravation. I am quite involved in human trauma but even I can in this state sense this, which means this state of passiveness is becoming more influential.

Sadly, often a consciousness that is asleep needs a nightmare to wake up to the nightmare they have been living in all along.

Imagine for a moment that people won't even think of speeding on roads due to caring for other people on the road. Imagine governments putting the people and the country before political and material gains. Imagine a reality were abuse is impossible, where abuse won't even come into people's minds. Imagine not being able to live in fear. Sounds like a fantasy or of another reality apart from human reality!!

Yes, it sounds like I am sensing another realities conscious passiveness, which is very possible for many of us to do, but as many of us are also able to do, sense the behind the scene changes occurring in human reality, to human consciousness.

It would seem a great catalyst is concurring, a catalyst that was brought on by the very same thing that is trying to avert such a catalyst occurring. In reaction to a rise in the influence of passive consciousness, the aggressive chaotic side to human consciousness has inadvertently created the very same situation it is trying to eradicate. In the process of a very aggressive eradication, a certain opposite effect has also been created. When you shut of all the lights and leave one light shining, what is more prominent, the dark or the light? We are of course talking about a light that can't be extinguished or eradicated. Yes, this light can as a whole become extinguished from human consciousness, but not from consciousness as a whole.

We are not just of human consciousness, therefore we are governed by a consciousness beyond the control of human consciousness. Yes, many of us can be coerced into believing we are just of human consciousness, therefore the light can be extinguished if we allow it to be, but at no time are we just of human consciousness, as this aggressive chaotic part of human consciousness wants us to believe.

So, many of us will probably die or become coerced before this passive consciousness starts making a physical difference, in the process creating a state of fear. Like technical drawings, where a long process of thought, planning and then of drawing commences before construction, consciousness overall often takes a while to become physical as well.

Imagine living again when this passive consciousness becomes the most influential consciousness of human consciousness, what you sacrificed in a previous life will feel well worth it. As I am predicting myself, those who live another life within this passive human consciousness, will be noted as being pioneers of this passive consciousness. The harder this aggressive chaotic human consciousness pushes, the catalyst is, the more likely that a new age of passive human conscious is likely to eventuate. No, they have no idea of this otherwise they wouldn't push so hard, but be glad they are.

Note that anything I have stated here may not be true, but to someone like me most likely true considering the circumstances.

Time; a Reflection of Eternity

Written by Mathew Naismith

Titus: “Eternity is not in a length, it is a briefer moment, it is full as much it can be.”

Me: “This is interesting Titus, we often look at eternity through the eye's of time, in the process giving eternity a perception of length as in time, volume, value, space, etc.

The definition of eternity; time without end.

We are relating and comparing eternity to time, now do the opposite, relate time through the eyes of eternity, you come up with a different perspective. Everything within time is a fleeting moment of eternity. Everything of time is a passing reflection of eternity.

You seem to have been guided well by your fathers wisdom Titus. You can read all you like in the absence of wisdom, within this only of what you desire can only be learnt.”

Titus: “Time/sequential time can never measure eternity. Humanity is engaged in envisioning eternity, it is usually somewhere far and distant, it is never here. Eternity is more a converging event, it happens as many wholes all around. Seeing it as somewhere far turns it all unreal.”

Me: “I find it interesting Titus how some of us can see this, that you can't measure or size up eternity at the same time seeing eternity all around us. Science; you can't destroy energy, which makes it eternal, but you can change what energy transforms into. Some of us can perceive to some extent from the eternal, scientifically and spiritually.”

What would have to occur to change the present situation of excessive focus on time based existence, where life itself is based primarily on time?

Without uttering a word, the eternal consciousness would just have to become present in time to us and all of what time based reality created would become non-consequential, leading then to a reality based eternal consciousness. The more intense a consciousness becomes focused on time based reality, the bigger the impact of an eternal consciousness presence. It is good to see so many people more of an eternal consciousness than a time based consciousness.

A Weakened Mind

 

Watch your thoughts;They become words.

Watch you words;They become actions.

Watch your actions;They become habits.

Watch your habits;They become character.

Watch your character;It become your destiny.  

Written by Mathew Naismith

A weakened mind is simply of a mind that is unaware of what is beyond the boundaries of the physical mind, it is also of a mind where the ego is in control even when beyond the perception of the boundaries of the physical mind. It is also of a collective mind that thinks it is beyond a consciousness that created nature. In a real sense, this consciousness cannot even simulate nature, it can only mimic nature at best.

Yes, science perceives how to create a universe, this of course is only copying nature, science is unable to create anything remotely novel that is not a simulation or copy of the original creation in some way. Imagine a universe created by science. Would the consciousness, if a consciousness could be implanted seen as we don't even know where consciousness came from to begin with, be as diverse as the universe we exist in? The implanted consciousness would only be of what is of the creator, very limited due to the lack of awareness.

So what consciousness is so many people today in awe of?

Look at all the power, control and physical wealth of multinationals, which could only come about due to abusing a less malign consciousness, a consciousness not entirely true to what created something like the universe and nature itself from scratch. There was nothing to mimic or simulate from, only an awareness far beyond human perception. A malign consciousness is simply a product of being less aware and quite naturally so. Yes, a malign consciousness is simply a creation of nature, a natural development of a consciousness being less aware.

Today, the observer just smiles at what less aware humans have created and are trying to create, however, the participator feels great anguish and distress at what this unaware consciousness is creating. It is funny, because multinationals are only simulating a malign consciousness while trying to act like some kind of deity. The observer just smiles.

To the participator, we are suffering big time but to the observer this suffering is of nothing real or of great importance, for what is of suffering is nothing to what is not suffering. Our suffering is like a grain of sand on the beach. So what would I know about suffering? I know as much about suffering as I do about not suffering, yes, I often smile at my own literal life long suffering when I am not participating in my suffering. For starters, I have literary had a broken arm since I was six years old, I also have at no point taken pain killers for any amount of time. Yes, my pain killer has been the ability to simply observe my own suffering.

“Suffering is something entirely different, however. Suffering is what we think of the pain, not the situation that caused the pain. Suffering is the emotional energy we invest in pain. Suffering is a choice. You might just read that last sentence a couple more times, as well. If it is a new concept, it might just change your approach to life. If you are in the habit of really getting in deep with your suffering, it will seem impossible that you could choose something otherwise. Suffering is simply our attachment to our pain, our ownership of and identification with it.”

Sorry, the blog doesn't seem have a language translator.

https://www.stephanielynnyoga.com/single-post/2015/06/21/On-Pain-and-Suffering-The-Balance-of-Effort-and-Surrender

In a real sense, if you want to suffer from what the multinationals are creating at present, you will feel much greater pain than you have to. Make the best of life instead of the worse of life, however, a no time suffer from not being able to make the best of life either, you won't if you are participating for this is a part of being the participator. Yes, Yoga as whole, not just the exercises alone, teaches you to become the observer as many spiritual teachings do. You can see why the multinationals and communists alike desire to rid the world of any teachings that help is lessening the suffering through becoming the observer. I smile all the times I think of the observer, I just can't help it, very lucky me, but I also suffer from pain at times as this is a part of being a participator as well.

The induced suffering could push people's consciousness to become the observer, as many traumas can cause an awakening of some kind. The malign can interfere with the psychical mind, but the observing consciousness is unaffected, in a real sense.

Thinking As One Mind

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

It has occurred before in times of great persecution and trauma, where of one mind becomes apparent, obvious to many minds. The trick is to become of this one mind instead of simply aware of this one mind, in other words instead of participating in being aware of this one mind, observe through this one mind to become of this one mind.

As in science and religion, awareness is one thing, becoming involved in what you are observing is something else.

No, communism and fascism and alike are not of becoming of one mind, it is one mind set simply enslaving all other minds to a mind set. To do this persecution is dealt out in a way to give fear of being locked down, isolated from all other minds except for a particular mind set. Instead of being of a one mind, every mind becomes subservient to a mind set.

Now the difference between being of one mind and being of a mind set, is being of one mind is of the observer, where being of a mind set is being observed. As we are seeing today, especially through the degree of censorship we are seeing, observing this kind of mind set is heavily discouraged. The subservient to this mind set are not allowed to observe, simply learn to become subservient. Yes, you are then no longer of this one mind or even of your own mind.

To a person who has an interest in science and spirituality overall, not being able to freely observe what is observable is a travesty observer wise. You are only able to observe in accordance with the mind set and as any mind set, this is limited to the mind set, however, thinking as one mind has no limitations to what can be observed, in actuality it is of observation of what is observable within it's entirety. It amazes me today how many scientists are content in being subservient to this very limiting mind set, a state of mind often witnessed occurring through being subservient to religious fanaticism, being subservient to a mind set instead of being guided by thinking as one mind.

So we are thinking as one mind and one mind only, is this not very limiting?

If we were all going to just religiously think and not scientifically think as well or visa-versa, this is not being of one mind, one mind is the ability to think as of all minds, be it of different minds. I may think more of spiritual matters, others may think more of science matters, thinking as one they are of one mind. The mind set of communism or fascism on the other hand wants everyone to be of separate minds, within this mind set you are only able to observe in accordance with the mind set, thinking as one mind on the other hand allows all minds to observe all other minds withhold hindrance.

So being subservient to a mind set seems to be all powerful over the subservient mind, this is an illusion of being all powerful. We feel and witnesses the great power and control the mind set has over the subservient. What power and control? So it is all powerful making all other minds subservient to one mind set, minds that are vulnerable to the influence of mind sets like communism and fascism. Notice only in times of great peril and trauma can this occur!!

So this is what the mind set wants you to believe is all powerful and controlling, minds that are vulnerable. Now if this mind set was to hold power and control over an equal devious and immoral mind set, I would say there is some kind of limited power and control but no, having power and control over the vulnerable mind is not all powerful. On top of this, the mind set itself has to stay ignorant to everything else it is unable to control. For a particular mind set to exist takes a particular degree of observational awareness, all else that is observable is ignored or disposed of, as we are seeing today.

Would this supposed all powerful mind set actually hold up to or have some degree of control over a mind thinking as one mind? There is no comparison to begin with, this is why these very limiting and limited mind sets have to always gain control of the influence of thinking as one mind has on minds. Why the persecution of the Christians all over again, and eventually of any spirituality of teaching of one mind? Actually, I have seen science go the same way, the mind set that profits come before science, in the process creating profiteering science as opposed to real science, a real science that puts science before profits and any other bias. I am not sure why spiritual people and atheists are not coming together on this, where we all simply become subservient to a mind set of great limitations.

So you may look at China and see no limitations of technological advancements, the same China that has live organ harvesting, literal slave labour, filthy rich while the poor go hungry, degradation of forests like in Africa at present, the building of hundreds of coal driven power plants, etc. This is the minds set Chinese style globalisation of communism, a country that outlaws males being expressive of femininity in any sense. This is a mind set of communist atheism, where spirituality is only tolerated when under the strictest control of communist mind set, if you are lucky. Was atheism allowed to express itself freely under religious observation in the modern era? This globalisation of communist style mind set is not so gracious or moral, it is it's way or no way. This should sound awfully like religious fanaticism, because that is what it is as of any extremism.

So in saying all this, no, mind sets like this are not all powerful and controlling over this one mind Yes, over minds that are vulnerable but not over this one mind, where all is observed, not just of what is desired to be observed in accordance with a mind set.

You have today a leader of a communist country replacing images of Jesus with his own image, yes, they are this delusional, thinking they have any resemblance to the one mind. I know this one mind idea is hard to imagine for a lot of people, but when we are to freely as a human species allowed to think in our own way, altogether we think as one mind. Excluding one part of this one mind is not of one mind, simply a mind set which scientifically and spiritually we should avoid. Yes, religion once went down this track of mind setting, and now it's communist atheists turn it would seem.

Will we ever start learning from the past instead of suffering from the past as a collective species? Yes, when we start thinking as one mind. I am not just referring to the one mind of the human species either, but that is my preference.

A Surprising Scenario

Written by Mathew Naismith

What happens to energy when oppressed, when constricted into a compressed dense form?

Before we answer this, what happens when you compress an energy form that acquires all it's energy from external sources? It simply folds in on itself, devours itself. It is in line with western atheism, where atheism could not exist without the existence of something to disbelieve in, or have a belief that an existence doesn't exist. Western atheism is totally reliant on an existence atheism simply believes doesn't exist. Sounds awfully irrational to me. Yes, they could be right within their own beliefs and disbelief but this is not the point, atheism totally relies on an external energy form to exist, this is not the same with a belief in an existence, due to everything being of this existence. It is not an external energy existence you devour or try to destroy, for this is impossible.

So what is going to occur when dark energy, that only exists due to the existence of light energy, oppresses or compresses light energy into a dense energy form? Like an old pressure cooker, when this light energy is compressed too much it explodes. Imagine light being compressed into a dense energy form to the point of exploding out from this restricted environment, light is going to shine everywhere.

The most illogical thing dark energy could do is compress/oppress light to the point of exploding out in all directions. Dark simply can't exist within the light. It is like if the beliefs atheists disbelieve in became apparent, atheism would no longer exist.

The wise thing to do for this dark energy is allow light energy to coexist with itself, of course the main driving force and control comes from the ego. As we are seeing today, mass psychosis exist all over the world and so do psychopathic tendencies, as explained in my blog COVID-19 Mind Control.

https://covid9mindcontrol.blogspot.com/ 

The ego is in control wants total autonomy thus control over the light, in the process in a very unwise way compressing/oppressing light energy.

Donald Trump was labelled a Nazi, which is really irrational because he wasn't the one burning books, censoring information, knowledge, history and free speech. Actually, it is the socialists /communists that are doing this today. Yes, censoring information, knowledge, history and free speech, is obviously of this dark energy, a very oppressive energy and an energy totally reliant on fear to orchestrate it's desires. There is nothing wise about the dark energy, in fact it is an energy form that is of the absence of wisdom, for wisdom of course is of the light as we are clearly seeing today.

The last thing you want to do is compress light into a dense form to the point of exploding, but lucky enough for the light energy this is what the dark energy is doing and does all the times. As foretold, a 1000+ years of peace/light, created by the very same energy trying to stop this occurring.

What is Defined as Meditation

Written by Mathew Naismith

This is difficult to determine because each spiritual practice has it's own definition in what is meditation, this is in accordance with the implementation of meditation. I am not going to look at the various implementations of meditation here, but what I will look at is what all meditations are governed by.

Meditation is of quietening the mind to one degree or another, the quieter the mind becomes, the more of enlightened kind of meditation the consciousness of the mind becomes. Keep in mind that not all meditation techniques lead to enlightenment, many meditation techniques are of simply quietening the mind. It is not the mind that becomes enlightened, it is the consciousness of the mind that becomes enlightened.

So firstly what is quietening the mind?

Quietening the mind is of the absence of participation, the less your mind therefore body participates within an environment, the quieter the mind becomes. Now we may think that praying or chanting is not a form of meditation because we are still mentally and/or physically active, therefore of participating in the environment. Praying and chanting can be like focusing on your breath which is still of participation be it of limited participation, however, we are far less of partition of the environment. In this case we are only participating in praying or chanting, just like focusing on your breath. You could imagine the benefits of quietening your mind with meditative techniques like this.

This may sound strange to some people, but every kind of participation is due to observation, participation cannot exist without being observed. Look at it like this. The universe itself simply exists because it is being observed, without the observation from a consciousness the universe could not exist. It is like the double slit science experiment, where the act of a determining observation changes the outcome. It is how we observe to what is going to be created from this observation.

This brings us to observation itself which leads to enlightenment through meditation. We are all observing our own participation, the reason we are unaware of this because we become involved in what we are observing. Meditation that leads to enlightenment is of observation in the absence of participation. The further your consciousness becomes conditioned to participation, the more likely you are going to become of participation in the absence of observation. This is where meditation comes into it, where you condition your consciousness to become less of participation but further from this, more of observation of participation.

Meditation is simply the reconditioning of consciousness to become more of observation than participation. Yes, this can take time but this time is shortened if you are aware that you are in observation of your own participation, you are never not. Observe more without participating.

Meditation that leads to enlightenment is not of a consciousness that is conditioned to inhumanities, so if your observer self is conditioned to inhumanities, what you will create in observation will create an environment in accordance with the way a consciousness observes. Inhumanities is of a great deal of participation, mainly due to the extent of abuse of energy involved. The less abusive an observing consciousness becomes, the less of participation a consciousness becomes conditioned to. Yes, after a human life cycle has ended, what our observer self is conditioned to makes a different to what we will experience in the after life. Meditation in a really big way just doesn't help us to cope better in life's participation's, meditation also helps in what we will experience in the after life.

I hope this helps some people because what is and is not meditation can be confusing. Also, what I have stated here are of my own words that can be similar or dissimilar to other views in relation to meditation.

The Sacred Life

Written by Mathew Naismith

The truth is only of fear when we fear the truth, for only when the truth becomes negative has the lies become the truth. Words to remember the truth by, I mean really.

What is dividing us so much at present? What is sacred to some is not to others and visa-versa.

To people like me, life is sacred but this doesn't stop with physical life but is also of spiritual life. Now is this the same with people who's only sacredness is money, power and control? Often there is only a perception of physical life, even after the human life ends, this is why in human life money, power and control become sacred and life itself is only there to be used and abused. It is sad but it does seem like the case because look at the difference between people of the sacredness of life to those of the sacredness of money, power and control.

As I wrote recently:

“Looking at the research material lately makes me wonder how did so many people became coerced into supporting hate groups. The now obvious anti-freedom of choice movement is astonishing, now creating hate for people who don't want to get the covid vaccine. What next, hate for people who value life above all else, especially above material wealth? You have been duped big time people and you don't even know it, but the program is elaborate to say the least.

The anti-freedom of choice movement is simply those who go with all the leftist hate groups and movements like BLM, ANTIFA, CRT, woke, communism, etc. Don't get me wrong, I am certainly not for right wing hate groups either. All hate groups like this should be discouraged as they are of simply suffering from the past instead of learning from the past. Wisdom is certainly struggling to survive in the present environment.”

Also:

“People like us take note and learn from the past instead of suffering from the past. What do hate groups want to do? Destroy or censor the past before they learn from the past, in the process keep suffering from the past. I am so disappointed that people are allowing themselves to be continually coerced down this hate group path. It feels like I shouldn't even be hear, that I don't belong, this is no big deal though for people like me, for this is only of the finite.

I am looking at writing a post to do with sacred life, where people like us are of the sacred life and needs, where life is precious, to people who think material possessions and desires are sacred, where life is abused.”

It is awkward times for the truth to prevail, as it is for the people of sacred life, for both are a representation of the same thing. In this prevailing times would you rather be not of the truth therefore not of sacred life, where life is sacred like a child is to it's mother? The mother will suffer for her prevalence but solace comes from this prevalence of suffering.

It is more than okay to suffer, embrace this suffering for it tells of one thing, that life is indeed sacred for one to suffer for.

It is funny, these are my own words and it sounds as if I am preaching!!