The Value of the Insignificant

Written by Mathew Naismith

Biologically speaking and knowing, life on Earth could not exist without the existence of microorganisms nor electrons and protons. This means life on Earth as a whole relies on microorganisms including the creation of the air we breathe, however, what if I told you that there is something way smaller than microscopic organisms or entities as a whole!!

Actually, microscopic organisms or microscopic entities are immensely huge compared to what everything was created from. If life on Earth and the universe itself relied and relies on microscopic organisms and mass/form to exist, what does everything, including consciousness, rely on to exist? If physical mass on Earth relies on microscopic organisms to exist, what would, say for example, consciousness rely on to exist? Would not consciousness itself in the absence of form consist of something far less miniscule than micro matter or form?

I often visualise my egos right index finger ever so gently touching something so seemingly insignificant to the ego that it almost seems not to exist, not until this interaction creates a ball of bright light. Light in this sense seems to represents a pure state of awareness. The interaction seems to be between two distinct entities of ego and non-ego. Often the ego exists in a state of bias and/or desire thus lessoning its state of awareness.

Isn’t it funny, how the ego always goes after or searches for what is significant to what is insignificant. How huge is the expression of love or material gain these days?  Love to a lot of people is far bigger than the universe itself with huge gains, something significantly significant. Materialism, there is never enough in volume where material gain is hugely significantly significant.

Yes, people like me are in quite a different state of consciousness to the above, where the ego sees more significance in the insignificant than the significant.

         

Insignificant: Not worthy of notice

Significant: Important in effect or meaning

No, I am not a theist but I am certainly not an atheist either. To an atheist, before microorganism could be proven to exist, they simply couldn’t have existed as there was no device to measure their existence. So if it can’t be measured, it simply could have never existed!! I don’t think like this, where facts are the main stay to the existence or none existence of everything, usually in the absence of truth. Yes, I certainly seem to think more like a theist, where measurable facts are not the only way to know or have some idea of the true existence of something.

What are human measuring devices totally reliant on? The five senses, in other words truth is very limited to the five senses. In this case, no device can be created to measure anything beyond the five senses, within this, of course nothing smaller than what can be measured by these devices built upon these senses will ever exist.

Sixth sense: Grasping the inner nature of things intuitively

Intuition:  Obtained through intuition rather than from reasoning or observation

Our reasoning if often governed only by our five senses, as is our observation and even life experiences, however, an observation beyond the limitations of our five senses creates a totally different reasoning process that is not limited to certain specific biased variables.

So let’s get to the truth of the matter. God, or what ever you may call this state of pure awareness, is that small that the ego often overlooks this state. It is like the measuring devices based on the five senses, if it not of a significant size or feels good to the ego, it is insignificant therefore either non-existing or totally ignored as having no significant value to the ego. The perception of love and materialism has a huge significant value to the ego. Yes, if it is not valuable in someway to the ego, it is often ignored. Think on this, how could something of non-ego have value to the ego?

So why is this God state so minuscule that is almost doesn’t seem to exist to the ego? 

The answer is obvious, it is a state of non-ego for only the ego has volume therefore value.

So does this state of non-ego have value to me? Yes, to my ego, but not in the same way as a measurable value, a value of some kind of significance.

Our own bodies are made of trillions of microscopic atoms, could not everything as a whole, including consciousness, be the creation of something even smaller than microscopic or electrons and protons, in other words something very insignificant to the ego but highly significant to existence as a whole? 

If our egos like it or not, the ego and everything else of physical significance is totally reliant on the non-ego entity or non-ego state of pure awareness existence. Yes, even in a pure state of ego, the non-ego resides, be it of insignificance therefore unimportant to the ego in this state.

So why does this state of pure awareness give a strong feeling of love?

As hate is in relation to ignorance, for only in ignorance can a consciousness become abusive to energy, so it is the opposite of love, for only in awareness can a consciousness become complementary to energy. It is the awareness in the ego that creates a feeling of love, as it is that ignorance creates a feeling of hate, and quite naturally so.

In all, the non-ego (God) within everything has no self-value, only can the ego see value in a non-ego entity, of course to do this, the ego itself has to see far more value in the insignificant than the significant. You could relate this to; it is the people’s inactions not actions that tell the true story!! Something to ponder…….

Working with Energy

Written by Mathew Naismith

Working with or in unison with energy is not within itself spiritual, even though certain spiritual practices  and awareness can lead to a person working better or more harmoniously with energy.

When I lived in the bush (forest), I often knew that I was going to encounter a snake that day. Even when I didn’t know where in the bush I was going to encounter a snake, my feelings were always correct. At one time I was stepping over a small fence, directly where I was going to step there was a deadly tiger snake that I was about to step on. Tiger snakes in the bush are not easy to detect. One of our dogs jumped the fence further up the fence and immediately attacked the snake I was about to step on. The dog was nowhere near around me until that very moment. Where I knew I was going to encounter a snake that day, I didn’t know where. I didn’t just predict snake encounter but other encounters as well.    

Yes, the dog was more in tune with the energy around it than I was, however, would have the dog saved my life if I wasn’t to some degree in tune with the energy around me? You could say that the dog and I were psychic or of some other kind of spiritual ability, but in truth it is simply working in unison with energy. Yes, it is most amusing to think that we think only humans can be in tune with the energy around them, in other words psychic or of some kind of spiritual prowess over and above all other living entities. You really know this to be untrue when you come to some kind of understanding of energy as simply energy, not energy being only of what we desire to make of it.

Without a doubt I have been fortunate to have had a number of minor experiences in regards to energy as a whole. You add singing ghosts (souls) and other interactions with ghosts, foretelling and a number of other life experiences, you realise that there is much more to using energy than we desire to know about. My favourite experience is simply experiencing just being, where you simply observe in the absence of participation, of course participating is also a part of my life I may or may not enjoy as a participator. Don’t ever expect or demands, while being participators, that you will always enjoy your own participation, for other energies around you are always at work as well. I am sure the snake at the fence didn’t enjoy our dog’s partition in saving my life, as I am sure I wouldn’t have enjoyed the snake biting me either!!

Yes, experiencing energy is a two way street, especially if all energies are not working together as one or in unison to each other. So what would occur if all participating energies worked as one energy source in participation?

Imagine being that in tune with energy while in participation that no insect or wild animal invades your home!! Imagine going out in the wild a picking up a deadly snake and cuddling it!! Imagine being hungry in the wild and a rabbit simply pops up right in front of you!! Sounds like utter lunacy to an ego that has no idea of working in unison with energy, but to an energy that realises there is more to energy than what we are conditioned to today, the impossible becomes possible.                       

In the Presence of Wisdom

Written by Mathew Naismith

https://www.space.com/33001-mars-ice-age-ending-now.html

Yes, the ice age on Mars is ending which is primarily due to the natural cycles of Mars, not simply due to the sun heating Mars surface temperature as has been suggested. Yes, the sun solar flares are tripping away the Earth’s ozone layer, at the same time, being so intelligent of course, our own egos are stripping away the ozone layer on the inner side of the ozone layer.

As more egos are gorging (gormandising) themselves on materialism, the more we are helping the sun to bemire (befoul) or putrefy life on Earth as a whole. Of course a real intelligent being would do quite the opposite, counteract the suns influence on Earth, or so people like me would presume!!           

Intelligence: The ability to comprehend; to understand and profit from experience

Wisdom:  Ability to apply knowledge, experience, understanding or common sense and insight

How many people are materially profiting from the gorging of materialism? Our egos certainly understand how to profit from the experiences of materialism, at the same time ignoring how life itself as a whole could profit from not gorging itself on materialism. Yes, utilise materialism in moderation but not to the excessive extent of gorging on materialism.  

Yes, this takes wisdom for the implementation of the proper use of intelligence; this is instead of an improper or degenerative use of intelligence. I say degenerative because the improper or overuse of anything to the extent of degenerately bemiring life on Earth, isn’t what I would call a sign of a stable mentality. This is while considering how the sun is influencing life on Earth. Is the use of intelligence in the deliberate absence of wisdom of a stable mind? As wisdom has become less used and known to the mass, has our mentality degenerated to the point of gorging on anything to feed an ever hungry gorging ego?

Only in the absence of wisdom can intelligence 

be so misused, causing a degenerative 

deterioration of the mind or consciousness as a whole.

~Mathew G~

Very Aware Ancient Entities

Written by Mathew Naismith

I am going to start off making reference to past lives lived in this post, so this post will of course not be for everyone.

I fairly often have dreams where I am just very sad, sobbing or outright crying in parts of my dreams. You may think I have huge psychological problems to overcome, well, in a sense yes but not in reality, a reality pertaining to myself personally that is.

In one of my past lives lived in the 4^th dynasty in Egypt, I was a priest of no high stature. Our order was somewhat different to most other priesthood orders of the day. Our order didn’t see the God’s as actual God’s as most other orders saw them, they were however entities of great significant awareness. No, at no time did we see the Pharaoh’s (kings) as being a representation or of a reincarnated God or Goddess. Our order kept this very secretive as we knew what the consequences would be otherwise, as what eventually occurred.

As I don’t today, see the rich and powerful as being demigods or see that their materialism has much value to me or the rest of humanity at all. Yes, I am a part of this materialism, but I am not of this materialism, there is a big difference. As in ancient Egypt, where I was a part of the present political and religious regime, our order was separate to this regime. The reason for this lays in how our order materialised. I can’t go into this for a couple of different reasons.

Now, to get back to why all of a sudden in a dream I will become very saddened. As I thought back then in ancient Egypt, presently, why are we still doing this to each other and the environment!! Even back in ancient Egypt, the environment was abused and manipulates to serve the few or the so-called elite. The environment to our order includes people as well as animals and nature, all of what is of physical and/or mental form. Actually, these significantly aware entities also didn’t like being abused, used in a way psychologically to primarily benefit the elite, as of today. The environment as a whole isn’t there to primarily serve the few elite as in ancient Egypt and today.

So many people are becoming a part of this materialist regime at present, being simply fed the scraps that the elite will benefit from by keeping the slaves to the elite materialistic, not spiritualistic!! So why am I so saddened at times? The answer to this can’t be found through materialistic ideologies but spiritually, where one knows one is all of what is in the absolute absence of bias or desire. Yes, I still express desire and bias, but not often at the expense or of abuse of the environment around me. As I think we all should be, yes, I am saddened at times.

The following is a good read on the recollection of past lives lived.

https://upliftconnect.com/past-lives/      

Back in the Comfort Zone

Written by Mathew Naismith

There are some fundamental differences between atheism and theism/agnosticism/oneness psychology as I will explain. My own sense of oneness is of a different psychology to atheism for a very good reason.     

Gee whiz, what a discomforting experience to experience. Yes, I am back from experiencing something exceptionally distorted and discomforting but on the other hand also very aware building or enlightening. If you wonder why you get that creepy feeling up the spine being a spiritually aware person who is aware and probably empathic, this is why. To be simply in the absence of fear in any environment, this is what truly being fearless really is. Unbeknownst to these people, they had no hope in instilling fear in me or recruiting me. Yes, they tried a number of times to recruit me in their ranks as well.

Yes, atheists are on a big pilgrimage or recruiting drive. I say pilgrimage because quite a number of atheists are on a road to a world of total atheistic domination, of course along the way they must try to recruit more people to accomplish this world domination. Of course this takes a fair amount of atheistic preaching, deceitfulness and trickery. It would seem one of their exceptionally dogmatic doctrines quite clearly states, “If you are not a theist, you must then be an atheist.” Their stance on this seemed dogmatic to an extreme, but there is something a little strange in the psyche implemented here as I will explain.

Under the unbiased definitions of atheism, you have the doctrines of the belief that there are no deities, or, a disbelief that there is no deities. The new atheist doctrine states, which isn’t in the dictionary I use, is atheism is a lack of belief in the existence of deities. This is supposed to be the new up to date atheist doctrine of today, which to me is simply of deception. Why?

Agnosticism: “A person who claims that they cannot have true knowledge about the existence of God (but does not deny that God might exist)”, also, “Someone who is doubtful or noncommittal about something.”

Atheism is strictly of the commitment that the existence of deities don’t exist and can never exist, however, the agnostics stance isn’t of commitment at all in relation to the existence of deities. No joke, it was stated by a very active member of this group that you are then classed an agnostic atheist, under the present atheistic doctrines of course. In all honesty, so many atheists used agnostic principles when their commitment and dogmas where exceptionally evidently atheistic to someone like me.

There is also another difference between agnostics and even theists/spiritually aware people. Atheism, through science, is psychologically governed by facts where agnostics and spiritually aware people as a whole try to be governed by truth. As I have shown in my previous posts, facts can actually distort reality and truth. Add the fact that fraud is obviously a problem in today’s science, going by facts alone using science alone isn’t of wisdom but complete blind faith, as I found out as they didn’t know about the fraud within today’s science. The possibility that they didn’t want to know is probably more probable with some atheists. Yes, in my mind so many seemed to be also of deliberate self-deception.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticism

Extract: Agnosticism; is the view that the existence of God, of the divine or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable. Another definition provided is the view that "human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist."

Atheism: Less broadly, atheism is a rejection of the belief that any deities exist. In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. Atheism is contrasted with theism, which, in its most general form, is the belief that at least one deity exists.

I find it strange psychology and reasoning that you have to be either an atheist, agnostic atheist or an atheist agnostic, or, a theist agnostic or an agnostic theist. Of course simply being an agnostic didn’t come into this kind of psychology by the looks of it. Truly, I didn’t know there were so many difference sects of atheism and there is even more. For someone into oneness, were you have a quality of seeing everything as one, such as energy instead of separated energy entities, this kind of psychology and reasoning is beyond me. Or if you like, behind me.

Oneness; can be described as being One with God, or One with nature or being One with all Life…. but these are only words pointing to the Truth…. they are not the Truth. Oneness closes the gap between the observer and the observed, between a person and God, between a person and nature, between a person and Life.

You could say that facts also point to the truth as well. In theory, facts are supposed to point to truth when in actuality facts can often distort the truth. DNA didn’t exist until the facts proved DNA existed, even when DNA existed way before the facts determined DNA to have existed!! So the universe couldn’t have existed before the facts proved the existence of the universe!! Facts, like the perception of oneness, can point to the truth, but of course not necessarily.

So is oneness governed by the same principles as facts when pointing towards truth?

Through general science, energy is separated into separate entities, where oneness simply sees all energy being as one no matter how different they are to each other. Within the perception of oneness, everything is connected and acts as one entity even though we as humans are unable to detect this. Just because we are unable to detect this, therefore being of facts, doesn’t mean it’s not true but it does to someone whose psyche is totally reliant on facts!!  I would not myself feel comfortable reasoning like this, in all honesty to me, it is not proper practical reasoning pointing towards facts in the absence of truth.

As it is, atheists, through science, are of facts where spirituality and agnostics, which includes oneness, is more pointing towards the truth being the primary source of awareness, not facts. The difference to someone like me is obvious. Don’t make the mistake though, that atheism is a separate entity to spirituality and oneness, what would atheists have to disbelieve if it wasn’t for spiritually and oneness!!                   

Beyond the Comfort Zone II

Written by Mathew Naismith

It is funny but spirituality as a whole within its wisdom looks for the truth, even in the absence of facts, where’s science looks for the facts often in the absence of truth!!

This may sound strange, “At no time is fact directly related to truth, only when facts have been verified to be true.” As I will explain through my reply to a self-proclaimed atheist, facts don’t necessarily lead to truth. Actually, quite often facts can distort the truth, also, truth is often found within beliefs in the absence of facts. I also gave an example of this. Facts don’t verify the truth, truth verifies the facts or beliefs. A belief can simply be a hypothesis and still be truth in the absence of facts. Facts are simply of perceptions until they become verified truths, however, a belief can be of truth in the absence of facts. There is no truth within a fact until verified as being of truth!!

Science is simply of facts, not truth, and atheism is of neither facts nor truth within itself. Atheism, unlike other belief systems, is an empty shell on its own but other belief systems on the other hand can be of facts and/or truths. A belief system of doctrines of disbeliefs, such as atheism, has no substance to it, no value to become aware or knowing but to simply disbelieve in the absence of facts and truth on its own, unlike other belief systems. As one of the atheist doctrines state, “A lack of belief”, is a play on words to deceive that atheists simply believe there are no proven existing deities.       

“Here are scientific facts that were verified to be fact but obviously not true, of truth.

https://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/everyday-myths/10-false-science-facts.htm

https://www.rd.com/culture/science-myths/ 

If facts were directly related to truth, why would one then need truth to begin with? Not all facts produce truth to start with, even when seemingly verified. No, facts often don’t lead to truth. On top of this, you have a science that is known to be fraudulent at times.

It is obvious that truth is simply in the absence of untruths be it of verified facts or not. 

Science or atheism isn’t about truth, to the lead up to a hopeful truth, science is simply about facts. Why do atheists only refer to science being about facts instead of truth? Because science isn’t about truth, it can only hopefully lead to truth.

Actually, science should never be about truth itself, but to lead to truth. Why? Because once truth is discovered, that is the end of the story. Science is meant to keep evolving, it has to, which is different to religion. Sadly, unlike spirituality as a whole, atheism itself is neither about truth nor facts, itself. Beliefs can lead to truths like hypothesises where unbelief’s are simply an empty shell on their own. Facts can be distorted, truth can’t.

Hypothesising: To believe especially on uncertain or tentative grounds

Belief systems can lead to truths, where unbelief’s systems on their own lead to, an empty shell. Atheism has only science it would seem to find truth, which isn’t within itself about truth, obviously!! Don’t get me wrong, science often leads to truth as well but so do beliefs. Facts have been known to distort the truth, probably on the same level as beliefs.

Before DNA was known to exist, DNA couldn’t have existed without science proving so, even when it did!! However, in the absence of facts, beliefs could tell us otherwise as in a Hypothesis. Facts often distort reality and truth. No, facts don’t always lead to truth but beliefs can lead to truth in the absence of facts.  

Mistakenly in my mind, atheists search for facts through science instead of the truth through science. To an atheist, DNA couldn’t have ever or ever will exist in the absence of facts, even when the belief in the existence of DNA was of truth in the absence of facts!! Without a doubt, facts can often distort the truth either leading to falsehood’s (fraud) or lead to missing the truth altogether.

Facts are of science therefore atheism. Faith is of spirituality as a whole. I think it is the faith that allows us in spirituality to look for the truth instead of unwisely looking for the facts instead. Faith won’t always lead to the truth but neither will the facts, so don’t be fooled in relying on the facts in the absence of truth. 

Some people think what I write about is dysfunctional (negative). I don't ever find the truth negative in any sense, unless the truth is distorted through facts and reasoning based on biases. I don't have  bias in favour of the positives as truth also comes in negatives as well.        

Beyond the Comfort Zone

Written by Mathew Naismith

This is what comes from going way outside your comfort zone can reveal at times.

Quote: “At no time is fact directly related to truth, only when facts have been verified to be true. This is interesting, which I never thought of before, atheists often refer to facts instead of truth, but spiritually aware people often refer to truth instead of facts.  Hmmmm, this is why I am not an atheist!!  Let’s be honest, one of the doctrines or laws of atheism is it must be of facts, not truth. Seen as more people are becoming atheistic, is the fraud in today’s science linked to this? Is today’s mess in the world linked to this? Add immoral deceptive militants to this equation, why not!!”

This will make more sense when you read on to the reply I sent to an atheist on the topic of atheist doctrines based on fiction, not facts.  So many atheists also totally believe, obviously in the absence of truth, that we are born an atheist or theist, also, that you can only be an atheist or a theist!! Yes, these two firmly believed doctrines of atheism are simply based on fiction it would seem.     

But, if you are not a theist, you are an atheist does I suppose!! True and false are often used in a different context to fact and fiction, so you are saying fact is exactly the same as true and false is exactly the same as fiction!! This is exactly what you seem to be saying Junious. I did make reference to fact and fiction, not true and false.

Fact:  A piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred

Truth: A fact that has been verified

Fiction: The creation of something in the mind

False: Not in accordance with the fact, reality or actuality

As previously quoted: At no time is fact directly related to truth, only when facts have been verified to be true. This is interesting, which I never thought of before, atheists often refer to facts instead of truth, but spiritually aware people often refer to truth instead of facts.  Hmmmm, this is why I am not an atheist!!  Let’s be honest, one of the doctrines or laws of atheism is it must be of facts, not truth. Seen as more people are becoming atheistic, is the fraud in today’s science linked to this? Is today’s mess in the world linked to this? Add immoral deceptive militants to this equation, why not!!     

In relation to fiction and falseness, they seem the same but there not Junious. Fiction can often be based on fact and even truth, falseness is never based on fact and certainly not truth.

I hope you didn’t do this on purpose, used words manipulatively to serve your own purpose. Junious, we use quite different reasoning processes, I think this should be obvious to you now.

The doctrine of lack of belief, disbelief or whatever you want to change it to, is not based on truth or facts.  So if it is not based on truth or facts, what is it? The only fact there is, at this point in time, is that deities can’t scientifically be proven to exist but can in other ways. Are these other ways accepted by atheists? No, but they are to many others. This is not truth by atheists Junious, as atheists obviously don’t work on truths, which is a huge error in my mind. Hones.yt, I can’t ever remember an atheist making a number of references to truth, only facts which isn’t truth until proven to be true.

The problem with belief systems, including atheism, is militants, and yes, atheism without a doubt has its militants or radicals as well.  Can you now see the way you and so many other atheists, not all, reasoning are quite incorrect?

What you have done here disappoints me, not that should worry you of course.

I was encouraged by the creator of this atheist group to join the discussions on this group. I have a funny feeling they regret this now.  Yes, I am open minded and often honest within my truths, but this also includes being open minded and honest with my truths in relation to beliefs systems like atheism.  I was simply a shock to the system being as openly honest as I was.

It is not about changing people’s minds, it is about freely expressing one’s own views.